New federal data shows Maine's foster care population grew at the fastest rate in the nation
It was one of just six states that increased its foster care population during that five-year period, according to a Maine Monitor analysis of data from the federal Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS).
AFCARS published data for fiscal year 2023, the most recent year for which data is available, in May, showing that Maine removed children from their families because of abuse and neglect at one of the highest rates in the country.
In 2023, Maine was more likely to remove children than all but five other states: West Virginia, Alaska, Montana, Kentucky and South Dakota. That year, Maine removed 4.14 children per 1,000 living in the state, about 75 percent higher than the national rate of 2.4 children per 1,000.
While Maine's foster care population increased 17 percent between 2019 and 2023, the most in the nation, the national foster care population fell nearly 20 percent.
More recent data from Maine's Department of Health and Human Services, however, shows the state foster care population has declined since reaching a 20-year high last fall.
Maine's child welfare system includes DHHS, the Attorney General's office, which represents the department in court, the attorneys who represent parents and the judges who preside over child protection cases.
Within DHHS, the Office of Child and Family Services (OFCS) oversees child protective cases and the removal of children. In an interview, OFCS Director Bobbi Johnson said the growth of Maine's foster care population was due in part to higher than average rates of cases involving substance abuse, a lack of attorneys to represent parents and a dearth of behavioral and mental health support services, which has 'resulted in a lack of reunification services.'
Johnson, who became the office's director in early 2024, also attributed the increase to several highly publicized deaths of children known to DHHS in late 2017 and early 2018. Those tragic deaths prompted legislative changes and policy shifts, as well as an increase in reports to the department.
The phenomenon is not unique to Maine. Research has suggested media coverage of child deaths can prompt increases in the number of children entering foster care and decreases in the number adopted or reunited with their families, as caseworkers take a 'better safe than sorry' approach.
Johnson said the department is working with organizations that study the science of children's safety as it adjusts its approach to be less 'reactive.'
She expressed a desire to improve the system and staff knowledge instead of 'saying the system is not working effectively and everything needs to be changed, which I think tends to be what you see in jurisdictions where there are child fatalities.'
Some still see an issue, however.
'We continue to be in a place in our state where we are almost solely focused on these tragedies and criticism of the child welfare agency's response; that has an impact on decision-making at many levels, which can lead to more kids coming into care,' Melissa Hackett, a policy associate with the Maine Children's Alliance, said in an email.
Poverty vs. neglect
The federal data shows that two-thirds of the children Maine put in foster care in 2023 were placed there because of neglect, which is higher than the national average.
In recent years, there has been a growing consensus nationwide that in many cases, removing children from homes can result in more long-term harm than leaving them there and connecting families with services, such as mental health and substance use treatment, behavioral supports and financial resources. This movement is linked to the idea that child welfare agencies often accuse parents of neglect when the root issue is poverty, and could be addressed by putting supports in place rather than removing a child.
Earlier this week, Governor Janet Mills signed legislation into law that changed the state's definition of child neglect, creating an exception for parents who can't provide necessities because they are unable to afford them. More than half of U.S. states have adopted similar statutes. The department supported the change.
But some lawmakers and advocates in Augusta argued that the bill didn't go far enough. They argue the state is unnecessarily separating families and paying for foster care, lawyers and court time instead of addressing the symptoms of poverty. They argue the state is opening too many cases, making it harder to identify those that are particularly dangerous.
'The system we have now is not designed to effectively keep children safe,' Alica Rea from the Maine ACLU testified before a legislative committee in April. 'Instead, the system puts parents, especially single mothers, in the impossible situation of having to overcome poverty in order to stop being monitored and to reunite with their children, without providing them with the resources necessary to do so.'
Not everyone shares this perspective. According to Maine's child welfare ombudsman, the state is not removing children from homes quickly enough.
'Since 2019, the trends that my office has seen do not show that the Department is taking too many children into state custody,' Christine Alberi wrote in an email. 'The Department has often delayed taking children into custody too long after multiple investigations or safety plans.'
Alberi said the department's reaction after 2018 included 'a much higher level of risk aversion' that was 'not a model for child welfare practice.'
This included reinvestigating cases sent to the Alternative Response Program (which is often where low severity cases are referred) and ending out-of-home safety planning, which resulted in more children entering custody, Alberi said.
'Many changes were needed but instead of refocusing on proper practice, the Department did too much too quickly,' Alberi wrote.
Declining numbers
Data suggests Maine's foster care surge may be receding.
The number of children entering state custody increased from 820 to 1,246 between 2017 and 2019, a 50 percent rise. But in the next five years, entries into the system fell 15 percent to 1,054 in 2023.
Despite the lower level of children entering the system, the overall foster care population continued to grow until well into 2024, as the number of children exiting the system, due to adoption or reunification with parents, was lower than the number of children entering.
While federal data is lagging, Maine's child welfare dashboard has more current numbers. They show that the foster care population continued to increase from 2023 to 2024. In July, the number of children in state care hit a 20-year high of 2,579.
But that total has been declining since, dropping to 2,290 in April.
Johnson sees the decline as 'a positive movement.'
She attributed the decline to more adoptions (Maine has a higher rate of children leaving the system through adoption than the national average) and efforts to identify barriers to either adoption or reunification. She also credited investments in the state's behavioral health system, which allow families to get help before removal is needed, Johnson said.
'Building out the infrastructure of prevention within our state is really critical,' she said.
___
This story was originally published by The Maine Monitor and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
28 minutes ago
- Medscape
PCPs as Frontline in Dyspnea
When a patient calls a primary care provider due to shortness of breath symptoms, recommending an in-office examination is generally warranted. Your patient may explain how they are out of breath from everyday activities like using stairs, getting winded from walking the dog, or just not being able to catch their breath. 'All new episodes of shortness of breath should be evaluated in real time by a clinician, ideally in person,' said Panagis Galiatsatos, MD, a pulmonologist and associate professor in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore. 'The only time I can see foregoing an immediate clinic visit is if a known cardiopulmonary diagnosis exists.' For example, if a diagnosis is already known (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) and their dyspnea (shortness of breath) is in accordance with prior episodes of similar breathlessness, a phone call or virtual discussion could be enough. Such episodes could also be managed by an action plan that has already been discussed at prior clinic visits, Galiatsatos said. If a patient, already in the office for another concern, casually mentions episodes of shortness of breath, how should the primary doctor proceed? Even if dyspnea is mentioned nonchalantly, it warrants a thorough history and focused physical exam, especially if this is new or worsening. This could be an early sign of a more serious problem, according to Lijo Illipparambil, MD, a pulmonologist and assistant professor of clinical thoracic medicine and surgery at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia. When discussing symptoms, Illipparambil recommends these questions: • Start the discussion related to context: When do episodes occur — exertion or rest? • How long have these symptoms been occurring? • Inquire about associated symptoms such as fatigue, chest tightness, wheezing, cough, or swelling. • Review exercise limitations: are they able to climb stairs, and if so, how many? Is walking across a room or doing daily chores causing them to be dyspneic? How can primary care doctors serve as frontline partners in managing patients' shortness of breath? Primary care doctors are essential in identifying early signs of cardiopulmonary disease. 'Generally, they are the first physicians who meet the patients and do most of the work-up initially,' said Illipparambil. 'They coordinate care, especially with specialists, provide lifestyle counseling, and monitor chronic conditions like COPD, asthma, and congestive heart failure.' In many ways, they are the real central component for care for patients with dyspnea, he said. 'They also have the advantage of longitudinal relationships, allowing them to notice changes over time and engage in shared decision-making to create sustainable health strategies and earlier intervention if needed,' Illipparambil explained. Assessment Protocol Usually, a thorough physical exam, including checking vital signs (especially oxygen saturation and heart rate) is next, according to Illipparambil. Additional testing should also be considered, including chest x-ray, EKG, and laboratory work-up, as well as referral to specialists if necessary. Red flags that warrant further testing include: • Dyspnea at rest: This is always a reason for further testing, according to Illipparambil. 'It is not normal to be short of breath at rest; it is most often a sign of significant impending decompensation,' he said. Worsening shortness of breath over days or weeks can demonstrate a progressive process, Illipparambil added. Difficulty walking short distances or performing basic activities (eg, walking in the supermarket, pushing a stroller), especially as a change from their baseline, can be a sign of an active problem. • Orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea are signs of heart failure that need further investigation. • Unilateral leg swelling should always have a differential that includes deep venous thrombosis and, when a patient is short of breath, possible pulmonary embolism, Illipparambil said. Expert Assessments and Symptoms Consider the shortness of breath assessments below, according to Galiatsatos with Johns Hopkins. Airway diseases. COPD or asthma are examples. 'I would recognize due to inability to walk incline or when holding groceries, not walking through the grocery store, but once their arms are engaged, their breathlessness is noticeable,' he said. Cardiac rhythm issues. Especially at low heart rates, most people notice this breathlessness even after walking just a few dozen feet on a flat surface, he noted. Pulmonary embolism (lung blood clot). This tends to occur more acutely, and patients often describe a heaviness and discomfort in their chest. 'This is often accompanied by something that provoked the blood clot — long hours of sitting (for example, during a long flight) — or trauma to the legs,' Galiatsatos said. Heart failure. The key symptom here is the inability to lay down flat. Patients will note having to sleep with several pillows — propping their head and upper torso in an upright position — or abandoning their bed altogether in favor of a recliner, he explained. How can a primary doctor discuss lifestyle changes, medications, or strategies to reduce shortness of breath? The key is to be empathetic, collaborative, and goal oriented. 'This is indeed a delicate yet vital conversation,' Illipparambil said. There are several causes for shortness of breath and approaching patients this way can encourage openness and discussion. One thing that helps is the use of motivational interviewing techniques. For instance, Illipparambil recommends asking permission to discuss weight, tobacco use, or other lifestyle habits that may be affecting shortness of breath. Another approach is to focus on functions, such as walking without getting winded and changing habits toward a healthy lifestyle, rather than just the number on the scale. Offering resources and referrals for issues like nutrition, sleep, and physical therapy can also go a long way, Illipparambil said. 'Medications, of course, can help, especially inhalers in COPD and asthma patients,' he said. 'Antihypertensives, other medications that help modify heart disease, and goal-directed medical therapy have been shown to improve symptoms in patients with heart failure.' How does obesity affect with shortness of breath? Obesity is often linked to cardiopulmonary deconditioning, according to Trishul Siddharthan, MD, a pulmonologist and associate professor of medicine with the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, and the University of Miami Health System. 'Extra weight is a significant cause of shortness of breath in the general population and interacts with respiratory diseases, like asthma, to worsen symptoms,' Siddharthan said. 'I think most patients understand how weight can impair respiratory status, particularly if they are having shortness of breath. Lifestyle changes and other strategies to cope are a shared decision. I ensure I address the underlying medical condition while addressing enablers and barriers to weight loss.'
Fast Company
28 minutes ago
- Fast Company
3 signs you suffer from ‘hyper-ambition' (and how to overcome it)
It's true that personal ambition fuels success. But we can reach a dangerous tipping point when healthy drive becomes 'hyper-ambition'—a compulsive cycle of excessive striving that becomes self-defeating. Unlike healthy ambition that energizes you, hyper-ambition can leave you perpetually unsatisfied, overextended, and grinding to exhaustion. The cost isn't just personal—hyper-ambition eventually undermines the very professional success it promises. Here's how to recognize if you've crossed into the danger zone—and take practical steps to realign toward healthy ambition. 1. You Feel Like You've Never Achieved Enough and Are Never Satisfied Are you on a professional achievement treadmill, immediately shifting focus to your next goal after hitting a milestone? While accomplishments and rewards can provide short-term satisfaction, the challenge to getting into such a rhythm is that you may pursue goals without considering what you truly want. This can catch up to you when you realize you've met external expectations but never connected to your internal motivation, leaving you dissatisfied. Putting all your attention against the pursuit of professional validation can also lead to ignoring key areas of one's life that affect long-term happiness and well-being, such as your personal relationships, your health, and activities that fulfill and restore you. To realign to healthy ambition, orient your goals toward internal motivation first—it's a better predictor of engagement and success. Research has shown that putting attention and focus on personal success linked to fulfillment, satisfaction, and happiness begets external success, while the opposite focus doesn't hold true. Start with your values: test if a goal is aligned with what is important and matters to you, rather than solely meeting external expectations. Academic studies have shown that aligning our goals with our values leads to more satisfaction, higher persistence, and more goal attainment. Expand your ambition to include meaningful life goals and challenge what success truly means in your life. Studies confirm that once our basic needs are met, more income, wealth, or possessions don't correlate with lifelong happiness. Plus, Gallup research finds that well-being isn't tied just to career or finances, but also encompasses physical, social, and community well-being. 2. You Feel Constantly Over-Extended and Frustrated You Can't 'Do It All' Do you say yes to every opportunity without strategic prioritization, then feel stretched thin and frustrated by your inability to pursue them all effectively? This suggests you either think more is always better, leading to overload and overwhelm, or you may not have an approach to help you choose where to put your time and attention when faced with seemingly equally valid goals. To shift toward focusing on what matters, use strategic methods to make conscious choices. Create and visualize a goal system by identifying your core priorities and mapping how other goals connect. This can reveal if you're pursuing too much, show how aligned actions serve multiple goals, and reduce perceived friction between supposedly competing goals. You can maximize goal attainment by creating these positive connections, minimizing conflicts, and better understanding trade-offs you may make. When faced with choices, apply the urgency–energy filter. Ask, 'What has urgency, and do I have energy for it?' This reveals several strategies: Prioritize: Commit to high-urgency, high-energy ambitions Reinterpret: For high-urgency, low-energy goals, find ways to achieve the same outcome with less time and effort Postpone: Back-burner lower-priority ambitions Let go: With self-compassion, release goals that no longer serve you Learn to compromise wisely by focusing on what matters at this time rather than trying to do everything. 3. You're Grinding Hard All the Time Without Recovery How often do you find yourself compulsively working, putting in excessive hours without recovery time, leaving you exhausted? Operating in a persistent high-performance mode leads to unproductive stress, causing your physical and mental health to suffer. Ironically, your productivity declines and your work suffers, too. To break this pattern, be strategic about managing your effort and prioritizing recovery. Our ambitions aren't created equal. Be discerning about the effort put against your goals by asking three key questions: Aspiration: How good do I want to be at this? Determination: What is worth the hard work? Motivation: How much effort do I want to put in and what's required? Additionally, manage perfectionism. Be conscious about where you apply excellence and give yourself permission to say 'this is good enough' for lower-stakes areas. Finally, make recovery a leadership imperative. Doris Kearns Goodwin, the celebrated presidential biographer, has said: 'The most underappreciated leadership strength is the ability to relax and replenish energy.' Research shows we paradoxically neglect recovery practices when we need them most. We need a deliberate plan to sustain ourselves for the work that matters and to prioritize time to psychologically disconnect from work. Sustainable success comes from strategic ambition, not hyper-ambition. The idea that you have to choose between being ambitious and being well is a false choice. The goal shouldn't be to eliminate ambition, but to keep it in a healthy zone where it energizes rather than depletes you—allowing you to achieve what you really want both professionally and personally.
Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Ovarian Cancer Risk Rises Soon After IBS Diagnosis
TOPLINE: Women with a new diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have a significantly higher risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months and 6 months post-diagnosis, but this risk is no longer elevated beyond 8 months. METHODOLOGY: Ovarian cancer often presents with nonspecific symptoms overlapping those of IBS. The frequency of misdiagnosis remains unknown, and not all IBS guidelines recommend screening for ovarian cancer. Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study using US administrative claims data to compare ovarian cancer incidence in adult women with and without a new IBS diagnosis. Diagnostic codes were used to identify cases of IBS and ovarian cancer. TAKEAWAY: The cohort comprised 9804 women with IBS and 79,804 women without IBS, identified between January 2017 and December 2020. Women with IBS had a significantly higher risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; P = .02) and 6 months (HR, 1.43; P = .02), but not beyond 8 months post-diagnosis. Women with both IBS and endometriosis had an even greater risk for ovarian cancer at 3 months (HR, 4.20; P = .01), 6 months (HR, 3.52; P = .01), and after 1 year (HR, 2.67; P = .04). Increasing age was significantly associated with higher ovarian cancer incidence only in women younger than 50 years (HR, 1.07; P < .01), regardless of IBS status. IN PRACTICE: 'Identifying patient-specific risk factors, such as chronic pelvic pain or endometriosis, could help develop tailored risk profiles and improve the approach to personalized care in women with IBS-type symptoms,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Andrea Shin, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles. It was published online in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. LIMITATIONS: The use of diagnostic codes for identifying IBS may have led to misclassification or reflected symptoms rather than confirmed and validated diagnosis. DISCLOSURES: This study received support from the National Institutes of Health. Some authors reported serving as consultants, advisors, and/or receiving research support from pharmaceutical and healthcare companies; one author reported having stock options. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
