Donald Trump visit to Scotland expected to be met with wave of protest
The US president is expected to arrive in Scotland on Friday for a five-day private visit to his luxury golf resorts at Turnberry in Ayrshire and Menie in Aberdeenshire.
While it is not a formal trip, Keir Starmer will hold talks in Scotland with Trump on Monday. No press conference is scheduled, but the media are expected to attend the start of the discussions – opening the possibility for another freewheeling question and answer session by the president.
There is no expectation the protests will bring disorder or disruption, the assistant chief constable Emma Bond, Police Scotland's gold command for the operation, insisted at a pre-visit briefing on Tuesday.
But the Scottish Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, said the scale of the policing operation would stretch resources and could double the time taken for a police officer to attend an incident elsewhere.
The Stop Trump Coalition is organising events in Aberdeen in the city centre and outside the US consulate in Edinburgh on Saturday at midday – similar gatherings during Trump's visit to Scotland in 2018 attracted thousands of protesters.
Along with the two main city gatherings, protests are expected around Turnberry and Menie, where Trump is expected to open a new 18-hole golf course named in honour of his mother, Mary Anne MacLeod Trump, who was born on the Isle of Lewis.
Starmer is likely to travel to Scotland on Monday morning or late on Sunday, after attending the women's Euro final in Switzerland, in which England are playing, although if the White House dinner on Sunday night goes ahead, he might have to change his plans.
Downing Street has given little information about the trip and Starmer's role in it, saying that normal protocols do not apply because it is officially a private visit.
The White House has already said that a pool of 12 US journalists will be present at the talks with Starmer, and the expectation is that the UK media will aim to be represented as well.
While most initial greetings between world leaders are brief and uneventful, Trump has a habit of answering a number of questions shouted out to him, often creating news.
Before the last time Trump and Starmer met, at the G7 summit in Alberta, the US president answered questions on subjects including the possibility of tariffs on UK steel, Ukraine, and his stated affection for the prime minister.
Connor Dylan, the organiser of the anti-Trump protests in Aberdeen and Edinburgh, said: 'The vast majority of people in Scotland were already opposed to everything Trump stood for when he first visited as president. As we've learned more and more about him and the way he governs, that attitude has only hardened.
'His politics – and those of the people around him – have only become more extreme since then, with once fringe ideas like mass deportations now part of mainstream American politics and being effectively exported to the UK and other European countries by far-right allies.'
A fellow organiser, Alena Ivanova, said she had heard from people across the country who planned to protest: 'There's a widespread anger and determination to come out from people across Scotland and calling on our elected leaders not to give Trump the acknowledgement and welcome he wants.'
While Police Scotland has pledged a 'positive and engaged approach' to lawful protests, Ch Supt Rob Hay, president of the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents said the visit would require a 'significant operation across the country over many days' which would 'undoubtedly stretch all our resources from local policing divisions to specialist and support functions such as contact, command and control'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
White House uses Jet2 meme to promote ICE deportations
The White House has posted a controversial tweet on X using a viral British airline advert meme to seemingly mock migrants being deported. The tweet featured handcuffed undocumented individuals being escorted onto an ICE-contracted flight, captioned with a sarcastic reference to a " Jet2 holiday to deportation." The post sparked widespread outrage among social media users, who condemned it as "disgusting" and "mind blowing." Singer Jess Glynne, whose song is part of the meme, expressed her disgust, stating her music promotes "love, unity, and spreading positivity," not "division or hate." The incident aligns with President Donald Trump 's recent signing of a law allocating significant funds for border enforcement and his pledge to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
India-US trade talks go off rails on row over farm markets
NEW DELHI, July 30 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States would impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting August 1, citing New Delhi's high tariffs and strict non-monetary trade barriers. Following are the key issues that appear to have derailed the trade talks between the U.S., the world's largest economy, and India, its fifth largest: India has resisted U.S. demands to open its agricultural and dairy markets, saying such moves would hurt millions of poor farmers. New Delhi has historically excluded agriculture from free trade pacts to protect domestic livelihoods. Tariff cuts on corn, soybean, wheat and ethanol remain off the table, with Indian officials citing risks from subsidised U.S. farm products. Domestic automakers, pharma firms and small industries have also lobbied for only a gradual opening, fearing disruption from U.S. imports. According to a White House fact sheet, India imposes an average MFN (Most Favoured Nation) tariff of 39% on imported farm goods, compared to 5% in the U.S., with some duties as high as 50%. Trump's administration has repeatedly flagged these tariffs as a key obstacle to deeper trade ties with India. Washington is pushing for better access to India's markets for agriculture, ethanol, dairy, alcoholic beverages, autos, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices. It also wants India to reduce non-tariff barriers, and reform rules on patents, digital trade, and data flows. Despite offering limited tariff cuts and boosting imports of U.S. energy and defence goods, India says it is still awaiting clear proposals from Washington. Officials cite Trump's unpredictable trade moves as a concern. Indian exporters remain uneasy over rising U.S. levies on imports: a 10% base tariff, up to 50% on steel and aluminium, 25% on autos, and now 25% across a broader range of goods. Trump's repeated assertions that he helped broker a ceasefire between India and Pakistan earlier this year have raised concerns in New Delhi. Indian officials view the remarks as a strategic tilt toward Pakistan, complicating broader bilateral relations. Indian officials were initially confident of a deal, expecting the U.S. to favour deeper trade with one of its biggest commercial partners. Modi and Trump had aimed to sign a first-phase pact by autumn 2025, targeting bilateral trade of $500 billion by 2030, up from $191 billion in 2024. Despite the tariff setback, India hopes its exports – including pharmaceuticals, electronics, engineering goods and garments – could remain competitive, especially with tariff advantages over China. Indian goods exports to the U.S. rose to $87 billion in 2024, with gems and jewellery ($8.5 billion), pharma ($8 billion) and petrochemicals ($4 billion) leading the list. Services exports, mainly IT and professional services, were worth $33 billion. The United States is India's third-largest investor, with $68 billion in cumulative FDI since 2002. U.S. manufacturing exports to India, valued at nearly $42 billion in 2024, face high tariffs, ranging from 7% on wood products and machinery to as much as 15% to 20% on footwear and transport equipment, and nearly 68% on food.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Palestine Action can challenge terror ban, judge rules
A co-founder of Palestine Action (PA) has won the right to a High Court challenge over the group's ban as a terror organisation. Huda Ammori was granted permission on grounds that the proscription of PA was a 'disproportionate interference with freedom of expression and freedom of protest'. The challenge was also permitted on the basis that the Home Secretary should have consulted the group before announcing the ban. The Government's move to proscribe the organisation came after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Announcing the intention to ban the group on June 23, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. The ban means membership of, or support for, the direct action group is a criminal offence that is punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring the High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, previously told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.' The vandalism of the two planes caused an estimated £7m of damage.
