Stellan Skarsgård Took Pay Cut For Crew To Get Lunch
As well as taking a pay cut, Stellan said he became an executive producer because he wanted to ensure that the crew received good lunches on set. 'I wasn't supposed to be [an executive producer] at first, but I said I'd never film in Norway without having a special contract,' he explained at the Karlovy Vary Film Festival, per Variety.
Stellan then claimed that after a negative experience shooting Erik Skjoldbjærg's Insomnia (1997), he vowed never to film in Norway again unless good lunches were provided.
'I lost eight kilos on Insomnia. We would usually get a loaf of bread, that's pre-sliced, and a plastic salami. That's it!' Stellan claimed. 'I've made other films in Norway since then, but it has always said in my contract that everybody should get lunches of the highest European standard. And that's expensive. Norway, they're the richest country, but they don't want to spend money on food.'
'I went down, I think, half a million kroner in my salary to pay for this, for the food for everybody,' he continued. 'And the producer said, 'You'll get credit for that.' Also, the food has to be served on real china – no plastic, paper bags or whatever. And you're not standing in line, you sit down and eat. It makes everybody happier and makes the film much better. I haven't made one bad film in Norway since.'
Stellan isn't the only actor who has accepted a pay cut for the benefit of others. Will Smith, for example, paid the King Richard cast bonuses out of his own pocket in 2021 after WarnerMedia chose to release the film on streaming services and in theaters simultaneously, resulting in a loss of theatrical returns.
Keanu Reeves once reportedly gave the visual effects crew of The Matrix a 'very hefty bonus' to ensure that they were fairly compensated for their hard work.
Back in 2017, it was reported that the original five stars of The Big Bang Theory — Jim Parsons, Johnny Galecki, Kaley Cuoco, Kunal Nayyar, and Simon Helberg — all agreed to $100,000 per episode pay cuts to allow their costars Mayim Bialik and Melissa Rauch to receive higher salaries.
Meanwhile, the screenwriters behind Deadpool (Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick) once claimed that Ryan Reynolds paid for them to be on set during filming because the studio refused to.
Stories like these absolutely restore my faith in Hollywood. If you can think of more examples, let me know in the comments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
What's it like to believe we live inside a video game?
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But even though people who are drawn to the simulation hypothesis frame it as reasoned thinking informed by science and technology, it's remarkably like religion: It is fueled by faith and works only as an allegory. Advertisement That is my main takeaway from Advertisement The title of the book reveals a contradiction in this idea. Start with the term 'hypothesis,' which is misleading. The claim that we are in a simulation is not falsifiable, because any evidence seemingly to the contrary could just be part of the simulation. So it's not a hypothesis in the scientific sense. No one says Christians have a 'Jesus hypothesis.' And indeed, by the end of the title, Virk is past conjecture and expressing belief. The book didn't My interview with Virk has been edited and condensed. How confident are you that we live inside a simulation? When I wrote the first edition of this book, I said it was more than 50 percent. Now I think it's over 70 percent, maybe as high as 80 percent likely that we are inside a video game. Rizwan Virk at a 2017 event for Play Labs, an MIT accelerator program that he founded and ran. MIT How does this shape your worldview? I have to explain what I call the NPC ('non-player character') versus RPG ('role-playing game') flavors of the simulation hypothesis. In the NPC version, everyone is just AI running on a computer, and that's it. As soon as the game is over or it's shut down, that character no longer exists, that world no longer exists. I think when most academics talk about the simulation hypothesis, that's what they're talking about. Advertisement At the other end of the spectrum is the RPG version. This is closer to what was depicted in the movie 'The Matrix.' In that version, you are a player that exists outside of the game, and inside the game you have an avatar or a player character. And that would be us — our avatars would be our bodies inside the simulation. I think you reach very different conclusions depending on where you end up on this axis. In RPG video games, you choose your particular character that you're going to play and you choose a particular storyline. You still are free to make decisions along that storyline that will affect the game. So when something happens in my life that's difficult, like a physical difficulty or financial or other difficulties, I think of it as a kind of quest: 'OK, this is a more difficult quest or achievement. Let me see if I can get through it.' In what other ways does this play out for you? There is this idea in quantum physics of a multiverse, where there are different possibilities and we're trying them out in different universes. There's not a good understanding of exactly how that would work in a physical universe. But in a computational universe, you can think of it as perhaps there's a part of me, the player, that's actually trying out different things. In my life I chose to become an entrepreneur and spent most of my time in Silicon Valley, but I've also had an affinity for more of an academic path. I didn't get a PhD earlier, but that was one of those paths — I felt that there was a version of me that had tried it out and was interested in trying out that path. And so later in life, I have returned to academia as a professor, getting a PhD as well. In a simulated universe, I could try out different possibilities in my life. Advertisement Virk writes that his intuitions about the simulation hypothesis arose from "many different threads of my life." Penguin Random House Then there is the question of how we should play the video game of life and what its purpose is. I don't think we're playing a game like 'Grand Theft Auto,' where your goal is to inflict a bunch of damage on other people. Within the religious and spiritual context, there's this idea that how we treat other people matters. It's one of the core ideas across religions and even in people who've had near-death experiences: that we have to review the deeds of our life and how we affected other people. And with a virtual reality model, there's a technological basis for how that might work. It's called the life review. The life review is a replay, if you will, of the things that we did in our lives. And you're going to have to replay the game from [other people's] point of view — not just see but feel what it was like to be these other people. This changes my perspective on how I treat other people and relationships, because I think that may actually be the bigger point of the game. I am not sure how much you're using video games as a metaphor, and how much you really believe that they describe the essence of reality. Both interpretations would apply to what you just said. Advertisement Well, I think it's a bit of both. I think of the simulation hypothesis as having a few basic underpinnings or assumptions. One is that the universe consists of information. The second is that that information gets rendered in a way that looks real. And then the third is that it's some kind of a hoax or a game, if you think of it from the RPG perspective. I think that's what religious scriptures have done for a long time, saying that the world is like a dream, which was the metaphor that was used in, say, Buddhism and in other religious texts as well. I'm using our technology to describe it. I think it's the best metaphor to date for the underlying nature of reality, because video games are built on computation and information processing, and so is the physical universe. I'm not disagreeing that it's a metaphor, and it's a metaphor that may not be complete, but it's way more complete than anything else that we've come up with. There's a meme going around that anyone who doesn't exhibit much original thought is a mere NPC — an automated, non-player character. Right. Yes. So are we living in a world where some of us are actual characters and other people are just filling the background? What I've come to believe is that it's better to assume everyone is actually a player character or an avatar because that affects how you treat them. And this gets back to my earlier statement about how I don't think we're living in 'Grand Theft Auto.' Advertisement That said, I think we all enter NPC mode. In NPC mode, we are just an AI that has been trained by our life experiences. So if you think of AI today and large language models like ChatGPT, they are a certain type of neural network that's been trained on a certain amount of data. And similarly, we also have a neural network that gets trained on our life experiences and how we've been trained, whether it's from the time we were brought up, it's religious training, or indoctrination within different philosophies and political parties. I think what happens is we get into NPC mode and then we play different roles for different people. So it's possible that other people are playing a role for us in a quest in our lives, but that doesn't mean that we should treat them as expendable. Somebody once said to me, 'I think my husband is an NPC.' I said, 'Well, I don't think that's a healthy attitude. Assume that they have their own set of stories and quests, but maybe they're playing a role for you for certain challenges and for certain adventures that you're having in this life.' Was that person who said that to you a woman? Yeah. That's interesting to me, because I think I've only ever heard the simulation hypothesis espoused by men. Well, I think that was true initially. I'm finding that if you are not just talking about the NPC version, if you're not talking about 'everybody is an AI,' then I find many more women interested in the idea. Here's a worry I have about the simulation idea. If you think all this is probably a video game, then it doesn't seem like a stretch to say, 'It might not be so bad if we destroy the environment by filling every single square foot of earth with a data center, as long as doing so lets us create quintillions of simulated worlds that could be as beautiful and meaningful as ours is.' How can the simulation idea comport with traditions that tell us to take care of creation as the only world we've got? Well, I don't know that the simulation hypothesis is necessarily saying that any worlds that we create are as valuable as this world, because now you're thinking of layers of the simulation. But this gets back to the central issue that I've been talking about, which is the NPC versus RPG version. We're here for a reason: We've chosen to go through what many, many ancient traditions have called the veil of forgetfulness, to be here and to forget that we're players from outside this world. So it doesn't mean we shouldn't enjoy this particular world. And more importantly, it doesn't mean we should destroy this world. In an ongoing role-playing game, others will enter after us, and we have a responsibility to them. Rizwan Virk will be talking about his book before a screening of ' in Brookline on July 28. Brian Bergstein is the editor of the Globe Ideas section. He can be reached at
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jamie Lee Curtis on Reuniting with Lindsay Lohan for ‘Freakier Friday,' Her ‘The Bear' Emmy Nom and Stephen Colbert's ‘Late Show' Cancellation: ‘It's Awful'
Jamie Lee Curtis says she's learned a lot from Lindsay Lohan since reuniting for 'Freakier Friday,' the much buzzed-about sequel to 2003's 'Freaky Friday.' 'She has taught me so much,' Curtis told Variety's Marc Malkin on Thursday at the Las Culturistas Culture Awards at the Orpheum Theatre in Los Angeles. 'She has her team, where her two people would be standing on either side of a camera holding a big light. It's Lindsay lighting — that would have been good branding — they hold lights so that we look better. So, I've learned a lot from her already. We had a good time. We love each other.' More from Variety Comic-Con: 'Wicked' Star Marissa Bode to Judge Her Universe Fashion Show (EXCLUSIVE) Tony Morrison Departs GLAAD, Launches Media Company (EXCLUSIVE) 'American Love Story' Star Sarah Pidgeon on Carolyn Bessette Hair and Fashion Backlash: 'I Understand How Beloved She Is' The original movie, based on Mary Rodgers' 1972 novel of the same name, follows mother-daughter duo Tess (Curtis) and Anna (Lohan) switching bodies. The new story features a 'multigenerational twist' that features Anna as a mom. 'It's a movie for today,' Curtis said of the second installment. 'It is a happy, nostalgic, funny, sweet, heartfelt, Disney movie right at the end of the summer. There haven't been a lot of movies for women, and this is a love letter to every mother, grandma, sister, cousin and daughter.' Curtis and Lohan will be joined by returning cast members Chad Michael Murray, Mark Harmon, Christina Vidal Mitchell, Haley Hudson, Lucille Soong, Stephen Tobolowsky and Rosalind Chao. Additionally, 'The Acolyte' star Manny Jacinto, 'Never Have I Ever' breakout Maitreyi Ramakrishnan, Sophia Hammons and Julia Butters will also appear in the sequel. Andrew Gunn, who produced the first movie, is producing the sequel alongside former Disney executive Kristin Burr, with a script from 'Dollface' creator Jordan Weiss. Nisha Ganatra directs the film. Curtis, Nathan Kelly, Ann Marie Sanderlin and Lohan also serve as executive producers. 'Freakier Friday' is in theaters Aug. 8. Curtis also talked about her recent and second Emmy nomination for her work as Donna on 'The Bear' following her win last year. 'I can't believe it,' Curtis said, adding, 'It's just beautiful. It's a beautiful show and I'm thrilled to be a part of it. I love it. I'm a fan of the show. I was a fan from the beginning and so I just love the stories they tell and the characters they create.' As for the possibility of a Donna spinoff, Curtis insisted, 'Never, never.' Just hours before the Las Culturistas Culture Awards carpet, it was announced that Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show' show was being cancelled. 'It's bad,' Curtis offered. 'I'm excited that I will get to be on his show in about two weeks. I've never been on his show. I really like him. He's smart and funny and a lovely human. It's awful.' The Las Culturistas Culture Awards air Aug. 5 on Bravo and next day on Peacock. See more photos from the awards below. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Final Emmy Nom Predictions: 'Severance' and 'The Studio' Expected to Lead Series With 19 Noms Each
Elle
19 hours ago
- Elle
Where Ana de Armas and Tom Cruise's Relationship Stands Amid Dating Rumors
THE RUNDOWN Actress Ana de Armas is officially single following a relationship with Manuel Anido Cuesta, the stepson of Cuba's president, Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez. They were first spotted sharing a kiss in November 2024. By May 2025, it was rumored they had split, but the breakup was confirmed by a source speaking to People this week. Amid her distance from Cuesta, rumors have followed de Armas as she preps for an upcoming film with actor Tom Cruise. The pair has been seen spending time together, leading to whispers of a romantic relationship. But the source indicated she and Cruise are simply working on the Doug Liman-directed thriller, Deeper. De Armas was also supposedly receiving advice from Cruise as she trained for her movie Ballerina, set in the John Wick universe. The movie is filled with stunts, which Cruise is famous for doing in his own films. 'Tom is crazy hardworking and she's very excited to work with him. She calls it an opportunity of a lifetime,' said the insider. 'Tom is an incredible mentor to Ana. She has nothing but amazing things to say about him.' This week, Cruise and de Armas were photographed together again, enjoying some sunshine on a yacht near the island of Menorca, just off the coast of Spain. The source emphasized that their connection is 'not romantic.' In February, a source told People something similar after they were seen having dinner together with their agents, during which they were supposedly 'discussing potential collaborations down the line' and 'appeared to have no romantic connection, just friends.' They have since been seen in London, after attending David Beckham's 50th birthday party, and then again in early May taking a walk through the park on de Armas's 37th birthday. In June, the actress told Variety that Cruise's support for Ballerina was 'unbelievable' and 'amazing.' 'It is very special that someone like him is supporting,' she shared. 'It is really special in general to have other actors and people supporting each other. We can do well all together.'
