
Indigo is a new camera app by the guys who made the Pixel and Google Camera apps
Adamya Sharma / Android Authority
TL;DR Adobe has launched the Indigo camera app on the Apple App Store.
Two of the influential minds behind the Google and Pixel Camera apps are also working on Indigo.
The team says they're planning an Android version of the app, but there's no word on a release window.
The Pixel Camera app (formerly Google Camera) is perhaps the most influential smartphone camera app ever made. That was in large part due to the HDR+ processing and Super Res Zoom for improved hybrid zoom. Now, two of the brains behind the Pixel Camera app have launched a spiritual successor of sorts.
Adobe recently launched the Indigo camera app on the iPhone's App Store, and it seems to build on the foundation of the Pixel Camera app. It's no coincidence as two of the creators, Marc Levoy and Florian Kainz, previously worked on the Google Camera and Pixel Camera apps.
The duo penned a blog post describing Indigo as a computational photography camera app that provides great image quality, a more natural look, and full manual controls.
Indigo picks up where the Pixel Camera left off
Indigo follows Google's original HDR+ approach by combining a series of deliberately under-exposed images for each shot you take. However, Adobe's app differs by combining up to 32 images at once versus Google's 15 images. The team says it also under-exposes these images 'more strongly' than most other solutions.
'This means that our photos have fewer blown-out highlights and less noise in the shadows,' Levoy and Kainz explained. 'Taking a photo with our app may require slightly more patience after pressing the shutter button than you're used to, but after a few seconds you'll be rewarded with a better picture.'
Adobe also posted two images (seen below) comparing a single frame captured by the iPhone to Indigo's multi-frame picture. The latter image unsurprisingly shows greatly reduced noise compared to the single-frame shot.
Single frame output
Multi-frame output
Adobe explains that this approach also means less denoising (i.e., smoothing) is needed for images. In fact, the app leans towards minimal smoothing in order to preserve natural textures, even if this means there's some noise in the picture. This multi-frame approach with reduced denoising also applies to RAW images.
Another Pixel Camera feature that's made its way to Indigo is Super Res Zoom. Google introduced this feature with the Pixel 3 series, combining multiple frames, your natural hand shake, and super-resolution to deliver improved hybrid zoom. Google also combined Super Res Zoom and image cropping from 1x and 5x cameras to deliver higher quality 2x and 10x shots. And Indigo offers pretty much the same approach on iPhone Pro Max models, enabling improved 2x and 10x images. In fact, the 2x and 10x zoom buttons have little 'SR' icons to denote super-resolution zoom.
How else does Indigo stand out from other camera apps?
Adobe said Indigo offers a more natural look by avoiding strong tone mapping, aggressive smoothing, and over-sharpening. We've also seen most brands use semantic segmentation (e.g., object/subject detection) to make major adjustments, but Adobe claims that Indigo only makes subtle tweaks.
The Indigo camera app also offers a night mode, which combines up to 32 one-second-long images into one picture when a tripod is detected. However, the night mode still supports handheld photography, as you might expect. This behavior is in line with several other OEM camera apps, which can automatically detect a tripod and offer longer exposures.
Other notable features include zero shutter lag, pro controls (ISO, shutter speed, exposure, white balance), and a long exposure mode that supports RAW output. In fact, Indigo also lets users set the number of captured frames to be combined into an image. The latter could be useful if you need to capture a fast-moving subject.
Indigo app availability: What about Android?
Adobe has released Indigo on the App Store, and it looks like you need an iPhone with at least 6GB of RAM:
The app runs on all Pro and Pro Max iPhones starting from series 12, and on all non-Pro iPhones starting from series 14.
The company also confirmed that an Android version of the app is in the pipeline, but it didn't reveal any more details. Other features on the way include alternative looks, a high-quality portrait mode, a video mode (with 'cool computational video' features), and a panorama option.
Adobe said it's also considering several bracketing options (exposure, focus, etc), with the camera app combining these bracketed shots. The company says these options could be handy for astrophotography or a shot that's completely in focus.
In any event, I'm glad to see two of the minds behind the modern Pixel Camera experience working on such a robust camera app. So our fingers are crossed that the app comes to Android sooner rather than later.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ?
Quantum computing soared following the release of Google's Willow quantum chip in December. IonQ is still deeply unprofitable, but the company expects its revenue to double this year. The company is building momentum following a deal with EPB and multiple acquisitions. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › Quantum computing stocks captivated investors like few other sectors in recent months. Ever since Alphabet's Google announced its state-of-the-art quantum chip, Willow, in December, quantum computing stocks have soared. Many investors see them as the next major technology on the horizon, following in the footsteps of artificial intelligence (AI). One of the biggest players in AI is IonQ (NYSE: IONQ), a developer and seller of quantum computers. The company sells hardware, software, and services, making its quantum computers available through providers like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, a business model known as quantum-computing-as-a-service (QCaaS). IonQ differentiates itself from other publicly traded quantum computing stocks like Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum, and Quantum Computing because of its trapped-ion technology, which uses atoms suspended in a vacuum and manipulated with lasers. Right now is also an excellent time to consider buying IonQ stock, as it's down 30% from its peak late last year, and it's pulled back by nearly as much after a surge in late May, following an interview in Barron's with CEO Niccolo de Masi, who said the company aimed to be the "Nvidia of quantum computing." With IonQ stock having cooled off a bit in June, let's take a closer look at what the stock has to offer. Despite a market cap over $10 billion, IonQ is still essentially a development-stage company, as it brought in just $7.6 million in revenue in the first quarter. However, that was down slightly from the year before, showing the company is not delivering the kind of growth you might expect from a high-priced stock like IonQ. IonQ is also deeply unprofitable, with the company posting a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) operating loss of $75.7 million in the period, or 10 times what it brought in revenue. It does expect revenue growth to accelerate over the remainder of the year, forecasting $75 million to $95 million in revenue for the full year. That forecast, which includes some small acquisitions, targets revenue roughly doubling from $43.1 million last year. There are other signs the company is making progress. It signed a $22 million deal with EPB of Chattanooga, an energy and telecom company, and it's waiting to close on its acquisition of Lightsynq Technologies, a maker of quantum interconnects to bridge the gap to large-scale quantum computers. IonQ also took part in Nvidia's first-ever Quantum Day, where it demonstrated quantum-accelerated computation and commercially relevant applications, further evidence that quantum computing could is progressing toward mainstream. Additionally, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in June that the technology is at an inflection point, comments that came just months after he said that "very useful" quantum computers could be decades away. There's no question that there's a ton of uncertainty around quantum computing stocks right now. Valuations have been inflated by the attention placed on the sector following Google's announcement about Willow last December. Based on IonQ's guidance, the company still trades at a price-to-sales ratio of more than 100 using its 2025 forecast. However, there is real momentum in the industry, and analysts expect IonQ's revenue to double both this year and next. Given its leadership in quantum computing, business momentum, and expected revenue growth, opening a small position in the stock seems reasonable for risk-tolerant investors. Keep in mind that the risk with IonQ remains high at the current valuation, and the stock could fall a long way if its performance comes up short in the coming quarters. Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Jeremy Bowman has positions in Amazon and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Down 30%, Should You Buy the Dip on IonQ? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ascent Solar enters teaming agreement with US-based defense solutions provider
Ascent Solar (ASTI) Technologies announced that it has entered into a Teaming Agreement to supply a US-based defense solutions provider with its cutting edge, thin-film solar technology solutions for upcoming orbital applications and future missions. 'Our thin-film solar technology's ability to reliably deliver power solutions on short timelines makes Ascent the perfect choice for agreements with defense tech brands,' said Paul Warley, Chief Executive Officer of Ascent Solar Technologies. 'There are a number of hurdles slowing the deployment of reliable solar solutions in space that few are equipped to face. However, Ascent's technology differentiators – specifically our lightweight, flexible and durable design -continue to provide a market-ready solution that mitigates many space environment challenges, allowing for long-term application on a wide variety of spacecraft.' Take advantage of TipRanks Premium for 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See today's best-performing stocks on TipRanks >> Read More on ASTI: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Why Is Ascent Solar Technologies Stock (ASTI) Up 150% Today? Morning News Wrap-Up: Thursday's Biggest Stock Market Stories! Ascent Solar enters collaborative agreement notice with NASA Ascent Solar files to sell 3.21M shares of common stock, warrants Ascent Solar Reduces Authorized Shares to 200 Million Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
X Will Soon Charge for Ads Based on the Size of Your Visuals
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. After announcing that hashtags would be banned from all Promoted Posts on X last week, X owner Elon Musk also flagged another coming to change to X's ad process, with bigger ads to soon cost more per placement. Which, like the decision on hashtags, relates to aesthetics, and ensuring that the X feed looks neat and clean. As explained by Musk: 'X is moving to charging for ads based on vertical size, so an ad that takes up the whole screen would cost more than an ad that takes up 1/4 of the screen, otherwise the incentive is to create giant ads that impair the user experience.' To be clear, X hasn't enacted this update as yet, and there's nothing mentioned about the change in X's ad pricing overview at this stage. But the change is coming, which is another consideration for your X campaigns. So why the update? Well, as Musk notes, right now, advertisers are able to take up more screen space with bigger images and videos in their ads, which wins them greater screen presence. As you can see in these examples of X's text, image and video ads, each can vary in size, depending on the length of the attachment you include in your promotion. Here's another comparison of varying X ad size (on desktop): You can also see how Community Notes alerts extend this even further, taking up more feed space. There are limits on this, as the text element gets cut off after 180 characters (hidden by a 'show more' tag beyond that), and there are size restrictions for images and videos. But you can see how the variation can lead to differing ad experiences. And clearly, Elon's not happy with some of the longer ads he's seeing. So does this make logical sense, or is it a cash-grab by X, which is still struggling to make money? Maybe both? It does make some sense to charge based on ad size, which other platforms do already, and given the variance based on your visual attachments, there could be a significant difference in this respect. And yes, that will also enable X to make more money, though really, this depends on how much more X is planning to actually charge brands to get these bigger ads, which could have a significant impact on your platform planning. If Elon ups the price by a lot, you can bet that many X ads will suddenly shrink in response, as ad partners look to see if they can get the same response from less spend. But if the variance is little, then maybe there's no difference, and it won't be a big consideration for your promotions. We don't know what the new pricing structure will be, nor how it will be communicated to advertisers, but it is coming, and will be another factor to take note of in your planning. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data