logo
Zohran Mamdani's New York primary win sparks the ire of Modi's supporters

Zohran Mamdani's New York primary win sparks the ire of Modi's supporters

Al Jazeeraa day ago
If he wins the general election in November, Zohran Mamdani could become New York City's first South Asian mayor and the first of Indian origin.
But the same identity that makes him a trailblazer in United States politics has also exposed him to public outcry in India and within its diaspora.
Ever since Mamdani achieved a thumping win in the Democratic mayoral primary on June 24, his campaign has weathered a flood of vitriol – some of it coming from the Hindu right.
Experts say the attacks are a reflection of the tensions that have arisen between supporters of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and critics of the human rights abuses under his leadership, particularly against religious minorities.
A number of those attacks have fixated on Mamdani's religion: The 33-year-old is Muslim. Some commenters have accused the mayoral hopeful of being a 'jihadi' and 'Islamist'. Others have called him anti-Hindu and anti-India.
Kayla Bassett, the director of research at the Center for the Study of Organized Hate (CSOH), a Washington-based think tank, believes the attacks against Mamdani are a vehicle to attack the Muslim community more broadly.
'This isn't just about one individual,' she said. 'It's about promoting a narrative that casts Muslims as inherently suspect or un-American.'
Backlash from Modi's party
That narrative could potentially have consequences for Mamdani's campaign, as he works to increase his support among New York voters.
Mamdani will face competition in November from more established names in politics. He is expected to face incumbent mayor Eric Adams in the final vote. His rival in the Democratic primary, former Governor Andrew Cuomo, has also not yet ruled out an independent run.
The mayoral hopeful has vocally denounced human rights abuses, including in places like Gaza and India.
That unabashed stance has not only earned him criticism from his rival candidates but also from overseas.
Members of Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), for example, have been among the voices slamming Mamdani's remarks and questioning his fitness for the mayor's seat.
BJP Member of Parliament Kangana Ranaut posted on social media, for example, that Mamdani 'sounds more Pakistani than Indian'.
'Whatever happened to his Hindu identity or bloodline,' she asked, pointing to the Hindu roots of his mother, director Mira Nair. 'Now he is ready to wipe out Hinduism.'
Soon after Mamdani's primary win, a prominent pro-BJP news channel in India, Aaj Tak, also aired a segment claiming that he had received funding from organisations that promote an 'anti-India' agenda.
It also warned of a growing Muslim population in New York City, an assertion it coupled with footage of women wearing hijabs.
But some of the backlash has come from sources closer to home.
A New Jersey-based group named Indian Americans for Cuomo spent $3,570 for a plane to fly a banner over New York City with the message: 'Save NYC from Global Intifada. Reject Mamdani.'
A critic of human rights abuses
Much of the pushback can be linked to Mamdani's vocal criticism of Hindu nationalism and Modi in particular.
In 2020, Mamdani participated in a Times Square demonstration against a temple built on the site of the Babri mosque in Ayodhya that was destroyed by Hindu extremists in 1992. He called out the BJP's participation in and normalisation of that violence.
'I am here today to protest against the BJP government in India and the demolition of the Babri masjid,' he said.
Then, in 2023, Mamdani read aloud notes from an imprisoned Indian activist ahead of Modi's visit to New York City.
That activist, Umar Khalid, has been imprisoned since 2020 without trial on terrorism charges after making speeches criticising Modi's government.
More recently, during a town hall for mayoral candidates in May, Mamdani was asked if he would meet with Modi if the prime minister were to visit the city again. Mamdani said he wouldn't.
'This is a war criminal,' he replied.
Mamdani pointed to Modi's leadership in the Indian state of Gujarat during a period of religious riots in 2002. Modi has been criticised for turning a blind eye to the violence, which killed more than a thousand people, many of them Muslim.
In the aftermath, Modi was denied a US visa for 'severe violations of religious freedom'.
'Narendra Modi helped to orchestrate what was a mass slaughter of Muslims in Gujarat, to the extent that we don't even believe that there are Gujarati Muslims any more,' Mamdani told the town hall. 'When I tell someone that I am, it's a shock to them that that's even the case.'
Barriers of class and religion
It's that 'fearless' and consistent criticism of Modi that has made Mamdani the target of outrage from the Hindu right, according to Rohit Chopra, a communications professor at Santa Clara University.
'Among the Hindu right, there is a project of the political management of the memory of 2002. There's this silence around Modi being denied a visa to enter the US,' said Chopra.
The professor also said class fragmentation among Hindu Americans may also fuel scepticism towards Mamdani.
Hindu Americans are a relatively privileged minority in terms of socioeconomic status: The Pew Research Center estimates that 44 percent Asian American Hindus enjoy a family income of more than $150,000, and six in 10 have obtained postgraduate degrees.
That relative prosperity, Chopra said, can translate into social barriers.
'They don't necessarily even identify with other Hindu Americans who may come from very different kinds of class backgrounds – people who might be working as cab drivers, or dishwashers, or other blue-collar jobs,' he explained.
Meanwhile, Suchitra Vijayan, a New York City-based writer and the founder of the digital magazine Polis Project, has noticed that many lines of attack against Mamdani centre on his identity.
'Mamdani is an elected leader who is unabashedly Muslim,' she said.
She pointed out that other Muslim politicians, including US Congress members Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, have sparked similar backlash for reproaching Modi over the Gujarat violence.
But Mamdani's family ties to the region make the scrutiny all the more intense.
'In Mamdani's case, he's Muslim, he's African, but also his father is of Gujarati descent and has openly spoken about the pogrom in Gujarat,' Vijayan said.
A 'seismic' victory
Despite the online backlash, experts and local organisers believe Mamdani's campaign can mobilise Indian American voters and other members of the South Asian diaspora who traditionally lean Democratic.
The Pew Research Center estimates that there are 710,000 Indians and Indian Americans living in the New York City area, the most of any metropolitan centre in the US.
Preliminary results from June's mayoral primary show that Mamdani scored big in neighbourhoods with strong Asian populations, like Little Bangladesh, Jackson Heights and Parkchester.
A final tally of the ranked-choice ballots was released earlier this week, on July 1, showing Mamdani trounced his closest rival, Cuomo, 56 percent to 44.
'I've heard his win described as 'seismic',' said Arvind Rajagopal, a professor of media studies at New York University. 'He can speak not only Spanish but Hindi, Urdu, and passable Bangla. A candidate with this level of depth and breadth is rare in recent times.'
Rajagopal added that Mamdani's decision to own his Muslim identity became an asset for him on the campaign trail, particularly in the current political climate.
With President Donald Trump in office for a second term, many voters are bracing for the anti-Muslim rhetoric and policies that accompanied his first four years in the White House.
Back then, Trump called for a 'total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States', saying they represented an 'influx of hatred' and 'danger'.
'The moment of Trump is something that Mamdani answers perfectly,' Rajagopal said. He called Mamdani's success 'a big reality check for the Hindu right'.
Whatever backlash Mamdani is facing from Hindu groups, Jagpreet Singh is sceptical about its influence over New York City.
'I can assure you – it's not coming from within the city,' said Singh, the political director of DRUM Beats, a sister organisation to the social justice organisation Desis Rising Up and Moving.
That group was among the first in the city to endorse Mamdani's candidacy for mayor.
Since early in his campaign, Singh pointed out that Mamdani has reached out to Hindu working-class communities 'in an authentic way'.
This included visiting the Durga Temple and Nepalese Cultural Center in Ridgewood and speaking at events in the Guyanese and Trinidadian Hindu communities, Singh pointed out. During his time as a state assembly member, Mamdani also pushed for legislation that would recognise Diwali – the Hindu festival of lights – as a state holiday.
At a Diwali celebration last year, Singh said Mamdani 'took part in lighting of the diyas, spoke on stage, and talked about his mother's background as being somebody who is of Hindu faith'.
To Singh, the message was clear. South Asian groups in New York City, including Hindu Americans, 'have adopted him as their own'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Wrong': Trump administration completes deportations to South Sudan
‘Wrong': Trump administration completes deportations to South Sudan

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

‘Wrong': Trump administration completes deportations to South Sudan

The United States has confirmed it completed the deportations of eight men to South Sudan, a day after a US judge cleared the way for President Donald Trump's administration to send them to the violence-hit African country. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said on Saturday that the men were deported a day earlier, on US Independence Day on Friday, after they lost a last-minute legal bid to halt their transfer. The eight detainees – immigrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam – had been held under guard at a US military base in Djibouti for weeks. A staffer working at Juba airport in South Sudan told the Reuters news agency that the aircraft carrying the men had arrived on Saturday at 6am local time (04:00 GMT). Their current location is not known. In a statement, DHS said the eight men had been convicted of a range of crimes, including first-degree murder, robbery, drug trafficking and sexual assault. Their case had become a flashpoint in ongoing legal battles over the Trump administration's campaign of mass deportations, including removals to so-called 'third countries' where rights groups say deportees face safety risks and possible abuses. 'These third country deportations are wrong, period. And the United States should not be sending people to a literal war zone,' progressive Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal wrote on social media earlier this week, urging the deportations to be blocked. The eight men had been held in a converted shipping container in Djibouti since late May, when an earlier deportation flight to South Sudan was halted by the courts over due process concerns. The US Supreme Court has twice ruled that the Trump administration could deport them to countries outside of their homelands, issuing its latest decision on Thursday (PDF). That same night, the eight detainees had filed an appeal, arguing that their 'impermissibly punitive' deportation to South Sudan would violate the US Constitution, which prohibits 'cruel and unusual punishment'. But Judge Brian Murphy of Boston, whose rulings had previously halted efforts to begin deportations to the African country, ruled on Friday evening that the Supreme Court had tied his hands, clearing the way for the deportations to go ahead. On Saturday, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin hailed the removals as 'a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people'. The US State Department advises citizens not to travel to South Sudan due to 'crime, kidnapping, and armed conflict'. The United Nations has also warned that a political crisis embroiling the African country could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018. Last week, Blaine Bookey, legal director at the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco, condemned the US's use of deportations to third countries. 'The administration's increased use of third country transfers flies in the face of due process rights, the United States' international legal obligations, and basic principles of human decency,' Bookey said in a statement.

Iran has not agreed to inspections or given up enrichment, says Trump
Iran has not agreed to inspections or given up enrichment, says Trump

Al Jazeera

time13 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Iran has not agreed to inspections or given up enrichment, says Trump

United States President Donald Trump has said Iran has not agreed to inspections of its nuclear programme or to giving up enriching uranium. He told reporters on board Air Force One on Friday that he believed Tehran's nuclear programme had been 'set back permanently', although he conceded Iran could restart it at a different location. Trump said he would discuss Iran with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he visits the White House on Monday, where a potential Gaza ceasefire is expected to top the agenda. Trump said, as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House, 'I would think they'd have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem.' Trump said he would not allow Tehran to resume its nuclear programme, adding that Iranian officials wanted to meet with him. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Friday it had pulled out its inspectors from Iran as a standoff deepens over their return to the country's nuclear facilities that were bombed by the US and Israel. The US and Israel say Iran was enriching uranium to build nuclear weapons. Tehran denies wanting to produce a nuclear bomb, reiterating for years that its nuclear programme has been for civilian use only. Neither US intelligence nor the UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said they had found any proof that Tehran was building a nuclear weapon. Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in a 12-day war with the Islamic Republic three weeks ago, with the US intervening on the side of its staunch ally by launching massive strikes on the sites on June 22. The IAEA's inspectors have been unable to inspect Iran's facilities since the beginning of the conflict, even though Grossi has said that it is his top priority. Grossi stressed 'the crucial importance' of holding talks with Iran to resume its monitoring and verification work as soon as possible. Distrust of IAEA In the aftermath of the US and Israeli attacks, Iran, which has said it is still committed to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), made painfully clear its burgeoning distrust of the IAEA. Since the start of the conflict, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA, not only for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes, but also for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing Tehran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations, the day before Israel attacked. On Wednesday, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian ordered the country to cut ties with the nuclear watchdog. A bill to suspend cooperation had already been passed in the Iranian parliament and approved by the country's Guardian Council. Guardian Council spokesperson Hadi Tahan Nazif said the decision had been taken for the 'full respect for the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Iran'. The bill itself says the suspension 'will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists', according to Iranian state television. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency's inspectors will be able to return to Iran. On Monday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi summarily dismissed Grossi's request to visit nuclear facilities bombed by Israel and the US. 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent,' Araghchi said. The US claims military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran's three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what had happened to much of Iran's nine tonnes of enriched uranium, especially the more than 400kg (880 pounds) enriched to up to 60 percent purity, a closer step but not in the realm of weapons grade at 90 percent or more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store