How geography helped shape Jefferson Parish's growth
Moving New Orleans Forward anchor LBJ took a look at how geography shaped the parish's growth.
'Orleans Parish was very big and it encompassed the City of New Orleans and then all of these outlying areas. Those outlying areas that would soon become Jefferson Parish, were of two geographies. There was the higher natural levees and the ridges, which were fully developed as agricultural and enslaved plantations. And then there were the back swamps that were empty,' said Geography Professor at Tulane's School of Architecture and Built Environment, Richard Campenella.
As what normally happens is landowners and residents wanted more political control of their destiny.
'They didn't want all of the power to be the state legislature and so forth to be coming out of urban New Orleans. So, as part of that process to give themselves more representation, they got the state legislature in 1825 to carve out of Orleans Parish a separate parish. Now, they had their own police, jury, now they had their own representation,' said Campenella.
While Jefferson's size today might suggest a population swell from the 1800s, that is not what happened.
'If you look at the populations of Jefferson Parish in the early years starting with the 1830s census, they do some strange things between 1830 up to 1880. The area is growing but what is happening is that Orleans, that is the City of New Orleans, is the big boy on the block and it is annexing in the most populous cities within Jefferson Parish,' said Campenella,
Those areas would have included many parts of uptown New Orleans. Fast forward 100 years between 1930 and 1980, favorable conditions equal the growth of the parish we had known now.
'There's a 50-year time where I think the parish population increases 11-fold. It's the age of automobiles, it's the age of reclamation and drainage, there's the oil boom and most importantly there's access. There's ingress and egress. There's the Pontchartrain Expressway, there's I-10, there's Airline Hwy, there's the Causeway. You could get there through there,' said Campenella.U.S. Attorney's Office indicts New Orleans man accused of enticing teen
LSU fans favored to win College World Series Jello Shot Challenge
New Balance shoes and gear are up to 40% off on Amazon right now
Slidell man pleads guilty in child sexual abuse material possession case
Beach Boys' Brian Wilson dies, family 'at a loss for words'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
23-07-2025
- The Hill
We need major changes to Social Security and Medicare before it's too late
I was recently on a flight from Philadelphia to Hilton Head. Behind me was a couple in their 60s, and I couldn't help but overhear their conversation with their seatmate. They were saying how much they loved retirement. They were talking about how the pension and healthcare benefits they were receiving from their former corporate jobs were allowing them to travel and see their grandkids whenever they wanted. And they were both excited to get to their vacation home — their third home! — which they boasted was being paid for entirely by their monthly Social Security checks. Good for them. They earned it, right? But come on — is this what Social Security is for? Is this what FDR intended when he established this program back in 1935? To fund a life of leisure and a vacation home for two upper-middle-class retirees? I am 60 years old and a small-business owner. According to the rules, I will soon be allowed to start collecting Social Security and receiving Medicare benefits. If I were to begin collecting Social Security at the age of 62, my monthly payment would be about $2,500. If I wait until the age of 70, my monthly payment will be $5,000. This doesn't include the payments my wife will receive. When we turn 65, both my wife and I will also be eligible for Medicare. That means that our hospital insurance will be free. And although we will pay a separate premium for doctor visits and prescription drugs, the premium will be significantly less — thousands less per year — than we are paying right now. That's lots of extra cash coming in just a few years. Should we buy a vacation home in Hilton Head too? That's one way to look at it. But there's also another way: It's people like us that are causing these entitlement programs to go broke. The 2024 Social Security Trustees Report projects the combined Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance trust funds 'will be depleted in 2035.' The 2024 Medicare Trustees Report projects its trust fund will run out in 2036. My wife and I are not the intended recipients of these funds. When Social Security was first established 90 years ago, FDR said its purpose was to provide economic security and protection for vulnerable Americans during times of hardship. 'We can never insure one hundred percent of the population against one hundred percent of the hazards and vicissitudes of life, but we have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age,' he said. When Medicare started as part of LBJ's 'Great Society,' its goal was different. It was not intended as charity. It was considered to be an entitlement. 'Nearly every older American will receive hospital care — not as an act of charity, but as the insured right of a senior citizen,' Lyndon Johnson said at the bill's signing. But does every senior citizen need this kind of entitlement? The answer is no. We don't — at least not this year. About 3.2 percent of current retirees — Americans aged 65 and older — have total retirement account assets exceeding $1 million, based on the 2022 Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances. I suspect that number has risen over the last few years. I don't think these people need the help either. Maybe some of us will in the future, and if that's the case then fine — we'll apply and get it. And this is how we fix this funding problem. People who don't need help from the government shouldn't be automatically getting it. Means testing should be required to qualify for Social Security and Medicare. Rather than just receiving checks once a certain age is reached, recipients should have to prove that they are in need of these funds. Like any other government aid program, we should be made to apply for the help and submit documentation — bank statements, tax returns, asset disclosures — that demonstrate our need. Otherwise we shouldn't get it. But wait — aren't we owed this money? Didn't I spend a lifetime paying into Social Security and Medicare through payroll taxes? Isn't it unfair that many others in my same financial position received this government aid, even though they didn't need it? Yeah, it's unfair. Life is unfair. Sometimes things turn out. Sometimes they don't. But the reality is that this system of entitlements can't be sustained much longer. In the most recent fiscal year, spending on Social Security and Medicare combined amounted to about 36 percent of all federal spending, or almost $2.5 trillion. There are so many others who need government aid that aren't getting it because programs are being shut down or cut in order to fund these entitlements. We have national defense issues. National debt issues. And meanwhile, these two retirees are using their government checks for a vacation home in Hilton Head. Can we refuse the money? Give it back? Good luck trying. Maybe I should take that money (and pay the taxes on it) and give it away to a charity. But how many people are going to do that? How many people are instead — like my fellow passengers on that flight — going to spend it on themselves? Too many. According to a recent study from Georgetown University, as many as one-third of all people (employees and their families) associated with small businesses rely on Medicare, which is funding that small-business owners don't have to provide. Our older employees who choose to retire do so with the expectation that Social Security will help them pay their bills, otherwise who else will they turn to? Will the necessary funding of these programs result in higher taxes? Cutbacks in other programs that benefit our businesses? Or will the government merely print more money to meet these obligations and thereby put further inflationary pressure and higher borrowing rates on us? That seems most likely. And yet any business owner who knows their numbers will agree that fixing the underfunding of Social Security and Medicare is possible. Just go back to the original aims of these programs. Take the benefits away from people who don't need them and give them to the people who do. Unpopular? Perhaps. Common sense? Most definitely.
Yahoo
10-07-2025
- Yahoo
Health care town hall slated for Thursday in New Orleans
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — The Congressional House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee will host an informational town hall regarding its concerns about the president's budget and health care. Congressman Troy Carter stopped by the WGNO studio to speak with Moving New Orleans Forward anchor LBJ about the event. New Orleans City Council considers changes for future carnival seasons 'We're fortunate to have a Democratic leader, Hakeem Jeffries, Congresswoman Robin Kelly, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Congresswoman Annette Barragan. These are all members of the Steering and Policy Committee, who will be coming to New Orleans to be a part of this discussion,' said Carter. Regarding the effects of the recently signed 'Big, Beautiful Bill' signed into law by President Donald Trump, Carter offered: 'Some 17 million people will be cut off the rolls. We know that a third of the people of Louisiana, roughly 30% of people Louisiana are dependent on one way, some shape, form of fashion of, Medicaid. We have senior citizens living in assisted living facilities. We have Snap benefits for our young people, to make sure that meals we have veterans, we have individuals that are living with disabilities. We have the working poor people who work every day but still don't make enough money to maintain health care. But now we have to educate people on what you have to do to maintain your positioning as those who we will fight to stay on the rolls, because there's a mechanism that says every six months you have to renew. Well, have you had to renew your driver's license every six months, most people wouldn't have one.' The town hall will happen at 6 p.m. Thursday, July 10, and you must register. Once registered, you will be given the location of the event. To register visit Troy Carter's by day with Super BUCK Moon by night for Thursday Judge Seeber bridge to fully close for repairs: DOTD Walmart recalls about 850,000 water bottles after 2 people blinded Three fall into water at Glacier National Park while taking photo: rangers Iconic cereal maker WK Kellogg selling to Ferrero for $3B Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10-07-2025
- Yahoo
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry shares thoughts following FEMA Review Council meeting
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — The Federal Emergency Management Agency has played a role in Louisiana Storm Relief for decades, providing the state with about $47 billion since 2003, according to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The FEMA review council along with Gov. Jeff Landry, who is not a member of the council, says the program has not served its purpose properly in recent decades. 'Here we are, some 20 years later, and yet we're still talking about the flawed system of bureaucracy that FEMA is still enveloped in,' Landry said. River parish residents sue Formosa Plastics over burial site for their descendants During the meeting, Chair of the FEMA Review Council Secretary Kristi Noem echoed President Donald Trump's wishes to eliminate the program. Landry believes that as of now, the program will stay intact following the council's recommendations. 'You know, I've always been let's fix what's broken,' Landry said. However, he says, if FEMA were to be eliminated, Trump would replace it with a more streamlined program with no federal money lost. 'He recognized that there needs to be efficiencies in a program because every dollar that is either fraudfully taken or ill spent means someone else doesn't get the money that they need. We don't want the greedy taking from the needy,' Landry said. Landry says he plans to spend more time focused on the National Flood Insurance Program, something that has greatly contributed to the homeowner's insurance crisis in Louisiana and surrounding coastal states. 'We have a coalition that's been built of states that has been trying to get to congress to say listen we need to fix the system,' Landry by day with Super BUCK Moon by night for Thursday Judge Seeber bridge to fully close for repairs: DOTD Walmart recalls about 850,000 water bottles after 2 people blinded Three fall into water at Glacier National Park while taking photo: rangers Iconic cereal maker WK Kellogg selling to Ferrero for $3B Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
