Taiwan downplays national security concerns after Trump and TSMC's $100bn semiconductor deal
Taiwan presidential office spokesperson, Karen Kuo, said the government was aware of the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) deal which must go through government assessments to safeguard the interests of the island as well as the investors.
Ms Kuo said TSMC 'will keep its most advanced manufacturing processes in Taiwan'.
'Following TSMC's US$100bn investment in the US, Taiwan will work to ensure our high-tech industries remain competitive while expanding their global presence, paving the way to building resilient semiconductor supply chains with our partners & a stronger Taiwan-US partnership,' a statement on X said.
It follows fears that the deal could undermine the island's national security as the industry remains crucial to the economy and the country's defence.
The deal was announced on Monday by Mr Trump and chief executive of TSMC, CC Wei, to invest an additional $100bn over the next four years to expand semiconductor operations in the US. It was on top of more than $65bn investment already.
TSMC, the world's biggest semiconductor manufacturer, produces chips for companies including Apple, Intel, and Nvidia.
'We're going to produce many chips to support AI progress and to support the smartphones' progress, and we thank President Trump again for his support,' Mr Wei said, adding that the deal will create thousands of high-tech manufacturing jobs.
Mr Trump, who has repeatedly accused Taiwan of 'stealing' the US semiconductor business, said the deal will allow TSMC to avoid industry-wide 25 per cent tariffs.
'By doing it here, he has no tariffs,' Mr Trump said, when he was questioned his threats of tariffs have played in influencing companies' decisions to invest in the US.
Ms Kuo cited the Industrial Innovation Act and said the companies must obtain approval from the government for foreign investments above $45.5m.
She added that the government was drafting a plan to forge resilient and diversified semiconductor supply chains with the US and other partners.
Government statements indicated that TSMC had not yet sought the necessary approvals for foreign investments of that scale at the time of the deal's announcement.
Opposition leaders in Taiwan have said the deal could undermine the country's defence. KMT's legislative caucus, Fu Kun-chi, questioned: 'Where is Taiwan's national security if TSMC become ASMC (American Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) and the sacred mountain that protects the country is gone?'
On Tuesday, Mr Trump said the US should get rid of the 2022 bipartisan law that give $52.7bn in subsidies for semiconductor chips manufacturing and production and use the proceeds to pay debt.
"The CHIPS act is a horrible, horrible thing. We give hundreds of billions of dollars and it doesn't mean a thing. They take our money and they don't spend it," Mr Trump said in a speech to Congress. "You should get rid of the CHIPS Act and whatever is left over, Mr Speaker, you should use it to reduce debt."
The CHIPS and Science law signed by then-president Joe Biden in August 2022 included $39bn in subsidies for US semiconductor manufacturing and related components along with $75bn in government lending authority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
25 minutes ago
- Spectator
Does Trump prefer Starmer's wife to him?
The Trump Golf Course at Turnberry in Scotland looks like a middle-ranking complex for assisted living. It is all plastic double glazing, unfashionably bright flowers and ornamental balls. It was to here that Ursula von der Leyen and now Sir Keir Starmer had been summoned by the President to pay homage during the Donald's golfing tour. Mr Trump appeared on the steps of his plastic palace, while Sir Keir and Lady Starmer emerged from their Land Rover to the sound of a piper. I can't say what he was playing. Traditional options include the Skye Boat Song or – appropriately – Cock o' the North. Knowing Mr Trump it might well have been the YMCA. As soon as the Prime Minister and his wife arrived, Mr Trump turned his attention to Mrs Starmer, over whom he practically slobbered. 'She's a respected person over all the United States', the President said, in one of his trademark mad reveries. This conjured the image of the Prime Minister's wife being afforded that same respect across the United States. All Hollywood is a-chatter with tales of Sir Keir's Missus. New York cab drivers affix a miniature of Lady Starmer on the wing mirrors. Drifters across the great truck routes of Appalachia tell tales of her beneath the stars. On the remaining reservations of the Rosebud Sioux in South Dakota when they rise to beard the new dawn, they do so by saluting Victoria, the Lady Starmer. Questions came from the press. What did Mr Trump think of illegal immigration? 'We are, er, stopping the boats', interjected Starmer, trying to seize control of the question before the Donald committed him to gunboats in the Channel. He spent the interview wringing his hands, every inch the Fleshy Grima Wormtongue next to the Mad Orange King. Next came an even trickier question from Bev Turner of GB News – about the importance of free speech. 'I don't know if you're referring to somewhere specific', asked Mr Trump. Until now, the PM had kept up a solemn pout into the middle-distance, while the Donald did most of the talking. Suddenly a look of blind fear swept over his face. 'We have had free speech for a very long time so, ermmmm, we're very proud about that', he stammered. Just 'had' might have been more appropriate, given the advent of Sir Keir's Interweb Gauleiters to crack down on whatever it is the government thinks is 'extremism'. There was a squeal of piggy panic in the PM's voice. He knew exactly which country the question referred to, even if the President affected not to. He needn't have worried. Mr Trump answered the questions he wanted to hear rather than the ones he was asked. A question about Israel became a list of other wars. Cambodia, Congo, and, crucially, the India/Pakistan conflict. This allowed Mr Trump to do his own bit on how nuclear fallout works. 'We'll get nuclear dust, you'll get nuclear dust', he said, turning to Sir Keir. Come friendly bombs, indeed.
Spectator
25 minutes ago
- Spectator
What should we make of the Starmer-Trump relationship?
It's often the rotator blades of Marine One that blare over Donald Trump's voice as he stands near the helipad on the south lawn of the White House. In Turnberry, Scotland, it was bagpipes. Trump, playing host to the British Prime Minister in Britain, performed his now familiar ingratiation ritual as he welcomed Sir Keir and Lady Victoria Starmer to his golf course. 'Our relationship is unparalleled,' he said, above the din. He flattered the PM's wife and even suggested, in his delightful nonsensical way, that she is a well-known figure all over the United States. Lucy Dunn is joined by US editor Freddy Gray and political editor Tim Shipman to discuss what the trip means, and what we should make of the Starmer-Trump relationship.
North Wales Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Tariff of 15% ‘challenging' but avoids a trade war
Peter Burke said that the EU-US deal avoids both a trade war and EU counter-measures, which would have had an effect on the north-south economy. He said 'the devil is in the detail' of the trade agreement finalised on Sunday by Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. 'We had a lot of modelling carried out on the various different options, and some were very perverse, that would have closed the market if you had over a 30% tariff with a stacking mechanism,' Mr Burke told RTE Radio. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carve outs. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agrifoods and potentially spirits.' The bloc is set to face 15% tariffs on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars over three years. Mr Burke said it was his understanding that the 15% tariff on the pharmaceutical sector would be a maximum rate. He added: 'I think the president of the Commission has been very clear that 15% will be a ceiling.' It is still unclear from the deal, agreed five days before Mr Trump's threat of a 30% tariff would have come into effect, will mean Ireland will need to invest in US energy, he added. 'This all has to be worked out yet, as you can appreciate, I'm only hearing this for the first time last night, and we have nothing on paper.' Ireland's premier Micheal Martin and deputy premier Simon Harris welcomed the agreement struck on Sunday, saying that while Ireland 'regrets' the baseline tariff of 15%, it welcomed the certainty for businesses. Mr Harris said further detail was needed around how tariffs would affect sectors including pharmaceuticals. Ireland remains vulnerable to a slow down in trade with the US economy, due to exports of products such as alcohol, dairy and beef. The Irish government has also expressed concern at how tariffs could affect pharma multinationals based in Ireland, which employs about 45,000 people in Ireland, as Mr Trump had signalled he intended to target that industry. In addition, 65% of all aircraft are leased through Ireland globally. Business group Ibec said although the uncertainty may be dissipating, the agreement was 'punishing' for Europe. The group's chief executive Danny McCoy said 'Europe has capitulated on this' and 15% is 'very substantial'. 'I don't think it's a great deal if I'm really honest,' Simon McKeever, of the Irish Exporters Association, said. He said the deal was not a good one for Irish businesses and said the EU was negotiating with 'one if not two hands tied behind our backs' because of the EU's reliance on the US in relation to defence and security. He said questions remained about the effect it would have on Northern Ireland given the UK had a lower tariff of 10% in place. 'There's a huge amount of this that is extremely uncertain,' he said. Last week, Finance Minister Paschal Dohonoe said the Irish government would spend 9.4 billion euro on its budget in October, based on a zero-tariff scenario for next year. He and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers said these estimates would need to be revised if there was a shock to the Irish economy. Mr Burke said it was not naive to base the government's economic scenario on a zero-for-zero trade agreement with the US. 'No it wasn't because we didn't know what we were to be faced with,' he said on Monday. 'We do need to find out what happens in other areas, because this is very complex. 'It depends what happens with China, that's a very significant market that a deal hasn't happened yet. 'It really impacts what happens with our exporters here in Ireland as well, because so much product is in danger of being redirected into EU market. 'We also don't know what separate carve outs are going to emerge for the different sectors that are so vulnerable from an Irish perspective. 'Until we get flesh on the bones and all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what budgetary parameters (we) will end up with.'
