
Canara Bank Under Fire For No Kannada-Speaking Staff In Rural Branches, Here's How It Responded
A recent incident at the AIT Circle branch in Chikkamagaluru district has brought the issue back into focus after a woman customer struggled to communicate with bank staff
Canara Bank is once again facing criticism for failing to offer banking services in a language that customers can understand, especially by posting non-Kannada-speaking staff in rural areas of Karnataka. A recent incident at the AIT Circle branch in Chikkamagaluru district has brought the issue back into focus after a woman customer struggled to communicate with bank staff.
In a video recorded by the customer, she can be heard saying that money meant for hospital expenses had been deducted from her account but the staff member was unable to explain the reason behind the deduction. The woman is also heard saying that a similar issue had took place the previous month.
As another person tried to intervene, the woman expressed her frustration, stating that she could not understand what the staff member was saying and questioned how can they make her sit there. 'I don't know English," she added.
Chikkamagaluru is predominantly rural, with many residents relying on agriculture and plantation work for their livelihood.
The Canara Bank employee, who was initially heard speaking Malayalam to another person, admitted that she was unable to effectively communicate with the customer. 'She is unable to follow what I am saying," the staff member is heard saying in the video.
As the video quickly went viral, members of Kannada Sene, a pro-Kannada group, accused the bank of employing only Malayalam- and Hindi-speaking staff at the branch. They claimed this made it difficult for local customers to carry out basic banking tasks. The group urged the bank manager to assign Kannada-speaking staff to all customer-facing roles to avoid such issues in the future.
In response to the backlash, Canara Bank issued a statement on social media platform X, acknowledging the concerns raised. The bank stated that Karnataka is not just a location for them, but the very birthplace of the bank, where its journey began over a century ago.
'Kannada is our foundation, your support is our strength. For Canara Bank, Karnataka is not just a state — it is our birthplace, the very first foundation of our journey that began over a hundred years ago," the bank wrote.
The bank further assured the public of its commitment to serving customers in the local language across all branches in Karnataka.
'Kannada is not merely a language to us — it is a feeling, a pride…We are committed to providing services in the local language at every branch in the state," it added.
First Published:
July 06, 2025, 22:55 IST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump slaps new tariffs on dozen countries as India-US trade deal awaits final nod
NEW DELHI : US President Donald Trump has announced a sweeping set of new tariffs, effective 1 August, on imports from more than a dozen countries, including key Asian economies such as Thailand, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, Japan, and South Korea. India, notably, remains off the list—for now—amid ongoing negotiations over a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), which remains unsigned on the President's desk. Tariff breakdown: Asia hit hardest Trump announced the tariffs through letters posted on his social media platform Social Truth. Laos and Myanmar were hit the hardest, facing duties up to 40%. Thailand retained its 36% duty from April, while Cambodia saw a slight reduction to 36% from 49%. Bangladesh's rate dropped to 35% from 37%, and Indonesia held steady at 32%. Malaysia's duty rose by 1% to 25%, while both Japan and South Korea were slapped with new 25% tariffs. Non-Asian countries also affected include Bosnia (30%), Serbia (35%), Tunisia (25%), Kazakhstan (25%), and South Africa (30%). Also read: 'US close to trade deal with India', Donald Trump announces amid new tariffs on 14 countries India holds its ground—for now India, which has offered multiple trade concessions to the US in recent months, was conspicuously absent from the tariff list. This gives the country a pricing edge in labour-intensive sectors like textiles, apparel, electronics, and toys, where its Asian competitors now face stiffer duties. 'As these rival exporters contend with steeper duties, Indian products are likely to gain a pricing edge, offering a strategic opening for Indian manufacturers to expand their footprint in the US and attract greater sourcing attention from American buyers," said Ajay Sahai, director general, Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO). The tariff hike comes just 48 hours before the 9 July deadline for the 90-day pause on Trump's Reciprocal Tariff Policy expires. While the US Trade Representative (USTR) has cleared the draft India-US trade deal, the final sign-off awaits Trump's approval. Indian officials say the agreement is unlikely to be concluded without top-level political intervention, especially on contentious issues like agriculture, dairy, and genetically modified seeds. The move, detailed through tariff letters signed by Trump and posted on his social media platform, Social Truth, comes just as the much-awaited India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) remains unsigned and pending on the President's desk. 'The deal is ready on paper, but it's now a political call," a government official said. 'If it's not signed in time, some Indian products with strong export interest may be kept out, and the same could apply to US goods. These could be taken up in later phases." Indian negotiators remain cautiously optimistic that if the 9 July deadline is missed, it could be extended to 1 August—buying time for the trade deal. Until then, India is expected to be spared from a direct tariff blow. Also read: Donald Trump announces 25% tariffs on imports from Japan and South Korea, warns against retaliation Trump's statement 'Large and persistent US trade deficits pose an extraordinary threat to our national security and economy," Trump said in an executive order. 'The 90-day suspension of additional duties, implemented in April, was based on the sincere intentions of our trading partners. That suspension will now be extended until 1 August 2025." 'Where partners take significant steps to align with the United States on economic and national security matters, I may modify tariffs accordingly," he added. The tariff hikes form part of Trump's broader Reciprocal Tariff Policy targeting countries he accuses of maintaining unfair trade barriers against American goods. With India offering market access in sectors like dairy and medical devices, New Delhi hopes its cooperative stance will spare it from a similar fate. Also read: US trade deal down to the wire as tariff pause nears close


The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
OECD Tax Framework Collapses as G7 Bows to Trump's reciprocal tax threat
Published : Jul 07, 2025 16:03 IST - 6 MINS READ Developments that have occurred in quick succession have crushed the successful efforts made in recent years to increase global cooperation aimed at raising tax revenues to take on a host of global challenges. Late in June, the non-US six (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the UK) in the G7 announced that they had agreed to a 'side-by-side solution' that amounts to a retreat from the existing global agreement to cooperate on corporate taxation. They have decided to exempt US multinationals from being subject to a minimum tax on their profits of 15 per cent, as required under an agreement sealed in 2021. To recall, after years of negotiation, an agreement titled the 'OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)' was arrived at in 2021 under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), with non-OECD countries too joining the discussion. That agreement was a commitment on the part of over 140 governments to work towards implementing a common framework to tax the global profits of transnational companies that find ways to transfer to and record their profits in low tax locations where they often have little economic activity. The BEPS framework was a means to combat such tax avoidance practices that reduce national and aggregate global tax revenues, and help governments tax profits in jurisdictions where economic activity actually occurs and value creation takes place. Also Read | A summit of subordinates The core of the agreement, which recommended 15 actions, was named Pillar Two of the framework. This was by no means far-reaching. It merely set a 15 per cent floor rate of tax on the profits of multinationals in all the cooperating jurisdictions, which was much lower than the 25-30 per cent considered reasonable by those looking to raise resources for meeting various financing challenges. Dissatisfaction over this and the tardy move to implement the OECD agreement set off demands for a global tax convention under the auspices of the UN, which would give less developed countries more of a say in determining the terms of the agreement and a greater role in its implementation. Some progress has been achieved on this, with a UN General Assembly decision to constitute an ad hoc committee to draft the terms of reference for a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation. Negotiations on the convention were to occur over 2025 to 2027. Weaponised tariffs However, from the very start the US—though a party to the OECD agreement—has been expressing reservations about a number of the proposed measures, especially the Pillar Two global minimum tax. With US multinationals being the principal adopters of profit-shifting strategies, they would have been the main targets of any such minimum tax, however low. So, the US, while committed to the inclusive framework, campaigned during Donald Trump's first term as President of the US, for a much-diluted version of the minimum tax proposal. And, in Trump's more aggressive second term, in which he has chosen to weaponise tariffs and taxes, Pillar Two seems to be under attack. Going on the offensive, the original version of Trump's so-called 'big beautiful' budget Bill included a section—Section 899—that authorised the US government to impose 'revenge taxes' on foreign investments emanating from countries that 'discriminated' against US firms in their tax practices. Support for a minimum corporate tax on global profits in locations were they were actually earned was seen as an instance of such discrimination. In the face of that threat, the non-US members of the G7 caved in and agreed to a side-by-side solution that exempts US multinationals from the global minimum tax provision, which amounts to dumping Pillar Two and with it the OECD agreement. That would also undermine efforts to institute an effective UN convention on international taxation, since leading countries are now likely to opt out of the convention. The link between the decision on the minimum tax and the proposed revenge taxes was clearly revealed when the US Treasury Department asked the US Congress to drop Section 899 because, in Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's words, the US had secured concessions exempting US companies from the OECD's global minimum tax regime. In fact, the Trump administration seems set to destroy all efforts at combating tax avoidance by threatening action against any international taxation measures that target multinational profits. Days after the 'side-by-side solution' was announced by non-US G7 members, Canada declared that it was scrapping a proposed tax on digital services companies that was to come into effect on June 30. The tax involved was a paltry levy of 3 per cent, which was to apply on revenues earned by firms like Meta, Netflix, and Amazon from cross-border provision of services to Canadian clients. But even that small levy was expected to increase Canada's federal government revenues by $5.3 billion over five years. Trump declared the tax a 'direct and blatant' attack on US firms, and suspended negotiations on a deal on reciprocal and special tariffs. Fearing that the tax would upend discussions on that deal, Canadian Prime Minister Mike Carney said that his government had decided to scrap the levy in order to facilitate resumption of trade talks. Global repercussions This too is likely to be a precedent with global repercussions. Many countries, especially in the EU like France have digital services taxes in place. Germany has been considering imposing a 10 per cent tax on global digital platforms like Meta and Google. And the European Commission has been talking of imposing a tax on the advertising revenues of tech firms. All of these are now under threat, as revoking them may be made a precondition for any deal on tariffs, even though there are signs that a baseline 10 per cent reciprocal tariff on imports into the US will remain and only special tariffs above these are up for negotiation. Also Read | Trade is very central to Trump's world view: Navtej Sarna One of Trump's slogans is that he wants to 'Make America Great Again' by bringing back manufacturing that had moved abroad, not least by relying on import tariffs. That could affect the profits of US firms if they are forced to withdraw from low-cost production locations abroad. Simultaneously, he seems intent on fighting discrimination against US multinationals to protect the profits of US firms. The possibility that the two objectives might be in contradiction seems lost on the President. C.P. Chandrasekhar taught for more than three decades at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He is currently Senior Research Fellow at the Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst, US.


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
TikTok new app coming for U.S users, claim reports. Check launch date, how to download
TikTok is reportedly developing a new version of its app or users in the US as the deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets nears. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Americans are reportedly set to get a new version of TikTok as the China-based ByteDance video sharing platform is building a new version of its app for users in the United States, Reuters reported quoting The Information report. This comes ahead of a planned sale of the app to a group of investors. US President Donald Trump has said that he will start talking to China on Monday or Tuesday about a possible TikTok deal. He said the United States "pretty much" has a deal on the sale of the TikTok short-video has developed a plan to launch the new app to U.S. app stores on September 5, the report said. Last month, Trump extended to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets of report added that TikTok users will eventually have to download the new app to be able to continue using the service, although the existing app will work until March of next year, though the timeline could change.A deal had been in the works earlier this year to spin off TikTok's U.S. operations into a new U.S.-based firm, majority-owned and operated by U.S. investors. That was put on hold after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese said the United States will probably have to get a deal approved by did not say who the potential buyer was. The president said earlier in the week that he had found a buyer for the U.S. branch of TikTok, the popular Chinese-owned video app that faces a ban adopted by Congress over national security concerns. A 2024 law required that the app effectively be banned in the United States unless its parent company, ByteDance, sold it to a non-Chinese company. Congress was concerned that sensitive user data could end up in the hands of the Chinese was not clear if the deal would comply with some of the requirements Congress adopted for a sale of TikTok, particularly if ByteDance chose not to share the app's algorithm with the U.S. buyers. Private equity firms have been hesitant to invest in a deal without some form of indemnification.A1. Parent company of TikTok is Byte Dance.A2. Donald Trump did not say who the potential buyer was.