CERN Physicists Find Key Piece of the Matter-Antimatter Puzzle
Now, we might be one step closer to explaining why there's an imbalance between matter and antimatter, an unsolved mystery in physics formally known as the charge-parity (CP) violation, or CP asymmetry. In a paper published today in Nature, researchers at the Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb) Collaboration at CERN, Switzerland, report the first experimental verification of the CP violation in the decay of baryons—fundamental particles that make up most matter in the observable universe. The results were announced earlier this year at the Rencontres de Moriond conference.
'Until recently, CP violation had only been clearly observed in mesons [or] particles made of a quark and an antiquark,' explained Xueting Yang, LHC physicist and study lead author, in an email to Gizmodo. 'This result shows that baryons—which are made of three quarks like protons and neutrons—can also violate CP symmetry.'
While a significant first step, the new finding still falls short of observing baryon asymmetry, which refers to that paradox of there being more matter than antimatter in the universe today. What Yang's team observed specifically was an instance of CP violation in baryon decay, or the slight difference in behavior between a baryon and its antimatter counterpart as the particle breaks down into smaller particles.
'Well, it's a small part of a much bigger puzzle—but you know, every part matters,' Sean Carroll, a theoretical physicist at Johns Hopkins University who wasn't involved in the new work, told Gizmodo in a video call. 'It's intrinsically interesting when you find a phenomenon that has never been observed before, but…maybe it will teach us something about why there are more baryons than anti-baryons in the universe.'
For the study, Yang's team took around nine years of data from observing the decay of almost one trillion beauty-lambda (Λb) baryons, the heavyweight cousin-particle of protons and neutrons. In about a mere trillionth of a second, beauty-lambda baryons and their antimatter counterparts break down into smaller parts, requiring the technical prowess of something as big as the LHC to capture.
From the data, the researchers sifted through the different interactions to pick out the ones of interest to them, namely the decay behavior of beauty-lambda baryons and their antimatter counterparts. 'If CP symmetry were true, you'd have exactly the same rate for these interactions,' Carroll explained. 'But it is violated, so you get slightly different rates.'
That rate was about 2.5%, a small but statistically significant difference—at least, enough for the team to start brainstorming ideas for how they'd like to build on this result.
'Studying how baryons are formed, how they interact, and how they decay is essential to understanding the fundamental forces of nature,' Yang said. 'This observation marks just the beginning. To answer why [the universe contains] more matter than antimatter, we need more sources of CP violation than the current [Standard Model of particle physics].'
The Standard Model—the theory that describes particle behavior with chilling accuracy—is both the magnum opus and the punching bag of particle physics. It explains everything so ludicrously well, while missing some huge chunks of known physical phenomena, such as gravity or dark matter, to name a few. And so, when the LHC came along, physicists expected it to achieve great things—which it did, and continues to do. But as with all great physics discoveries, it's a holy grail that'll take some more time to realize.
'We were, to be honest, a little bit disappointed that the Large Hadron Collider hasn't found any physics beyond the Standard Model,' Carroll said. 'But I think it's super important to keep looking. The LHC is a beautiful machine that has done amazing work—and yet, it hasn't quite taken us to the promised land. So it's another reminder that there are really big questions out there, and one way or the other we, as the human race, should be doing our best to answer them.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Just Linked This Diet to a Lower Lung Cancer Risk
Reviewed by Dietitian Jessica Ball, M.S., RD At this point, you've likely heard about the Mediterranean diet, the DASH diet and the MIND diet. But there's one diet that might be new to you: the planetary health diet (PHD). The PHD was developed in 2019 by the EAT-Lancet Commission and focuses on promoting human health and environmental sustainability. The planetary health diet is primarily plant-based, focusing on fruits, vegetables, nuts, seeds, legumes, whole grains and unsaturated fats. It includes small amounts of animal-based proteins, including seafood, poultry and dairy, but these are eaten in much smaller quantities, as most protein comes from plant protein. Added sugars, refined grains and processed meats are limited or avoided. Research regarding the planetary health diet has been mixed, so researchers from Austria and Switzerland wanted to see what they could find out about the relationship between the planetary health diet and mortality, cancer and heart disease. They published their results in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. How Was This Study Conducted? Researchers drew their data from the UK Biobank, a long-running study that collects demographic, health and medical data from over 500,000 UK citizens. Baseline data were gathered between 2006 and 2010, with the average age at baseline ranging from 40 to 69. Assessments were repeated every few years and collected data on lifestyle, health status and diet. Researchers also had access to medical records and death registries. For this current study, researchers used varying numbers of participants for three different analyses: almost 205,000 were used in the mortality risk analyses, over 200,000 for the cancer risk analyses, and over 196,000 for the cardiovascular disease risk analyses. Adherence to the planetary health diet eating pattern was scored based on the inclusion of 14 primary food components of the planetary health diet. Participants scored one point for each food or food group they included, with a possible high score of 14. Scores for this study ranged from 1 to 11 points, which represents low to medium diet adherence. What Did This Study Find? After running statistical analyses, including adjusting for potential confounding factors (factors that might influence or change results), researchers found that: Every 1-point increase in the PHD score was related to a 3% decrease in all-cause mortality (risk of dying from anything). Every 1-point increase in the PHD score was associated with a 9% lower lung cancer risk. When all factors were fully adjusted for, no relationship was found in this study between the PHD and cardiovascular disease risk. There were several limitations of this study. Because comparatively few people in the Biobank were following a planetary health diet eating pattern, the confidence of these results is lower than it would have been had there been more people following it. Also, out of the five possible Biobank 24-hour dietary recalls, about 40% of the participants completed just one of them. Again, less data means less confidence in the results. And since the Biobank includes mostly white adults from Europe, it is unknown if the results can be generalized to other groups. How Does This Apply to Real Life? The term 'plant-based diet' can mean different things to different people. While some equate it to a vegan, all-plant diet, others see it more as making plants the foundation of your diet, while still including small amounts of animal-based foods, like eggs, dairy, fish and poultry. The latter is what the planetary health diet is about. It also limits added sugar, refined grains and processed meats. Eating more plants has many benefits, including reduced disease risk. This is in part thanks to plants' antioxidants and their ability to create a healthy gut microbiome by providing food for your gut's beneficial bacteria. A healthy gut can help lower chronic inflammation, which helps reduce disease risk. And while you can add helpful bacteria to your gut with fermented plants—like sauerkraut or kimchi—many people find it easier to get them in yogurt or kefir, which is where the animal protein can come in. It's easy to get stuck in a rut with fruits and vegetables, or to always turn to bread for whole grains. But there are lots of creative ways to use whole grains—like rice, quinoa, farro and oats—that don't include bread. Grain bowls are a delicious way to eat more plants, and they can be tailored to your taste and preferences. They're also easy to meal-prep for lunches throughout the week. We also love salads as meals. You can pack every food group into a salad if you want to. You'll love our filling, satisfying High-Protein Pasta Salad, Massaged Kale Salad with Roasted Sweet Potato & Black Beans or Salmon Salad with Crispy White Beans. If you want more guidance and are ready to go all in on increasing your plant intake, check out our 7-Day Plant-Based High-Protein Meal Plan for Beginners. It's loaded with a variety of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and plant-based proteins, like peanut butter, edamame and beans, to keep you full and satisfied. Whether you use the plan as is or use it as inspiration, you'll find it fun and easy to get more plants into your meals and snacks. Our Expert Take This study suggests that eating more plants may reduce your risk of all-cause mortality and lung disease. While this study didn't show an association between eating a plant-based diet and reduced risk of heart disease, other studies have. Just remember that eating more plants doesn't have to be all or nothing. Start where you're at and be intentional with choosing plant-based foods more often. Snacks can be an easy way to start. Instead of reaching for your typical snack, try a handful of nuts and a piece of fruit, or dip fruit slices into nut butter or veggie sticks into guacamole or hummus. Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Neither Scales Nor Feathers: Bizarre Appendage Discovered on Reptile Fossil
A bizarre reptile once scurried through the Triassic treetops with an extravagant crest on its back, one made from neither scale, nor bone, nor feather. The extinct creature's 247-million-year-old fossils immediately stood out to paleontologists. The impressive appendage on its back looks like a frill of overlapping feathers at first glance, but it's much older than the earliest fossilized feather, and there's no branching to indicate a plume. The elaborate structure also lacks bony spines, such as those seen in later dinosaurs, like Spinosaurus. Related: "This had to be something new," Stuttgart State Museum of Natural History paleontologist Stephan Spiekman told ScienceAlert. "Prior to our discovery, complex outgrowths from the skin were restricted to mammals and birds and their closest relatives, predominantly in the form of feathers and hair. "We now have another, different type of complex appendage, in a very early reptile." Long before dinosaurs evolved plumage, it appears that some early reptiles were already putting together a genetic toolkit for complex appendages. The dorsal crests discovered by Spiekman and his colleagues are "basically novel to science", so they don't yet have a name. In their study, the researchers essentially refer to them as skin outgrowths, but they aren't actually similar to reptile skin. Spiekman thinks the outgrowths may be made of keratin, similar to nails, hairs, scales, or claws. Confirming that suspicion will require further analysis. Altogether, Spiekman and his colleagues studied more than 80 fossils of the outgrowths, recently donated to the State Museum of Natural History in Stuttgart, Germany. The vast majority had lost their corresponding skeletons; only one of the fossils featured the bird-like skull of a small, ancient reptile. The extinct animal has been named Mirasaura grauvogeli, the first part of which means 'wonderous reptile'. Technically, the species is a drepanosaur – a small, early reptile that lived in the trees, hunting insects with its velociraptor-like claws. But its crest is the real stand-out feature. "Mirasaura developed an alternative to feathers very early in Earth's history, long before the dinosaurs, which we did not expect and which will stimulate discussion and research," says reptile paleontologist Rainer Schoch, from the State Museum of Natural History in Stuttgart. The exact function of the Mirasaura's dorsal appendage is unknown, but based on the physics, it probably wasn't used for flight or insulation. A role in visual communication, such as predator deterrence or intraspecies signaling, is more likely. The best preserved Mirasaura fossils were found to contain traces of melanosomes, which are organelles within pigment cells. Interestingly, their geometry is consistent with the melanosomes that color feathers, but not those found in reptile skin or mammal hair. "Mirasaura really shows how surprising evolution can be, and how much we can still learn from palaeontology," Spiekman told ScienceAlert. "We already knew from genetics and developmental biology that much of the pathway to form feathers, hairs, and scales, is shared between mammals, reptiles, and birds. Now, with Mirasaura, we can say that such complex structures did indeed grow in other animals, too." Turns out, reptiles aren't the scaly, simple animals we often paint them out to be. They deserve more credit. The study was published in Nature. Related News America's Largest Crater Has Surprise Link to Grand Canyon, Study Finds 500-Million-Year-Old Fossil Suggests Ocean Origin For Spiders Secret Bone Armor Discovered Beneath Skins of Australian Lizards Solve the daily Crossword
Gizmodo
5 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Physicists Create First-Ever Antimatter Qubit, Making the Quantum World Even Weirder
Readers following our existential physics coverage may remember a recent breakthrough from CERN concerning matter's evil twin, antimatter. An outstanding mystery in physics is that our universe contains more matter than antimatter, contradicting most theoretical predictions. Scientists, therefore, understandably want to explain why and how this is the case. CERN announced yet another significant leap for studying antimatter—and this time, the achievement creeps into the realm of quantum computing. In a Nature paper published on July 23, CERN's Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment (BASE) collaboration announced the first-ever demonstration of an antimatter quantum bit, or qubit—the smallest unit of information for quantum computers. The qubit in question is an antiproton, a proton's antimatter counterpart, caught in a curious quantum swing—arcing back and forth between 'up' and 'down' spin states in perfect rhythm. The oscillation lasted for 50 seconds. The technical prowess that enabled this result represents a significant leap forward in our understanding of antimatter, the researchers claim. For the experiment, the team applied a technique called coherent quantum transition spectroscopy, which measures—with chilling precision—a particle's magnetic moment, or its behavior inside magnetic fields. First, the team brought in some antiprotons from CERN's antimatter factory, trapping the particles in an electromagnetic Penning trap—a superposition of magnetic fields. Next, they set up a second multi-trap inside the same magnet, extracting individual antiprotons to measure and tweak the particle's spin states in the process. Quantum states are fragile and easily disturbed by outside distractions. The wrong push can immediately send them spiraling down the drain toward decoherence—at which point the system loses the valuable information physicists hope to find. This fundamental limitation of quantum systems was a major concern for the BASE collaboration, who in 2017 used a similar setup to the new experiment to confirm that protons and antiprotons had practically identical magnetic moments. The team made substantial revisions to its technology, paying special attention to developing the mechanisms needed to suppress and eliminate decoherence. This hard work paid off; the antiproton performed a stable quantum swing for 50 seconds—a motion akin to how qubits exist in superpositions of states, which theoretically could allow them to store exponential loads of information. Additionally, it marked the first time physicists observed this phenomenon in a single free nuclear magnetic moment, whereas previous experiments had only seen it in large groups of particles. 'This represents the first antimatter qubit and opens up the prospect of applying the entire set of coherent spectroscopy methods to single matter and antimatter systems in precision experiments,' BASE spokesperson Stefan Ulmer said in a statement. That said, the team doesn't believe the new results will introduce antimatter qubits to quantum computing, at least not anytime soon. 'It does not make sense to use [the antimatter qubit] at the moment for quantum computers, because, simply speaking, engineering related to production and storage of antimatter is much more difficult than for normal matter,' Latacz explained, adding that since matter and antimatter are known to share fundamental properties, opting for the latter wouldn't make practical sense. 'However, if in the future [we find] that antimatter behaves differently than matter, then it may be interesting to consider this.' There are additional improvements the team hopes to make, which will happen sometime very soon, Latacz said. The upgrades to BASE—termed BASE-STEP—will greatly improve our capacity to study antiprotons with higher precision and allow us to 'improve the measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton by at least a factor of 10, and in a longer perspective even a factor of 100,' she said. The new breakthrough could contribute to engineering advances in quantum computing, atomic clocks, and other areas. But as the researchers emphasize, such technological applications aren't anything we should expect any time soon. Nevertheless, the result itself presents some fascinating lessons for fundamental physics—questions that may take years to answer, but to quote physicist Sean Carroll from the other recent CERN finding, 'Well, it's a small part of a much bigger puzzle—but you know, every part matters.'
