logo
Iran could begin enriching uranium in 'matter of months', head of UN nuclear watchdog says

Iran could begin enriching uranium in 'matter of months', head of UN nuclear watchdog says

ITV News11 hours ago

The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has said the US strikes on Iran fell short of causing fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear programme, and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium 'in a matter of months'.
It contradicts US President Donald Trump 's claims that the US "completely and totally obliterated" Tehran's nuclear programme.
Rafael Grossi's comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency, first reported on by ITV News' US partner CNN.
It suggested the United States ' strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.
The 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran began earlier this month when Israel launched an unprecedented attack it said aimed at preventing Tehran developing a nuclear bomb.
Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.
The US then struck three key Iranian nuclear sites before a ceasefire began.
The extent of the damage to Tehran's nuclear program has been debated since.
US military officials have provided some new information about the planning of the strikes in recent days, but offered no new evidence of their effectiveness against Iran's nuclear programme.
Following classified briefings this week, Republican lawmakers acknowledged the US strikes may not have eliminated all of Iran's nuclear materials – but argued that this was never part of the military's mission.
Asked about the different assessments, Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS's 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan': 'This hourglass approach in weapons of mass destruction is not a good idea.'
'The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that.
"But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there,' he told Brennan, according to a transcript released ahead of the broadcast.
'It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage,' Grossi went on to say.
'Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.'
Grossi also told CBS News that the IAEA has resisted pressure to say whether Iran has nuclear weapons or was close to having weapons before the strikes.
'We didn't see a programme that was aiming in that direction (of nuclear weapons), but at the same time, they were not answering very, very important questions that were pending.'
CNN has asked the White House for comment on Grossi's claims.
Grossi stressed the need for the IAEA to be granted access to Iran, to assess nuclear activities.
He said Iran had been disclosing information to the agency up until recent Israeli and US strikes, but that 'there were some things that they were not clarifying to us.'
'In this sensitive area of the number of centrifuges and the amount of material, we had perfect view,' he said.
'What I was concerned about is that there were other things that were not clear. For example, we had found traces of uranium in some places in Iran, which were not the normal declared facilities. And we were asking for years, why did we find these traces of enriched uranium in place x, y or z? And we were simply not getting credible answers.'
The initial Pentagon assessment said Tehran may have moved some of the enriched uranium out of the sites before they were attacked, but Trump has insisted nothing was moved.
'It's logical to presume that when they announce that they are going to be taking protective measures, this could be part of it (moving the material). But, as I said, we don't know where this material could be, or if part of it could have been, you know, under the attack during those 12 days,' Grossi told Brennan.
Meanwhile, Tehran has made moves towards withdrawing from international oversight over its nuclear programme.
Iran's parliament passed a bill halting cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, while the Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, also said that the country could also rethink its membership of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which prohibits signatories from developing nuclear weapons.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran's nuclear enrichment ‘will never stop', nation's UN ambassador says
Iran's nuclear enrichment ‘will never stop', nation's UN ambassador says

The Guardian

time41 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Iran's nuclear enrichment ‘will never stop', nation's UN ambassador says

Amir-Saeid Iravani, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, said on Sunday that the Islamic republic's nuclear enrichment 'will never stop' because it is permitted for 'peaceful energy' purposes under the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. 'The enrichment is our right, an inalienable right, and we want to implement this right,' Iravani told CBS News, adding that Iran was ready for negotiations but 'unconditional surrender is not negotiation. It is dictating the policy toward us.' But Iravani said Tehran is 'ready for the negotiation, but after this aggression, it is not proper condition for a new round of the negotiation, and there is no request for negotiation and meeting with the president'. The Iranian UN envoy also denied that there are any threats from his government to the safety of Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, or against the agency's inspectors, who are accused by some Iranian officials of helping Israel justify its attacks. IAEA inspectors are currently in Iran but do not have access to Iran's nuclear facilities. Pressed by the CBS News anchor Margaret Brennan on whether he would condemn calls for the arrest and execution of the IAEA head, which Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state said a newspaper close to Iran's leader had made, Iravani said that he would. 'There is no any threat,' Irvani said, but acknowledged that Iran's parliament had suspended cooperation with IAEA. The inspectors, he said, 'are in Iran, they are in safe conditions, but the activity has been suspended. They cannot have access to our site … our assessment is that they have not done their jobs.' Iravani also responded to questions on why Tehran has not accepted proposals for a diplomatic solution. Referring to Trump's 'unconditional surrender' demand, Irvani said that the US 'is dictating the policy towards us. If they are ready for negotiation, they will find us ready for that. But if they want to dictate us, it is impossible for any negotiation with them.' Iravani said on Saturday that Iran could transfer its stocks of enriched uranium to another country in the event of an agreement with the United States on Tehran's nuclear program, according to news site Al-Monitor. The transfer of 20% and 60% enriched uranium would not be a red line for Tehran, Iravani said, adding that the material could alternatively remain in Iran under IAEA supervision. But as he said again on Sunday, Iravani stressed that Iran would not renounce its right to domestic uranium production, a condition the US rejects. Irvani's comments comes as western nations, including the US, are pushing for Iran to resume negotiations over its nuclear program a week after the US launched strikes on three facilities, setting off days of heated dispute over whether the facilities has been 'totally obliterated', as Donald Trump initially claimed, or if they had delayed but not destroyed the program. Grossi told CBS that there is 'agreement in describing this as a very serious level of damage' but went on to say that Iran will likely will be able to begin to produce enriched uranium within months. 'The capacities they have are there,' he said. 'They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that. But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there.' On Sunday, President Trump again dismissed reports that Iran had moved 400kg (880lb) on 60% enriched uranium ahead of the strikes on Fordow, regarded as the center of Iran's enrichment program. 'It's very hard to do, dangerous to do, it's very heavy, plus we didn't give them much notice because they didn't know they we were coming,' Trump told the Fox News host Maria Bartiromo. Trump speculated that vehicles seen near the entrances to Fordow before the strikes were likely masons brought in to seal up the facility. 'There are thousands of tons of rock in that room right now,' Trump said. 'They whole place was just destroyed.' However, the Washington Post reported on Sunday that the US obtained intercepted Iranian communications in which senior Iran officials remarked that damage from the attack was not as destructive and extensive as they anticipated. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, scoffed at the Iranian claims in a comment to the Post in which she did not dispute that such communications had been intercepted. 'The notion that unnamed Iranian officials know what happened under hundreds of feet of rubble is nonsense,' Leavitt said. Separately on Sunday, Abdolrahim Mousavi, Iran's armed forces chief of staff, reportedly told the Saudi defense minister during a call that Tehran is not convinced Israel will honour the ceasefire that ended their 12-day war announced by Trump. 'Since we are completely doubtful about the enemy honoring its commitments, including the ceasefire, we are prepared to give it a tough response in case of recurrence of an act of aggression', Mousavi said, according to Turkey's state-run news agency Anadolu. Israel and the US, 'have shown that they do not adhere to any international rules and norms' the Iranian general added. 'We did not initiate war, but we responded with all our power to the aggressor.'

Trump threatens to cut off New York City funds if Mamdani ‘doesn't behave'
Trump threatens to cut off New York City funds if Mamdani ‘doesn't behave'

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump threatens to cut off New York City funds if Mamdani ‘doesn't behave'

Donald Trump on Sunday threatened to cut New York City off from federal funds if favored mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, 'doesn't behave himself' should he be elected. Mamdani, meanwhile, denied that he was – as the president said – a communist. But he reaffirmed his commitment to raise taxes on the wealthiest New Yorkers while saying: 'I don't think that we should have billionaires.' In an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump argued that a Mamdani victory was 'inconceivable' because he perceived the candidate to be 'a pure communist'. He added: 'Let's say this – if he does get in, I'm going to be president, and he's going to have to do the right thing, or they're not getting any money. He's got to do the right thing or they're not getting any money.' More than $100bn flows to the city from the federal government through different entities and programs, according to the city's comptroller last year. Speaking Sunday with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Mamdani said, 'no, I am not' a communist. He also said that he had 'already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am – ultimately because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for'. Mamdani said he was inspired by the US civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr, who once remarked: 'Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism. There has to be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country.' He then reiterated his intent to raise taxes on New York's wealthiest as part of a campaign pledge 'to shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods'. 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality – and ultimately what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' Mamdani said. 'And I look forward to work with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fairer for all of them.' Mamdani said the proposal reflected 'a description of what we see right now'. 'It's not driven by race,' he said. 'It's more of an assessment of what neighborhoods are being undertaxed versus overtaxed. 'It is not to work backwards from a racial assessment of neighborhoods or our city. Rather, it's to ensure that we actually have an equal playing field.' Many New Yorkers and moderate Democratic politicians have expressed concern over Mamdani's win over former governor Andrew Cuomo in the 24 June primary for the Democratic nomination. Among those to endorse him was progressive congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. But he has not been endorsed by many other prominent Democratic party figures, including the New York governor, Kathy Hochul, who said coolly after his win: 'Obviously, there's areas of difference in our positions, but I also think we need to have those conversations.' Mamdani said on Sunday that he was looking forward to discussions with Hochul, saying: 'Ultimately, my policies, my vision, it's driven by an assessment of what's actually happening.' Asked if he thought moderate Democrats were afraid of him, Mamdani said: 'I think that people are catching up to this election. 'Ultimately what we're showing is that by putting working people first, by returning to the roots of the Democratic party, we actually have a path out of this moment where we're facing authoritarianism in Washington DC' under the Trump administration. In his comments on Mamdani's having secured the Democrats' nomination in the heavily Democratic city, Trump said: 'It's shocking.' 'I used to say we will never have a socialist in this country,' the president said, in part. Asked about Mamdani's proposals to oppose his administration's immigration crackdown and to arrest Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he sets foot in New York, Trump said the mayoral candidate would 'be very unsuccessful' on both counts. 'He's a radical left lunatic,' Trump said. Mamdani, for his part, said Democrats 'need to be a party that's not just against Donald Trump – but also for something'. 'And our campaign was for working people, bringing dignity back into those lives,' Mamdani said.

British Israeli soldier killed in Gaza, reports say
British Israeli soldier killed in Gaza, reports say

Powys County Times

timean hour ago

  • Powys County Times

British Israeli soldier killed in Gaza, reports say

A British Israeli soldier has been killed while fighting in northern Gaza, according to reports in Israel. He was named locally as 20-year-old Sergeant Yisrael Natan Rosenfeld from the city of Ra'anana. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said it is 'looking into reports that an IDF soldier who died in combat in Gaza is a British national'. The IDF soldier, of the 601st Combat Engineering Battalion, was killed by an explosive device on Sunday, the Times of Israel reported. The paper said Mr Rosenfeld moved to Israel from London with his family 11 years ago. Israel has been operating in Gaza since the Hamas militant group's October 7 2023 attack on Israel. More than 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza. US-led ceasefire efforts have repeatedly stalled. The Israeli offensive has devastated Gaza and killed more than 56,000 people, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, a branch of the Hamas government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store