Chabria: Even tough-on-crime district attorneys know prison reform is smart
Name the crime, one of these guys has probably done it.
"It's not every day that you're in a room of 100 people, most of whom have committed murder, extremely violent crimes, and been convicted of it," Hochman later said.
Many of these men, in their casual blue uniforms, were serving long sentences with little chance of getting out, like Marlon Arturo Melendez, an L.A. native who is now in for murder.
Melendez sat in a "sharing circle," close enough to Hochman that their knees could touch, no bars between them. They chatted about the decrease in gang violence in the decades since Melendez was first incarcerated more than 20 years ago, and Melendez said he found Hochman "interesting."
Inside San Quentin, this kind of interaction between inmates and guests isn't unusual. For decades, the prison by the Bay has been doing incarceration differently, cobbling together a system that focuses on accountability and rehabilitation.
Like the other men in the room, Melendez takes responsibility for the harm he caused, and every day works to be a better man. When he introduces himself, he names his victims — an acknowledgment that what he did can't be undone but also an acknowledgment that he doesn't have to remain the same man who pulled the trigger.
Whether or not Melendez or any of these men ever walk free, what was once California's most notorious lockup is now a place that offers them the chance to change and provides the most elusive of emotions for prisoners — hope.
Creating that culture is a theory and practice of imprisonment that Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to make the standard across the state.
Read more: Chabria: California to transform infamous San Quentin prison with Scandinavian ideas, rehab focus
He's dubbed it the California Model, but as I've written about before, it's common practice in other countries (and even in a few places in the United States). It's based on a simple truth about incarceration: Most people who go into prison come out again. Public safety demands that they behave differently when they do.
"We are either paying to keep them here or we are paying if they come back out and harm somebody," said Brooke Jenkins, the district attorney of San Francisco, who has visited San Quentin regularly for years.
Jenkins was the organizer of this unusual day that brought district attorneys from around the state inside of San Quentin to gain a better understanding of how the California Model works, and why even tough-on-crime district attorneys should support transforming our prisons.
As California does an about-face away from a decade of progressive criminal justice advances with new crackdowns such as those promised by the recently passed Proposition 36 (which is expected to increase the state inmate population), it is also continuing to move ahead with the controversial plan to remake prison culture, both for inmates and guards, by centering on rehabilitation over punishment.
Despite a tough economic year that is requiring the state to slash spending, Newsom has kept intact more than $200 million from the prior budget to revamp San Quentin so that its outdated facilities can support more than just locking up folks in cells.
Some of that construction, already happening on the grounds, is expected to be completed next year. It will make San Quentin the most visible example of the California Model. But changes in how inmates and guards interact and what rehabilitation opportunities are available are already underway at prisons across the state.
It is an overdue and profound transformation that has the potential to not only improve public safety and save money in the long run, but to fundamentally reshape what incarceration means across the country.
Jenkins' push to help more prosecutors understand and value this metamorphosis might be crucial to helping the public support it as well — especially for those D.A.s whose constituents are just fine with a system that locks up men to suffer for their (often atrocious) crimes. Or even those Californians, such as many in San Francisco and Los Angeles, who are just fed up with the perception that California is soft on criminals.
"It's not about moderate or progressive, but I think all of us that are moderates have to admit that there are reforms that still need to happen," Jenkins told me as we walked through the prison yard. She took office after the successful recall of her progressive predecessor, Chesa Boudin, and a rightward shift in San Francisco on crime policy.
Still, she is vocal about the need for second chances. For her, prison reform is about more than the California Model, but a broader lens that includes the perspectives of incarcerated people, and their insights on what they need to make rehabilitation work.
"It really grounds you in your obligation to make sure that the culture in the [district attorney's] office is fair," she said.
For Hochman, a former federal prosecutor and defense lawyer who resoundingly ousted progressive George Gascón last year, rehabilitation makes sense. He likes to paraphrase a Fyodor Dostoevsky quote, 'The degree of civilization in a society is revealed by entering its prisons.'
"In my perfect world, the education system, the family system, the community, would have done all this work on the front end such that these people wouldn't have been in position to commit crimes in the first place," he said. But when that fails, it's up to the criminal justice system to help people fix themselves.
Read more: Chabria: Bringing the death penalty back to L.A. is politics and hubris, not justice
Despite being perceived as a tough-on-crime D.A. (he prefers "fair on crime") he's so committed to that goal of rehabilitation that he is determined to push for a new Men's Central Jail in Los Angeles County — an expensive (billions) and unpopular idea that he says is long overdue but critical to public safety.
"Los Angeles County is absolutely failing because our prisons and jails are woefully inadequate," he said.
He's quick to add that rehabilitation isn't for everyone. Some just aren't ready for it. Some don't care. The inmates of San Quentin agree with him. They are often fiercely vocal about who gets transferred to the prison, knowing that its success relies on having incarcerated people who want to change — one rogue inmate at San Quentin could ruin it for all of them.
"It has to be a choice. You have to understand that for yourself," Oscar Acosta told me. Now 32, he's a "CDC baby," as he puts it — referring to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation — and has been behind bars since he was 18. He credits San Quentin with helping him accept responsibility for his crimes and see a path forward.
When the California Model works, as the district attorneys saw, it's obvious what its value is. Men who once were nothing but dangerous have the option to live different lives, with different values. Even if they remain incarcerated.
"After having been considered the worst of the worst, today I am a new man," Melendez told me. "I hope (the district attorneys) were able to see real change in those who sat with them and be persuaded that rehabilitation over punishment is more fruitful and that justice seasoned with restoration is better for all."
Melendez and the other incarcerated men at San Quentin aspire for us to see them as more than their worst actions. And they take heart that even prosecutors like Jenkins and Hochman, who put them behind bars, sometimes with triple-digit sentences, do see that the past does not always determine the future, and that investing in their change is an investment in safer communities.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street was expecting a TACO Tuesday. But Dow futures fall 250 points after Trump says he will set tariffs as high as 70%
While U.S. markets were closed for the July 4 holiday, stock futures sank on Friday after President Donald Trump said he will start sending out letters informing countries of what tariffs they will face. The rates, which could reach as high as 70%, would become effective Aug. 1, he added. That comes ahead of the July 9 expiration of a temporary pause on his 'Liberation Day' tariffs. U.S. stock futures tumbled on Friday after President Donald Trump said he will start sending out letters informing countries of what tariffs they will face. On Thursday, he told reporters that about '10 or 12' letters would go out Friday, with additional letters coming 'over the next few days.' The rates would become effective Aug. 1. 'They'll range in value from maybe 60 or 70% tariffs to 10 and 20% tariffs,' Trump added. While U.S. markets were closed for the July 4 holiday, futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 251 points, or 0.56%. S&P 500 futures were down 0.64%, and Nasdaq futures fell 0.68%. U.S. oil prices slipped 0.75% to $66.50 per barrel, and Brent crude lost 0.41% to $68.52. Gold edged up 0.11% to $3,346.70 per ounce, while the U.S. dollar fell 0.16% against the euro and 0.30% against the yen. The Trump administration has been negotiating with top trade partners since the president put his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on a 90-day pause. That reprieve will expire on Wednesday, July 9. So far, only a few limited trade deals have been announced, and negotiations with other countries were expected to require more time. So as the Wednesday deadline approached, Wall Street was expecting Trump to announce an extension to the tariff pause by Tuesday, reviving the so-called TACO trade that alludes to his history of pulling back from his maximalist threats. 'We suspect that further last-minute concessions will be made to permit extensions for most countries, but a few of the 'worst offenders' may be singled out for punitive treatment,' analysts at Capital Economics predicted earlier this week. 'Markets seem to be positioned for a fairly benign outcome, implying a risk of some near-term turbulence if that fails to materialise.' That assumes Trump won't risk a repeat of the epic April selloff that was triggered by his Liberation Day tariffs, and Capital Economics also warned such an assumption could be complacent. In fact, Trump has been saying for weeks that he prefers to unilaterally set tariffs with each country rather than engage in negotiations with all of them. But amid the absence of any letters, markets downplayed the risk that tariffs could spike again. Still, Trump has kept beating the drum about letters. In an interview that aired on Sunday, he was asked about the tariff pause and the looming deadline. 'I'd rather just send them a letter, very fair letter, saying, 'Congratulations, we're going to allow you to trade in the United States of America. You're gonna pay a 25% tariff or 20% or 40% or 50%,'' Trump replied. 'I would rather do that.' When asked if the pause will not be extended, he said, 'I don't think I'll need to because—I could—there's no big deal.' Trump further clarified his stance on the July 9 deadline, saying, 'I'm gonna send letters. That's the end of the trade deal.' This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
De minimis exemption slated to end in 2027
This story was originally published on Supply Chain Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Supply Chain Dive newsletter. The de minimis exemption will be eliminated in two years after President Donald Trump signed a sweeping policy bill into law on Friday. As part of the package introduced as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' the U.S. will repeal the exemption allowing imports under $800 to enter the country duty and tax free, effective July 1, 2027. Exemptions will remain in place for eligible items bought during travel and bona fide gifts from foreign citizens to U.S. residents. The bill also establishes a civil penalty, starting 30 days after its enactment, for any person attempting to use de minimis entry in a way that "violates any other provision of" U.S. customs law. The amount is $5,000 for the first violation and up to $10,000 for subsequent violations. The move builds upon the Trump administration's efforts to restrict the de minimis exemption, which lawmakers and customs officials have scrutinized in recent years due to contraband entering the U.S. via low-cost packages. Earlier this year, the White House removed the exemption for imports from China and Hong Kong and announced its plans to end de minimis for other countries once systems are in place to collect duty revenue. The vast majority of de minimis volume entering the U.S. originated from China prior to the May 2 ban, making up 76% of shipments in Custom and Border Protection's 2024 fiscal year. The full repeal of the exemption in two years would expose low-cost shipments from Canada, Mexico and other countries to tariffs and other import taxes. E-commerce companies like Shein and Temu have historically benefited from the exemption, which allows them to ship products made internationally direct to U.S. consumers without facing added duties. Some experts say de minimis-reliant supply chains will shift to more traditional bulk shipping models or expanded U.S. fulfillment operations due to policy changes by the Trump administration. Recommended Reading De minimis' future: 4 questions shippers should consider Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
As the US dollar falls, is now the time to buy US shares?
Ongoing uncertainty around tariffs has caused the dollar to weaken against the pound. As a result, UK investors looking to buy US shares get more for their money than they used to. Investors might wonder whether this means now is the time to look at some US stocks. But while the currency shift is a genuine benefit, I think there are more important considerations. Currency fluctuations are one of those things that investors don't usually pay much attention to. And a lot of the time, this is justified because the moves are too small to be meaningful. There are some exceptions. One example is the 75% decline in the value of the Nigerian naira that has given Airtel Africa shareholders something to think about over the last five years. Generally, though, movements in currencies tend to be small and not worth considering. But the value of the US dollar against the British pound is down 8% in the last 12 months. In effect, this means an 8% discount for UK investors looking to buy US stocks. And given the valuation gap between the FTSE 100 and the S&P 500, that sounds quite nice. Over the last year or so, the balance of my Stocks and Shares ISA has gradually shifted towards UK equities. That's not deliberate, it's just the way I've seen opportunities over that time. I am, however, very much looking for opportunities to balance this out a bit. So I'm actively looking for opportunities across the Atlantic (as well as elsewhere) that look attractive. Unfortunately, I don't have a particularly strong view on where the dollar is going next. So there is – from my perspective – a very real possibility it could work against me. This risk notwithstanding, there are one or two US stocks that I think look attractive. And there's one in particular that I've been buying. Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) is a stock I've just started buying in the last couple of weeks. In my view, it's a rare example of a US equity trading at an unusually attractive valuation. The big challenge facing the company at the moment is the US administration's desire to reduce the amount the country spends on drugs. That's a risk for pharmaceutical firms across the board. Johnson & Johnson, however, might be less exposed to this than a number of its peers. It has a growing medical devices business that makes up around a third of its overall revenues. Moreover, the company has a strong record of increasing its dividend each year. And analysts are expecting this to continue until at least 2027. While most of my buying lately has been UK-focused, I have added Johnson & Johnson shares to my portfolio recently. But this isn't because of currency fluctuations – it's because of what I see as the strength of the underlying businesses. I'm not denying that the dollar weakening against the pound makes a difference to UK investors. However, I think there are more important things to consider when it comes to buying shares. Sometimes stocks have listings in different currencies. In those situations, I prefer to eliminate the risk of shifting foreign exchange rates entirely. But that isn't always possible, so it's something I put up with for the right opportunity. The post As the US dollar falls, is now the time to buy US shares? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Stephen Wright has positions in Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Airtel Africa Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio