India braces for higher US tariffs, eyes broader trade deal, sources say
Instead, New Delhi plans to resume broader trade negotiations when a U.S. delegation visits in mid-August, with the goal of finalising a comprehensive bilateral agreement by September or October, one of the Indian officials told Reuters.
"Talks are progressing well, and a delegation is expected in Delhi by mid-August,' one of the Indian government officials said, adding that President Donald Trump could issue a tariff letter imposing duties of 20 or 25% in a "worst-case scenario".
"However, we assume it would be a temporary measure, considering the five rounds of trade talks that have taken place. A deal will soon be worked out,' the official said.
Trump said on Monday most partners that do not negotiate separate trade deals would soon face tariffs of 15% to 20% on their exports to the United States, well above the broad 10% tariff he imposed in April. His administration will notify some 200 countries soon of their new "world tariff" rate.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC on Monday that talks with India required more negotiations as Trump was more interested in good deals than quick deals.
India has shown "strong interest in opening portions of its market" though its trade policy had long focussed on protecting domestic interests, Greer said.
Piyush Goyal, India's trade minister, told Reuters last week India is making "fantastic" progress in U.S. trade talks.
Indian officials said New Delhi has offered tariff cuts on a wide range of goods and is working to ease non-tariff barriers.
However, agriculture and dairy remain 'no-go' areas, with India unwilling to allow imports of genetically modified soybean or corn, or to open its dairy sector.
Total bilateral goods trade reached about $129 billion in 2024, with India posting a trade surplus of nearly $46 billion.
India is holding back on fresh offers while calibrating its strategy amid broader U.S. tariff threats targeting BRICS nations, including India, over issues such as de-dollarisation and purchases of Russian oil, said another official.
"We remain hopeful of securing a deal that gives Indian exporters preferential access compared to our peers," the official said.
Officials spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorised to speak to media.
India's commerce ministry and the U.S. Trade Representative's Office did not immediately respond to emailed requests for comments.
"We need more negotiations with our Indian friends to see how ambitious they want to be," Greer said.
Analysts said, without a deal, Indian exports could face average U.S. tariffs of around 26%, higher than those faced by Vietnam, Indonesia, Japan or the European Union.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australia's Star Entertainment reports fourth-quarter loss
July 30 (Reuters) - Australia's Star Entertainment ( opens new tab on Wednesday reported a fourth-quarter loss before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization of A$27 million ($17.58 million), citing impacts from mandatory carded play and cash limits. The cash-strapped casino operator reported an EBITDA of A$23 million a year ago. ($1 = 1.5356 Australian dollars)
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Massachusetts mayoral candidate Geoffrey Epstein has to keep reminding people he's not Jeffrey Epstein
Name recognition can be helpful for prospective political candidates — just look at the Kennedys — but it's been more of a thorn in the side for Framingham, Massachusetts, mayoral candidate Geoffrey Epstein. The Australian -born Epstein said he's been making a point to remind people that he's not the notorious child sex trafficker and former pal of Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein. The infamous Epstein died in 2019 in the Metropolitan Detention Center while he was awaiting trial, but that hasn't stopped angry — and apparently quite out of date — commenters on social media demanding that he "show us the files," referring to the rumored Epstein client list. 'My guy. Might wanna pull out of the race if that's your name. Or, you could show us the files,' one commenter wrote on the mayoral candidate's Facebook page. Thankfully, according to the mayoral candidate, most of his prospective constituents can differentiate the two. He told Politico that "no one locally cares about that at all," noting that the Epstein with the creepy island was "a dead American, and I'm an alive Australian." It's an especially tough time to have Epstein as a surname if you're involved in politics, as the disgraced financier has been front and center in the news due to the Trump administration's failure to produce the sex trafficker's rumored 'client list.' After Trump and Bondi failed to produce the alleged client list, some of Trump's longtime supporters — including podcaster Joe Rogan and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino — criticized the White House's handling of the situation. But it's not all bad news for Geoffrey Epstein; another politician who shares both his first and last names with men accused of horrific crimes not only ran for office, but won. According to Politico, New York state assembly member Harvey Epstein — whose name is the unfortunate combination of disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein's first name and Epstein's surname — feels the Australian mayor-hopeful's pain, but believes there's a lot more to a person than a name. 'My advice to Geoffrey would be to lead with your values and who you are as a candidate,' Harvey said. 'People will support you if you do the work and follow through.' Epstein — who goes by Geoff — told the publication he got into the race to try to tackle issues he's seen with the city's infrastructure, environmental action, and education. He's pitched expanding solar installation on school roofs and parking lots, and using more of the city's funds to pay for education. He's got strong competition in the city's incumbent Mayor Charlie Sisitsky, but if Harvey Epstein can pull it out despite his name, maybe there is hope for Geoffrey.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Harvard to comply with Trump officials' demand to turn over employment forms
Harvard University said on Tuesday that it will comply with the demands of Donald Trump's administration to turn over employment forms for thousands of university staff, but for the time being was not sharing records for those employed in roles only available to students. In an email to university employees sent on Tuesday, Harvard said that earlier this month it received a notice of inspection and a related subpoena from the Department of Homeland Security, seeking to inspect the I-9, or Employment Eligibility Verification, forms and supporting documentation for university employees. The I-9 forms, from US Citizenship and Immigration Services, are used to verify the identity and employment authorization of individuals hired for work in the US, according to the agency's website. Harvard said federal regulations entitle the government to access a US employer's paperwork, including information on employment eligibility. Harvard has been embroiled in a legal fight with the Trump administration to have its billions of dollars of frozen federal funds restored. It sued the Trump administration earlier this year. The president has threatened universities with federal funding cuts over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, climate initiatives, transgender policies and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Rights advocates have raised concerns over free speech, due process and academic freedom. Harvard said that, for now, it was not sharing records with the government for people employed in roles only available to students as it was determining if such a request complied with privacy protection requirements. The New York Times reported on Monday that Harvard was open to spending up to $500m to end its dispute with the government. That amount was more than twice what Columbia University agreed to pay last week to resolve federal inquiries. The newspaper said negotiators were still discussing the financial details of the Harvard deal and that Harvard opposed allowing an outside monitor to oversee the deal. On Monday, the government initiated a probe into Duke University and the Duke Law Journal to determine if the journal's selection of its editors gave preferences to candidates from minority communities. On Tuesday, the government said it notified Duke of a freeze of $109m in federal funds. Separately it alleged that the University of California, Los Angeles violated federal civil rights law. Both Duke and UCLA had no immediate comment.
