Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
Supreme Court
Planned ParenthoodFacebookTweetLink
Follow
The Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb.
State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother 'intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child.'
It was in effect until 1973, when the US Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the US Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it.
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist.
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide – which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent – but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin.
Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban.
Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights.
Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
‘Big Beautiful Bill' Raises Threat of Default for Litigation Asset-Backed Securities
Legislation tucked inside President Donald Trump's landmark tax bill could make it difficult for asset-backed securities tied to litigation funding to make timely interest payments, according to a note by Kroll Bond Rating Agency. The Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act, which is part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act currently in the Senate, would impose substantial new taxes on profits from third-party litigation funding, says the June 27 note by authors including Joanne DeSimone and Zara Shirazi.
Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
5 Key Ways Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Transforms Corporate Taxation
Tax The House has passed the Senate's version of Trump's Big Beautiful Bill by a narrow margin (216-214), and it will now head to President Trump's desk for his signature. The bill includes significant tax cuts that dwarf the spending cuts to the tune of a $3.1 trillion increase in the deficit over the next 10 years, according to Forbes. This article highlights 5 key ways the One Big Beautiful Bill Act transforms corporate taxation. For a look at how the bill will affect individual taxation, see my companion article on Forbes. (1) Corporate Tax Rates Will Not Increase A key provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 lowered the corporate tax rate by a staggering 40% (from 35% to 21%). The previous rate of 35% has been held constant since 1986. However, relative to other OECD countries, the 35% tax rate was among the highest levied on corporations in the OECD. Many companies and policymakers felt this put US corporations at a competitive disadvantage, especially given the increasingly global economy, according to the Tax Policy Center. Absent a provision allowing the corporate rates to hold steady, they would have reverted to their 35% tax rate. In a statement released by the White House, holding the corporate tax rate at 21% signals a pro-business environment for starting and growing businesses. (2) Full Expensing Of Domestic Research And Experimentation Since 2022, corporations have been required to amortize and expense their research and development (R&D) expenses over time. As highlighted by The Tax Foundation, not being able to immediately expense R&D stifles corporate innovation in the US. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act addresses this issue by allowing R&D performed in the US to be immediately expensed. Meanwhile, R&D performed by US corporations outside the US will continue to be subject to the amortization rules. While separating domestic from international R&D expenses will create other nuances that need to be addressed over time, this provision benefits corporations by allowing the immediate expensing of these costs, yielding significant tax benefits due to the time value of money. This provision enables corporations to recognize expenses earlier, rather than later, thereby benefiting from the time value of money. This provision will also benefit the US by providing financial incentives for corporations to locate their R&D activities within the US. Lastly, an important portion of this provision is that it will be retroactively implemented as of December 31, 2021. This change means that corporations that have been amortizing their R&D over the last three and a half years can now recognize these expenses. For companies with annual gross receipts of less than $31 million, the expensing can occur immediately. All other companies can recognize these expenses over the next two years. (3) Bonus Depreciation Is Back The bonus depreciation benefits, which provide an immediate expense deduction for specified types of property purchased, were introduced by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. These benefits have been slowly phased out in recent years and were scheduled to expire completely in 2027. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act brings back the 100% immediate expensing through 2029. The property that qualifies for bonus depreciation typically includes tangible personal property, such as furniture and fixtures, computer equipment, appliances, and certain types of vehicles. The immediate expensing allows corporations to realize significant tax benefits by accelerating their tax deductions for qualifying expenditures over many years. Being able to deduct these expenses immediately not only puts the cash flows back in the corporation's hands, but it also gives them a time value of money benefit for their tax deductions. (4) Reenactment And Amplified Opportunity Zone Tax Benefits The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 introduced the concept of opportunity zones, designed to utilize tax incentives to stimulate investment in underserved communities. According to the Tax Policy Center, opportunity zones had three key tax benefits: (1) temporary deferral of taxes on previously earned capital gains, (2) basis step-up of previously earned capital gains invested, and (3) exclusion of taxable income on new gains. While the benefits of opportunity zones primarily accrue to high-wealth individuals, many of these opportunity zones have flowed into real estate and operating businesses, representing a potential catalyst for companies that might ultimately become or be acquired by corporations. Importantly, these entities can only be developed and allocated in specific areas, which means that investments are flowing into areas that are most in need of economic stimulus. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act brings back opportunity zones through 2033. The key changes include that 33% of the zones must be in rural areas (an area with fewer than 50,000 inhabitants), and an increased tax incentive of a 30% exclusion of a deferred gain (previously 10%). Thus, this provision will increase the incentives for wealthy taxpayers to invest in rural areas that may be in need of an economic stimulus. (5) Less Extreme Changes To Multinational Taxation Rules Perhaps no bill in history has altered the taxation of US multinationals as significantly as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. In that bill, US multinationals transitioned from a worldwide tax system, where profits generated anywhere in the world were taxed in the US, to a quasi-territorial tax system, where, as long as certain conditions were met, profits were only taxed in the jurisdiction where they were generated. This lowered the complexity for multinational corporation tax laws. However, other provisions have also now become a mainstay in US multinational tax law, such as the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) tax, which introduces an additional layer of US tax when companies have unusually high income relative to their assets overseas. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 also introduced the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII) provision, which provides a lower tax rate for products made in the US and exported overseas. Lastly, the act introduced the Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT), which adds tax liabilities to large corporations that make significant payments to foreign subsidiaries, such as royalties and interest. Each of these provisions were set to become less beneficial to US corporations starting in 2026. Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the quasi-territorial tax system will remain in place. The additional layer of GILTI tax will increase from 10.5% to 10.7%. While this increase is higher than 13.1%, it is better than what it would have been absent this bill. Similarly, the lower FDII tax rate was 13.125%, and it would have increased to 16.4%. Instead, it will be 13.3% starting in 2026. Lastly, the BEAT tax rate will increase from 10% to 10.1% under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, rather than 12.5% under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. While some of these changes and modifications may appear small, it is essential to consider the magnitude of the global economy and recognize that even tenths of a percent can have multi-million-dollar ripple effects. Above all else, these changes help ensure our corporations remain competitive in the global economy. These key changes are not all that is packed into the nearly 1,000-page One Big Beautiful Bill Act. However, they do represent some of the most impactful to US Corporations should President Trump sign it into office on the 4th of July.
Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
Unprecedented Student Loan Overhaul In ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Passes House, Heads To Trump
Getty Images The House of Representatives on Thursday approved President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that would make unprecedented changes to federal student loan programs. Republican lawmakers approved the bill on a narrow party-line vote, with all Democrats opposing the measure. The bill now heads to President Trump, who is expected to sign it on Friday afternoon. Never before has Congress passed legislation that would take away benefits and relief from current student loan borrowers and college-bound families on such a massive scale. Borrowers currently in repayment on their student loans or pursuing student loan forgiveness, as well as prospective students hoping to attend college or enroll in a graduate program, will now have fewer options to pay for school or manage their existing student debt. The bill would also impose new restrictions and paperwork requirements for Medicaid and nutritional benefits, which are expected to result in millions of Americans losing access to healthcare and food stamps. GOP lawmakers argued the cuts were necessary to address alleged waste and fraud, and to help offset the costs associated with massive tax cuts. Democrats countered that the bill would disproportionately benefit the wealthiest people, raise the cost of living for everyone else, and endanger the nation's fiscal health by ballooning the deficit. 'Republicans broke their promise to voters to lower costs, instead radically reshaping the way American families pay for the basics while sidelining the federal enforcement officials who hold big corporations accountable for treating families fairly,' said Mike Pierce, Executive Director of the Student Borrower Protection Center, in a statement earlier this week. 'This bill will drive patients deeper into medical debt, borrowers deeper into student debt, and working families deeper into debt to pay for higher energy costs, higher grocery bills, and more expensive cars and trucks.' Republicans, however, praised the legislation. 'The One Big, Beautiful Bill is one big, beautiful win for the American people,' said Education and Workforce Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-MI) in remarks on the House floor early Thursday. 'Americans struggled under crushing inflation driven by the Biden-Harris administration's outrageous spending. Even worse, the Biden-Harris administration spent billions on reckless student loan repayment pauses, forcing Americans who never set foot on a college campus to cover the costs of elite Ivy League degrees.' Here's what student loan borrowers need to know about the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' and what comes next. Major Changes To Student Loan Repayment And Forgiveness When the Senate narrowly passed its own version of the bill earlier this week, there were some doubts as to whether the House would approve it, given some very significant differences between the Senate bill and the legislation approved by the House in May. But the Senate version of the bill ultimately won the day. The legislation will phase out most current income-driven repayment plans by July 2026. The SAVE plan, as well as ICR and PAYE, would no longer be an option for any borrower, including those who are now in repayment under those plans. Those who are enrolled in SAVE, ICR, or PAYE would, at some point between July 2026 and 2028, have to either enroll in IBR or a new income-driven plan created by the bill called the Repayment Assistance Plan. Switching to IBR could result in significantly higher monthly payments for many borrowers, particularly those who had been repaying their student loans under PAYE or SAVE. While RAP could be more affordable for some compared to IBR, the tradeoff would be an additional five to 10 years in repayment before the borrower could qualify for student loan forgiveness. Borrowers who lose access to their current repayment plan and fail to make a selection would be forced into a Standard plan, which could be unaffordable for many. Parent PLUS borrowers who have already consolidated their loans and are currently enrolled in any income-driven repayment plan would be able to maintain access to the IBR plan. But all other Parent PLUS borrowers would have a fairly limited window to act. They would have one year to consolidate their loans, or they could wind up being completely cut off from income-driven repayment and any possibility of eventual student loan forgiveness. The GOP bill would also suspend new regulations enacted under the Biden-Harris administration that expanded access to student loan discharge programs associated with school misconduct. And it would slash most of the funding allocated to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal watchdog agency created to oversee and regulate the financial services sector, including the student loan servicing industry. More Limited Student Loan Options Starting Next Year For prospective students and college-bound families, the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' would fundamentally change the landscape for higher education financing. For college students, Stafford loans would remain capped. Parent PLUS loans would still be available, but with severely reduced limits (a $65,000 lifetime cap). And any parent who already has a Parent PLUS loan, and then takes out a new Parent PLUS loan in 2026 or later, could become completely ineligible for any income-driven repayment program or student loan forgiveness, including through the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. For graduate and professional students, financing options would also become more narrow. The bill eliminates the Graduate PLUS program, a federal student loan option that helps fund attendance at graduate and professional schools. Increased Stafford loan borrowing limits would partially offset the elimination of this option, but with lifetime caps of $100,000 for graduate students and $200,000 for professional students, it may simply not be enough to cover the full cost of expensive advanced degrees. Critics have argued that some prospective students may turn to riskier private student loans, or decide against going to medical or law school altogether, which would make existing shortages in high-need areas (like rural hospitals) even worse. And new borrowers who take out any federal student loans starting in July 2026 – regardless of whether they are graduate or undergraduate students – would have only two repayment plan options: a Standard plan on a 10 to 25 year term depending on the loan amount, or the RAP plan, which requires 30 years in repayment before the borrower could qualify for student loan forgiveness. Student Loan Forgiveness Under PSLF Is Intact But Still In Danger If there's any good news for borrowers, it's that Congress left the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, or PSLF, untouched. PSLF offers student loan forgiveness to nonprofit and government workers in as little as 10 years. An earlier provision of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' would have locked new doctors and dentists out of PSLF, but this provision was dropped by the Senate before passage, and the House approved this modified version of the bill. But the Trump administration is separately working on a major PSLF overhaul through a rulemaking process that allows the Department of Education to change existing regulations governing federal student loans. The department completed a three-day negotiated rulemaking session this week as it works to implement President Trump's executive order issued in March that would restrict student loan forgiveness under PSLF for organizations that engage in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose.' Critics have argued that the proposed rules are illegal without approval from Congress, and would allow the Trump administration to weaponize the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program against nonprofit organizations and state and local governments whose policies and missions don't align with the administration's.
