Asim Munir: Pakistan army chief's Kashmir remarks cause anger in India
Gen Munir, who is in his late 50s, is the son of a school principal and religious scholar. He joined the army through the Officers Training School in Mangla in 1986, earning the prestigious Sword of Honour given to the best-performing cadet. He was then commissioned into the 23 Frontier Force Regiment.Over nearly four decades, Gen Munir has commanded troops along Pakistan's sensitive northern borders near Kashmir, led its intelligence services and served in Saudi Arabia to bolster defence ties.He holds a masters degree in public policy and strategic security management from the National Defence University in Islamabad and is also an alumnus of military institutions in Japan and Malaysia.I first saw Gen Munir in Islamabad in 2023, at a packed hotel hall filled with ministers, diplomats, generals and journalists. Dressed in civilian clothes, he moved with calm authority, scanning the room as he approached the podium.He opened his speech with a recitation from the Quran, reflecting his rare status as a hafiz - someone who has memorised Islam's holy book in its entirety - among Pakistan's military elite.In person, Gen Munir seemed soft-spoken and polite. On stage, he was stern, with the sharp gaze of a former spymaster. A man trained to watch, listen and wait. Now, his words are echoing beyond Pakistan.Gen Munir became Pakistan's chief of army staff in November 2022, stepping into the role amid a perfect storm of political upheaval, an economic crisis and public disillusionment with the military's role in governance.His appointment followed months of speculation, largely because of his fallout with the then-prime minister Imran Khan.Gen Munir had served just eight months as the chief of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) spy agency before being removed by Khan in what many believe was a deeply personal and political move - though both sides deny this. That moment remains a turning point in their relationship.Today, Khan is serving a sentence in jail and Gen Munir is the most powerful man in the country.Gen Munir is regarded by many commentators as differing in temperament and approach from his immediate predecessor, Qamar Javed Bajwa.Gen Bajwa was more public-facing, supported backchannel diplomacy with India and handled a major escalation of tensions between the countries in 2019 with caution.Under what came to be known as the "Bajwa Doctrine", he increasingly emphasised regional stability and geo-economics alongside traditional security priorities.After a suicide bomb attack on troops in Indian-administered Kashmir at Pulwama in 2019, Gen Bajwa oversaw Pakistan's military response to Indian air raids but refrained from escalation, returning Indian pilot Abhinandan Varthaman and helping avert a full-blown war."Bajwa was clear," says Abdul Basit, senior fellow at Singapore's S Rajaratnam School of International Studies."He had diplomatic channels open and was managing multiple fronts like Kashmir, Afghanistan and the US withdrawal from Afghanistan with pragmatism," he said, adding that Gen Munir "is under immediate, intense pressure to act"."He has come in with unfinished business to stabilise the country's security situation internally… The problems he faces (rising terrorism, political instability, an economic crisis, regional tensions) are urgent and worsening. He cannot afford long, drawn-out strategies like his predecessor Bajwa could. He needs quicker, firmer responses - both at home and abroad."
The dispute over Kashmir is an issue that no Pakistani military leader can appear weak on, observers say."Kashmir is Pakistan's national security interest - every child in Pakistani schools is taught this," political and defence analyst Amir Zia told the BBC, adding: "It's a basic understanding here that we cannot give India any leverage."Last week's attack was the deadliest on civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir in two decades and led to India accusing Pakistan of supporting the attackers, charges Islamabad denies. There are fears India will respond with military action.Since he took over, Gen Munir has mostly not spoken in public, but one pivotal speech has gained widespread attention.On 17 April, he told a meeting of expatriates in Islamabad "we are different from Hindus" in every possible way.He doubled down on Kashmir, calling it Pakistan's "jugular vein", and vowed Pakistan would "never abandon Kashmiris in their heroic struggle against Indian occupation". The speech might have remained one of many ideological statements made by Pakistani leaders over the years except for what happened next.Just five days later, on 22 April, militants opened fire on tourists in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir."This was not standard rhetoric," says Joshua T White, a South Asia expert at Johns Hopkins University."While the substance aligns with Pakistan's ideological narrative, the tone - especially its direct invocation of Hindu-Muslim differences - made it particularly inflammatory.""Coming just before the Pahalgam attack, it has badly complicated any effort by Pakistan to claim restraint or pursue backchannel diplomacy," he adds.Mr Basit agrees the optics were damaging: "He [Munir] may have been caught up in the moment. He said things that, in a private setting, may not have raised eyebrows but on that public platform, as army chief, they came across as overtly confrontational.""Some saw it as a power move," says Mr Basit."It felt like his arrival moment. A declaration that he's now firmly in control, that Pakistan's direction is once again in the army's hands," he adds.Gen Munir made another speech earlier in the year, which some think may signal he is adopting a harder line than his predecessor. Speaking in Muzaffarabad on Kashmir Solidarity Day on 5 February, he declared: "Pakistan has already fought three wars for Kashmir, and if 10 more wars are required, Pakistan will fight them."But given the timing, it's his latest speech that has fuelled speculation after the Pahalgam attack, with Indian officials hinting at a link. Though no evidence has been presented so far, the rhetoric has deepened mistrust.
At home, Gen Munir's actions are being seen by many as those of a leader who is calculated, uncompromising and determined to reassert military authority.After the 9 May 2023 riots sparked by Khan's arrest, Gen Munir launched an unprecedented crackdown on his supporters.Civilians were tried under military laws, a top general was forced into early retirement, and former ISI chief Lt Gen Faiz Hameed (retired), once close to Khan, was arrested.Critics called it a purge of Khan loyalists; supporters saw it as restoring discipline to Pakistan's powerful military whose authority – and that of Bajwa and Munir – had been challenged. The two men were being heavily criticised in public.Gen Munir is just over two years into his five-year term, but the contours of his legacy are already taking shape.Whether the simmering crisis with India escalates into a larger military stand-off or is tackled through diplomacy, the future of Pakistan's relationship with its neighbour may well hinge on which direction Gen Munir steers it in.Mr Basit warns the next few weeks "will determine how things unfold"."How Gen Munir navigates this crisis will define him as a soldier, as a power broker, and what kind of regional actor Pakistan wants to be. And right now, that choice sits largely with him."Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
10 hours ago
- New Statesman
Scotland needed Kate Forbes
Photo by JeffNot predicted, but perhaps predictable. Kate Forbes, a young woman whose politics are unusually values-based, is quitting Holyrood at the tender age of 35. Forbes, by some margin the outstanding SNP talent of her generation, is walking away from the job of deputy first minister and the prospect of succeeding John Swinney in the top post within the next few years. That she is doing so in order to spend more time with her family, particularly her three-year-old daughter Naomi, is entirely in keeping with how she lives her life. Of all the politicians I have known, she is the most fiercely driven by service and faith. Her authenticity, her refusal to hear the cock crow, has cost her at times. But it also elevated her among her peers. Forbes's explanation of the moment that led her to make the decision during this summer recess, having already been selected as a candidate for next May's election, rings all too true. Visiting an Indian orphanage, 'there was a moment… when it just suddenly dawned on me what a great privilege it is to be a mother but also to have a parent', she told the Times. 'It's not an inconvenience to be squeezed into the rest of my life but actually is quite a high calling.' I've spoken to her often over the years, and it was always clear that the long distances and time-sacrifice involved in pursuing her career – regular five-hour drives to and from her Highland constituency and home – were a drain. The arrival of a child only added to the burden of juggling everything in a fulfilling way. Holyrood is meant to be a family-friendly parliament, but there will always be a limit to just how family-friendly the political life can be. Not just an MSP, but a Cabinet minister holding demanding posts and, latterly, the cross-government role of deputy FM. It's not a life that can be lived half-in, half-out. In the end, something had to give, and she has made her choice. It is, clearly, a loss: to the government, to the SNP, and to Scottish public life. Forbes was the ballast in the Swinney administration, the senior guarantor that the Sturgeon era of increasingly radical leftism was at an end. Her very presence underwrote Swinney's promise that his administration would be mainstream and moderate. She was also, simply, very good at being a minister, a rarity in Edinburgh. Her civil servants rated her highly, as did their colleagues in Whitehall – she was energetic, constructive and bullshit-free. The business community saw her as their voice in government, not as a cheerleader come what may, but as an ally who understood the need for economic growth, wealth creation and innovation not just to boost national performance but also to provide the tax revenues that could fund public services and a war on poverty. She felt this naturally, in a way few of her party colleagues do. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The public liked her too. I remember sitting with her in a café in Inverness, where she was continually approached by passers-by displaying real warmth towards her. She connected with ordinary people in an unaffected, natural way. Not all of them agreed with her faith-based social conservatism, but they could detect the authenticity, and were less put off by her traditional views than the progressive campaigners who often screamed loudest. She was real, in an era of plastic politicians. SNP high command, which Nicola Sturgeon controlled long after leaving office, did everything it could to stop her rising to the top. Humza Yousaf was, fatally, shoved forward to stop her replacing Sturgeon, and the party machine put up every block it could. Forbes was more popular with the public, and even those of us who don't support independence could see she was the better candidate by a distance. Sturgeon got her way, Yousaf won, and then very quickly he fell. Forbes would have been good at the job. In an era of growing political division, we need politicians like Forbes. She pursued politics and policy in a way that rose above ideology, which made her a uniter, rather than a divider. She liked to work with politicians across the political spectrum to get things done. And as Reform rises, her particular mix of hard-headedness, compassion and common sense perhaps offered a compelling pathway to tackling that threat. The government, without her, looks thin on talent. I'm more impressed by the junior ministers than most of the Cabinet, who have been in situ too long without making much of a difference to Scots' quality of life. In fact, they have overseen decline across the board. Forbes was one of the few motive forces towards improvement – a believer in radical public sector reform and challenging the vested interests that continue to hold the nation back. Mark Logan, formerly Scotland's chief entrepreneur and a senior figure at Skyscanner, the tech giant sold for £1.3 billion, worked closely with her, and said he would have given her a senior job in any company he worked for. There aren't many at Holyrood you would say that about. It seems more likely that Forbes will do something with a social impact, though. 'I will continue to be motivated by public service of some kind,' she said. 'Public service is what gets me out of bed in the morning.' There is no reason to doubt that is true. She hasn't ruled out returning to Holyrood at some point in the future. She is young enough to raise her family and then start a political career again. One hopes her voice will continue to be heard. For now, though, the progressive left and its online warriors won't have Kate Forbes to kick around any more. What's that phrase? Sometimes you don't know what you've got till it's gone. [Further reading: Britain's decline is as much intellectual as political] Related
Reuters
14 hours ago
- Reuters
India in talks with Philippines for developing submarine infrastructure
NEW DELHI, Aug 5 (Reuters) - India is in talks with the Philippines for development of submarine infrastructure, the Indian foreign ministry said on Tuesday, at a media briefing during Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos's visit to India.
Fashion United
18 hours ago
- Fashion United
India-UK FTA: Balancing trade dynamics amid US tariff concerns
The highly anticipated Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the UK and India has been officially signed, promising to significantly reshape the trade landscape for both nations. The agreement, signed in the presence of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his British counterpart Keir Starmer, is expected to increase annual trade by 34.53 billion dollars and aims to double bilateral trade to 120 billion dollars by 2030. A key feature of the pact is the elimination of import duties on major Indian export goods, including apparel, leather goods, and footwear. A game-changer for India's apparel sector The removal of tariffs, which typically range from 8-12 percent, is set to make Indian apparel and home textiles more competitive and affordable in the UK. This will particularly benefit exporters in major hubs like Ludhiana, Surat, and Tirupur. The Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) vice chairman, A. Sakthivel, hailed the agreement as a historic achievement, projecting that India's ready-made garment (RMG) exports to the UK will more than double from the current 1.45 billion dollars to 3.25 billion dollars in the near future. Knitwear exports alone are expected to surge from 0.8 billion dollars to nearly 2 billion dollars, accounting for roughly 70 percent of total RMG exports to the UK. Rajeev Gupta, joint managing director of RSWM Ltd, echoed this sentiment, stating that the FTA is a "game-changing shift" that removes the 9-12 percent tariff disadvantage, allowing Indian exporters to compete directly with zero-duty countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan. He added that the agreement reflects a growing trust in India's manufacturing capabilities and will lay the groundwork for export growth, innovation, and greater integration with global fashion supply chains. The FTA also includes provisions for digital, paperless trade and the mutual acceptance of safety and hygiene standards, which will streamline trade processes and guarantee product quality. Balancing global trade dynamics The signing of the India-UK FTA comes at a crucial time, as New Delhi navigates complex trade relations with other major partners. The agreement stands in stark contrast to the current dynamic with the U.S., where a recent tariff threat has created a layer of uncertainty for Indian exporters. President Donald Trump has been vocal about India's high tariffs, suggesting a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods and an "unspecified penalty" for its relationship with Russia. Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData, and Dr. Sheng Lu of the University of Delaware, have both expressed concern that this U.S. tariff threat could make India less competitive as a manufacturing hub and potentially hinder new commitments from U.S. fashion companies. However, the India-UK FTA provides a counterbalance to this uncertainty. As Rajeev Gupta of RSWM Ltd. commented, "The 25% tariff by the U.S. comes as a temporary setback... Our Free Trade Agreement with the UK opens up varied opportunities and is a welcoming move for the industry." New opportunities and challenges for both sides The FTA promises benefits for both Indian and British consumers and businesses. For Indian buyers, the agreement means lower prices on British footwear brands like Clarks and Dr. Martens, and on high-end fashion houses such as Burberry and Ted Baker. This increased affordability is expected to drive new fashion trends and expand the market for British goods in India. For Indian brands, the FTA "unlocks a powerful runway... to export both product and purpose," said Rakesh Bali, senior vice president and head of marketing at Reliance Industries Limited. He highlighted the opportunity for Indian fashion and lifestyle brands to launch in the UK with a strong sustainability story, noting that this "can catalyse business, product and knowledge exchange" between the two nations. Bali also pointed out a key challenge for Indian exporters, stating that "the key challenge will be aligning with the UK's high expectations around ESG, circularity, and transparency." He stressed that while cost and capacity are strengths, "long-term success will require embedding sustainability into brand and product DNA." For UK businesses entering the Indian market, Bali said they will need to adapt to regional consumer nuances and evolving sustainability preferences. He explained that "Indian consumers, especially Gen Z and Millennials, are increasingly drawn to eco-conscious, craft-based brands with a strong cultural storytelling." The India-UK FTA is seen as a comprehensive economic enabler that will not only boost trade in key sectors but also foster greater market access, regulatory cooperation, and job creation in both nations.
