Much ado about nothing
Radio NZ reports:
Booze industry lobbyists have been granted input into the development of alcohol policies, including how to deal with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder.
This is framed to seem like something bad, but all it means is that the very industry being regulated gets consulted on regulations that affect them. They don't get any special access. They simply are one of many stakeholders.
The hard left activists think that companies which make money are inherently evil and should never be allowed to have a say on regulations that affect them. But this is preposterous. Of course those impacted by regulations should be allowed to have a say on them.
Documents obtained by RNZ also show that references to a review of safe drinking guidelines were removed from an Health New Zealand website after an alcohol lobbyist complained to Ross Bell, a manager with the Ministry of Health's Public Health Agency.
Further down you learn the reason why. Nothing to do with all powerful alcohol lobbyists. It is simply that the review was a matter for the Ministry of Health, not Health NZ. And that Ministers had not agreed to a review. So Health NZ had incorrect information on their website, which got corrected.
An October 2024 email from New Zealand Winegrowers to Bell, which copies in a lobbyist with the spirits industry, shows the extent to which alcohol lobbyists are involved in the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) strategy.
'Appreciate the link to the speech and FASD initiatives,' the wine industry lobbyist says. 'We'd be interested in discussing the opportunity for industry engagement in the refresh of the action plan, as we were involved in the development of the initial plan.'
FASD affects about 1800 babies a year in New Zealand. The alcohol industry fought a 20 year battle against product labels warning pregnant women not to drink, before they finally became compulsory in 2023.
No one wants kids born with FASD. If the Government and industry want the same outcome, why would you not engage with them. This does not mean you agree with them – just engagement. Engagement is good.
As for the issue of warning labels, it is (in my view) one of those initiatives that is entirely ineffective. To think that a warning label about drinking while pregnant will have an impact, you need to believe the following: The pregnant woman genuinely doesn't know she shouldn't drink when pregnant
She is purchasing alcohol from a bottle, rather than at a bar or restaurant in a glass
She picks up her bottle of wine (or beer) and before drinking from it, reads the various logos and info on the label
She sees the no drinking while pregnant logo and realises she should not be drinking, and then puts down the bottle she has purchased, and leaves it undrunk
This is a classic issue and example of why you do want to consult with industry. Sticking another logo on labels can have large compliance costs, and actually make no difference at all to FASD. I bet you there is no peer reviewed evidence anywhere that these warnings on bottles have led to a decrease of FASD.
There are many good initiatives you could take to reduce FASD. Information at Plunket. Targeted advertising. Television advertising. Whanua Ora funded programmes etc.
The story makes it seem like the industry is against reducing FASD levels, as opposed to wanting initiatives to be ones that actually will make a difference.
The documents also show that the alcohol industry has input into how the Ministry of Health spends the alcohol levy, a ring-fenced fund of $16.6 million, used to support alcohol harm reduction measures.
Bell emailed lobbyists with the wine and beer industries in November 2024, giving them information about the alcohol levy process and calling for their input.
Of course they get consulted – they pay the levy into the fund. Just as Telcos get consulted on how the Telco levy is spent.
Consultation is not decision making. It is government best practice.
Alcohol is a legal product in NZ, and is enjoyed by the vast majority of NZers. It is a minority, not a majority, that abuse alcohol. Why should a vineyard not be consulted on how a levy they pay, is used?
The documents show lobbyists from the beer, wine and spirits industries also secured a meeting with health officials on 'the development of New Zealand's position' at a United Nations meeting.
It is the job of officials to meet with any interested party, to developed positions on an issue. I am sure they also had scores of meeting with public health activists.
What this is about is the activists don't want any contrary views to their own to be heard or considered.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Cook Islands Cabinet approves significant increase in tobacco tax
By Losirene Lacanivalu , Cook Islands News According to Cook Islands' 2022 STEPS survey, 35.5 percent of adults aged 25-64 are current smokers. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King Cook Islands Cabinet has approved a significant increase in tobacco tax, aiming to reduce smoking rates and combat non-communicable diseases. The Cabinet has recently approved the initiative set by Ministry of Health to increase the tobacco tax by NZ$125.50 per 1000 cigarettes or kilogram of tobacco annually for the next three years. Additionally, a five percent increase has been approved for each subsequent year. The tax increase will come into effect after the proposal is tabled and passed in parliament, according to the Ministry of Finance and Economic Management. The new tobacco taxation represents a 30 percent increase in the average price of a pack of 20 cigarettes over the first three years, raising the price from NZ$26.88 to NZ$35.54 by July 2027, says TMO. According to modelling estimates by the World Health Organisation (WHO), this tax is also anticipated to lower the smoking rate from 34.50 per cent to 33.4 per cent. According to Cook Islands' 2022 STEPS survey, 35.5 percent of adults aged 25-64 are current smokers. Smoking is more prevalent among younger men aged 18-44 (44 per cent) compared to older men aged 45-69 (26.2 per cent). TMO states that although the overall number of tobacco users in the Cook Islands has decreased over the years, young people are alarmingly initiating tobacco use at an earlier age, from an average of 19.7 years in 2015 to 17.8 years in 2022. It adds that tobacco use is one of the leading risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer. "By making tobacco products less affordable, we aim to decrease tobacco use and its associated health risks, towards a healthier, smoke-free Cook Islands," Minister for Health Vainetutai Rose Toki-Brown said. However, prominent Cook Islander Mike Tavioni begs to differ, arguing that if the government, through the Ministry of Health, doesn't see the tax increase as profitable, then it should stop importing tobacco altogether. "On the left hand, the government agrees for the importation of cigarettes. And then on the right hand, the government through health says, don't smoke." Tavioni believes if the source - the importation of tobacco - is eliminated, people will be less likely to smoke. "Hypothetically, if the price of cigarettes from the factory is $5, so the government is making, what, 600% profit, right? Therefore, 200% goes to making sure the people with cancer are comfortable. The other 400% is for the government budget," he argued. "If it's not profitable to the government, why don't the government just wipe it? Why don't the government just say no more?" Tavioni says the government should consider increasing the tax on sugary drinks such as Coca-Cola to tackle NCDs. "The cigarette is just profit-making for the government. So if the government is convinced that it's bad for its people, then stop importing it. But they won't … Because it's lucrative, profitable for government, they allow it to be imported." A Cook Islander, who wished to remain anonymous, welcomed Cabinet's decision to increase the tobacco tax. The person believes it is a positive step that will lead to fewer smokers and benefit non-smokers as well. As a passive smoker, the person feels they are exposed to even more harmful chemicals when around smokers, putting them at greater risk of health issues. According to TMO, to address the significant burden of NCDs and tobacco use in the country, the Cook Islands has implemented strong policies and plans, including the Cook Islands Tobacco Control Action Plan 2023-2031 and the Tobacco Products Control Amendment Act 2024. The increase in tobacco taxation is a key component of the Tobacco Products Control Action Plan, says TMO. Minister Toki-Brown thanked the Cabinet Ministers for prioritising health, "through the approval of these tobacco taxation reforms". "I also thank Te Marae Ora Ministry of Health for its commitment to a better and heathier future for our children and people, the Ministry of Finance and Economic Management and WHO for their close collaboration." The Cook Islands has been a party to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) since 2004. Because of the Cook Islands' strong tobacco control measures, they were awarded the World No Tobacco Day Award 2025 by WHO last May 2025. Health Secretary Bob Williams accepted the award on behalf of Te Marae Ora from WHO's Director-General Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus on 19 May at the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland. "We congratulate the Cook Islands on their decision to increase tobacco taxes and their overall robust and comprehensive measures in tobacco control. Indeed, the World No Tobacco Day Award is well-deserved," said Lepaitai Hansell Blanche, officer-in-charge of the WHO Representative Office for Samoa, American Samoa, Cook Islands, Niue and Tokelau. "The Cook Islands' efforts set a strong example for the rest of the region to follow. We urge other Pacific nations to adopt similar measures and work together towards achieving tobacco- and nicotine-free islands." -This article was first published by Cook Islands News .
Otago Daily Times
12 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
New 'rules of engagement' with alcohol lobby
By Guyon Espiner of RNZ New "rules of engagement" for health officials dealing with the alcohol industry are coming after a senior staffer complained a public health manager had been "way too friendly" with booze lobbyists. In May it was reported that Ross Bell, a manager with the Ministry of Health's Public Health Agency, had close engagement with alcohol lobbyists, who were granted input into the development of alcohol policies. References to a review of safe drinking guidelines were removed from a Health New Zealand website after an alcohol lobbyist complained to Bell. On the day the story was published, Deputy Director-General of Health Dr Andrew Old sent an email to staff saying Bell had "acted entirely appropriately" in his engagement with the alcohol industry. "Engaging with industry can, and has, yielded meaningful health gains for New Zealanders in the past - and will do so again," the email said. "However, we also know that some industry interests lead to public health harm, and so our engagement needs to be careful, mature, and intentional." Old invited Ministry of Health staff to respond. Dr Clair Mills, who provides advice to the Public Health Advisory committee, took issue with the engagement with the alcohol industry. "I do think there is a problem - at the very least, in terms of perception," she wrote to Old, in emails released under the Official Information Act. The alcohol industry's fight against Local Alcohol Policies - where communities set their own conditions for sale - revealed its motivations, Mill said. It contrasted with the "lack of community voice and power". RNZ's reporting revealed a series of emails between Bell and alcohol lobbyists, which showed close relationships, multiple meetings and exchanges of information. "I think the tone of the emails was way too friendly," Mills, whose career includes serving as Medical Director for Médecins Sans Frontières' and as Medical Officer of Health in Northland, said in her email to Old. "In my experience… these alcohol interests have zero interest in reducing harm (or sales of booze) and a huge purse to fund their lawyers." 'Perception becomes reality' Old responded to Mills saying stronger processes for health officials engaging with the alcohol industry were being prepared. "All good points - perception becomes reality after all," he told her. "Given we are expected to engage with industry, whether that's alcohol, food or anything else (except tobacco!) it would help to have some clear rules of engagement. I'm picking that up with our central MOH team." Tobacco lobbyists are shut out of policy making because New Zealand is a signatory to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Under the FCTC countries protect policy development from the "vested interests of the tobacco industry" as there is an "irreconcilable conflict between the tobacco industry's interests and public health policy interests". In contrast, the alcohol industry has input into policy development in New Zealand, including managing Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and spending the Alcohol Levy, a $16 million fund to reduce alcohol harm, estimated in a 2024 report by NZIER to cost $9.1 billion a year. RNZ used the OIA to obtain 85 pages of emails detailing engagement between the Ministry of Health (MOH) and alcohol lobbyists, with Ross Bell emerging as the main conduit. One document describes a 90 minute meeting between lobbyists and MOH staff in February 2025 as "Alcohol industry reps and Ministry of Health regular meeting". The documents show the plan to manage FASD has been given to the alcohol industry. "Thanks for sharing the draft FASD plan," a wine lobbyist says in an email to public health officials, copying in a lobbyist with the spirits industry. The documents show alcohol lobbyists made their own submissions to MOH on how they believed FASD should be managed. The Spirits New Zealand submission runs to four pages but is entirely redacted by MOH under a section of the OIA designed to protect "the confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers of the Crown and officials". RNZ has asked the Ombudsman to investigate whether the MOH can legitimately use this section of the OIA to protect correspondence from a spirits industry lobbyist. Alcohol industry's input The documents obtained by RNZ show Bell was receptive to requests from the alcohol industry. In November 2024 the Brewer's Association complained to Bell that references to a review of the low risk drinking guidelines were still on the Health New Zealand website, after it had already complained to him about it. It also took issue that the site linked to what other countries, including Canada, were doing with their advice on low-risk drinking. Bell intervened in an email to Health New Zealand in December 2024. "All work on this project will now pause. You will update relevant Health NZ websites to remove references to the review and also to other jurisdictions' guidelines (including the Canadian one)." Bell refused to be interviewed by RNZ but in a previous statement he said the material was removed from the website to avoid confusion, as the drinking guidelines were now led by the Ministry of Health not Health New Zealand which runs the website. He said that was an internal decision by MOH and that a review of the drinking guidelines was now on hold while the ministry considered its priorities. The documents obtained by RNZ show that Bell also shared the Alcohol Levy investment framework with wine and beer lobbyists in a November 2024 email. "As discussed and as promised, attached is the draft Alcohol Levy Investment Framework for your consideration and feedback," he wrote. The alcohol lobbyists then provided at least three pages of feedback on how the money should be spent. But again MOH is keeping all that information secret under the section of the OIA designed to protect "the confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers of the Crown and officials". Minister for Mental Health Matt Doocey turned down RNZ's request for information on the Alcohol Levy but did release correspondence from alcohol lobbyists. Those documents included a July 2024 email to Doocey and his Cabinet colleague Shane Reti where the wine, beer and spirits industries pushed for greater involvement in setting alcohol policy. "We still believe industry has a lot to offer as government seeks to reduce harmful drinking," the booze lobbyists wrote. They pointed out that they funded the main education programme which teaches students about the impacts of alcohol. "We also fund, through our own social investment charity - The Tomorrow Project, an in-school theatre-based better drinking education programme called Smashed," the lobbyists told the Ministers. "Smashed is independently run and delivered by The Life Education Trust and reaches over 20,000 year 9 students every year." Filings with the Charities Services show that the beer, wine and spirits industries each paid $105,000 towards The Tomorrow Project, a charity entirely funded by the alcohol industry. The alcohol lobbyists also make a pitch for the government to "partner with industry" in deciding how to spend the Alcohol Levy and say they should be "working directly with officials" on reducing alcohol harm.
RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
New 'rules of engagement' with alcohol lobby after alarm at 'way too friendly' interactions
New rules for health officials dealing with the alcohol industry are being drawn up. Photo: RNZ / Dom Thomas New "rules of engagement" for health officials dealing with the alcohol industry are coming after a senior staffer complained a public health manager had been "way too friendly" with booze lobbyists. In May RNZ reported that Ross Bell, a manager with the Ministry of Health's Public Health Agency, had close engagement with alcohol lobbyists, who were granted input into the development of alcohol policies. References to a review of safe drinking guidelines were removed from a Health New Zealand website after an alcohol lobbyist complained to Bell. On the day RNZ published its story, Deputy Director-General of Health Dr Andrew Old sent an email to staff saying Bell had "acted entirely appropriately" in his engagement with the alcohol industry. "Engaging with industry can, and has, yielded meaningful health gains for New Zealanders in the past - and will do so again," the email said. "However, we also know that some industry interests lead to public health harm, and so our engagement needs to be careful, mature, and intentional." Old invited Ministry of Health staff to respond. Dr Clair Mills, who provides advice to the Public Health Advisory committee, took issue with the engagement with the alcohol industry. "I do think there is a problem - at the very least, in terms of perception," she wrote to Old, in emails released to RNZ under the Official Information Act. The alcohol industry's fight against Local Alcohol Policies - where communities set their own conditions for sale - revealed its motivations, Mill said. It contrasted with the "lack of community voice and power". RNZ's reporting revealed a series of emails between Bell and alcohol lobbyists, which showed close relationships, multiple meetings and exchanges of information. "I think the tone of the emails was way too friendly," Mills, whose career includes serving as Medical Director for Médecins Sans Frontières' and as Medical Officer of Health in Northland, said in her email to Old. "In my experience… these alcohol interests have zero interest in reducing harm (or sales of booze) and a huge purse to fund their lawyers." Old responded to Mills saying stronger processes for health officials engaging with the alcohol industry were being prepared. "All good points - perception becomes reality after all," he told her. "Given we are expected to engage with industry, whether that's alcohol, food or anything else (except tobacco!) it would help to have some clear rules of engagement. I'm picking that up with our central MOH team." Dr Andrew Old Photo: NZME via LDR Tobacco lobbyists are shut out of policy making because New Zealand is a signatory to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Under the FCTC countries protect policy development from the "vested interests of the tobacco industry" as there is an "irreconcilable conflict between the tobacco industry's interests and public health policy interests". In contrast, the alcohol industry has input into policy development in New Zealand, including managing Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and spending the Alcohol Levy, a $16 million fund to reduce alcohol harm, estimated in a 2024 report by NZIER to cost $9.1 billion a year. RNZ used the OIA to obtain 85 pages of emails detailing engagement between the Ministry of Health (MOH) and alcohol lobbyists, with Ross Bell emerging as the main conduit. One document describes a 90 minute meeting between lobbyists and MOH staff in February 2025 as "Alcohol industry reps and Ministry of Health regular meeting". The documents show the plan to manage FASD has been given to the alcohol industry. "Thanks for sharing the draft FASD plan," a wine lobbyist says in an email to public health officials, copying in a lobbyist with the spirits industry. The documents show alcohol lobbyists made their own submissions to MOH on how they believed FASD should be managed. The Spirits New Zealand submission runs to four pages but is entirely redacted by MOH under a section of the OIA designed to protect "the confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers of the Crown and officials". RNZ has asked the Ombudsman to investigate whether the MOH can legitimately use this section of the OIA to protect correspondence from a spirits industry lobbyist. The documents obtained by RNZ show Bell was receptive to requests from the alcohol industry. In November 2024 the Brewer's Association complained to Bell that references to a review of the low risk drinking guidelines were still on the Health New Zealand website, after it had already complained to him about it. It also took issue that the site linked to what other countries, including Canada, were doing with their advice on low risk drinking. Bell intervened in an email to Health New Zealand in December 2024. "All work on this project will now pause. You will update relevant Health NZ websites to remove references to the review and also to other jurisdictions' guidelines (including the Canadian one)." Bell refused to be interviewed by RNZ but in a previous statement he said the material was removed from the website to avoid confusion, as the drinking guidelines were now led by the Ministry of Health not Health New Zealand which runs the website. He said that was an internal decision by MOH and that a review of the drinking guidelines was now on hold while the ministry considered its priorities. The documents obtained by RNZ show that Bell also shared the Alcohol Levy investment framework with wine and beer lobbyists in a November 2024 email. "As discussed and as promised, attached is the draft Alcohol Levy Investment Framework for your consideration and feedback," he wrote. The alcohol lobbyists then provided at least three pages of feedback on how the money should be spent. But again MOH is keeping all that information secret under the section of the OIA designed to protect "the confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers of the Crown and officials". Photo: 123RF Minister for Mental Health Matt Doocey turned down RNZ's request for information on the Alcohol Levy but did release correspondence from alcohol lobbyists. Those documents included a July 2024 email to Doocey and his Cabinet colleague Shane Reti where the wine, beer and spirits industries pushed for greater involvement in setting alcohol policy. "We still believe industry has a lot to offer as government seeks to reduce harmful drinking," the booze lobbyists wrote. They pointed out that they funded the main education programme which teaches students about the impacts of alcohol. "We also fund, through our own social investment charity - The Tomorrow Project, an in-school theatre-based better drinking education programme called Smashed," the lobbyists told the Ministers. "Smashed is independently run and delivered by The Life Education Trust and reaches over 20,000 year 9 students every year." Filings with the Charities Services show that the beer, wine and spirits industries each paid $105,000 towards The Tomorrow Project, a charity entirely funded by the alcohol industry. The alcohol lobbyists also make a pitch for the government to "partner with industry" in deciding how to spend the Alcohol Levy and say they should be "working directly with officials" on reducing alcohol harm.
