Ireland adds 10,000 foreign multinational jobs in H1, up from 2024
Ireland is hugely reliant on the taxes and jobs of foreign multinationals. They have almost doubled their workforce in the last decade to make up around 11% of the entire labour market, but jobs growth has stalled over the past two years.
The decades-old model of attracting jobs from mainly U.S. firms in sectors such as technology and pharmaceuticals has been further threatened by President Donald Trump's sweeping economic policies and pledge to bring more production back to the U.S.
IDA Ireland's half-year results do not take job losses into account that broadly cancelled out new jobs in 2023 and 2024. New jobs are unlikely to be as strong in the second half, but that seasonality is not unusual, IDA CEO Michael Lohan said on Wednesday.
"Ireland has promoted its political, policy and institutional stability as important aspects of our offering to FDI. Today's results are evidence that in a turbulent world, this stability now stands out as a very attractive feature," IDA Chairman, Feargal O'Rourke, added.
The new job commitments arose from 179 new investments, also up from 131 in the first half of 2024. Research, development and innovation projects accounted for a quarter of those and were driven by the pharmaceutical and technology sectors.
The total share from North American companies stood at 65%, in line with historical trends, while the new investments included 52 companies investing in Ireland for the first time.
Lohan added that foreign multinationals are starting to make major capital investment decisions again now they are beginning to see a path to what the future might look like following the huge uncertainty unleashed by U.S. tariff announcements in April.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
City of York Council 'rules out' congestion charge
Congestion charges have been ruled out as a method of cutting city centre traffic in York, transport leaders Ravilious, City of York council's executive member for transport, said the measure was not among those being considered, though said "everything else is part of the toolbox".Speaking at Active City York 2025, Ravilious said other schemes being considered include the creation of a "Sustainable Transport Corridor" from York Station to Tower she said it was important to "get the framing right" after the recent backlash to increased parking charges in the city. Ravilious spoke to attendees at the event alongside Public Health Director Peter Roderick about the council's efforts to promote walking, cycling and public transport council's Local Transport Strategy, which is guiding the work, aims to cut car use in York by a fifth by 2030, according to the Local Democracy Reporting told the event plans to achieve the goal include the creation of a Sustainable Transport Corridor, to give buses priority along a route from York Station to Tower Street via the Ouse Bridge, over all but essential private car said the authority had also tried to use hikes in parking charges at council-run car parks to try and discourage car she acknowledged the reaction from residents, traders and opposition councillors highlighted the importance of taking people with them when enacting transport changes. "We raised parking charges to reduce congestion by making a family bus ticket cheaper than the first two hours," she said."But we didn't get the framing right and it's not gone down well, it's very difficult because it came as part of our budget so we couldn't do it with the positives."It's been very difficult and painful, it's been a lesson for us to have the carrot alongside the stick."We've ruled out a congestion charge for York, but everything else is part of the toolbox, parking is an important tool and we all have to address it." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour refuses to shield state pension from ‘retirement tax'
Labour has rejected a petition calling for the personal allowance to be raised to protect state pensioners from income tax. The Treasury said the tax-free personal allowance would not be raised for retirees – a move campaigners have called a 'betrayal' of the elderly. Millions of Britain's poorest retirees face being dragged into the tax net when the state pension breaches the £12,570 tax-free threshold in a move which has been dubbed the 'retirement tax'. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, has committed to keeping income tax thresholds frozen until at least 2028, a policy introduced under the Tories. Last week she refused to rule out extending the freeze beyond this date. However, the new 'full' state pension of £11,973 a year, paid to 12.9 million people aged 66 and over, is set to breach as early as next year. The triple lock ensures that the state pension rises each April by the highest of inflation, average earnings or 2.5pc. If average earnings continue to grow at their current rate of 5.2pc, then the state pension will exceed the tax-free allowance for the first time next year. This will mean pensioners – many of whom rely solely on the state pension for their income – will be taxed at 20pc on the portion above £12,570. In March, the Silver Voices campaign group submitted a petition with 125,000 signatures to Number 10 and the Chancellor calling on the Government to lift the personal allowance threshold for pensioners and to commit to raising it in line with future triple lock rises. However, the Treasury last week rejected the idea of 'exempting the state pension and other benefits' from income tax as doing so would 'add complexity to the tax system'. Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, said the 'inadequate' response had 'stuck two fingers up' at pensioners who felt 'insulted and betrayed' by the Government. He added: 'The British state pension isn't a king's ransom and it's very difficult to survive on at the moment, even without getting taxed on it. 'Keeping thresholds frozen is a backhanded way of taxing the state pension and triple lock, which is often people's only source of income. 'Extending the freeze to 2030 will make the situation even worse.' The threshold freeze helped to push an extra 2.5 million pensioners into the tax net under the Tories' 14 years in power. Ahead of the general election last year, the Conservatives proposed raising the personal allowance in line with the triple lock for pensioners to shield them from a 'retirement tax'. Analysis by wealth manager Quilter suggests that an extra one million low-income pensioners would be taxed on their state pension if Labour were to extend the freeze until 2030. 'Giving with one hand and taking with the other' Baroness Altmann, a former Tory pensions minister, said: 'Inevitably, if the state pension keeps going up and the threshold doesn't, more and more pensioners are going to pass the threshold with their state pension income alone. 'Those with no other income are increasingly going to find that the Government is giving with one hand and taking with the other. There's likely to be a lot of upset. 'Also, if you only have the state pension, an increase is only going to take you slightly over the threshold by a few pounds, the cost of administering it could well be more than the amount of tax they will collect.' It comes as the former Labour leader Lord Kinnock said the Party is 'willing to explore' a new wealth tax of 2pc on assets over £10m. In its response to the campaign, a Treasury spokesman said: 'Exempting the state pension and other benefits from income tax would add complexity to the tax system and those paying higher rates of tax would receive the greatest benefit. 'Individuals earning above the higher rate threshold would benefit more than those with incomes below, and those earning below the personal allowance would not benefit at all. 'It would also be expensive at a time when the Government has inherited a very challenging set of fiscal circumstances.'
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Panic over Labour 'wealth tax' to fill £30bn black hole in government finances - with warning millionaires have ALREADY moved huge amounts of cash out of UK
has been warned that a wealth tax would make her situation even worse as Labour 's Left demands more spending. The prospect of a charge on the assets of the well-off has been mooted as the Chancellor scrambles to fill a potential £30billion black hole in the public finances. Lord Kinnock, who led Labour between 1983 and 1992, fueled speculation yesterday by suggesting ministers were looking at a two per cent levy on assets worth more than £10million. He said the move could raise up to £11billion a year and be popular with a 'great majority of the general public'. Left-wingers and unions have lined up behind the idea, as they knock back tentative efforts to curb spiralling benefits costs. However, the Tories warned that there was already an alarming exodus of wealth-creators from Britain thanks to Labour's policies - saying the only people who would suffer from the raid would be the least well-off. Tories warned that there was already an alarming exodus of wealth-creators from Britain thanks to Labour's policies - saying the only people who would suffer from the raid would be the least well-off. Ms Reeves seems to be backed into a corner as she is adamant about sticking to her strict fiscal rules on borrowing. She has also said Labour will keep the manifesto pledge not to hike taxes on income tax, employee national insurance or VAT. But experts have suggested that the stalling economy together with spending pressures could mean she has a £31billion funding gap to fill at the Autumn Budget. The respected IFS has warned the tax increases might even need to be on a similar scale to the record £41billion hike in the burden imposed last year. Speaking to Sky News yesterday, Lord Kinnock said there was now an appearance the Government was being 'bogged down by their own imposed limitations'. But he added there are 'ways around that', such as the introduction of a wealth tax when Ms Reeves presents her next Budget in the Autumn. 'There are ways around that, ways out of it, pathways that I think people are willing to explore and actually, would commend themselves to the great majority of the general public,' the peer said. 'They include, for instance, asset taxes in a period in which - for the last 20-odd years in the UK, like quite a lot of other Western economies - earned incomes have stagnated in real terms while asset values have zoomed. 'They've just gone through the roof.' He added: 'You wouldn't have to touch assets of under £6million or £7million. So people's houses would be secure obviously. 'But even by going for an imposition of 2 per cent on asset values above £10million, say, which is very big fortune, the Government would be in a position to collect £10billion or £11 billion a year. But Tory shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride condemned a tax on assets over £10million as 'the worst thing to do'. He said Labour's tax hikes had already seen around 10,000 to 15,000 high net worth individuals leave Britain. 'Some people, the socialists, might say 'well, who cares about that?', he added. 'Well, the problem is that the amount of tax that those people have been paying requires about a third of a million people on average earnings to cover that lost tax that's just gone straight out of the door. 'So the last thing we want to be doing now is piling further taxes on the wealth creators. 'We need to be, if anything, getting those taxes down, and empowering them to go out and do what they do best, which is creating jobs, and, you know, creating wealth and prosperity for our country.'
