Trump's immigration golden ticket not on the cards soon: experts
Donald Trump has boasted of selling US residency to wealthy foreigners through an around $5 million "Gold Card" from as early as March, but immigration experts say the planned visa cannot be created without Congress.
"We have it all worked out from a legal standpoint," the US president declared last month, assuring the new card would be on the market two weeks later. It "goes on sale very, very soon", he then told Congress Tuesday.
While his administration has "significant authority" to manage existing visa programmes, creating a new visa category "would require an act of Congress", Migration Policy Institute communications director Michelle Mittelstadt told AFP.
- Not without Congress -
A similar programme to the "Gold Card" already exists in the United States. Created in 1990 to stimulate the economy, the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program offered a permanent residency card -- better known as the Green Card -- provided they invest enough capital in an American business.
Other conditions include creating or preserving at least 10 permanent jobs reserved for American employees.
In the United States, permanent residents can usually apply for naturalisation after five years.
Some 8,000 people were issued a EB-5 visa in 2022, according to Mittelstadt.
"We're going to replace it with the Trump gold card," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said.
The EB-5, he said, "was full of nonsense, make-believe and fraud, and it was a way to get a green card that was low price".
However, "an existing program established by Congress and set in the law cannot be unilaterally changed this drastically simply by the executive branch. It would not be legal," said Sharvari Dalal-Dheini, Director of Government Relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
The US Constitution explicitly grants Congress the power to legislate on immigration under Section 8 of Article 1.
Trump claims that the United States could "sell maybe a million of these cards" to reduce the country's debt.
But "current law only authorises up to 10,000 EB-5 visas annually", Dalal-Dheini said. To change the quota, the backing of Congress would be essential.
- Long legislative process -
"It is highly unlikely that that the program could begin this month," Mittelstadt said.
Even with a Republican majority in both chambers of Congress, "it is likely that this type of legislation would require more than a simple majority to pass it," Dalal-Dheini said.
The legislative process could "take weeks if not months, or may never come to be".
It remains unclear what level of support the changes even has in Congress, she added.
"There are some pockets of resistance, even in conservative circles, to the idea of selling US citizenship," Mittelstadt said.
If Congress approved the new visa, it would still require "a significant period of time" for the country's immigration services to develop the necessary guidance and materials to launch the programme, she added.
ecb/ico/asm/giv/sbk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From gym memberships to gun silencers, Trump's tax bill is full of surprises
WASHINGTON – The Republicans' massive policy bill would do more than extend income tax cuts, add restrictions to Medicaid and food stamps and pour funding into President Donald Trump's deportation campaign. The 1,000-plus-page bill includes several lesser-known provisions that could have an impact on Americans' lives, from the court system to the gym. The bill is likely to be one of the most important pieces of legislation passed during Trump's second term. The immense pressure from the White House to pass the bill makes it a convenient vehicle for lawmakers to add in their preferred policies and increase their chances of making it into law. Still, the bill is not set in stone: The Senate will start considering the bill next week, and the measure may undergo considerable changes. Here are nine parts of the bill you might not yet know about: Republicans included a provision in the bill that would restrict judges' ability to hold people accountable for violating court orders. It comes as some judges consider contempt rulings against the Trump administration for bypassing court orders restricting their actions. More: How Trump's clash with the courts is brewing into an 'all-out war' The legislation would bar judges from enforcing contempt rulings if they didn't first order a bond, which is commonly set at zero or not ordered in cases when people are claiming the government did something unconstitutional. Democrats have argued it's a clear attempt to bypass the courts, while Republicans say it's an incentive to stop frivolous lawsuits by requiring plaintiffs to pay in. The bill would allocate $500 million to help modernize government with the help of artificial intelligence – and would prevent states from creating new regulations to shape how AI is used or developed. It also would block dozens of states from enforcing AI regulations and oversight structures they've already implemented. There is now no federal AI regulation to take the place of state policies. More: Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' could ban states from regulating AI for a decade Tech industry leaders support the approach, warning that regulation can get in the way of innovation in a new industry. Some Republicans in the Senate, however, have raised concerns that the ban is not a good idea without a federal structure to take its place. Republicans added a provision to the bill that would get rid of a $200 registration fee for gun silencers that has existed for more than 90 years and removed a requirement for gun owners to register their silencers. More: Trump admin allows devices that let some weapons shoot as fast as machine guns "Who asked for this − was it the assassin lobby?" said Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nevada, at a hearing on the legislation earlier in May. But Republicans argued that eliminating the fee aligns with the Second Amendment, which protects a right to bear arms, and protects gun users' hearing. The bill would qualify sports and fitness expenses as qualified medical care, which would allow people to pay for them tax-free through a Health Savings Account. People could spend up to $500 a year on gym memberships through their HSAs, or $1,000 for a married couple. More: Robert F. Kennedy now heads Trump's MAHA commission: What to know The benefit could not be used at "a private club" owned by members, or a facility that offers golf, hunting, sailing or riding facilities. The health and fitness part of the business also couldn't be "incidental to its overall function and purpose." Some people who earned a Purple Heart in the military – the decoration for service members who were wounded or killed in action – would qualify for a new income tax credit under the legislation. Purple Heart recipients who lost a portion of their Social Security disability benefits because they got a job could get a higher Earned Income Tax Credit to make up those lost Social Security benefits. The bill would create new savings accounts dubbed "Trump accounts" in which babies who are born between January 2025 and January 2029 can benefit from a one-time $1,000 payment from the federal government placed in the account. Parents would then be able to contribute up to $5,000 a year. The savings would be invested in a stock fund that would grow with the U.S. stock market. More: After 100 days, one thing is clear: The stock market is leery of Trump's tariffs The child could be able to access a portion of the money when they reach age 18 for things like education, training or buying their first house. They can use the full balance at age 30. The bill includes a change to the Pell Grant program, which provides federal aid to low-income students to attend colleges and universities. Right now, students are considered full time and qualify for the maximum amount of aid if they take 12 credits a semester. The bill would change that to 15 credits a semester, which the National College Attainment Network estimated would result in a nearly $1,500 cut in benefits for students who can't increase their course load because of work or caretaking. More: Trump orders shift on student loan management to Small Business Administration It would also end multiple existing programs for people to pay back their student loans, including a Biden-era program that tailored payment requirements to the person's income. It would be replaced with a new fixed-rate program. Migrants often move to other countries in part to send money home to their family or community abroad. The United States is the world's largest source of these transfers, known as remittances. The Republican bill would implement a 3.5% tax on those transfers, which must be paid by the person sending the money. It would include an exemption for U.S. citizens and nationals sending money abroad. The GOP proposal would charge new fees for people seeking to immigrate to the United States. Among the proposed fees: $1,000 to request asylum, $550 payments every six months for work authorization, $500 to apply for temporary protected status, $1,000 for undocumented immigrants paroled into the country, and $3,500 to sponsor unaccompanied child migrants. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How Trump's tax bill could affect your gym membership, savings and guns
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major student loan changes just came one step closer to becoming law
WASHINGTON – Congress is closer than it's been in a long time to massively reforming college financial aid. On June 10, GOP lawmakers in the U.S. Senate proposed their version of the higher education section of President Trump's tax and spending megabill. The 71-page portion of the so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" would set new caps on student loan borrowing while drastically cutting the number of repayment plans. Read more: Republicans propose massive overhaul of student loans, Pell Grants The Senate's version of the legislation is less aggressive than the bill that Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives introduced in late April. While it will likely be further watered down due to congressional budget rules, the scope of the legislation indicates big changes will be enacted soon to how Americans pay for college. When President Donald Trump asked Republicans to find billions of dollars in federal spending cuts, GOP lawmakers in the House drew up measures to eliminate or dramatically curb many student loan programs. In April, they proposed cutting subsidized loans altogether for undergraduates. When students take out a federal direct subsidized loan, the government pays the interest while they're in school (and for a short grace period after the students complete their studies). That idea didn't survive in the Senate version of the bill, which was expected to be slightly more moderate than the House proposal. Read more: Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned Other elements of the House version remain, however. Like the House bill, the Senate measure proposes cutting the number of student loan repayment plans to just two. That change would kill former President Joe Biden's Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE, program, which former Education Secretary Miguel Cardona repeatedly called the "most affordable repayment plan ever." SAVE has been stalled in court for months, placing roughly 8 million people in forbearance. The Senate bill would also dramatically curb lending for graduate students and parents (though at lower caps than House Republicans wanted). Ben Cecil, a senior education policy advisor at Third Way, a center-left think tank, said he was pleased to see the bill appeared to make compromises. "These loan limits are much more reasonable," he said. Melanie Storey, president of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, said she was "relieved" some of the "most harmful" provisions of the House bill had been nixed. "Still, there are several concerning aspects of this bill that would ultimately make college less affordable for students," she said, including changes that "may drive borrowers to riskier private loans, which are not available to all borrowers." One of college access groups' biggest criticisms of the initial bill was a significant change to Pell Grants, federal subsidies that help lower-income students pay for college. House Republicans wanted to increase the number of credits students would need to take each semester to be eligible for Pell Grants. The Center for American Progress, a progressive think tank, estimated that two out of three Pell recipients could've lost their grants or received smaller ones if that requirement were enacted. The Senate version takes a softer approach, codifying a provision to more fully exclude higher-income students qualify for Pell funds. At the same time, the bill expands Pell Grants in ways that could waste money, according to critics such as Sameer Gadkaree, president of The Institute for College Access & Success, a college affordability group. 'While the Senate nixed most of the House's proposed cuts to the Pell Grant program and averts a looming funding shortfall, it regrettably threatens the program's long-term stability by extending Pell eligibility to unaccredited programs that are unlikely to pay off for students," Gadkaree said in a statement. One of the biggest distinctions between the House and Senate versions of the bill is that they lay out two entirely different sets of new accountability rules for colleges. The House proposal would fine colleges for leaving students on the hook for unpaid student loan debt. The Senate's framework suggests taking federal financial aid away from college programs if they can't prove that students who graduate are earning more than they would have without a degree. Mike Itzkowitz, who served in the Education Department under President Barack Obama, said that concept has bipartisan support. "I don't know anyone who would be willing to fork over their time to take on loans to earn less than a high school graduate," he said. But it's possible that particular provision won't survive special Senate rules. To avoid needing the support of Democrats, Republicans are trying to pass Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" using the budget process. That strategy comes with challenges, however, namely that the bill must only make changes that spend money or save money. Significant reforms to college oversight might go too far, said Jon Fansmith, the senior vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, the main association for colleges and universities. "This process isn't designed to do complicated policymaking," he said. "I really do worry about rushing something through without understanding what we're doing." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: GOP student loan overhaul is getting closer to becoming law
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Trump accounts' for babies? Why the White House is pushing cash for kids
WASHINGTON – In his first term, President Donald Trump made waves when he put his name on stimulus checks the U.S. government sent to millions of Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, the Republican president is celebrating a provision tucked into the GOP tax bill that would create and affix his name onto investment accounts for babies, if the legislation that very narrowly passed the House makes it through the Senate and becomes law. The program for American children born during Trump's current term would involve a one-time contribution from the federal government of $1,000 per toddler into a mutual fund or index fund that is tied to the performance of the stock market. The legislation also allows for parents, churches, and private foundations to make contributions of up to $5,000 annually during childhood – which the child could access when they turn 18 to pay for education, training or a first-time home purchase. The full balance would be available at age 30. "They'll really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economies into the future," Trump said at a June 9 event at the White House touting the legislation. From gym memberships to gun silencers, Trump's tax bill is full of surprises House Republicans changed the name of the program from "MAGA accounts" to "Trump accounts" before the bill's passage last month, offering the president a tangible benefit for working-class Americans that he can put his stamp on. The program also serves as a counter to Democratic arguments that the legislation that extends the GOP's 2017 tax cuts primarily helps the nation's wealthiest Americans. Trump announced at his June 9 event that a handful of large corporations have further pledged to contribute to their employees' accounts. Trump is set to leave office on Jan. 20, 2029, but he and the GOP could benefit politically from the creation of the program in the 2026 campaign. Midterm elections have historically been unkind to the sitting president's political party, and Republicans have been sprinting to get their tax cut bill through quick enough to improve their political fortunes. Ahead of Trump's event, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the bill would "change the lives of working, middle class families across America" through tax cuts, increasing the child tax credit, "AND by creating this incredible new ''Trump Account' program, which will put the lives of young Americans on the right financial path!' The House overcame a myriad of obstacles, coming from pockets of lawmakers in the GOP and a unified opposition from Democrat, to pass the lower chamber in late May. It has since run into trouble in the Senate, where conservative Republicans have raised fresh concerns that the bill would balloon the national debt. They are also fighting over provisions dealing with Medicaid and the state and local tax deduction, or SALT, that were critical to the bill's passage in the House. Fewer than three Republicans can defect for the bill to pass. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, has said he's a no, and senators such as Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, have pushed to get the price tag down. Republicans are aiming to get the bill through the Senate, approved again by the House and to Trump for his signature by July 4. But the president also echoed some GOP lawmakers in acknowledging that the party's self-imposed deadline could slip. Donald Trump Airport? Trump on the $500 bill? Republicans can't stop honoring ex-president "I've encouraged my dear friends and colleagues over there don't modify it too much, because we've got a very delicate balance that we've reached and it took us a long time to get there. And we don't want to upset that balance too much," House Speaker Mike Johnson said during Trump's roundtable event at the White House. Johnson added: "So they're putting their fingerprints on it. I think – I hope – it will be a light touch, and they'll send it back, and we'll get this thing done, and get it to the president's desk." Trump has been putting public and private pressure on lawmakers to vote for the bill. The White House last week touted support from police officers in a bid to bring attention to Trump's fulfillment of a campaign pledge in the legislation to eliminate taxes on overtime. Trump's turning his attention to the investment fund for newborns in the legislation that would start as a pilot program. The benefit is backdated to run between Jan. 1, 2024, and Jan. 1, 2029, just before the end of Trump's term, though the White House hopes the program will be so popular that it is permanently extended. The White House offered to sweeten the pot on June 9, when it said the CEOs of several large corporations would make billons of dollars in additional investments into accounts for the children of their employees. Dell Technologies, Salesforce, Uber and Goldman Sachs were among the companies the White House said would be participating. "Dell technologies will match the government's contributions, dollar for dollar, for every child born to a Dell team member," said Michael Dell, the CEO of Dell Technologies, at Trump's event. Calling it an "investment" in America's future. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang called Trump's plan "visionary – a seed fund for America's next generation" in a statement before the event and said his company would contribute an unspecified amount to the accounts of its employees' children. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Cash for kids: Trump touts plan for babies' investment accounts Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
