Rein in spending to cut reliance on ‘volatile' corporation tax, Ibec says
Ibec
has called on the Government to reduce the growth of public expenditure in an effort to reduce the State's reliance on 'volatile'
corporate profit tax
receipts.
The lobbying group said the positive status of the State's headline economic markers are largely funded by corporate tax, which its chief economist Gerard Brady said could be 'volatile' over the coming years.
Ibec suggested a maximum net spend on budget day of €3 billion, with increased exchequer spending offset by fiscal drag and €1.3 billion made up of commitments under the National Development Plan.
[
Ireland's corporate tax receipts hit €156bn
Opens in new window
]
Ibec pointed to figures showing that, should Ireland collect a level of corporate profit tax comparable to similar economies, every worker in the country would have to pay an additional €4,000 in taxes to make up the State's current tax revenue.
In light of the reliance of the State's balance sheet on corporation tax, Ibec called for the Government to rein in spending increases in the coming budgets to 'return to a balance of income over expenditure, were our corporate tax receipts to be realigned with other mid-sized globalised economies'.
The lobbying group said the gap stands at around €5 billion, and Mr Brady noted that recent US policy is adding to the economy's exposure to volatility with the State at risk of being left 'very short' on tax receipts should that risk materialise.
Mr Brady said the Government could 'correct, fairly painlessly, the underlying budget deficit' over a number of years and would avoid 'more painful' measures in the future.
He said the business community's biggest concern is of a 'sharp correction' in Government policy should that 'volatility be materialised'.
Asked whether it supported Government indications that cost-of-living measures would not be needed in the Budget, Fergal O'Brien, Ibec's head of lobbying and influence, said the group was against 'universal supports'.
'We shouldn't be doing across-the-board, universal supports – it is just really bad economic policy,' Mr O'Brien said, urging the State to target distressed households and reduce the cost of business.
[
The EU/US tariff deal: The good, the bad and the potentially ugly for Ireland
Opens in new window
]
Ibec also called for 'targeted supports' for industries hardest hit by US import tariffs, such as the the spirits industry, where Ibec noted more than 90 per cent of distilleries had paused or cut back production.
Mr Brady said that some sectors would be placed under 'existential pressure' should the level of tariffs rest at 20 or 30 per cent.
The lobbying group noted that their members have been 'very vocal' in raising 'a lot of concerns' about the EU's countermeasures in response to US tariffs.
One measure Ibec suggested to reduce costs to businesses and households is reducing the fixed cost component on Irish energy bills through a 'strategic annual subvention'. The group also suggested indexing the top tax band and income tax credits to wage growth at a cost of €440 million and €240 million respectively.
Amid economic turmoil, Ibec called on the Government not to reduce infrastructural spending, and to introduce a set of spending targets in the upcoming 2026-2029 medium-term fiscal plan.
These include a fiscal investment target of 5 per cent of gross national income (GNI), and working towards increasing public investment in research and innovation to 1 per cent of GNI by 2035.
To encourage homebuilding, Ibec called for the reduction of VAT to 5 per cent and the removal of Government levies on new-build apartments – which it said would 'improve the viability of apartment building'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
39 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
'Difficult' to ban services from Occupied Palestinian Territories
The employers group IBEC has warned that it would be "incredibly difficult" for businesses to implement a ban on services coming from the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The group's Executive Director of Lobbying and Influence, Fergal O'Brien, told the Oireachtas Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade tonight that such services were "incredibly hard" to identify. Asked if he could quantify the value of services in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Mr O'Brien said he did not have such data. He said each business would have to conduct a customer by customer analysis to establish the facts, and this would be "extremely difficult." Mr O'Brien said, unlike goods which are labelled, services are part of an integrated complicated trading system and so the likely impact would be that activities would be served by another jurisdiction. He said even if only goods were banned by the proposed legislation, his members would be concerned at the likely international reputational damage which would flow from adopting such a bill. Mr O'Brien indicated that US companies based in Ireland are deeply concerned with anti-boycott legislation in many US states, which were introduced to protect Israel, and the damage this could pose on them. He said an IBEC survey suggested that Ireland's US trading partners view the country as having taken "an isolationist approach" in considering such legislation, and was possibly acting "outside of EU" - even though we're "interlinked with the US more than any EU country." Mr O'Brien said Irish companies are being asked a lot of questions about what Ireland is doing and the sense is that the approach is being viewed as "anti-Israel." He said it appeared that Ireland conducted "minuscule" trade with the Occupied Territories and therefore the financial impact pf a ban on goods would be "minimal." However, he said there could be complications due to Ireland's all-island economy, as well as goods from the Occupied Territories entering the EU.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Dublin gay bar to keep late-night licence after judge dismisses objection
One of Dublin's best known gay bars will retain its late-night dance licences despite complaints from a resident living in an apartment above it. Tommy Bergin claimed the noise coming from the Street 66 bar on Parliament Street was 'bonkers' and he could not sleep before 3am on Friday or Saturday night and also on Sunday nights of a bank holiday weekend. He said the bar now had a late-night licence for 130 days a year. Dublin District Court judge Máire Conneely dismissed his objection to Street 66 bar's late-night licence. She said the court had to take into account where the bar is located and its environs. READ MORE It was 'not reasonable' to live in an apartment in a city centre location where there are lots of bars and late-night venues and expect that the music would be inaudible. Mr Bergin, who moved into an apartment above the bar in 2019, made a similar application last year. He stated that mitigation measures taken after last year's application went before the late Judge Marie Quirke had made little difference to the problem. She ordered that the premises implement a 10 decibel drop in the music levels. Mr Bergin's barrister Conor Duff suggested that the premises was simply not suitable as a late-night venue. Bar owner Siobhán Conmy was emotional on the stand when she told the judge that she had spent €58,000 on noise mitigation measures. 'I have always offered to do anything that people have asked. My heart is really in it,' she told the judge. The late-night licence accounted for 30 per cent of her business and she was fearful of losing it. Acoustics expert Diarmuid Keaney said he had fitted two noise limiters, one in the front bar and the other in the back, to comply with Judge Quirke's order, and neither had been tampered with. Judge Conneely said the management company had said there were others within the building who complained, but none had come forward to give evidence. There were no actual Irish or EU standards that could be referenced in relation to what constitutes a noise breach and experts were divided on the matter. The fact that the premises had been a late-night bar for many years was a 'relevant matter that the courts must take into consideration'. The judge found it 'strange' that Mr Bergin's complaint has been ongoing for three years, but he had not sought to engage directly with the owner about the issue. Taking all that into account, she dismissed Mr Bergin's application.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Starmer and Martin to hold talks following Labour revolt over plan to abort Troubles Legacy Act
Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Keir Starmer , Britain's prime minister, are expected to hold talks this week, possibly on Thursday, after the UK government's plan to scrap Legacy Act immunity for British soldiers and others sparked a revolt within the Labour Party. Mr Starmer's Labour government had promised to effectively repeal and redraft the Act, which was found by a court in the North to be incompatible with human rights law. The Irish Government had also lobbied hard against the Act, passed in 2023 by the Tories even though it was opposed by both sides of the community in the North. However, the plan to withdraw immunity, potentially opening up soldiers and others to prosecution for acts committed during the Troubles, has become politically controversial in Britain. READ MORE Alistair Carns, the Labour government's veterans minister and a former royal marine, has threatened to resign if British soldiers are stripped of immunity. Labour backbenchers in working-class constituencies with big numbers of former soldiers, notably in England's midlands and north, also expressed concern. That led to fears in Downing Street of yet another backbench rebellion should it press ahead. Revolts from the backbenches have already forced the UK government into embarrassing U-turns on welfare cuts. Some of the most restive Labour MPs are in constituencies where Nigel Farage's Reform UK is their biggest electoral threat. Labour MPs who spoke to The Irish Times speculated Downing Street could reverse the plan to replace the Act or water any redraft down to prevent a rebellion. [ Keir Starmer was quick to condemn Kneecap, but strangely silent on Moygashel Opens in new window ] Colum Eastwood, SDLP MP for Foyle in Derry, challenged Mr Starmer over the issue at prime minister's questions in the House of Commons on Wednesday. He said the prime minister had gone to the North to meet victims' families and 'looked people in the eye and promised them that no murderer will be immune from prosecution'. He asked Mr Starmer to 'recommit' to the repeal plan. The prime minister responded: 'Can I begin by saying I have a profound respect and debt to our veterans who served' in the North. This prompted exasperation from Tory benches. One MP could be heard exclaiming: 'For f**k sake.' The prime minister did not directly respond to Mr Eastwood's exhortation to recommit, although he repeatedly referred to it as the 'failed Legacy Act' and the promise of immunity as 'false'. [ 'Worst of any prime minister': Ten moments that defined Labour's first year in power in the UK Opens in new window ] He also said, however, that veterans would be protected from 'unjustified persecution'. Officials were working on plans for Mr Martin and Mr Starmer to speak on Thursday or later in the week if necessary. An Irish government source said engagement is ongoing and the Government's priority is to assist victims and families. If the UK government backtracks on its plan, however, officials speculated it would cause friction between the two governments.
