logo
Hainault sword attacker Marcus Monzo found guilty of murdering boy, 14, and three attempted murders

Hainault sword attacker Marcus Monzo found guilty of murdering boy, 14, and three attempted murders

Sky News25-06-2025
A man has been found guilty of murdering a 14-year-old boy with a samurai sword as he walked to school in east London.
Marcus Arduini Monzo, 37, nearly decapitated Daniel Anjorin and attacked five others during a 20-minute rampage in Hainault on 30 April last year.
Prosecutors said he skinned and deboned his pet cat Wizard before trying "to kill as many people as he could" while under the influence of cannabis.
Monzo, a Spanish-Brazilian national from Newham in east London, admitted two charges of possessing an offensive weapon relating to two swords, which he said he bought for display purposes.
He claimed he had no memory of carrying out the attacks denied Daniel's murder along with four charges of attempted murder, wounding with intent, aggravated burglary and possession of a bladed article.
He was cleared of one count of attempted murder - instead found guilty of intending grievous harm - and found guilty of all other charges following a trial at the Old Bailey.
The court heard Monzo was a "talented martial artist" and the jury was shown footage of him unboxing a samurai sword on 4 April last year.
In the four-minute video clip, he calls the weapon "freaking sexy" as he lunges towards the camera and makes different moves.
1:27
The court was also shown CCTV footage from the morning of 30 April, with audible screams in one clip as Monzo drove his grey Ford Transit van at speed into pedestrian Donato Iwule.
Mr Iwule told jurors: "I thought I was dying" and "I saw blood coming out of my neck", after he was struck with a sword before running away.
Witnesses described how Monzo was running around "like a maniac" and "looked a bit mad, like there was nothing there".
Daniel, who had left home at around 7am wearing headphones and school sports clothes, suffered "a near-decapitation" when Monzo attacked him with the weapon from behind, prosecutor Tom Little KC told the jury.
PC Yasmin Mechem-Whitfield chased the armed attacker through alleyways before Monzo struck her three times with the 60cm blade using "extreme force", the court heard.
He then entered a nearby house through the back door and walked upstairs before attacking sleeping couple Sindy Arias and Henry De Los Rios Polania, who he asked: "Do you believe in God?"
Mr Little said their lives were only spared because their four-year-old daughter, who was sleeping nearby, woke up and started to cry.
Monzo, who had been cornered by police, also struck Inspector Moloy Campbell once with the sword before he was finally disarmed and arrested after trying to climb onto a garage to escape.
Doorbell footage shows the moment officers shout: "Don't move, don't f****** move", after he was brought to the ground by three separate taser discharges.
Monzo told police he had "many personalities", including a "professional assassin", and compared the events to The Hunger Games film franchise.
He wept while giving evidence as he said he did not intend to harm anybody and told jurors he had no memory of what happened.
He told how he had previously used psychedelic drugs and smoked cannabis "three or four times a week" before the attack, but denied doing so on the day.
Prosecutors said he likely suffered from a psychotic disorder with "schizophrenic-like symptoms", including "delusional beliefs" that both he and his family were in "mortal danger".
But Mr Little said his psychotic state was self-induced and did not meet the threshold for diminished responsibility.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police issue warning over Palestine Action protests after group proscribed as terrorist organisation
Police issue warning over Palestine Action protests after group proscribed as terrorist organisation

The Independent

time34 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Police issue warning over Palestine Action protests after group proscribed as terrorist organisation

The police have warned protesters against demonstrating in favour of Palestine Action after it was proscribed as a terrorist group by the government. Protesters are planning to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries. In a letter to Yvette Cooper, protesters said: " We do not wish to go to prison or to be branded with a terrorism conviction. But we refuse to be cowed into silence by your order." But, ahead of the planned demonstration, the Metropolitan Police said the proscription means expressing support for the group is now a criminal offence in the UK. 'Officers policing these will act where criminal offences, including those related to support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed,' the force warned. The Met said it is an offence to invite or express support for a proscribed organisation through chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos. The warning raises the stakes ahead of the protest, with demonstrators facing the threat of being arrested under the terrorism act. It comes after the ban on Palestine Action passed into law despite a late-night legal bid to block it. The home secretary welcomed the court's decision not to block the law change, which means supporting Palestine Action is punishable by up to 14 years in prison. A Home Office spokesperson said on Saturday: "We welcome the Court's decision and Palestine Action are now a proscribed group. "The government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens." Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was "disgraceful" and that the group had a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage". MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people - Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 - have all been charged in connection with the incident at Brize Norton. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Left-wing MPs, including Labour backbenchers, opposed the government's decision to proscribe the group, with independent MP Zarah Sultana telling the Commons: 'To equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn't just absurd, it is grotesque. It is a deliberate distortion of the law to chill dissent, criminalise solidarity and suppress the truth.' Nine Labour MPs voted against the ban. Reacting to the proscription, a spokesperson for Palestine Action said: 'While the government is rushing through parliament absurd legislation to proscribe Palestine Action, the real terrorism is being committed in Gaza. 'Palestine Action affirms that direct action is necessary in the face of Israel's ongoing crimes against humanity of genocide, apartheid and occupation, and to end British facilitation of those crimes.'

Moment ‘cowardly' driver runs away after smashing stolen Porsche into family's car & killing boy, 2, in hit-and-run
Moment ‘cowardly' driver runs away after smashing stolen Porsche into family's car & killing boy, 2, in hit-and-run

The Sun

time35 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Moment ‘cowardly' driver runs away after smashing stolen Porsche into family's car & killing boy, 2, in hit-and-run

SHOCKING footage shows the moment a "callous and cowardly" speeding driver ran away after killing a two-year-old boy in a hit and run. Sharjeel Shahzad was jailed for more than 15 years after he crashed a stolen Porsche Cayenne into a family's car in Smethwick, West Midlands, just before 11pm on December 14 last year. 3 3 3 Shahzad already been banned from getting behind the wheel and was awaiting a court date for dangerous driving when he caused the death of a toddler and left his mum in a coma. Wolverhampton Crown Court heard the 30-year-old, of Cooksey Lane, Great Barr, West Midlands, had been driving at speeds of up to 50mph. He then overtook a vehicle on approach to a sweeping blind bend on Dartmouth Road and lost control of the powerful high-powered Porsche, which had false plates. Sickening footage shows the reckless driver veering onto the opposite side of the road, into a Toyota Auris being driven by Baljeet Singh. Cowardly Shahzad is seen moments later fleeing his vehicle without a second thought for the victims he left behind. The criminal was caught on camera running without looking back as other shocked motorists came to a halt following the horror smash. Baljeet, who was driving the other car, had been out celebrating a family birthday with his wife and friends that evening. Also in the car were Amritpal Singh, Kushpreet Kaur and their two-year-old son Shehbaz Singh. Shehbaz, who was unrestrained in the back of the Toyota, was pronounced dead, despite efforts to save him at the scene and at Birmingham Children's Hospital. Ms Kaur suffered severe injuries to her brain and is still in hospital. She has not been told her son has died. The court also heard Shahzad had been due to face court on December 23 in connection with a 19-minute, 30-mile pursuit he led police on in a stolen Audi on June 10. Shock moment drunk Fiat 500 driver smashes into car and flips over during dangerous overtake on quiet residential street Shahzad reached speeds of almost 150mph as he tried to evade officers, heard the court. He was only stopped when police rammed the Audi and he tried to flee the scene but was apprehended. Shahzad had also been arrested for a similar incident the day before on June 9 but this case was not continued. In October 2024, Shahzad was banned from driving for six months, despite only having a provisional driving licence, for driving without due care and attention. Jailing him for 15 years and four months for causing the death by dangerous driving of Shehbaz Singh, Judge Jonathan Gosling said the impact of the fatal collision was "catastrophic". He said: "You destroyed the lives of Amritpal Singh and Kushpreet Kaur and devastated their family and friends. You killed that little boy." The judge said Shahzad's "true character is revealed" by the fact he fled after the fatal collision with no regard for the hurt he had caused. He added: "You are not only a dangerous man, you are callous and cowardly." Shahzad was given sentences of 15 months for dangerous driving on June 10, three years each for two counts of causing serious injury by dangerous driving and four months for driving while disqualified, all of which will run concurrently. While there was no evidence Shahzad was the one who stole the Porsche, by the time of the collision, it had false registration plates on which his fingerprint was found. 'CALLOUS AND COWARDLY' Judge Gosling said Shahzad had "completely disregarded the consequences" of his actions when he fled the scene, adding: "His only interest was to disappear. He was arrested two days later and denied being in the Porsche at the time. "He complained he was being compelled to drive this way by men he feared. No one compelled him to drive like that. "He ran from the car knowing he must, at the very least, have caused very serious injury to those in the Toyota." Defending Shahzad, Nicholas Berry told the court the defendant's life had "spiralled in the most reckless manner" in the lead-up to the collision as his long-term relationship had ended and he had lost work. He had written a letter to the judge expressing his remorse for what happened. He pleaded guilty to the charges he faced at a hearing on April 11. Judge Gosling also made Shahzad, who sat in the dock wearing a grey tracksuit and showed no emotion, subject to a three-year extended licence and banned him from driving for eight years upon his release. He must also take an extended driving test before he is allowed to drive. The judge recognised the efforts of two people who tried to help those in the Toyota and called out to Shahzad to stop as he fled by awarding them £500 each.

Murder-accused father 'was really rough with two-week-old baby'
Murder-accused father 'was really rough with two-week-old baby'

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Murder-accused father 'was really rough with two-week-old baby'

A father who is accused of murdering his premature baby would shout and get angry at the infant, a jury has Gunter, 27, "had no patience" with the two-week-old and was "really rough with him", the father's aunt told Bristol Crown baby, Brendon Staddon, suffered "catastrophic injuries" to his head, neck, legs and jaw while in a special care unit at Yeovil District Hospital in Somerset on 5 March last year. He died on the same Gunter and the baby's mother, Sophie Staddon, 23, both of no fixed address, deny charges of murder and causing or allowing the child's death. Mr Gunter's aunt, Louise Besica, said she first visited her great-nephew in hospital on 22 February last year, two days after his birth, and again on 24 the first occasion, she said Mr Gunter became angry after being told by a nurse he had to wait 20 minutes to pick up his son, because the infant had just been fed through his nasogastric tube."His words were, 'It's not up to the nurses to tell me what to do'," she told the court."He went red in the face and his voice had gone higher. He was saying he was his baby and he should be allowed to change him."She said his voice was "loud" and he was "walking around a lot, and huffing and puffing".On her second visit, Ms Besica said Mr Gunter got angry when Brendon urinated on him as he changed his nappy."He said, 'For God's sake'," she told the court. "He said it in a quite shouty, really quite loud [manner], and I asked to take over."She said he was "really rough" in his handling of Brendon and this caused him to cry, which further "frustrated" his father. 'He controlled things' Ms Besica told the court that during her first visit, the baby's mother was "sat in a chair in the corner like she wasn't interested or really bothered".When asked about any changes in the mother's demeanour when Mr Gunter was present, Ms Besica replied: "Yes, when she was with me she was chattier, and more happy."When Daniel was there she was more quiet and it was more Daniel doing the talking. "He spoke for her sometimes, I noticed."She also described seeing Mr Gunter ordering food for the mother."That made me feel like that she wasn't able to speak for herself, like he had taken over, like he controlled things," Ms Besica told the court she had asked a nurse at the hospital to "keep an eye on them", out of concern for the child's safety.A post-mortem examination found Brendon died of "blunt force impact(s) head injury" with multiple non-accidental injuries to the trial continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store