Devdutta Majhi from West Bengal's Katwa secures top rank among girls in JEE (Advanced)
Ms Majhi, who topped from the IIT Kharagpur zone, obtained 312 marks out of a total of 360.
In this year's JEE (Mains) examination, she had also secured a top rank in the Session 2 Paper 1 (BE/BTech) with a perfect 100 percentile score.
'I am very happy with the results. I had a good feeling after the examination, I knew it went well. I love mathematics a lot, so I want to join the BTech course for maths and computing at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore,' Ms Majhi told The Hindu on Monday.
She added that her second choice would be the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Madras.
'For my preparation, I did not join any particular coaching institute. I would study diligently at home, and I appeared for several mock tests for practice,' Ms Majhi said.
Ms Majhi has a proven record of academic excellence. A student of Katwa Durgadasi Chaudhurani Girls' High School in Purba Bardhaman district, she ranked sixth in the State in this year's class 12 board examination conducted by the West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education.
In 2023, in the class 10 Madhyamik board examination conducted by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, Ms Majhi had secured the first rank in the State by scoring 697 out of 700 marks.
Chief Minister of West Bengal, Mamata Banerjee, took to social media to congratulate Ms Majhi.
'Today's JEE Advanced 2025 examination results show that you have been topper among all girls in the entire country, and the highest rank holder in the IIT Kharagpur zone. You achieved top ranks in our Secondary and Higher Secondary examinations earlier, and now you are the topper girl of India!' Ms Banerjee wrote.
Despite many girl students proving their merit in these pan-India entrance examinations, the gender ratio among students, particularly in the IITs, remains largely skewed.
According to the Union Ministry of Education's response to a question in the Lok Sabha in 2023, the government had decided to push for female representation in IITs by increasing their enrollment in the IITs' B.Tech. programmes from 8% to 14% in 2018-19, 17% in 2019-20 and 20% in 2020-21 through supernumerary seats.
Furthermore, the Central government also encouraged the institutions to improve their gender ratio through special scholarships for female students, counselling activities for JEE (Advanced)-qualified female students, special open house outreach programmes for female high school students to encourage them towards Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), etc.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
If government schools are free, why don't we send our kids there?
Despite free or minimal fees, public schools in India struggle to attract students. Here's why parents continue to flock to private schools and what the data says. Government schools in India offer free education, mid-day meals, and even scholarships. Yet, for many parents, especially middle-income households the idea of sending their child to a government school is not even a a country where 93% of children were enrolled in government schools post-Independence, the tide has turned dramatically. According to the Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE+) 2021-22, only 49.6% of school-going children are now in government schools, while 47.5% attend private schools. In urban India, private school preference is even higher, despite the financial burden it why is free education not enough?PERCEPTION OF QUALITY: "FREE" STILL HAS A COSTFree or not, the perception of poor teaching quality haunts government schools. In contrast, private schools even budget ones are seen to offer:Better teacher attendanceEnglish-medium instructionRegular exams and assignmentsMore personalised attentionDATA POINTThe ASER Report 2023 found that only 25.9% of Class 5 government school children could read a Class 2-level text, compared to 42.3% in private PROSPECTS & COMPETITIVE EXAMS: ENGLISH STILL RULESIndia's job market, especially in urban areas, rewards English fluency and a polished personality. Since many government schools still teach regional languages and often lack communication-skills grooming, parents fear their children will be left behind."Even if my child tops the class in a Hindi-medium school, how will he compete in IIT or appear for interviews in MNCs?" - Rohit Sharma, a parent in Lucknow. Moreover, private schools are often aligned with CBSE or ICSE boards that are better structured for national-level entrance AND EXTRACURRICULAR GAPSA Tale of Two Campuses:Private school in Noida: Smart classrooms, sports coaches, annual music/drama school nearby: One fan per classroom, poorly maintained science lab, outdated equipment, and ill-kept playgrounds that are often used for community events rather than student Ministry of Education's Performance Grading Index (PGI) 2023 revealed that:Only 57% of government secondary schools had a functioning than 30% had internet connectivity.40% lacked functioning schools often offer robotics labs, foreign language classes, debate clubs, and career counselling facilities rarely found in public ACCOUNTABILITY & INCENTIVESGovernment school teachers are often better paid than their private school counterparts. But higher salaries don't always mean better private schools:Teachers face direct accountability to parents and performance reviews are the contrast, government teachers are rarely fired for non-performance and are often assigned duties unrelated to teaching, like election work or census ASPIRATIONS AND SOCIAL PRESTIGEadvertisementEducation is not just about learning it's about social mobility. Private schooling, even if budget or low-cost, is often associated with upward mobility."When I say my daughter goes to XYZ International School, people take notice. I don't want her labelled just because she went to a sarkari school," - Anita Devi, a domestic worker in Delhi who spends 30% of her salary on private social bias has created a vicious cycle: better-off students leave government schools, which further reduces their competitiveness and EXIST BUT ARE RARESome public schools buck the trend:Delhi's Model Schools: Known for modern teaching methods and Vidyalayas (KVs) and Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs): Often outperform private schools such institutions are the exception, not the rule, and admission is highly EDUCATION ISN'T ENOUGH WITHOUT QUALITYIndia's Right to Education Act guarantees free and compulsory schooling. But if the quality gap remains, no amount of affordability will help government schools win back parents' trust. To truly reform public education, the government must address teacher accountability, upgrade infrastructure, integrate English-medium instruction, and embrace extracurricular development. Otherwise, the question will linger: If government schools are free, why aren't they good enough for our children?P.S. reached out to the Ministry of Education for clarification, but has not received a response yet. A reply is awaited.- EndsTrending Reel
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
National Sports Governance Bill: Federations split over new law, concerns raised over sports autonomy
The story so far: 'Preparing for 2036 Summer Olympics, it is imperative that the sports governance landscape undergoes a positive transformation to bring better outcomes,' reads the aims of the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025. The Bill, which has been tabled in the Lok Sabha by Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya is likely to be taken for debate next week. The Bill has been heralded by some sports federations as 'visionary, transformative and furthering sports in India', but several others remain skeptic. BCCI remains non-committal India's top cricketing body — Board of Cricket Control in India (BCCI), has opposed any efforts to be dragged under the ambit of Right to Information (RTI), citing it does not depend on government funding for its functioning. When asked about its stance on the Bill, BCCI General Secretary Devajit Saikia told The Hindu, 'Currently, it is too premature to comment on the Bill as it is going to be debated by MPs in Parliament. The BCCI will take a call once a final draft is passed by the Parliament'. Federations differ on government interference In October last year, Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President P.T. Usha had first raised concerns over the Bill citing government infringing on the IOA's independence. She had stated that the National Sports Board – which will have powers to recognise federations, may 'lead to a conflict between the government and international sports governance bodies, particularly the IOC, which has previously suspended many National Olympic committees for excessive governmental interference'. Ms. Usha found herself in a dilemma recently after the IOA's executive committee members had refused to ratify Mr. Raghuram Iyer's appointment as Chief Executive Officer, seeking to bring of motion of no confidence against Ms. Usha. Upon prodding from the Sports Ministry, the members ceded and Mr. Iyer's appointment was ratified. Disagreeing with IOA's stance, Hockey India Secretary-General Bhola Nath Singh, while speaking to The Hindu, says, 'If there were any such provisions which enhance government interference into sports, the international Olympic Committee would not approve this Bill. This legislation follows international norms.' Terming the Bill as helpful for promoting sports, he asserts, 'All federations were consulted thrice while the Bill was being drafted.' He also downplays any concerns over former poll officials conducting sports bodies' elections. 'If my federation is run properly and you seek welfare of your sportspersons, it would not matter if EC is involved in federation's elections,' he opines. 'The bill is anti-sports, anti-India': Rahul Mehra The biggest pushback from the Bill is from sports Activist and senior advocate Rahul Mehra. His public interest litigation filed in 2010 against the IOA for non-compliance to the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 (Sports Code), resulted in the landmark verdict by the Delhi High Court in 2022. The HC had made compliance with the sports code non-negotiable and failure will result in derecognition of the sports body. 'This Bill gives Centre de facto and maybe direct control of all federations and the entire sports domain of India. Apart from the Chairman, members of the National Sports Board are going to be senior bureaucrats, people from the ministry and Sports Authority of India. This is like how the Election Commissioner is appointed by the Prime Minister and his nominee, leaving the Leader of Opposition powerless,' Mr. Mehra tells to The Hindu. The Delhi HC verdict had mandated appointment of 25% sportspersons in such federations, paving way for Dilip Tirkey to become the first international player to head a national body — Hockey India. However, Mr. Bhola Nath Singh's tenure as Vice-President Hockey India was cut down as the court did not allow a former President to have voting rights in the executive committee. 'Earlier, the government used to appoint an MLA or a sportsperson via the 25% quota in these federations to exercise indirect control. This Bill stamps that idea of control, legally,' explains Mr. Mehra. When asked if the Bill infringes on sports autonomy, Mr. Mehra says, 'If a court appoints an administrator when a federation is deep-rooted in corruption, conflicts and nepotism, these federations file affidavits saying they will be suspended and derecognized by the international bodies. We saw the Sports Ministry citing these in cases of Football and Wrestling federations recently. However, this same government has now made infringement a law. He also decries the relaxation of age barrier for members by the Bill. 'As per the Sports Code, age of every elected member in all these bodies across the board, whether be President, Secretary, Treasurer, any elected office bearer, be the executive Committee member cannot exceed 70 years. This Bill imposes this age limit only for the top three — President, Secretary and Treasurer and also relaxes this to 75 years, but in actual it is perpetuity. In one section, it says that if the member happens to be in the office of an international body, he can apply for exemption and that will be granted to him.' He adds, 'The Sports Code mandated members to retire after 12 years of tenure. He cannot transfer to another sports body. But this Bill gives 12 years maximum and then a four-year cooling off then another 12 years and so on. Why do you want the same people to keep, stay put in power? Once these politicians and bureaucrats man these bodies, they want those to be there for perpetuity. Whether BJP is in power or not.' He also points out that while the Sports Code only allowed a government servant to serve one four-year term, this Bill is silent on it. 'So that means the government servant can ask multiple can stand for election multiple times,' he says. A new National Sports Tribunal which will adjudicate disputes between federations and players is also not well-intentioned, says Mr. Mehra. 'Earlier, citizens like me could go to court and challenge the government and the federation. Under new provisions of the Bill, barring anybody other than an aggrieved person cannot challenge its decisions. They have taken away the jurisdiction of the High Court by transfering all pending cases to the Tribunal. With this they have decided to undo these contempts of court and petitions where they have absolutely no answers in the court,' says Mr. Mehra. However, he adds that he is not against the Tribunal as such. 'However, the intention behind bringing the tribunal is not quick, speedy, efficacious remedy to sportspersons and to people involved in sports. Disputes are usually between a sportsperson and a sports adminstrator with deep pockets. It's a mismatched fight. The longer you prolong, the more the fatigue and disenchantment amongst the players and they give up. Now in order to improve the system, you're bringing your tribunal. But you have no time limit to the tribunal deciding a particular time,' he notes. 'Every single step should have a specific time bound period. So a case when it comes should be decided within 30 days. Appeals should be decided within another 30 days. Then if someone wants, they can take it to the Supreme Court. In 60-90 days, your entire litigation is over,' Mr. Mehra says. The only two aspects of the Bill he agrees with is the constitution of a National Sports Election panel and the government taking a final call on participation of sportspersons in international events where matters of national security, public order and safety are involved. He cedes, 'As a purist, I would say sports and politics should never be mixed. But you can't divorce it from the will of the people. However, by putting something like this in writing, you are inviting trouble. Certain things you just leave unsaid.' In contrast, Mr. Singh says, 'For any citizen, the government is responsible for safety. What is wrong if it decides on stopping players from travelling to such [dangerous] locations? We have seen how well security preparations are in Pakistan. India is prepared to welcome all Pakistani players with VISA because government is responsible for their safety.'
The Hindu
13 hours ago
- The Hindu
17 eminent personalities receive Loyola Alumni Award 2025 as part of centenary celebrations
A total of 17 eminent personalities on Sunday received the Loyola Alumni Award - 2025 as part of the Centenary celebrations. Delivering the presidential address, Loyola Alumni Association president G. Viswanathan said, 'If you get a seat in Loyola, it is not an ordinary thing, because this can take you to any heights in life. For example, I came here as a boy from a village in 1957. As I studied in the Tamil medium, it was difficult for me (in Loyola). After four years, when I left Loyola, I was an orator. I was representing Loyola in intercollegiate debates. I follow the same discipline in VIT University that I was taught in Loyola College, and we are very successful. If at all, there is any credit, it should go to Loyola College.' Loyola College Rector Rev. Fr. Antony Robinson presented the awards and pointed to the role played by Loyola College in educating the poor and marginalised students, so that they have a dignified life. The recipients of awards include: Professional Excellence Award - 2025, former High Court Chief Justice R. Sudhakar, Meleveetil Damodaran IAS, P. Wilson MP Rajya Sabha; Service Excellence Award - 2025 - S. Davidson Devasirvatham IPS, J. Premanand IRS; Guiding Light of the Year Award - 2025, Media Development Foundation and Asian College of Journalism Chairman Sashi Kumar and educationist V.M. Muralidharan; Business Leader of the Year Award - 2025 - Sarath Reddy; Research Excellence Award - 2025 Dr. V. Mohan; Global Excellence Award - 2025, M. Raghuraman; Sporting Excellence Award – 2025 -Viswanathan Anand and Sharath Kamal; Creative Excellence Award - 2025 - Gayatri Pushkar, Vijay Antony and Kiruthiga Udhayanidhi; Friends of Loyola Award - G.K. Vasan MP (RS) and Reji Abraham.
