
'Fourth branch' and fall of the Election Commission from Seshan's highs
Modern constitutions increasingly feature them—a constellation of institutions tasked with protecting constitutional democracy.
Among the most prominent of these are electoral bodies, anti-corruption agencies, ecological tribunals, and ombudsman offices. In India, these include the Election Commission, Comptroller and Auditor General, Information Commissions, Lokpal, National Green Tribunal, among others.
Much like Santa's elves, these institutions work quietly behind the scenes, performing essential functions that keep democracy functional—often without receiving due credit. And while elves become most visible during Christmas, these institutions come to the fore during moments of democratic stress—elections, corruption scandals, or constitutional breakdowns. They are presumed to be independent and non-partisan.
Raison d'être of the Fourth Branch
South Africa's post-Apartheid Constitution refers to these entities as "State Institutions Supporting Constitutional Democracy". The traditional Montesquieuan framework of three branches of government—legislative, executive, and judiciary—is increasingly seen as insufficient for modern constitutional design.
American legal scholar Bruce Ackerman, in The New Separation of Powers (2000), conceptualised an "Integrity Branch" devoted to rooting out corruption, as a fourth branch of governance. Similarly, Martin Loughlin spoke of the rise of the "ephorate" in modern democracies, drawing from ancient Greece, where ephors were empowered to supervise the state and conduct inquiries.
Today's fourth-branch institutions are the ephors of our times.
Governance is sustained over time not only through structural integrity but also through the promotion of civic virtues—or what Jürgen Habermas calls "constitutional patriotism." These institutions are the state's extra limbs that embody and protect those virtues.
Hans Kelsen, among the most influential jurists of the 20th century, was the one who proposed a fourth function of governance: the preservation of constitutional order through a dedicated guardian of the constitution.
Today, fourth-branch institutions largely fulfil this role. Moreover, some of these institutions require and possess specialised expertise unavailable within the traditional three branches.
In contemporary democracies, political parties wield real power—often beyond the constitutional framework. Parties in power may resort to enacting policies that entrench their hold on power, such as manipulating electoral rules or engaging in large-scale corruption.
Alarmingly, opposition parties often do not challenge these practices, anticipating a future opportunity to use the same tools. This dynamic creates an urgent need for independent constitutional guardians—like the fourth-branch bodies we have been discussing—and robust institutional design.
An umpire in flux
Ironically, fourth-branch institutions are most successful where they are least needed.
The Indian experience validates this paradox: the independence of institutions like the Election Commission has steadily eroded since the rise of the BJP as a dominant political force with no foreseeable challenger.
Malaysia's 2018 general election offers a cautionary example. Since 1957, Malaysian politics was dominated by the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition. The Election Commission, responsible for delimitation and elections, was seen as an extension of BN.
During the 2018 elections, it scheduled polling for a Wednesday—an inconvenient day for many working citizens and overseas Malaysians. It also redrew constituencies in ways that clearly advantaged the ruling coalition.
In India, the Constitution vests the Election Commission with sweeping powers to supervise, direct, and control the conduct of elections to Parliament and the offices of the President and Vice President. Its mandate includes maintaining voter rolls, ensuring free and fair voting, and accurate vote counting.
For decades, the Commission earned praise for maintaining the integrity of India's elections. A 1999 report even found it had the highest level of public trust among all public institutions.
Under TN Seshan's assertive leadership—bolstered by the weak coalition governments—the Election Commission emerged as a robust pillar of democracy. However, since the return of a dominant-party system under the BJP, the Commission's strength has visibly declined.
The decline in trust
Recent years have seen a growing perception that the Election Commission of India (ECI) operates with partisan bias. Critics allege selective enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct, often acting against opposition parties while overlooking violations by the ruling party. Inflammatory statements by powerful leaders often go unpunished, raising concerns about neutrality.
Though there is no conclusive proof of tampering with Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), the ECI's resistance to full-scale VVPAT audits—as recommended by the Supreme Court and civil society—has increased public skepticism. The Commission has also failed to check the misuse of electoral bonds, which obscure the sources of political funding.
The process for appointing Election Commissioners is also a concern. The ruling party has effectively monopolized appointments, excluding the Chief Justice from the selection panel. The departure from the assertive, independent style of leaders like Seshan has been striking. Current commissions are seen as more deferential to the executive.
Santa's elves are traditionally seen as neutral, diligent helpers—just as fourth-branch institutions are expected to operate independently, irrespective of who is in power. But when the elves go idle, Santa's sleigh ride becomes meaningless. If fourth-branch institutions fail to uphold constitutional democracy, the only alternative is to strengthen other institutions and civic movements that promote constitutional patriotism and civic virtue.
(Faisal CK is Deputy Law Secretary to the Government of Kerala. Views are personal.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Election Commission holding regular dialogue with parties: CEC on criticism from opposition
Firozabad (UP): With opposition parties accusing the Election Commission of ignoring their concerns, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Saturday asserted that the poll panel maintains a regular dialogue with political parties and 5,000 such meetings have been held in the past four months, beginning from the assembly to queries from reporters in Firozabad, where he came to attend a private programme, Kumar said that after voters, political parties are the next important stakeholders for the Commission, I.N.D.I.A. on collision course post meeting over Bihar electoral roll was asked about the recent criticism from opposition parties, including their allegations that their concerns related to poll-bound Bihar are being overlooked by the EC.."The Election Commission keeps having a regular dialogue with various political parties. In the last four months, all-party meetings were organised in every assembly constituency, in every district and also with every state chief electoral officer.."In all, 5000 such meetings were held in which 28,000 people, including leaders of political parties, participated." The CEC said that not only this, the Election Commission itself has been meeting all national and state parties..'Threatens electoral process': TMC urges SC to review Special Intensive Revision in Bihar."Five national parties and four state parties have met. If there is any issue, then all-party delegations also come, and the EC meets them," he Chief Election Commissioner also said that in the electoral process, the voters are the most important, but after them, "our political parties are the most important stakeholders"..Referring to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar, where assembly elections are due later this year, CEC Gyanesh Kumar said that whoever is in the voter list of 01.01.2003 in Bihar will be considered eligible from the primary point of view under Article 326 of the moves SC challenging EC's revision of electoral rolls in other words, people whose names are in that list will not be required to submit any supporting documents, and when voter IDs are to be made for their children, they too will not be required to give documents for their Election Commission has said it will soon upload the 2003 Bihar electoral roll on its website to facilitate the nearly 4.96 crore voters whose names figure on it to extract the relevant portion to be attached with the enumeration form for the special intensive revision of the voters' to the instructions issued by the poll authority to its Bihar poll machinery, the 4.96 crore voters -- 60 per cent of the total electors --- who were listed in the 2003 special intensive revision need not submit any supporting document to establish their date or place or birth except the relevant portion of the electoral roll brought out after the other three crore -- nearly 40 per cent -- will have to provide one of the 11 listed documents to establish their place or date of birth.."The basic exercise is to identify each and every individual of the remaining three crore voters before their names are included in the list," a functionary intensive revision will ensure that no eligible elector is left out of the electoral rolls and no ineligible one is part of it, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar had earlier told as of now, has more than 7.89 crore voters spread across 243 assembly seats. Polls in the state are due later this year.


Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Association for Democratic Reforms moves SC challenging EC's Bihar voter roll revision
The Association for Democratic Reforms on Saturday filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the Election Commission conducting a special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls, saying that the order is arbitrary and can disenfranchise millions of voters, Live Law reported. The non-profit organisation sought the quashing of the order, arguing that it violated Articles 14, 19, 21, 325 and 326 of the Constitution and also contravened provisions of the Representation of the People Act and Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules. Article 14 of the Constitution guarantees equality before the law, while Article 19 pertains to freedom of speech and expression and Article 21 to protection of life and personal liberty. Article 325 ensures that there is no discrimination based on religion, race, caste or sex in electoral rolls and Article 326 mandates elections to be based on adult suffrage. Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules pertains to the inclusion of names inadvertently omitted. The special intensive revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24, ahead of the Assembly elections expected to be held in the state in October or November. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. This means that 2.9 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore voters – or about 37% of the electors – will have to submit documentary evidence. Voters born before July 1, 1987, must show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, will need proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. In its petition, the Association for Democratic Reforms said that revision could 'arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country', The Hindu reported. The petition said that the order imposed fresh documentation requirements and shifted the burden of proof from the state to the citizen, Bar and Bench reported. Citing concerns over the exclusion of widely held documents such as Aadhaar and ration cards in the exercise, the election watchdog said that this would disproportionately affect the poor and marginalised voters, especially in rural parts of Bihar. 'The documentation requirements of the directive, lack of due process as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said special intensive revision of electoral roll in Bihar further make this exercise bound to result in removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement,' Bar and Bench quoted the petition as saying. Birth registration levels were historically low in Bihar and many voters did not have access to official documents, the petition said. It added that more than three crore voters in the state may not be able to meet the mandated criteria and could end up being removed from the electoral rolls. The Association for Democratic Reforms also noted that the Election Commission had not provided a reason for ordering the revision, Bar and Bench reported. Citing that Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act permitted special revisions only for recorded reasons, the non-profit organisation claimed that the order issued by the poll panel lacked such justification. Stating that a special summary revision had been conducted in Bihar from October 2024 to January 2025, the petition said that no reports of serious irregularities had been flagged. A fresh exercise ahead of the Assembly polls raised concerns about its intent and implementation, it added.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump underwater in every key swing state, and now he's slipping in Texas too
US President Donald Trump 's approval ratings are going down again. Apparently, the ratings plummeted even beyond swing states . As the Fourth of July comes and goes, a new poll shows he's now underwater in more than half the country. The president's stronghold, Texas, is starting to look shaky, too. Donald Trump's approval rating is low in 29 U.S. states. Polls show that many people are worried about the economy, tariffs, and immigration policies, which are all hurting his support across the country. What do the polls show? Civiqs' polling, which included 35,929 responses, indicates that while Trump's support rating is positive in some states, it is declining in others. Overall, net positive approval ratings are found in 21 of the 50 states that were studied, while net negative ratings are found in 29. ALSO READ: Mass layoffs in 2025: Microsoft, Meta, and more big names slash jobs — is yours next? Live Events His approval rating is below average in other states. In Maryland, his approval rating is -41, and in Hawaii, it is -47. Trump's approval rating has likewise stayed in the negative range on a national level. Trump had a net approval rating of -14 points, with 40 percent of respondents approving and 54 percent disapproving, according to a YouGov/Economist poll of 1,590 adults taken between June 20 and June 23, as per a report by Newsweek. This was a slight decrease from -13 last week. The margin of error for the survey was +/- 3.5 percent. In the meantime, a Tyson Group survey of 1,027 American adults conducted between June 25 and June 26 revealed that Trump's net approval rating was 6 points lower, with 45 percent of respondents approving and 51 percent disapproving. Where is Donald Trump still popular? Wyoming has the highest approval rating for Trump, with a net rating of +44 percent. With an approval rating of +36 in West Virginia, he is also well-liked there. What's driving his approval ratings down? Trump's first few months in office have seen a range in his popularity. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is in charge of overseeing the cuts that have sparked demonstrations. Trump's immigration policies have been the subject of other rallies, and his tariffs and strikes on Iran have also drawn criticism. On the other hand, the Fourth of July, also known as Independence Day in the United States, honours the Declaration of Independence. Given that it is a day of celebration and patriotism, any decline in Trump's popularity during the festivities would be devastating, as per a report by Newsweek. Protests against the Trump administration have taken place nationwide over the weekend of Independence Day, including rallies and demonstrations. The impact of Trump's policies and national and international events is likely to cause fluctuations in his approval rating. How are experts interpreting the polls? Since April, Donald Trump's approval rating has remained consistent in the mid-40s, indicating a high level of support, according to Richard Johnson, a senior lecturer in U.S. politics and policy at Queen Mary University of London. The economy has had a major impact on Trump's approval ratings, especially since the imposition of tariffs, which has caused a decline in ratings and is anticipated to be the main factor determining his future, an expert weighed in. FAQs In how many states is Trump's approval rating negative? According to Civiqs polling, Trump is losing support in 29 of 50 states, including some key swing states and even Republican stronghold Texas. What is causing the greatest drop in Trump's popularity? Economic uncertainty, tariffs, and controversial immigration and foreign affairs policies are cited as major reasons for the drop in his public support.