logo
Kajol Was Hesitant To Play Rape Victim In Dushman Until Pooja Bhatt Stepped In: 'I Refused Because...'

Kajol Was Hesitant To Play Rape Victim In Dushman Until Pooja Bhatt Stepped In: 'I Refused Because...'

News182 days ago
Kajol says she initially refused Dushman due to rape scenes. Pooja Bhatt assured her a body double would be used and nothing uncomfortable would be filmed.
Even after 25 years, Dushman continues to linger in the minds of viewers, largely due to Ashutosh Rana's terrifying portrayal of the sadistic killer Gokul Pandit. The 1998 psychological thriller, directed by Tanuja Chandra and produced by Pooja Bhatt, was a bold film that tackled themes of trauma, justice, and inner strength. At its emotional core was Kajol, who played dual roles—twin sisters whose lives are shattered by a brutal crime.
In a recent interview with The Lallantop, Kajol opened up about the emotional turmoil and hesitation she experienced before accepting the role. She revealed that she initially refused the project, despite being deeply moved by the story. 'It was a very difficult role. It was a subject matter. I had refused the film. Pooja Bhatt had approached me for the film because she was producing it, she wanted me to do the film. But I was like, 'I love the script. I love the idea, but I don't want to portray any kind of molestation or rape on screen. Not because of anything else but as an actor when you are acting in that emotion, you feel all those things. As an actor, I don't need to do that. I can show my acting prowess in other things," she recalled.
Kajol's apprehension was rooted not just in the graphic nature of the scenes, but the emotional toll such performances can take on an actor. However, what eventually convinced her was the unwavering support and empathy shown by the film's female-led creative team. 'Then Tanuja and Pooja made me understand. They said, 'Don't worry about it. We are women, we understand, and we will figure this out, and we will shoot with a body double and we will do this and that, and we will not do anything that you are uncomfortable with at any point,' so yes, that's how Dushman came to be," she said.
In the film, Kajol's performance is a powerful embodiment of vulnerability and strength. One sister is brutally raped and murdered by the psychotic Gokul Pandit, while the other—devastated and haunted—embarks on a path of revenge. Her transformation is aided by a blind ex-army officer, played by Sanjay Dutt, who trains her to confront her sister's killer and reclaim her power.
Though released in the same year as Kajol's mega-blockbuster Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, Dushman carved a very different space for itself in Indian cinema. Where one celebrated youthful romance, the other dove deep into psychological trauma and female resilience. Dushman didn't cater to mainstream tastes, but its bold narrative, taut direction, and unflinching performances earned it a cult status over time.
First Published:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kajol shares glam ‘Papped at Home' pics; Nysa's hilarious roast steals the show
Kajol shares glam ‘Papped at Home' pics; Nysa's hilarious roast steals the show

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Kajol shares glam ‘Papped at Home' pics; Nysa's hilarious roast steals the show

Kajol , known for her candid takes on fame and her frequent run-ins with the paparazzi, surprised fans this week with a rare moment of lighthearted self-parody, and her daughter Nysa Devgan wasn't about to let it slide. 'Got papped at home" The actress took to Instagram to share a series of striking pictures from a home photoshoot. Dressed in a fiery red wrap dress and posing confidently in front of a mirror, Kajol looked radiant. But it was her cheeky caption that stole the spotlight: 'Got papped at home #thecameralovesme.' While fans were delighted by her tongue-in-cheek humor, it was Nysa's response that had everyone laughing. 'Never seen you so happy to be papped before…,' she commented. It was a playful roast at her mom's long-standing discomfort with being photographed in public. Kajol replied with a laughing emoji. 'Photo! Photo!' It's so odd and disrespectful.' This light moment stands in contrast to Kajol's usual frustration with paparazzi culture. Just a few days earlier, in an interview with Bollywood Hungama, she had spoken out strongly against the intrusion of cameras into deeply personal moments. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo 'There are certain places where they shouldn't be, like funerals. You're there for someone's death, and someone's yelling, 'Photo! Photo!' It's so odd and disrespectful,' she said. Kajol also spoke about the exhausting experience of being followed across the city. 'I've had paps trail me from Juhu to Bandra just to see which building I'm going into. That's not normal.' Despite this, her recent post shows Kajol's ability to laugh at herself, especially when in control of the lens. Her fans, as well as celebrity friends like Mrunal Thakur , who called her an 'ethereal beauty,' were quick to shower the post with love. On the work front, Kajol was last seen in 'Maa,' a mythological horror film where she starred alongside Indraneil Sengupta and Ronit Roy . The movie is getting decent reviews. Kajol Felt 'Helpless' During Ajay Devgn's 2012 Clash with YRF

Jane Street slams Sebi allegations, plans to contest ban and impounding order
Jane Street slams Sebi allegations, plans to contest ban and impounding order

Indian Express

time31 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Jane Street slams Sebi allegations, plans to contest ban and impounding order

New York-based global proprietary trading firm Jane Street has strongly criticised India's market regulator Sebi over its recent enforcement action, calling the accusations 'extremely inflammatory' and stating it is 'beyond disappointed' by the order. The firm, which is among the largest players on Wall Street, said in a mail to its employees that it is preparing a formal response to the Securities and Exchange Board of India's (Sebi) decision, which includes a ban on the firm's market participation and an order to impound Rs 4,843 crore in what the regulator described as 'unlawful gains'. Jane Street rejected the market watchdog's charge that it was involved in 'an intentional, well planned, and sinister scheme' to manipulate Indian markets through its derivatives trades, especially in Nifty Index futures. The firm asserted it would contest the order through appropriate legal channels. In a memo sent to its roughly 3,000 employees on Sunday and reported by the Financial Times newspaper, Jane Street said, 'it's deeply upsetting to see the firm mischaracterised this way.' 'We take pride in the role we serve in markets around the world, and it's painful to have our firm's reputation tarnished by a report based on so many erroneous or unsupported assertions,' the memo said. Jane Street is yet to respond to a mail about the Sebi allegations sent by The Indian Express. Last week, the market regulator granted Jane Street 21 days to file an objection to its order and request a hearing. Jane Street, one of the most prominent and successful proprietary trading firms to emerge in the past two decades, has grown into a major force across global financial markets. In its internal memo, Jane Street criticised Sebi for relying on 'a metric for market impact and trading aggressiveness which seems disconnected from actual market dynamics.' The firm argued that its trading activity on January 17, 2024 — one of the days singled out in Sebi's report — reflected routine 'basic arbitrage trading,' a widely accepted strategy in the industry. Jane Street has sharply contested Sebi's claim that it disregarded concerns raised by the National Stock Exchange (NSE), an allegation the regulator used to justify its sudden and unprecedented ban on the firm's trading operations in India. In the internal memo, Jane Street described the charge as 'especially far from reality,' stating that it had promptly halted its trading activity at the time to better understand the exchange's concerns. The firm added that it subsequently adjusted its strategies to align with the NSE's stated preferences. 'Once again, we left this process feeling that we had reached an understanding of the concerns and reflected them in modifications to our trading behaviour,' the memo said. 'Since February, we have made ongoing efforts to communicate with Sebi and have been consistently rebuffed.' According to the FT report, the US firm nearly doubled its net trading revenues to $20.5 billion last year, outpacing several of Wall Street's biggest banks. In the first quarter of 2025, Jane Street notched up net trading revenues of $7.2 billion, more than Morgan Stanley. 'Sebi's investigation was triggered by revelations from a lawsuit launched by Jane Street last year against Millennium Management and two former traders that had moved to the hedge fund. Jane Street's complaint alleged that the traders had stolen a hugely valuable trading strategy, which was later revealed to revolve around Indian options trading,' FT report said. According to the regulator's findings, Jane Street's trades, particularly in Nifty index futures, showed a clear pattern. The firm wasn't trading passively or reacting to the market — it was nudging prices upward, consistently placing orders at or above the last traded price (LTP). This pattern intensified in the final hours of trading, a critical window that often shapes the day's closing price. Sebi described it as a 'non-neutral trading behaviour', a strategic attempt to influence prices rather than simply engage with the market. And the tactic wasn't random; it followed a well-known play in the trading world: 'marking the close.' Jane Street, regulators say, was executing what's known as an extended 'marking the close' strategy — placing large and aggressive buy or sell orders near the end of the trading session, with the intention of artificially moving the closing price of a stock or index. The closing price is critical, especially on derivatives expiry days, as it determines the settlement value for futures and options contracts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store