
Trump ends Canada trade talks in retaliation over digital tax
PRESIDENT Donald Trump said he was ending all trade discussions with Canada in retaliation for the country's digital services tax and threatened to impose a fresh tariff rate within the next week.
'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,' Trump posted Friday on social media.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on CNBC that he expects the administration will launch a so-called Section 301 investigation into Canada, a tool the US has used against other countries including China, which may lead to higher import taxes.
Canada and the US have one of the world's largest bilateral trading relationships, exchanging more than $900 billion of goods and services last year. But the alliance has grown tense since Trump won the election. The president threatened 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and repeatedly said he thinks it should become the 51st US state. Since taking office, he has put taxes on steel, aluminum and automobiles and other goods.
In response, many Canadians have boycotted US products and avoided travel to US destinations.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, speaking briefly on his way out of a meeting on Friday, said he hadn't spoken with Trump since his post. 'We'll continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians,' he said.
The Canadian dollar dropped more than 0.5% almost immediately after Trump's post before reversing those losses. Canada's benchmark equity index fell, ending the day down 0.2%, and the shares of companies that rely on moving goods across the border, including General Motors Co. and apparel maker Canada Goose Holdings Inc., also took a hit.
Dozens of countries face a July 9 deadline for Trump's higher tariffs to kick back into place, and have been engaged in negotiations with the US. That deadline doesn't apply to Canada and Mexico. The president imposed tariffs on the US's North American neighbors earlier this year over fentanyl trafficking and migration concerns, and talks with them are being handled on a separate track.
Last week, Trump and Carney met at the Group of Seven leaders' summit and agreed to try to hash out an agreement by the middle of July.
Business groups and some politicians quickly applied pressure on Carney to drop the digital tax. 'In an effort to get trade negotiations back on track, Canada should put forward an immediate proposal to eliminate the DST in exchange for an elimination of tariffs from the United States,' said Goldy Hyder, chief executive officer of the Business Council of Canada.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford reiterated his call for the prime minister to abandon the digital tax.
'We've long supported the idea that global tech giants should pay their fair share in the countries where they operate. But the digital services tax hasn't achieved that,' the Council of Canadian Innovators, which represents technology executives, said in a statement. 'It's functionally a pass-through cost paid by Canadian advertisers and consumers, and it leaves our economy exposed to draconian trade retaliation.'
Bessent on Thursday announced a deal with other G-7 countries that will exclude US companies from some taxes imposed by other countries in exchange for removing the Section 899 'revenge tax' from the administration's tax bill. However, the deal didn't address digital services taxes, which are in place in a number of countries but are opposed by Trump and his officials.
Canada's digital tax isn't new. It was passed into law a year ago but companies haven't had to pay it yet.
The government will proceed with implementing it, with the first payments due Monday, Canada's finance department said earlier Friday, before Trump's post. Business groups had warned it would increase the cost of services and invite retaliation by the US.
A group of 21 US lawmakers wrote to Trump earlier this month asking him to push for the tax's removal, estimating it will cost American companies $2 billion. Trump has long railed against taxes and other non-tariff barriers, casting them as an impediment to US exporters.
'We were hoping as a sign of goodwill that the new Carney administration would at least put a brake on that during the trade talks,' Bessent said on CNBC. 'They seem not to have.'
The US specifically asked for a 30-day delay in the tax when Trump and Carney met at the G-7, according to Kevin Hassett, Trump's National Economic Council Director, who spoke Friday in an interview with Fox Business.
The Canadian digital services tax is similar to those implemented by other countries, including the UK. The levy is 3% of the digital services revenue that a firm makes from Canadian users above C$20 million ($14.6 million) in a year.
It would apply to megacap technology companies including Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. and has been criticized by smaller players including Uber Technologies Inc. and Etsy Inc. 'We are disappointed by the Canadian government's decision to implement a discriminatory tax that will harm Canadian consumers, and we hope that this matter can be quickly resolved,' a spokesperson for Amazon said in an emailed statement.
Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne suggested last week that the digital tax may be renegotiated as part of US-Canada trade discussions.
'Obviously, all of that is something that we're considering as part of broader discussions that you may have,' he said. –BLOOMBERG
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump denies reports of $30 billion nuclear deal with Iran
WASHINGTON: U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday dismissed media reports that said his administration had discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program. CNN reported on Thursday and NBC News reported on Friday that the Trump administration in recent days had explored possible economic incentives for Iran in return for its government halting uranium enrichment. The reports cited sources. CNN cited officials as saying that several proposals were floated and were preliminary. "Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Friday, calling the reports a "HOAX." Since April, Iran and the U.S. have held indirect talks aimed at finding a new diplomatic solution regarding Iran's nuclear program. Tehran says its program is peaceful and Washington says it wants to ensure Iran cannot build a nuclear weapon. Trump, earlier this week, announced a ceasefire between U.S. ally Israel and its regional rival Iran to halt a war that began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran. The Israel-Iran conflict had raised alarms in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. The U.S. struck Iran's nuclear sites over the last weekend and Iran targeted a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation, before Trump announced the ceasefire. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country widely believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, has said it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons programme in Iran.


The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump dismisses reports US is weighing up to $30 billion civilian nuclear deal for Iran
WASHINGTON: U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday dismissed media reports that said his administration had discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program. CNN reported on Thursday and NBC News reported on Friday that the Trump administration in recent days had explored possible economic incentives for Iran in return for its government halting uranium enrichment. The reports cited sources. CNN cited officials as saying that several proposals were floated and were preliminary. "Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Friday, calling the reports a "HOAX." Since April, Iran and the U.S. have held indirect talks aimed at finding a new diplomatic solution regarding Iran's nuclear program. Tehran says its program is peaceful and Washington says it wants to ensure Iran cannot build a nuclear weapon. Trump, earlier this week, announced a ceasefire between U.S. ally Israel and its regional rival Iran to halt a war that began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran. The Israel-Iran conflict had raised alarms in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. The U.S. struck Iran's nuclear sites over the last weekend and Iran targeted a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation, before Trump announced the ceasefire. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country widely believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, has said it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons programme in Iran.


The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Trump victorious again as US Supreme Court wraps up its term
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on the last day of rulings for its current term gave Donald Trump his latest in a series of victories at the nation's top judicial body, one that may make it easier for him to implement contentious elements of his sweeping agenda as he tests the limits of presidential power. With its six conservative members in the majority and its three liberals dissenting, the court on Friday curbed the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide, resetting the power balance between the federal judiciary and presidents. The ruling came after the Republican president's administration asked the Supreme Court to narrow the scope of so-called "universal" injunctions issued by three federal judges that halted nationally the enforcement of his January executive order limiting birthright citizenship. The court's decision has "systematically weakened judicial oversight and strengthened executive discretion," said Paul Rosenzweig, an attorney who served in Republican President George W. Bush's administration. Friday's ruling said that judges generally can grant relief only to the individuals or groups who brought a particular lawsuit. The decision did not, however, permit immediate implementation of Trump's directive, instead instructing lower courts to reconsider the scope of the injunctions. The ruling was authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one of three conservative justices who Trump appointed during his first term in office from 2017-2021. Trump has scored a series of victories at the Supreme Court since returning to office in January. These have included clearing the way for his administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face and ending temporary legal status held by hundreds of thousands of migrants on humanitarian grounds. The court also permitted implementation of Trump's ban on transgender people in the military, let his administration withhold payment to foreign aid groups for work already performed for the government, allowed his firing of two Democratic members of federal labor boards to stand for now, and backed his Department of Government Efficiency in two disputes. 'A BULLY PULPIT' "President Trump secured the relief he sought in most of his administration's cases," George Mason University law school professor Robert Luther III said. "Justice Barrett's opinion is a win for the presidency," Luther said of the decision on nationwide injunctions. "It recognizes that the executive branch is a bully pulpit with a wide range of authorities to implement the promises of a campaign platform." Once again, as with many of the term's major decisions, the three liberal justices found themselves in dissent, a familiar position as the court under the guidance of Chief Justice John Roberts continues to shift American law rightward. The rulings in favor of Trump illustrate that "the court's three most liberal justices are proving less relevant now than at any earlier point in the Roberts Court with respect to their impact on its jurisprudence," Luther said. The cases involving Trump administration policies this year came to the court as emergency filings rather than through the normal process, with oral arguments held only in the birthright litigation. And those arguments did not focus on the legality of Trump's action but rather on the actions of the judges who found that it was likely unconstitutional. "One theme is the court's struggle to keep pace with a faster-moving legal world, especially as the Trump administration tests the outer boundaries of its powers," Boston College Law School professor Daniel Lyons said. In other cases during the nine-month term, the court sided with a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, endorsed South Carolina's plan to cut off public funding to reproductive healthcare and abortion provider Planned Parenthood, and made it easier to pursue claims alleging workplace "reverse" discrimination. The court also spared two American gun companies from the Mexican government's lawsuit accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels, and allowed parents to opt elementary school children out of classes when storybooks with LGBT characters are read. 'NOT THE COURT'S ROLE' In several cases involving federal statutes, the message from the justices is that people unhappy with the outcome need to take that up with Congress, according to Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson. "The court is implicitly saying, 'That's Congress' problem to fix, and it's not the court's role to solve those issues,'" Levinson said. This is the second straight year that the court ended its term with a decision handing Trump a major victory. On July 1, 2024, it ruled in favor of Trump in deciding that presidents cannot be prosecuted for official actions taken in office. It marked the first time that the court recognized any form of presidential immunity from prosecution. The Supreme Court's next term begins in October but Trump's administration still has some emergency requests pending that the justices could act upon at any time. It has asked the court to halt a judicial order blocking mass federal job cuts and the restructuring of agencies. It also has asked the justices to rein in the judge handling a case involving deportations to so-called "third countries." Recent rulings "have really shown the court for what it is, which is a deeply conservative court," Georgia State University law professor Anthony Michael Kreis said. The court's jurisprudence reflects a larger shift in the national discourse, with Republicans feeling they have the political capital to achieve long-sought aims, Kreis said. The court's conservative majority, Kreis said, "is probably feeling more emboldened to act." (Reporting by Jan Wolfe and Will Dunham, Editing by Rosalba O'Brien)