Tom Horne's attack on DEI is a stunt, just like the Luigi Mangione musical
Its language provides no specifics on what constitutes the dreaded DEI, yet Horne demands public schools sign to confirm they have nothing approaching it.
Of course, Horne should have plenty of examples, given that one of his first acts was to initiate a 'Empower Hotline,' to allow parents to report objectionable material taught to their kids.
And, of course, this turned out to be at best a nothing burger and at worst a fiasco.
If Horne had examples, you would think he would trot them out. But he doesn't, which suggests that Horne's 'No DEI Here' is just another performative stunt, trying to ingratiate himself with the Trumper crowd.
Mike McClellan, Gilbert
I believe I speak for hundreds of thousands of Arizona voters when I say I am absolutely sick of politics and empty-suit double-talking politicians.
Why on earth would you start up with political ads a full 18 months before the election? I could not hit the mute button fast enough when I started seeing yours.
You may have very well just caused me, out of pure frustration, to vote for someone else.
Antonio Morales Jr., Glendale
When libraries put parental controls on books, students will find a way to access the books they want to read through friends, bookstores and Kindle.
Wouldn't the parents rather know what their kids are reading?
Then perhaps they could open a dialogue about 'sensitive' subjects.
Bekke Hess, Bullhead City
Letter: Arizona public schools need more DEI, not less of it
I'm amazed that the homeschooling community is complaining about caps to their spending.
I am sure public-school students would love to bake with high-end equipment, design clothing with the best fabrics and buy the best tools.
Do you even realize that Arizona is spending nearly a billion dollars yearly on empowerment scholarship accounts? The budget isn't going to be able to sustain that without raising taxes.
Public school districts are struggling to provide competitive salaries for teachers, resources to maintain buildings and programs that don't charge students. They, too, would love a piece of the education dollars' pie.
Wake up state leaders and Arizonans, we are bankrupting the public education system.
Alexis Reed, Anthem
Letters: Arizona should ban hunting dogs - and politics in the entertainment section
Art imitates art?
Several years ago, Mel Brooks created a play called 'The Producers' about a Broadway impresario and his accountant who scheme to get rich by fraudulently overselling investment interests in a Broadway musical they know will flop. Their scheme depends on the play going belly up on opening night so they can walk away with all the invested dollars.
To ensure its failure, they set about writing and casting the worst, most tasteless production they can imagine — 'Springtime for Hitler.'
The play, however, turns out to be a comedy hit. Audiences love it. It goes on extended run and they lose their shirts and go to prison.
Today, producers in San Francisco are staging a musical called 'Luigi' about Luigi Mangione, the man accused of murdering a health-care CEO in New York City.
Apparently, these real-life producers are serious.
Charles Lopresto, Phoenix
Thank you so much for featuring the Phoenix demonstration for May Day on the front page. Of course, there were other demonstrations in Arizona, including in Gilbert, Tucson, Tempe and Sedona.
It is important that mainstream media recognize the popular resistance to the current administration and its policies.
The 47th president and his followers are gleefully destroying the government, including essential programs for families, veterans, seniors and health care.
The separation of powers is dying. The administration's lack of empathy and authoritarian impulses should be alarming to all citizens.
My father fought in World War II to defeat fascism. We may be called upon to do the same.
Gerri Chizeck, Chandler
I can't believe I'm writing this, but Phil Boas wrote a brilliant column. His analysis of the tragic death of an elderly woman whose power was shut off by APS was thoughtful and inquisitive.
While he acknowledged that her death shouldn't have happened, he also suggested that APS is not a social service agency and shouldn't bear sole responsibility for what happened. He closed with an important question: 'So, what's our next step?'
I remember first hearing about the woman's death and blaming APS. It was a sudden and visceral reaction. But Phil's piece made me sit back and think it through. By the time I got to his final question, I had come to a possible answer.
Before someone's power is disconnected for nonpayment, APS or SRP must notify the city of residence. They must have a plan to conduct a wellness (physical and/or financial) check.
It could be through the police or other agency. The city would already know if the person is paying his or her utility bills. The process then needs to include a plan on how to help the person involved.
And the power companies can only stop service when authorized by the city. It would involve coordination, but it's worth it.
Thanks, Phil.
Dan Peel, Scottsdale
What's on your mind? Send us a letter to the editor online or via email at opinions@arizonarepublic.com.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: AZ schools chief cozies up to Trump crowd with DEI stunt | Letters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
I'm a Black pastor alarmed by a new identity game some on the right are playing
The right's growing chorus of frustration with "Black people" is impossible to ignore. They call it "Black fatigue." They point to the race wars of the 2010s and the DEI takeover of America's institutions as their breaking point. But after Donald Trump's return to the White House, something shifted. Instead of doubling down on the American creed of individualism, this faction swung hard into collectivism, painting Blacks as a singular problem with the same tired tribal brush they once scorned. Now, some on the right are leaning into posts like this one from Evan Kilgore on X, who wrote: "Why are black people so disproportionately violent? Why do they threaten or act with violence the second they are offended or inconvenienced? Seriously…why are so many black people like this?" It's a refrain echoed across countless tweets, each one a lazy slide into tribal identity politics that erases the individual and damns an entire race for the sins of a few. If you think a handful of ugly videos defines every Black person because of shared skin, you're not seeing straight—you're neck-deep in the tribal swamp you claim to hate. My work is with kids—each one is a distinct soul, not a racial statistic. No two Blacks, no two anyone, are alike. Lifting them up means igniting their personal fire, not boxing them into a racial narrative. I know the violence in my community. You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone on the South Side of Chicago that isn't aware. It's raw, it's real, and I could sling blame at racism, "the White man," or liberal policies. I could just say, "That's just Black people." But that's weakness. Tribalism is a crutch, a cheap shot that fuels keyboard wars on X but fixes nothing. The irony burns: a sizable faction on the right, after years of slamming tribalism, now guzzles its easy power. They've swapped principle for the rush of collective rage. Where will this lead them? What is their actual end goal? I chose the tougher road. My work is with kids—each one is a distinct soul, not a racial statistic. No two Blacks, no two anyone, are alike. Lifting them up means igniting their personal fire, not boxing them into a racial narrative. (Isn't that how we got into this mess in the first place?) It's hard, it's messy, and not everyone makes it. But it's the only path that matters. And works. I pour American culture into my youth—its demand for individual grit, not "Black" politics or "Black" solutions. They're humans first, not pawns in a racial game. The way forward isn't through tribal traps, Right or Left, but through the discipline of forging their own futures.
4 hours ago
'I operate as my own independent agency': How Laura Loomer's pressure campaigns are reshaping the Trump administration
In mid-July, far-right activist Laura Loomer fired off a lengthy post on X targeting a senior Customs and Border Protection official, accusing him of having "Anti-Trump, pro-Open Borders, and Pro-DEI Bias," and demanding his removal from the federal government. "Why is this guy a Senior national security advisor at CBP, and why is he the Director of the National Vetting Center at @CBP?" Loomer wrote of the official, Monte Hawkins, who served under four presidents, both Democrat and Republican, and was previously appointed by the Trump administration in 2018. Less than 48 hours later, after also sending an appeal directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Loomer says an official personally contacted her, thanked her for amplifying the information, and later informed her that Hawkins had been removed. "I posted my report 2 days ago. Now he's FIRED," Loomer wrote on X. When asked about Hawkins' status, a DHS official told ABC News that Hawkins was placed on administrative leave. The episode is a clear example not only of how Loomer's pressure campaigns operate, but how she has increasingly carved out an unofficial but influential role as a political enforcer targeting administration officials she sees as disloyal to President Donald Trump. 'I don't keep count anymore' In Trump's second term, Loomer's efforts to single out officials for removal are being treated with growing urgency by the federal agencies she targets -- handing an outside ally of Trump a significant level of power. Loomer, who got her start as an undercover operative for the right-wing sting group Project Veritas, has been on a self-proclaimed mission to rid the administration of officials she says are disloyal to the president -- particularly those who served under the Biden administration or have previously disparaged Trump -- including some who served in Trump's first term. By ABC News' count, Loomer's pressure campaigns have so far contributed to the ouster of at least 15 individuals from Trump's second administration, through either direct firings or the withdrawal of senior political nominations, across six different federal agencies. "I don't keep count anymore," Loomer told ABC News when asked how many officials she had helped force out. "There's too many to keep track of." Just last week, the Trump administration pushed out FDA vaccine chief Dr. Vinay Prasad, removed NSA General Counsel April Falcon Doss, and rescinded Jen Easterly's appointment as chair of West Point's social sciences department -- each move coming shortly after public attacks and pressure from Loomer. "So many scalps this week! Stacking them up!" Loomer wrote on X this week following a string of ousters thanks at least in part to her efforts. Easterly, who previously worked for President George Bush's national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and led the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency under President Biden, posed Thursday on LinkedIn, "As a lifelong independent, I've served our nation in peacetime and combat under Republican and Democratic administrations" and that "Unfortunately, the opportunity to serve again at my alma mater was rescinded -- a casualty of casually manufactured outrage that drowned out the quiet labor of truth and the steady pulse of integrity." Loomer's campaigns have helped lead to the departures of officials from agencies including the National Security Agency, the National Security Council, the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Department of Defense. Most of the officials had held or were nominated for senior roles in the administration, including NSA Director Gen. Timothy Haugh, federal prosecutor Maurene Comey, and Trump's original pick for surgeon general, Dr. Janette Nesheiwat. Loomer told ABC News she finds her targets through a mix of research and tips she receives from her tip line or from followers on social media. Some tips even come from other Trump administration officials, she said. "I do a lot of the research myself ... I get tips every day," she said. Once she identifies a new target, Loomer says she often privately flags her findings to the relevant cabinet official or agency, urging them to take action. But if she feels her research is being ignored, Loomer says she will take the fight public and use her large social media following to ramp up the pressure for the administration to take action. "Sometimes I go private, and then sometimes I post," Loomer said. "But if too much time passes between the time that I go private and the time that action is taken, I have to go public." "People think they can just sit on their laurels and wait and twiddle their thumbs, and that's not how it works," she said. A major part of Loomer's leverage seems to show itself when she goes public with her attacks. Loomer's posts targeting officials often go viral on X and throughout MAGA circles, quickly grabbing millions of impressions and tens of thousands of likes and reposts, putting more pressure on the administration to act. 'I have communication with the president' But that wasn't always the case. For years, Loomer was banned from posting on Twitter for violating hate-speech policies with anti-Muslim posts targeting Rep. Ilhan Omar. She was reinstated when tech billionaire and Trump supporter Elon Musk purchased Twitter and renamed it X -- but even then, Loomer complained to Musk that her account was being throttled and shadowbanned, two ways in which the platform is said to limit access to content. Those claims stopped at the end of January, and Loomer's X account impressions surged -- as did her efforts to target administration officials. Through her work, Loomer says she's in direct contact with senior officials across the federal government and the White House -- as well as Trump himself. "I have communication with the president. I'm a big supporter, and I'll remain a supporter," Loomer said. When asked how many cabinet officials she's in touch with regularly, Loomer said, "I mean, I know a lot of people." "I've been in this line of work for a very long time," she said, describing her outreach as requesting comment as part of her journalism. But unlike most journalists, Loomer is usually calling for those officials to be fired, and often celebrates the results. In some federal agencies, her social posts have helped fuel anxiety, with some staffers sharing them in internal group chats whenever a new official is targeted, sources told ABC News. Amid the barrage of attacks, few of those targeted by Loomer have publicly responded to her claims. One person close to someone Loomer targeted told ABC News that many of her targets are afraid to speak out due to fear of retaliation and the potential impact on their future career prospects. "For a number of folks if you don't have the platform she does you're bringing a butter knife to a real knife fight," the person said. Asked about Loomer's influence, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement to ABC News, "It is not only appropriate, but critical for the Administration to continue to recruit the most qualified and experienced staffers who are totally aligned with President Trump's agenda to Make America Great Again." "The results that this Administration has already delivered for the American people -- from peace deals to trade deals -- prove that President Trump has assembled the best and brightest talent to put Americans and America First," Desai said. Trump, asked over the weekend about Loomer's influence, said that while she is known as being "radical right," he views her as a "patriot." "I think she's a patriot, and she gets excited because of the fact that she's a patriot," Trump told reporters. "And she doesn't like things going on that she thinks are bad for the country. I like her." In March, Loomer launched her own consulting firm, Loomered Strategies, where she says she advises clients on opposition research and vetting. She told The New York Times that she has five clients and that overall her activities earn a gross income of about $300,000. As Loomer's profile has risen, some critics online have accused her of being paid to target specific officials and appointees, which Loomer has pushed back on. "Wow you're telling me I could have been paid $100,000 for simply pointing out the obvious that a Trump hater who loves the radical left shouldn't be in the Trump admin?" Loomer wrote last week on X, responding to a critic accusing her of being paid to target Prasad. 'My own independent agency' With her growing list of "scalps," many in the MAGA base have called for Loomer to be given an official role inside the Trump administration, and have questioned why that hasn't happened yet. It's something she claims the president has offered her multiple times, but has been blocked each time. The relationship between Loomer and White House staff is viewed by some as an ongoing balancing act, as senior officials work to utilize her impact and influence -- and close relationship with the president -- while still trying to keep her at a distance, sources familiar with the matter told ABC News. Some inside the administration have used Loomer's work as a tool to target other officials they are seeking to have removed, sources said. "I had four jobs given to me in this Trump administration that basically have been taken away from me because some of President Trump's staff suffer from the incurable disease of professional jealousy," Loomer said. If she continues to be denied a formal position, Loomer told ABC News that she plans to keep operating as her "own independent agency." "If I'm going to be denied access by jealous staffers, and I'm also going to be denied access to the press room as a credentialed member of the press, even though I'm more deserving than most of the people who have access, then I have to operate as my own independent agency," she said. "So it's basically like my own agency that operates outside of the confines of the White House and the federal government," Loomer said. Loomer says she doesn't know which staffers around Trump are stopping her from joining the administration in an official capacity, but she does not blame the president. "I have no idea" who those staffers are, she said. "That's a question for the media to go find out. I just think it's really bizarre that I could be hired four times and [get blocked]. I don't hold it against President Trump for the way that some of his staff behaves towards me. But it is an elephant in the room." When asked, the White House did not answer questions about whether Loomer had been offered positions in the administration that were later denied, or why. Loomer's efforts to remove officials haven't all been successful, with a few officials having survived her attacks. One in particular has remained in place despite months of criticism dating back almost to the start of Trump's second term: Attorney General Pam Bondi, who Loomer has targeted for her handling of the Epstein files and other issues. "I mean, I'm not a fan. I'm not a fan, but everybody knows that," Loomer said when asked whether her view of Bondi had changed. Asked if she still believed Bondi would be fired, as she's called for since February, Loomer replied, "Probably not."
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
With Black Unemployment Hitting A 5-Year High, Have Race And DEI Become Scarlet Letters?
There's a statistic buried in the July jobs report that deserves far more attention than it's getting: Black unemployment has climbed to 7.2%, its highest level in nearly five years. That figure should ring alarm bells, but it's been met with silence in mainstream media, primarily getting headline coverage across Black media. After a surge in black hiring after the racial reckoning of 2020, it seems America has entered a new, more subtle era—one where race feels like a liability in the labor market, as equity goals and DEI are quietly being walked back. In July, 73,000 nonfarm payroll jobs were added in the US, well below expectations. Beyond that, May and June's job gains were adjusted in downward revisions, slashing a combined 258,000 jobs that had been previously added. The sectors that traditionally employ Black workers in large numbers—retail, transportation, and manufacturing— have barely moved upward. And one area that has long stood as a pathway of opportunity for Black professionals, particularly Black women—the federal government—accounted for 12,000 jobs cut in a single month. Overall, more than 84,000 federal positions have been cut since January. Black women, in particular, are being pushed to the margins. With nearly 300,000 having left the labor force in the past 90 days, even though they earn more college degrees than any other race-gender group in the United States. While the headlines read —modest job growth, low national unemployment— for Black America, the story is playing out differently. What gives? The Changing Narrative on Race and DEI In 2020, corporations, governments, and institutions made seemingly endless public commitments to racial equity. That was the year DEI roles were flourishing. For a moment, there was momentum. Fast forward to today, and we're seeing a stark reversal. Since the inauguration, DEI departments have been, and are continuing to be dismantled as names and titles are being changed. At the same time corporate pledges are being quietly sunset. The result is this: Black professionals are now being disproportionately impacted by layoffs. And Since 2023, U.S. employers have eliminated more than 2,600 jobs with words including "diversity" or "DEI" in the titles or descriptions. Which raises a chilling question: Have race and DEI become scarlet letters in today's America? In 1850, Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel The Scarlet Letter described the plight of a woman, Hester Prynne, who was forced to wear a scarlet letter on her dress as a sign of shame. The letter 'A', for adultery, could be seen by all that came around her, and was something she couldn't hide. The letter was a mark of shame - and limited both her life and her opportunities. Is this becoming a parallel for race and DEI today? The silence around this month's report seems to suggest so. With no urgent calls from policymakers and nary a think pieces from economists, we're watching a slow fade of resources and professional support. From budgets, to company websites to corporate sponsorships - less Black faces are showing up in places they dominated not long ago. Like Hester, who was able to turn the tides on the scarlet letter in the end, we must take this moment as an opportunity to do they same by taking take three deliberate actions Every day, people make decisions with their feet, their voices, and their wallets. These times are laying the foundation for consequences that could be generational. Just one change in behavior could help support someone responsible for keeping their households together and serving as a pillar in civic life. The scarlet letter should never be about race to begin with. But if perception is reality, then it's up to us to erase it.
