logo
South Auckland Grocery Store Loses Right To Sell Alcohol

South Auckland Grocery Store Loses Right To Sell Alcohol

Scoop7 days ago
A store in south Auckland has lost its right to sell alcohol after their efforts to pass itself off as a grocery store was rejected, in a precedent-setting case.
McLennan Grocery Store, at Swamp Kauri Grove in Papakura, was recently granted an off-licence in March by the Auckland District Licensing Committee (ADLC).
However, after an appeal led by Auckland councillor Angela Dalton with the Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority (ARLA), the off-licence was denied.
The appeal focused on whether the shop met the statutory definition of a grocery store under the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act.
According to section 33 of the Act, a grocery shop was defined as a premises that emphasised the sale of food products as the principal business, and characteristics normally associated with grocery shops.
Under the Act, a convenience store wasn't permitted to sell alcohol.
Communities Against Alcohol Harm secretary Dr Grant Hewison said ARLA's decision will now set a precedent for future off-license applications on grocery and convenience stores.
'This decision will be welcomed by many in the Papakura community," Hewison said.
'It's encouraging to see ARLA taking a firm stance on the difference between convenience stores and grocery stores to avoid alcohol being sold from convenience stores," Hewison said.
He said convenience stores were often located right in the centre of residential communities and were intended to be convenient.
Parliament made it clear in the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act that liquor shouldn't be sold from 'convenience' stores, Hewison said.
The off-licence application
Baj Holdings Limited applied for a new off-licence with the DLC, for McLennan Grocery Store September 3, 2024. The shop was formerly known as McLennan Convenience Store.
The applicant stated the primary business was food sales, and agreed to conditions such as alcohol sales only until 8pm.
The medical officer had initially opposed the application, but withdrew after viewing photos showing an increase in the range of food and groceries sold, and introduction of shopping baskets, after an earlier visit.
With no opposition from key agencies, and six public objectors related to alcohol-related harm, the application was granted on March 11.
DLC concluded the application met the object of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012, the company was suitable, the application was consistent with the Local Alcohol Policy, and the proposed hours, design, and other goods sold were appropriate.
The appeal
In June, councillor Dalton filed an appeal with ARLA, against the District Licensing Committee's decision for McLennan Grocery Store.
Her appeal was focused on whether the premises met the statutory definition of a grocery store under the Act, and the object of the Act.
In its own inspection, ARLA found the shop was not what people would consider patronising to shop for grocery items, but more to pick up items they were running out of, therefore characterising the shop as a 'convenience store'.
The entrance of the shop did not suggest it was a grocery store, other than the amended signage from McLennan Convenience Store to McLenann Grocery Store.
There was a large sign outside and inside with prices assigned to various goods. ARLA found none of the items listed suggested the store had as its principal business the sale of food products.
They found it concerning there was limited space given on the limited range of food products like bread, fresh fruit, vegetables and fresh meat.
However, greater prominence was given to other aspects of the business - drinks and takeaways.
The premises had a vape store, which ARLA said was more easily aligned with a convenience store than a grocery store, and that there were only two baskets available for shoppers to use to load goods, which was also inconsistent with a grocery store.
"For these reasons we consider that the appeal must succeed as we do not consider that these premises meet the requirements of a grocery store," ARLA said in its decision.
"The shop certainly had aspects that could be attributed to those expected of a grocery store but those aspects appeared to be secondary to other aspects of the business that appeared to us to be correctly and appropriately those of a convenience store."
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How To Convince Walmart To Come To New Zealand
How To Convince Walmart To Come To New Zealand

Scoop

time15 hours ago

  • Scoop

How To Convince Walmart To Come To New Zealand

'Cheaper groceries require real solutions. To deliver a better deal for Kiwis at the checkout, we need to create the right conditions to attract more supermarket players to New Zealand,' says ACT Leader David Seymour. 'When people are driving across the country just to buy butter at Costco in Auckland, it's a clear sign something's broken. We can't control global dairy prices, but we can create an environment where more retailers want to set up shop, bringing real competition to the grocery sector. 'One of the biggest barriers is New Zealand's outdated planning and consenting rules. ' ACT would introduce a fast-track approval process for grocery development. This one-stop shop would streamline rezoning, consenting, and investment approvals, making it easier and faster to build new supermarkets at scale. 'A new entrant or smaller grocer could get approval for a full rollout of stores and warehouses within months, not years. For comparison, it took Costco three years and $100 million just to open one store in New Zealand. 'The fast-track would allow any applicant building at least 10 stores (or equivalent floor area) to use the fast-track. For five years, it would be limited to new entrants or smaller players, giving them a head start before the major incumbents become eligible. 'Projects should not be blocked, scaled back, or burdened with conditions just because they're outside existing retail centres or might compete with dominant supermarket chains. 'Every approved development could also be mixed-use. That means a supermarket could have apartments or other commercial activities above it, making projects more attractive to investors who want to diversify and aren't sure the New Zealand groceries market is big enough to open a supermarket on its own. 'If we want the Walmarts, Aldis and Tescos of the world to come here, we need to give them a reason to set up shop. This fast-track process sends a message to them that New Zealand welcomes competition and that they won't be tied up in red tape by coming here. 'New Zealand needs to stop finger pointing and start problem solving. 'There is a serious cost of living challenge to tackle, we won't address it by cutting down tall poppies or playing the blame game, that just scares competition away. We want lower prices, so we need more competition, that means removing the barriers that stop new players from entering the market.'

ACT rally to focus on supermarkets, free speech, economy
ACT rally to focus on supermarkets, free speech, economy

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

ACT rally to focus on supermarkets, free speech, economy

FOR SUNDAY AM ACT is holding their annual rally on Sunday in Auckland. Shown: ACT leader David Seymour at last year's rally in Auckland. Photo: RNZ / MARIKA KHABAZI The ACT Party is hosting its annual "Free & Equal" rally in Auckland, as it takes stock of the first half of its term in government and unveils a policy to help competition in the supermarket sector. ACT leader David Seymour said the Sunday event was a chance to look back at what had been achieved, as well as forward towards "what New Zealand needs from us and from the government over the next 15 months". But speaking to RNZ, he rejected the notion it marked the start of the election campaign, saying the best campaigning is simply doing "our job in government". The rally will feature policy updates from ACT ministers and MPs, as well as a keynote speech from Seymour, currently deputy prime minister, and an international guest speaker that is causing concern for a group in Pōneke. ACT MP Cameron Luxton will MC the event, and ACT ministers due to speak are Brooke van Velden, Nicole McKee, Karen Chhour, Andrew Hoggard and Simon Court. Updates will include outlining progress on crime, economic reform, and reducing regulatory burdens, as well as on the government's policy programme. This will be an opportunity for the party to outline to its supporters the progress made while in government, and look ahead to the second half of the political term. The party will also outline its policy to tackle the lack of competition in the supermarket sector, which will likely look at cutting red tape to help overseas players get a foothold. Seymour said the coalition was elected to tackle the cost of living, crime and co-governance, and added that the country now faces a "challenge with health." But he said in each of those areas the government could point to "significant progress", while acknowledging there were still "substantial challenges" - particularly around the cost of living. "Our challenge is to see economic growth occur so that salaries grow in a real way, keeping up with the increase in prices they've faced." Asked whether - like NZ First - the halfway point was an opportunity to turn into campaign mode, Seymour said no, because it was "important that we do our job in government." "That's the best campaigning that you can do," he said. Seymour acknowledged there would be a different set of issues in 2026 than what was present in 2023, and if that wasn't the case, "it means that we haven't done a very good job of addressing the tasks they gave us". "So we do need to start thinking about the next election, but it's not here yet." In terms of what ACT supporters had been indicating the key issues were, Seymour said there had been "six years of long trouble" starting with the terror attacks in 2019, the Covid-19 pandemic, then inflation and high interest rates, recession and unemployment. "Now we face, probably the most uncertain geopolitical situation in several generations. "What we need is some hope to stop scapegoating, to start problem solving, really rally together as the pioneering nation that we can be so that we can address some of those long term problems around productivity, healthcare, cost of living, and really just having a sense that now we're getting somewhere." Last year, the rally was sold out and broadcaster Paul Henry's keynote speech had more than 200,000 views online. ACT described its annual gathering as an opportunity to connect with supporters, outline the party's policy direction, and foster open debate on the country's future. The latest RNZ Reid research poll, taken after the release of the Budget in May, had ACT down 2.8 points to 6.8 percent . More recently, the Taxpayers' Union-Curia Poll, published on Thursday, showed ACT on 9.1 percent , unchanged from their last poll in June. There will also be an "international guest keynote" from Dr James Lindsay, an American author, mathematician, and "prominent advocate for free speech". "Dr. Lindsay is one of the world's leading lights in challenging ideological extremes," Seymour said. "His insights on defending free expression and liberal values are especially relevant in New Zealand today." The Pōneke Anti-fascist Coalition has raised concerns about the ACT party hosting Lindsay, claiming he peddled harmful conspiracies and held radical views. The group was founded in 2022 following the occupation at Parliament. Since then they've organised various rallies and community events to show opposition to "far right ideas". A member of the group, Anne Campbell, said she was concerned the party had invited Lindsay to "rark up their base" and pointed to an article on the Southern Poverty Law Centre website outlining claims by Lindsay. The SPLC was established in 1971 to carry on work from the civil rights movement in the United States of America. Its website states it works in partnership with communities to "dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people". The SPLC article highlighted statements by Lindsay, including reference to the pride flag as "the flag of a hostile enemy": Screenshots show a tweet under Lindsay's handle @ConceptualJames. Lol what? It also highlighted a post on social media by Lindsay from 2023, saying "Drag Queen Story Hour is an initiation rite into the cult of Queer Gnosticism". Drag Queen Story Hour is an initiation rite into the cult of Queer Gnosticism. The tweet linked to a podcast on Lindsay's website stating "Queer Theory is the doctrine of a cult". The synopsis for the podcast told listeners to join Lindsay to "understand our danger." "This discussion will not only lay Queer Theory bare for the social-spiritual cult belief system that it is, but it will also make sense of the destructive phenomena like sexual graphic novels in our school libraries, Drag Queen Story Hour, and the relentless push for queer and trans everything into all aspects of our culture. Join him to understand our danger." Campbell said it was "really troubling" to bring these ideas into New Zealand and further "stoke that kind of hatred". She acknowledged Lindsay may not directly be "doing damage to minorities himself" but said it was "poisoning the well of political discourse and turning it further right". Seymour told RNZ he admired Lindsay's book Cynical Theories and met him while he was in New Zealand earlier in the year. "We got together, and we hit it off, and I think he's a very thoughtful and decent person." The Free Speech Union hosted Lindsay for a speaking tour earlier this year , where he also appeared on TVNZ's Q+A . In response to the concerns of the Pōneke Antifascist Coalition Seymour said he did not agree with the description of the pride flag as an enemy flag. "I march in the Pride Parade most years myself, so I wouldn't say that I agree with this. I wasn't aware that James Lindsay had said that. "If he has, it doesn't really bother me, because I've got lots of friends I disagree with, and I think it's healthy. "If I agreed with everything that everybody I associated with had ever said, we'd have a very boring place or maybe no friends." In regards to the claims about Drag Queen Story Time, Seymour said parents could decide for themselves who read stories to their children. "I don't really know why anyone else would think it was their business." The concerns were coming from a "pretty obscure extreme left so-called Anti-Fascist group," Seymour said. "They're entitled to their view, but I'm certainly not going to let them define what I think," he said. "People are a little tired of cancel culture and ideological purity tests." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

The ins and outs of what is in, and out, of the Standards Bill
The ins and outs of what is in, and out, of the Standards Bill

Otago Daily Times

time2 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

The ins and outs of what is in, and out, of the Standards Bill

On Thursday, as Act New Zealand leader David Seymour was touring Dunedin, back in Wellington a somewhat surreal select committee process of keen interest to him was drawing to a close. The finance and expenditure select committee — or at least a Covid lockdown-reminiscent Zoom version of it — spent all week considering submissions on Mr Seymour's trophy legislation, the Regulatory Standards Bill. Predictably, given the avalanche of criticism the Bill has received in the leadup to the hearings, the vast majority of submitters were implacably opposed to it, for a wide variety of reasons. This, somewhat disingenuously, mystifies Mr Seymour, who professes the Bill — which he has tried and failed to pass in previous parliaments — is nothing more than an attempt to improve the law-making process in New Zealand. This would be done by each piece of proposed regulation and legislation being reviewed through the lens of a set of regulatory principles ... and therein lies the fundamental issue critics have with the Bill. Put simply, what makes a good law is a contestable idea, and what Mr Seymour thinks should underpin responsible and responsive legislation is not a universally shared concept. The Bill does have a proposed safeguard in place — a committee to oversee its function — but many submitters also doubted it would, or could, be a truly independent watchdog. Some things in the regulatory principles are non-contentious: few would argue with laws being consistent with existing legislation, effective, having heed of the rule of law and not impinging unnecessarily on rights. But opposition to the Bill revolves, generally, around two things: what has been put in the Bill and what has been left out. What has been put in are things like guarantees of property rights and personal freedoms, and what has been left out is any consideration of the place and role of the Treaty of Waitangi or environmental protections. Bill supporters have been reassuring on this front, arguing that the principle that the public interest be considered when drafting laws and regulations covers a multitude of concerns; opponents, however, lack faith that those who will determine what the public interest actually is will truly reflect their concerns. A variety of southerners appeared before the committee this week. The first salvo from the region was one of the few in favour of the Bill, Queenstown's Basil Walker (once briefly an Act candidate) arguing that New Zealand could not increase economic growth, and hence income from business taxation, without the sort of better governance reforms the draft legislation proposed. Much more scepticism was evinced soon after by the Dunedin City Council, whose chief in-house lawyer Karilyn Canton said that the council was concerned the Bill was neither necessary or desirable, and overly narrow in some parts and over-simplified in others. She said the council felt the Bill ran counter to existing Local Government Act requirements concerning consideration of Treaty of Waitangi issues and environmental concerns. It also felt that it would be required to review bylaws and plans for their compliance to the Bill's principles — ironically adding to compliance costs when the Bill purported to reduce red tape. Speaking of the DCC, Tuesday featured a blast from the past when former mayor Aaron Hawkins (who was quite the juxtaposition to his preceding submitter, the Taxpayers Union) got his five minutes of fame. Mr Hawkins did not hold back, rejecting the Bill in its entirety — "no amount of tinkering can save this Bill from itself" — and saying he was appalled by Mr Seymour's attacks on opponents of the legislation. "Ultimately Mr Seymour's attacks leave me confused because either this Bill is necessary to shape all of our legislation coming through the House, as he says, or it's nothing to be worried about, as he also says, because it cannot be both." University of Otago Wellington public health academics Calvin Cochran and Amanda D'Souza did not have the same high-flying rhetoric but each had deep concerns over the Bill, which they felt posed unacceptable risks to public health, the environment and Maori/Crown relations. The law change could stymie future legislation on tobacco and vaping control, a potential sugar tax on junk food and drinks and controls on alcohol abuse. Mr Cochrane, a research fellow, further noted that health positive legislation — specifically the smokefree environment laws — might never have been passed had they first had to clear a scrutiny of their infringement on property rights. That afternoon the Otago University Students Association wheeled out its representative (and Labour-backed council candidate) Jett Groshinski. OUSA, in the manner of Mr Hawkins earlier, was not pulling any punches either, calling the Bill not just flawed, but dangerous. "Let's not sugarcoat it, this is a calculated attempt to rewrite how we make laws in this country, shifting power away from the public and towards an ideology that puts profits before people." Completing a local body candidate-packed lineup of southern submissions, on Thursday the Green Party opted for the party's Dunedin mayoral candidate Mickey Treadwell as the frontman for its organisational submission in opposition to the Bill. The Greens, unsurprisingly, highlighted the Bill's "egregious omission" of any reference to the Treaty, the environment and the Bill of Rights Act. More locally, Mr Treadwell felt it would create legal ambiguity for local bylaws, plans, liquor bans and freedom camping rules. Finally, and even more locally, he raised the spectre of residents in South Dunedin, from where he was zooming in, being ankle-deep in climate change-fuelled flooding, and asked rhetorically what the Bill's claimed improving of regulatory standards might do for them. Well, perhaps all the paper the Bill has generated this week might be used to build bulwarks and other defences?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store