Orla Mining Files Updated Technical Report on Camino Rojo to Include the Initial Underground Mineral Resource
The detailed technical report is now available on SEDAR+ and EDGAR under the Company's profile at www.sedarplus.ca and www.sec.gov, respectively. The technical report is now also available on Orla's website at www.orlamining.com.
Orla is currently advancing a 15,000-metre drilling program aimed at upgrading and expanding the upper part of the Zone 22 resource. This drill program is currently approximately 90% complete. Engineering and metallurgical studies are currently underway with the objective of delivering a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) in 2026. The next phase of exploration to support the possible development of the underground deposit, including Zone 22, involves the planning, permitting and construction of an exploration drift, which could commence as early as 2026.
Qualified Persons Statement
The scientific and technical information in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. J. Andrew Cormier, P. Eng., Chief Operating Officer of the Company, who is the Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101 standards.
About Orla Mining Ltd.
Orla's corporate strategy is to acquire, develop, and operate mineral properties where the Company's expertise can substantially increase stakeholder value. The Company has three material projects, consisting of two operating mines and one development project, all 100% owned by the Company: (1) Camino Rojo, in Zacatecas State, Mexico, an operating gold and silver open-pit and heap leach mine. The property covers over 139,000 hectares which contains a large oxide and sulphide mineral resource, (2) Musselwhite Mine, in Northwestern Ontario, Canada, an underground gold mine that has been in operation for over 25 years and produced over 6 million ounces of gold, with a long history of resource growth and conversion, and (3) South Railroad, in Nevada, United States, a feasibility-stage, open pit, heap leach gold project located on the Carlin trend in Nevada. The technical reports for the Company's material projects are available on Orla's website at www.orlamining.com, and on SEDAR+ and EDGAR under the Company's profile at www.sedarplus.ca and www.sec.gov, respectively.
For further information, please contact:
Jason Simpson
President & Chief Executive Officer
Andrew Bradbury
Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Development
Forward-looking Statements
This news release contains certain "forward-looking information" and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and within the meaning of Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the United States Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, or in releases made by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, all as may be amended from time to time, including, without limitation, the development of the underground deposit at Camino Rojo, including the timing of an exploration drift and publication of a PEA; and the Company's goals and objectives. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements were made, including without limitation, assumptions regarding: the future price of gold and silver; anticipated costs and the Company's ability to fund its programs; the Company's ability to carry on exploration, development, and mining activities; the Company's ability to successfully integrate the Musselwhite Mine; tonnage of ore to be mined and processed; ore grades and recoveries; decommissioning and reclamation estimates; currency exchange rates remaining as estimated; prices for energy inputs, labour, materials, supplies and services remaining as estimated; the Company's ability to secure and to meet obligations under property agreements, including the layback agreement with Fresnillo plc; that all conditions of the Company's credit facility will be met; the timing and results of drilling programs; mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates and the assumptions on which they are based; the discovery of mineral resources and mineral reserves on the Company's mineral properties; that political and legal developments will be consistent with current expectations; the timely receipt of required approvals and permits, including those approvals and permits required for successful project permitting, construction, and operation of projects; the timing of cash flows; the costs of operating and exploration expenditures; the Company's ability to operate in a safe, efficient, and effective manner; the Company's ability to obtain financing as and when required and on reasonable terms; that the Company's activities will be in accordance with the Company's public statements and stated goals; and that there will be no material adverse change or disruptions affecting the Company or its properties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements involve significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: uncertainty and variations in the estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves; risks related to the Company's indebtedness and gold prepayment; risks related to exploration, development, and operation activities; foreign country and political risks, including risks relating to foreign operations; tailings risks; reclamation costs; delays in obtaining or failure to obtain governmental permits, or non-compliance with permits; environmental and other regulatory requirements; loss of, delays in, or failure to get access from surface rights owners; uncertainties related to title to mineral properties; water rights; risks related to natural disasters, terrorist acts, health crises, and other disruptions and dislocations; financing risks and access to additional capital; risks related to guidance estimates and uncertainties inherent in the preparation of feasibility studies; uncertainty in estimates of production, capital, and operating costs and potential production and cost overruns; the fluctuating price of gold and silver; risks related to the Cerro Quema Project; unknown labilities in connection with acquisitions; global financial conditions; uninsured risks; climate change risks; competition from other companies and individuals; conflicts of interest; risks related to compliance with anti-corruption laws; volatility in the market price of the Company's securities; assessments by taxation authorities in multiple jurisdictions; foreign currency fluctuations; the Company's limited operating history; litigation risks; the Company's ability to identify, complete, and successfully integrate acquisitions; intervention by non-governmental organizations; outside contractor risks; risks related to historical data; the Company not having paid a dividend; risks related to the Company's foreign subsidiaries; risks related to the Company's accounting policies and internal controls; the Company's ability to satisfy the requirements of Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002; enforcement of civil liabilities; the Company's status as a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax purposes; information and cyber security; the Company's significant shareholders; gold industry concentration; shareholder activism; other risks associated with executing the Company's objectives and strategies; as well as those risk factors discussed in the Company's most recently filed management's discussion and analysis, as well as its annual information form dated March 18, 2025, which are available on www.sedarplus.ca and www.sec.gov. Except as required by the securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
6 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
What Are the 3 Best Bargain Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks to Buy Right Now
Key Points Taiwan Semiconductor's projected growth should translate into a higher premium than it is currently trading at. The market is concerned that AI will disrupt Adobe's business. Google Search is a primary target of several generative AI companies. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › Finding bargains in the artificial intelligence (AI) investing world isn't easy, but they're out there. Three that I've got my eye on are Taiwan Semiconductor (NYSE: TSM), Adobe (NASDAQ: ADBE), and Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL). All three of these trade at a hefty discount to the broader market, yet are still quite promising. If you're looking for value in the AI space, this trio is an excellent starting point. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » How do these three fit into AI? Taiwan Semiconductor is the best-positioned of this trio. It's the primary chip fabricator for some of the leading tech companies, including Nvidia and Apple. Its chip production facilities fabricate chips that its customers have designed, placing TSMC into a neutral position in the AI race. It performed phenomenally well over the past few years, with revenue in U.S. dollars rising an astounding 44% in the second quarter, which exceeded expectations. This strength is expected to persist for many years. Management guided at the start of 2025 that it expects its revenue to increase at nearly a 20% compound annual growth rate over the next five years. Taiwan Semi is a key player in AI technology, and it holds an enviable position. Adobe makes leading graphics design tools that are the industry standard. Whether it's video editing or image creation, Adobe is a top option. However, investors are growing increasingly concerned that generative AI creation technologies could displace Adobe. Image and video creation using generative AI models has come a long way, and has reached a point where it's nearly indistinguishable from what humans create. As a result, many are forecasting the downfall of Adobe. However, I think that's a bit premature. Adobe has also invested heavily in generative AI and has its own Firefly product that allows seamless integration of AI with its existing editing tools. This allows Adobe to compete in this realm while also giving creators more control over the end product than what many generative AI models do. This could keep Adobe relevant within the graphic design industry, making the forecast of its downfall somewhat inaccurate. Currently, Adobe is performing well and has posted consistent revenue growth over the past few years. ADBE Operating Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) data by YCharts. If Adobe is supposed to be getting displaced, don't tell it that, as it's still growing at a healthy pace. Last is Alphabet, the parent company of the Google Search engine. Its stock is running into the same fears as Adobe's, as investors worry that generative AI will replace Google Search. While some have made the switch, investors need to remember that Google is an ingrained habit among internet users around the globe. It would take a massive technological leap, which most users won't need anyway, to get them to switch. Google has already implemented the popular AI search overviews feature, which seamlessly integrates search results and AI, and that could be enough to maintain the vast majority of its dominant market share. If Google Search can maintain most of its market share, the stock is poised to move higher, as it trades at a significant discount to the broader market. How cheap is this trio? Alphabet's stock trades at a deep discount to the broader market, despite strong results. GOOGL PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts. Considering that the S&P 500 trades for 23.8 times forward earnings, this seems like a reasonable price to pay for the upside that Alphabet provides. Adobe is similarly cheap, trading for 18 times forward earnings. ADBE PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts. Taiwan Semiconductor is actually more expensive than the broader market at 25 times forward earnings. However, it's expected to grow at essentially double the pace of the market over the next five years, so this slight premium to the market seems a bit low. As a result, I'm confident labeling Taiwan Semiconductor as a bargain buy right now. Should you invest $1,000 in Alphabet right now? Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Globe and Mail
9 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Beverage Stock: Coca-Cola vs. PepsiCo
Key Points Coca-Cola appears to have the edge when comparing recent stock performances. Investors should also take PepsiCo's valuation and dividend returns into account. 10 stocks we like better than PepsiCo › Although earnings season has barely started, both PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) and its archrival, Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), have already reported earnings for the second quarter of 2025. The waning popularity of soda beverages and, in PepsiCo's case, the falling demand for snack foods, have translated into anemic growth for both companies. One thing to remember about both stocks is that they have become popular among dividend investors, each maintaining a record of annual dividend hikes for more than half a century. Amid such conditions, one beverage stock may ultimately stand out as a more suitable choice for most investors. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Comparing the two businesses Although a flagship cola product defines each stock, both companies are diversified beverage holdings. Each controls numerous brands under their umbrellas, and their selections encompass juices, coffees, teas, and waters. Additionally, both companies are now in the alcohol business. Coca-Cola entered this arena by offering Topo Chico hard seltzers, and PepsiCo has partnered with other companies to sell branded beverages like Hard Mountain Dew and Lipton Hard Iced Tea. Additionally, as previously mentioned, PepsiCo is in the snack business, owning such packaged food brands as Frito-Lay and Quaker. Unfortunately for both companies, a nutrition-inspired pivot has impacted sales, and this is particularly true of PepsiCo, whose customers are increasingly seeking healthier snack options. To that end, both companies have agreed with the Trump administration to produce cane sugar versions of their flagship colas, as more consumers turn away from high-fructose corn syrup. How the numbers compare However, such initiatives have not yet translated into higher sales. Furthermore, healthier ingredients often cost more, which will inevitably lead to higher input costs. As a result, both companies reported Q2 revenue increases of 1%, with price increases offsetting a slight drop in sales. From there, the results diverge, at least initially. Coca-Cola's Q2 net income was $3.8 billion, up from $2.4 billion in the year-ago quarter. Other operating charges fell from almost $1.4 billion in Q2 2024 to just $71 million one year later, accounting for nearly all of the improvement. In contrast, PepsiCo's $1.3 billion in Q2 net income was down from $3.1 billion 12 months ago. Still, if not for the $1.9 billion impairment charge on intangibles, net income would have narrowly increased. Thus, without one-time charges, the results seem to closely approximate each other. Even with their numerous similarities, Coca-Cola's stock has outperformed PepsiCo's over the previous year. PEP data by YCharts However, that outperformance does not necessarily make Coca-Cola the clear choice, even though Coca-Cola's P/E ratio of 28 is not significantly higher than PepsiCo's 27 earnings multiple. When comparing forward P/E ratios (which exclude one-time charges), PepsiCo's 18 forward price-to-earnings ratio is considerably lower than Coca-Cola's, a stock which trades at a forward P/E ratio of 23. Furthermore, PepsiCo may stand out with dividend investors. Both stocks are Dividend Kings by virtue of their long-established track records of annual payout hikes. Still, PepsiCo's dividend yield of almost 3.8% far outpaces Coca-Cola's at around 2.9%, arguably making PepsiCo a better fit for income investors. PEP Dividend Yield data by YCharts Coca-Cola or PepsiCo? As for which stock to choose, investors do not have a bad choice in the sense iconic brands will likely drive rising sales for both companies for years to come. However, if you're buying today, PepsiCo appears to offer a slight edge to shareholders. Admittedly, both stocks have offered growth and income to their long-term investors, and that is unlikely to change. Also, Coca-Cola's more recent outperformance may tempt investors to choose it. Nonetheless, both are mature, slower-growth companies, and that makes PepsiCo's attributes stand out. For one, since PepsiCo operates in both the beverage and snack industries, it offers a greater degree of revenue diversification. Also, while financial results appear similar in most respects, PepsiCo's forward P/E ratio suggests it is the lower-cost stock after factoring in one-time charges. Finally, thanks in part to a lower valuation, PepsiCo offers investors higher dividend returns. Since investors tend to buy these stocks for income, PepsiCo is probably the more suitable choice in most cases. Should you invest $1,000 in PepsiCo right now? Before you buy stock in PepsiCo, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and PepsiCo wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Globe and Mail
16 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Is Energy Transfer the Smartest Investment You Can Make Today?
Key Points Energy Transfer pays a lucrative distribution supported by stable cash flow and a strong financial profile. The MLP has lots of growth coming down the pipeline. It currently trades at one of the lowest valuations in its peer group. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) offers investors a high-yielding distribution (currently around 7.5%) backed by a rock-solid financial profile. The master limited partnership (MLP) is also growing at a healthy rate, which should continue. To top it off, the company trades at a very attractive valuation. Let's examine these features to determine whether they make Energy Transfer the smartest investment you can make today. A rock-solid income stream Energy Transfer's diversified midstream business generates substantial and stable cash flow, with fee-based contracts backing about 90% of the MLP 's annual earnings. During the first quarter, the company produced $2.3 billion of distributable cash flow. It distributed a little over $1.1 billion of this money to investors, retaining the rest to invest in expansion projects and maintain its strong financial profile. This conservative payout ratio allowed the MLP to maintain its leverage ratio in the lower half of its target range of 4 to 4.5 times. That has the company in its strongest financial position in its history. This strong financial profile makes the MLP's payout highly durable. A fully fueled growth engine Energy Transfer also has a healthy growth profile. The MLP is on track to grow its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) by around 5% this year. Growth drivers include last year's acquisition of WTG Midstream, recently completed organic expansion projects, and healthy market conditions. The MLP has even more growth ahead. It's investing $5 billion into growth capital projects this year, including several gas processing plants, a major new natural gas pipeline, and some additional export capacity. These growth projects should come online in the second half of 2025 through the end of next year. Given that timeline, Energy Transfer expects these projects will boost its earnings growth rate in the 2026 to 2027 time frame. That provides the MLP with lots of near-term visibility into its earnings growth. Additionally, Energy Transfer is developing several expansion projects, including its Lake Charles LNG facility and a new gas supply line for an AI data center. The MLP has identified three major catalysts -- rising Permian production, increasing gas demand from emerging sectors such as AI data centers, and growing export demand for natural gas liquids -- that will provide it with numerous opportunities to continue expanding its midstream footprint in the years to come. Its ability to secure more new projects would further enhance and extend its earnings growth outlook. Energy Transfer's strong financial position also enables it to continue making accretive acquisitions that complement its operations and growth. The MLP has a long history as a consolidator in the midstream sector, often making at least one major deal each year. Visible earnings growth from its upcoming projects and future expansion opportunities supports the company's plan to deliver 3% to 5% annual distribution increases. All this for an attractive value Despite its strong growth and financial profiles, the MLP currently trades for an enterprise value (EV)-to-EBITDA ratio of less than 9. That's the second-lowest valuation among energy midstream companies, where the peer group average is around 12. This low valuation is a key reason for Energy Transfer's high distribution yield, which enhances its appeal compared to peers. A wise choice Energy Transfer offers a high-yielding distribution and has a strong growth profile. It's also in the best financial shape of its history and has a valuation near the bottom of its peer group. These features make the MLP look like a very attractive investment these days, as it could deliver strong total returns. It's especially smart for those seeking a lucrative and growing passive income stream with potential tax benefits from the Schedule K-1 Federal Tax Form that the MLP sends investors each year. Should you invest $1,000 in Energy Transfer right now? Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
