Trump credits his involvement for Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire, says "proud to be President of PEACE"
Trump said that he spoke to Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Acting PM Phumtham Wechayachai, warning them that no trade deals would be made while the conflict persisted.
"Just spoke to the Acting Prime Minister of Thailand and the Prime Minister of Cambodia. I am pleased to announce that, after the involvement of President Donald J. Trump, both Countries have reached a CEASEFIRE and PEACE. Congratulations to all! By ending this War, we have saved thousands of lives, Trump wrote on Truth Social from Scotland.
"I have instructed my Trade Team to restart negotiations on Trade. I have now ended many Wars in just six months -- I am proud to be the President of PEACE!," he added.
"I have instructed my Trade Team to restart negotiations on Trade," he added. Over the weekend, Trump said he told the leaders he wouldn't make a trade deal with the countries "unless you settle the war."
Speaking during a bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer earlier Monday, Trump took credit for the diplomatic breakthrough.
"We solved that war, you probably saw it just, came out over the wire, so we solved it through trade. I said, 'I don't want to trade with anybody that's killing each other,' so we just got that one solved," he said.
The ceasefire declaration between Cambodia and Thailand was announced by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, the current chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), who mediated talks between Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai at his official residence near the capital, Kuala Lumpur, CNN reported.
Both sides have accused the other of starting the latest border flare-up and traded blame for the ongoing fighting, which has killed at least 35 people and injured more than 200, according to figures from Thai and Cambodian officials, as per CNN.
The dispute over their border goes back decades.
Reports of fighting dragged on even after the ceasefire was announced.
The head of an evacuation shelter on the Cambodian side, Moun Nara, said that hours after the announcement, "I still hear the sound of the shooting... It's not yet ended yet. Let's wait and see until midnight."
US President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that the Southeast Asian nations had agreed to ceasefire talks, but localised fighting continued throughout the weekend. Trump said he warned the Thai and Cambodian leaders that he would not make trade deals with either country if the deadly border conflict continued.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
With new 40% Tariff, Trump tries to box in China
Ever since President Donald Trump began raising tariffs on goods from China during his first term, Chinese companies have raced to set up warehouses and factories in Southeast Asia, Mexico and elsewhere to bypass US tariffs with indirect shipments to the US market via other countries. But on Thursday, Trump took aim at all indirect American imports, which he blames for part of the $1.2 trillion US trade deficit. The president imposed 40 per cent tariffs on so-called transshipments, which will take effect in a week. And a senior administration official who briefed reporters said work was underway that could broaden considerably the definition of indirect shipments. The new rules cover indirect shipments from anywhere, not just China. But China, with its massive factory infrastructure and expansive manufacturing ambition, has been the main country to develop a global network for such shipments. Trade experts were quick to predict that China would be the most affected — and the most annoyed. 'The trade provisions are a thinly veiled attempt to box in China — China will view them as such, and this will inevitably spill over into trade discussions with the United States,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator who is now a senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, a research group in Singapore. Trump's executive order Thursday created a new category of imports: goods that are transshipped through other countries instead of coming straight from the country of origin. The 40 per cent tariffs on these goods will be on top of whatever tariffs would have applied if the goods had come directly from the country where they were originally made. The legal definition of transshipment is quite narrow: a good that did not undergo a 'substantial transformation' in the country through which it was indirectly shipped. Countries in Southeast Asia like Vietnam have long denied that they allow a lot of transshipment, and they have been tightening inspections to prevent it. They contend that their soaring imports of Chinese components are being assembled into new and different products that can appropriately be labeled as made in their countries, and not labeled 'made in China.' In addition to the new 40 per cent tariffs on transshipment, the Trump administration plans to put in place so-called rules of origin for indirect shipments in 'a few weeks,' the senior administration official said. Rules of origin are meant to assure importers that goods really were manufactured where their sellers say they were. To be effective, rules of origin must be written strictly, as they are for goods to qualify for free trade agreements with the United States. For example, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement, require that as much as 75 per cent of cars be manufactured in North America to qualify for duty-free treatment in crossing borders. Brad Setser, an official under the Obama and Biden administrations who is now a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said that setting rules of origin could make a big difference. 'The most significant long-term change from the Trump tariff barrage may be creating rules of origin that define the Chinese content,' he said. But other experts were less convinced that the Trump administration would set stringent rules, particularly when discussions have been underway for a possible summit this autumn between Trump and Xi Jinping, China's top leader. The Chinese government has called for the removal of tariffs on its exports and further tightened its considerable restrictions on the purchase of American goods. Workers at a clothing factory in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, where 60 percent of fabrics for manufacturing come from China. — NYT 'There is nothing in there about content from certain countries, and that is helpful because it means that they aren't risking the wrath of China at this point in time,' said Deborah Elms, the head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore. The first country-specific trade deal reached by Trump to tackle transshipment head on was one on July 2 with Vietnam. It included a 40 per cent provision on goods indirectly shipped from China. The provision has turned out to be a blueprint for a sweeping new strategy to limit China's role in the world's supply chain. But a month later, Vietnam has not publicly confirmed the transshipment provision. With the exception of Indonesia, transshipment tariffs also have not been featured in announcements of subsequent deals with other countries in Southeast Asia. In recent weeks, Trump has also modulated his strident tone on China. He reversed a previously hard-line position on the export of artificial intelligence chips to China. Not long after, he told the president of the Philippines that he didn't mind if the country got along with China because the United States also had a good relationship with China. For countries in Southeast Asia that had raced to placate Trump over the months since he first announced his reciprocal tariffs, the flip-flopping has created both a sense of uncertainty and a dose of cynicism about the new agreements they have with the United States. At the same time, many countries in Southeast Asia have explored ways to crack down on Chinese companies that reroute exports through their countries without doing any further processing. Governments in the region have streamlined customs practices and promised to quash counterfeit and illegal trade. They have given serious thought to reducing the amount of Chinese content in the products they assemble and export. Multinationals like Walmart account for a sizable share of US imports and have fairly detailed information on how their products are made. But some analysts question whether US Customs and Border Enforcement is capable of identifying whether packages really come from China. 'Enforcement is likely to be challenging, and even if outright rerouting is reduced, trade diversion will continue to dampen the impact of US tariffs on China's aggregate export performance,' Capital Economics, an economic analysis consulting firm, said in a research note. — The New York Times
Times of Oman
5 hours ago
- Times of Oman
India may face annual export loss of $5-6.75 billion because of 25% tariffs imposed by US: Report
New Delhi: India may face an annual export loss of $5 to $6.75 billion if demand declines by 20 to 30 per cent because of 15 per cent tariff imposed by US, said a report by Ventura Securities. Given the country's FY25 GDP of around USD 3.3 trillion (Rs 287 lakh crore), this shortfall could reduce GDP growth by approximately 0.15 to 0.2 per cent, the report added. It further said that India's industry is expected to face short- to medium-term challenges due to US tariffs, however, during this period, the sector is likely to step up efforts to diversify its markets, with aim to maintain growth momentum. US President Donald Trump has imposed 25 per cent tariff on goods from India and an additional penalty if India imports crude from Russia. However, Ventura report highlighted that even with a 25 per cent US tariff, India is still competitive. "While export volumes are bound to be impacted, India can cushion much of the impact by leveraging the recently concluded FTAs with Australia, UAE, EFTA, ASEAN, and SAARC countries," the report added. While the sanctions are effective from today, higher tariffs will be imposed from August 7 onwards till a bilateral trade agreement is signed with the U.S. India continues to engage with the American counterparts to iron out the trade deal. "Negotiations are expected to resume mid-August and the deal is likely to be clinched by October. In this case, the pain would be relatively short-term with an improved trade trajectory," the report added. Over the past few months, India and the US have been negotiating for an interim trade deal, but there were some reservations from the Indian side on the US demand for opening up the agricultural and dairy sectors for the US. Agriculture and dairy are critical for India as these two sectors provide livelihood opportunities to a large section of its people. India reportedly faces US demands, including allowing remanufactured goods, opening up agriculture and dairy, accepting genetically modified (GM) feed, and adopting US rules on digital trade and product standards. Experts have stated that the decision will have a varied impact on different sectors.
Times of Oman
5 hours ago
- Times of Oman
India's GDP will go below 6.2% in FY26, if 25% US tariff continues post September: S&P Report
New Delhi: India's not giving market access to the United States in the agriculture and Dairy products sectors is likely to be the reason for not reaching on a trade agreement, noted S&P Market Intelligence report released on Friday. The report further says, if 25 per cent tariff imposed by U.S. will remain in place beyond September 2025, India's GDP will be adjusted downwards. S&P Market Intelligence has projected India's GDP for FY 2025-26 at 6.2 per cent in July, down from a GDP growth of 6.5 per cent in FY 2024-25. "This projection is likely to be adjusted downward if the 25 per cent tariff is implemented. Its application would leave India relatively disadvantaged versus regional competitors that have secured a lower tariff rate." The report noted that India is never going to offer market access for the U.S. in the agriculture and dairy products sectors as it will directly impact the farmers who represent a crucial electoral group in the country. "The Indian government would be highly reluctant to offer market access for the US in the agriculture and dairy products sectors, making it difficult for India to reduce its tariffs on US exports of soy, corn, wheat and rice as farmers represent a crucial electoral group in the country." noted S&P. Other contentious areas include exposure to section 232 which includes 'national security'. Tariffs on exports of electronics and pharmaceuticals to U.S, which accounted for 12.3 per cent and 17.8 per cent of India's export to U.S. (as per export data of 2024). U.S. has given exemption or reduced rates on both of these sectors for EU deal, it will put Indian manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage unless a similar deal is negotiated with U.S. The report further adds that import of Russian oil and defence equipment with Russia may be another issue delaying the trade agreement. "While India would be willing to increase imports of US crude oil, the government would be unwilling to pursue this policy change specifically due to US demands. India would be instead keener to import LNG from the US, given its growing domestic demand and expanded US supply capacity, to balance India-US trade (with a US$45.7 billion surplus recorded for India in 2024)." stated S&P.
