The 2026 Ram TRX Roars Back with Hellcat Muscle
Why Bring Back the TRX Now?
When Ram ended TRX production in 2024, the decision was framed as part of a broader strategy to reduce emissions and pivot toward more efficient powertrains like the inline-six Hurricane engine. But the decision didn't sit well with fans. In response to overwhelming public demand and media scrutiny, Stellantis reversed course. According to the CEO, bringing back the TRX wasn't just about passion—it made financial sense. The TRX, with its supercharged muscle and premium positioning, generates significantly higher profit margins than conventional trucks.
Supercharged Power That Redefines Performance
The revived 2026 Ram TRX will return with the iconic 6.2-liter supercharged Hellcat V8 engine, expected to produce between 702 and 720 horsepower. Paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission and a robust four-wheel-drive system, this beast is engineered for both brutal off-road environments and blistering straight-line speed.
Early performance estimates suggest the truck could sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.5 seconds—an astonishing feat for a vehicle of its size. Enhancements to suspension and braking systems are also anticipated, ensuring that the TRX delivers not just brute force but agile, confident handling on all terrains.
A Bold New Look for a Returning Icon
Visually, the 2026 Ram TRX will adopt a more aggressive design language, drawing from the styling updates seen on the 2025 Ram 1500. Expect a bolder front grille bearing the 'RAM' insignia, sleeker LED headlights, and muscular bumpers that assert its off-road dominance. A new lightweight rear spoiler will aid in aerodynamic stability while amplifying the truck's sporty presence.
The truck will also feature fresh exterior paint choices—including dual-layer finishes for added scratch protection—and rugged 18- or 20-inch wheels wrapped in off-road tires.
Inside: Where Performance Meets Premium
The interior of the new TRX promises to deliver both sportiness and luxury. It will feature TRX-branded leather-trimmed sport seats, and a large central touchscreen powered by the Uconnect 5 system with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration. Sound will be handled by a 19-speaker Harman Kardon system, providing an immersive audio experience that complements the truck's explosive performance.
Advanced driver-assist features such as blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise control, emergency braking, and a 360-degree camera system will also be part of the package, making the TRX as safe as it is thrilling.
Production Timeline and Pricing
Production of the new-generation 2026 Ram TRX is set to begin in January 2026 at the Sterling Heights Assembly Plant in Michigan—the same facility that built the previous model. Pricing is projected to start at around $92,000, or approximately 345,000 SAR.
Entering a Competitive Arena
The 2026 Ram TRX will re-enter a fiercely competitive segment, squaring off against heavyweights like the Ford F-150 Raptor R, GMC Sierra AT4X, and potentially even high-performance variants of the Tesla Cybertruck. With its unmistakable V8 growl, updated styling, and a suite of cutting-edge features, the TRX appears more than ready to reclaim its crown as the ultimate high-performance pickup.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ArabGT
15 hours ago
- ArabGT
Tesla Hit with $243 Million Verdict Over Fatal Crash
A courtroom in Florida may have just drawn a new line in the sand for autonomous driving. In a landmark ruling, a jury ordered Tesla to pay $243 million in damages following a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot system. But beyond the headline figure, what really stands out is the message: when technology falls short, it can—and will—be held accountable. The tragedy claimed the life of Naibel Benavides Leon and left her former partner, Dillon Angulo, with lifelong injuries. Both were standing beside their parked Chevrolet Tahoe when a Tesla Model S, driven at high speed by George McGee, slammed into them. McGee had reportedly dropped his phone and was reaching for it when he ran a stop sign and red light—without any warning from the Autopilot system. The jury didn't let Tesla off the hook. While the driver bore a significant share of the blame, the court also held Tesla responsible—arguing that the design of Autopilot allowed for misuse, and that public claims from Elon Musk about its safety may have misled consumers. The verdict awarded $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages. Tesla was found liable for 33% of the total. For Tesla, this is more than just a legal blow. It's a moment of reckoning. The company pushed back, insisting the crash was due solely to human error and warning that this kind of ruling could slow progress in developing life-saving technology. 'No car—then or now—could have avoided this accident,' Tesla said in a statement. But for Dillon and the family of Naibel, this ruling was something else entirely: a recognition that something broke down when it mattered most, and that someone needed to be held responsible. Legal experts are calling it a turning point. Professor Alex Lemann of Marquette University noted, 'We've seen many fatal Autopilot crashes, but this is the first time Tesla has been hit with a major financial judgment. It changes things.' And it comes at a sensitive time. As Tesla navigates slowing EV sales and rising pressure to justify its massive market valuation, the spotlight is back on whether its bold promises about autonomy and AI are outpacing reality. At its core, this case raises a vital question: in a world racing toward automation, what happens when the machines we're told to trust fail us? The answer, at least in this Florida courtroom, is that someone must answer for it.
ArabGT
15 hours ago
- ArabGT
American Automakers Lead This Week's Biggest Automotive Headlines
The automotive industry experienced a dynamic surge of developments last week, spanning notable shifts in electric vehicle demand, record-setting performance triumphs, and the revival of some of America's most iconic models. From innovations on the production line to historic runs on legendary racetracks, these changes underscore the fast-paced transformation of a sector that demands constant attention from industry watchers and enthusiasts alike. Here's a comprehensive look at the standout stories shaping the conversation this week. Chevrolet Breaks Records: Corvette ZR1X Becomes Fastest American Car at Nürburgring Chevrolet made history on Germany's Nürburgring Nordschleife as the 2025 Corvette ZR1X clocked a blistering lap time of 6:49, securing its position as the fastest American production car ever to conquer the challenging track. What elevates this achievement beyond raw performance is that all three entries—the Z06, ZR1, and ZR1X—were driven not by pro racers but by GM's own engineers. This strategic move demonstrates not only Chevrolet's technical prowess but also the brand's belief in real-world engineering credibility, bridging the gap between development and authentic track-tested capability. BYD Faces First Output Drop in Over a Year Amid Fierce Local Competition China's electric vehicle giant BYD, long seen as a pillar of growth in the EV market, reported its first production dip in 17 months, with July output slipping by 0.9%. Sales saw only marginal growth at 0.6%, prompting the company to scale back amid an increasingly brutal price war and intensifying domestic rivalry. The slowdown comes after a long phase of aggressive expansion, hinting at a potential recalibration in the world's largest EV market. Chevrolet Bolt to Return in 2027 as Affordable Long-Range EV General Motors has confirmed the return of the beloved Chevy Bolt, revamped as a next-generation electric model set for release in 2027. Built on GM's Ultium platform, the new Bolt is expected to offer an estimated 300-mile range and carry a competitive price tag near $30,000. The announcement breathes new life into the budget EV segment, promising practicality without compromising modern tech and range. Trade Truce Between US and EU Offers Relief to Automotive Sector In a move likely to bring greater predictability to global supply chains, the US and European Union have agreed to reduce tariffs on European imports to 15%—a notable drop from the anticipated 30%. The deal, finalized during a summit in Scotland between President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, marks a welcome de-escalation of trade tensions. The automotive and aerospace industries stand to benefit directly, with more accessible transatlantic exchange and lower cost burdens on manufacturers. Ram TRX Returns in 2026 with Legendary Hellcat Power The muscle truck is back. Stellantis has officially confirmed that the high-performance Ram TRX will return to the market in 2026, once again powered by the ferocious Hellcat V8 engine. Its reappearance reaffirms the enduring appeal of raw American horsepower, even as the industry accelerates toward electrification. For performance truck enthusiasts, it's a powerful reminder that combustion still has its place in the era of change.
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
Jury orders Tesla to pay more than $240 million in Florida Autopilot crash case
MIAMI: A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $240 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cellphone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'We finally learned what happened that night, that the car was actually defective,' said Benavides' sister, Neima Benavides. 'Justice was achieved.' Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. 'Today's verdict is wrong,' Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million of a total $129 million in compensatory damages for the crash, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. Even if that fails, the company says it will end up paying far less than what the jury decided because of a pre-trial agreement that limits punitive damages to three times Tesla's compensatory damages. Translation: $172 million, not $243 million. But the plaintiff says their deal was based on a multiple of all compensatory damages, not just Tesla's, and the figure the jury awarded is the one the company will have to pay. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust generally in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks, falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' and 'copilot' to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. 'Words matter,' Schreiber said. 'And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they're playing fast and lose with information and facts.' Schreiber acknowledged that the driver, George McGee, was negligent when he blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles an hour before slamming into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to get a look at the stars. The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on. 'I trusted the technology too much,' said McGee at one point in his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cellphone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn't crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: 'The cause is that he dropped his cellphone.' The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver's admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves.
