Indiana Statehouse: Property tax bill to get overhaul
The big picture: Seven weeks are left in the legislative session, with some big issues left to tackle.
While some bills have already taken clear shape and will likely move through the rest of session with relatively little change, several "priority issues" are less settled.
Here's what we're watching this week:
🥸 New chamber, new property tax bill
Senate Bill 1, the major property tax reform bill, will be back in committee this week, but it's going to look different from the proposal that received five hours of discussion last week.
Why it matters: At the request of Gov. Mike Braun and homeowners statewide reeling from skyrocketing home values, property tax reform is supposed to be one of the top priorities this legislative session.
Yes, but: Everyone hates Senate Bill 1.
Braun says it's not going to do enough for homeowners. Local governments, which depend on property taxes to fund the services they provide to their residents, say the loss of revenue will devastate them.
The latest: Rep. Jeff Thompson (R-Lizton), chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said he plans to introduce an amendment to strip SB 1 of its current language and insert House Bill 1402 — a different property tax bill that he authored but didn't move in the first half of the session.
As written, HB 1402 would give more relief to homeowners but less for other kinds of property. Thompson said he expects more amendments to the bill at a later date, too.
🧪 Ending the rape kit backlog
The Senate Corrections and Criminal Law Committee will consider House Bill 1413, which would create a fund for the Indiana State Police to eliminate the state's backlog of untested rape kits, at 9am Tuesday.
Why it matters: Indiana crime labs are sitting on hundreds of rape kits, waiting to be processed due to limited resources and technicians.
The fund would cover equipment, processing the kits and raising pay for technicians.
The bill would also require all law enforcement agencies and labs to process all rape kits in their possession as of July 1, 2025, by the end of 2026.
🏫 Office of School Safety
House Bill 1637, which would create the Office of School Safety, will get a hearing in the Senate Homeland Security and Transportation Committee at 9am Tuesday.
Another Braun priority, the office would focus on securing school buildings and coordinating disaster responses.
🤑 Senate budget hearings begin
We're more than a month out from getting a final budget proposal, but the current draft of the state's two-year spending plan has reached the Senate.
The latest: The Senate Appropriations Committee will start hearings on House Bill 1001 this week, taking requests from the state's higher education institutions (Tuesday at 2pm) and state agencies (Thursday at 11am).
Senate Republicans are expected to introduce their own spending proposal next month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
14 minutes ago
- New York Post
Key Trump national security roles left vacant due to Dem obstruction — leaving US vulnerable to threats
WASHINGTON — Crucial national security jobs in the Trump administration have been left empty by Senate Democrats' obstruction while the White House focuses on installing US ambassadors — leaving America vulnerable to foreign threats, The Post has learned. At least 144 nominees were awaiting confirmation when the Senate broke for its August recess — including picks for senior positions at the State, Defense and Energy departments tasked with military readiness, nuclear issues and weapons of mass destruction. Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), in line to take over as Chuck Schumer's No. 2 with the retirement of Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), initially placed a hold on more than 300 Trump nominees — a move one source familiar with the confirmation process described as 'payback' for the administration 'destroying USAID.' Advertisement 'Unprecedented Democrat obstruction against every single presidential nominee has left vital national-security positions vacant, even those tasked with preventing nuclear devices from falling into the wrong hands,' Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) told The Post last week, demanding that the August recess be canceled. 7 President Trump's national security picks have had their confirmations delayed due to Democratic obstruction and a focus instead on installing US ambassadors, administration sources told The Post. AP 'While Chuck Schumer wants to neglect his responsibilities, President Trump continues to work hard from the White House on behalf of the American people,' said White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly. 'He has been clear that the Senate must confirm all of his nominees as quickly as possible.' Advertisement Notably, only around two dozen ambassador nominations are still pending on the Senate calendar, compared to more than 100 nominees for other executive branch roles. The White House notifies the Senate when it wants nominations to be voted on, and some administration sources have groused that the approach of ensuring ambassadors are confirmed first is akin to 'having an army of generals without soldiers.' 'It's vital to have these positions to secure regional stability, especially in our own hemisphere,' added another source close to the White House. 'But it's one of many issues at the moment.' 7 'Unprecedented Democrat obstruction against every single presidential nominee has left vital national-security positions vacant,' Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) told The Post Friday, demanding that the August recess be canceled. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Advertisement While Trump has yet to nominate an assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense and global security at the Pentagon, for example, US ambassador to Belgium nominee Bill White, a businessman and former Obama fundraiser, has leapfrogged to the front of the line for consideration. Several ambassadors were approved late last week before the Senate recess — including Louis Rinaldi, a longtime golfing buddy of Trump's, to be envoy to Uruguay; and fast food magnate Andrew Puzder, who donated more than $100,000 to help Republicans and the president's re-election campaign, to be US representative to the European Union, Of the more than a dozen ambassadors confirmed so far, at least half donated to Trump's campaign committees or PACs during the 2024 election cycle or so far in 2025. Others opened their pocketbooks after the president took office — and were confirmed in two months. Advertisement 7 Of the more than a dozen ambassadors confirmed so far, at least half donated to Trump's campaign committees or PACs during the 2024 election cycle or in 2025 — including UK and Northern Ireland ambassador Warren Stephens. Getty Images Warren Stephens, Trump's ambassador to the United Kingdom, donated nearly $400,000 to the RNC in February — a little more than a week after the Senate received his nomination. He was confirmed in a bipartisan 59-39 vote on April 29. US Ambassador to Italy Tilman Fertitta gave $100,000 to the Republican National Committee on April 9, one month after his nomination was sent to the Senate. He was confirmed in a bipartisan 83-14 vote on April 29. Pending national security nominees include the State Department's Bureau of East Asian Affairs-designate Michael DeSombre, whose purview includes US policy on China. DeSombre's nomination was received in the Senate March 24, placed on its executive calendar June 5, and still hasn't received a vote. 7 Several ambassadors were approved late last week before August recess — including Louis Rinaldi, a golfing buddy of Trump's from New York, who was narrowly confirmed to be ambassador to Uruguay. Facebook/Trump National Golf Club Westchester Robert Kadlec, who helmed Trump's Operation Warp Speed and dug deep into the possible culpability of China's military experiments for the COVID-19 pandemic, was nominated in February for a similar role at the Pentagon — but hasn't made it out of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Gerald Parker, who reportedly helped craft the president's executive order banning gain-of-function research that officials and scientific experts have said could have started the COVID outbreak, was tapped to lead the White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy but recently resigned. Advertisement Meanwhile, Adrienne Keen, the ex-director for global health security at the National Intelligence Council, who played a role in keeping critical evidence on COVID origins out of a 2021 briefing delivered to former President Joe Biden, remains employed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 7 Robert Kadlec, who helmed Trump's Operation Warp Speed and dug deep into the possible culpability of China's military experiments for the COVID-19 pandemic, was nominated in February but hasn't cleared committee vetting. Bloomberg via Getty Images The delays in filling administration posts have left experts in the field impatient. Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright said it was 'dismaying the Senate has moved so slowly on confirmation of key nominees for biosecurity positions. The foot-dragging puts US health security and US national security at risk.' Advertisement 'It is even more dismaying that Adrienne Keen, who actively participated in defrauding the public and policy makers about the origin of COVID, remains at the CDC. Keene needs to be terminated for cause forthwith,' added Ebright, who testified on the pandemic's origins before the Senate last year. 'National security should not be politicized,' added Atlantic Council fellow Alex Plitsas. 'If nominees are unqualified or not confirmable for valid reasons then they should be acted upon accordingly to ensure another qualified nominee is sent forward to the Senate for consideration as soon as possible to prevent critical vacancies. Otherwise, holding qualified nominees indefinitely for other reasons is detrimental to our national security.' 7 'It is even more dismaying that Adrienne Keen, who actively participated in defrauding the public and policy makers about the origin of COVID, remains at the CDC,' said Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University molecular biologist. A political appointee tracking website shows the pace of confirmations is roughly the same as under Biden and during Trump's first term — but far beneath that set by former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush. Advertisement Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and Republicans have considered adopting new procedural rules to quicken the process — including eliminating the cloture vote, shortening debate time for nominees down to two hours or voting on groups of nominations at once. 'Going back multiple administrations, both Democrats and Republicans, as recently as Bill Clinton, 98% of all the noms considered were handled either by voice [vote] or UC [unanimous consent] and it's just deteriorated over time to where Trump's, you know, we're at zero here,' Thune told The Post in an exclusive interview last week. 'It's got to be fixed,' he said. 'It certainly hamstrings, I think, the functioning of our government in a way that's really detrimental to the country.' Senate committees noted that the pace of their confirmations is ahead of where it was during the previous two presidential terms, without directly commenting on any of the stalled nominees. Advertisement 7 Democrats have been blocking final Senate approval, with Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii initially placing a hold on more than 300 Trump nominees. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images 'As of July 30th,' a Senate Foreign Relations Committee spokeswoman said the panel, 'had passed 54 nominees, where the Biden Administration had only passed 18 at this point in the admin, and Trump 1.0 Administration had passed 24.' Of the 33 civilian leadership nominees advanced out of the Senate Armed Services Committee, at least 22 been confirmed, a spokesman for the panel added. The State Department, Pentagon, Department of Health and Human Services, and Republican National Committee did not immediately respond to requests for comment, nor did spokespeople for Thune, Schumer or Schatz.
New York Post
14 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats howling at Texas redistrict push should take a look in the mirror
Let's take a tour of the 13th congressional district in Illinois. It starts in East St. Louis and then moves steadily north. By the time it gets to Springfield, home of Abraham Lincoln, about 90 miles away, it takes a sharp turn to the east, reaching Decatur and finally Champaign, itself about 80 miles away from Springfield. Advertisement It's a jagged, narrow strip of territory with no obvious rhyme or reason as it traverses six counties. It's less a congressional district than a road trip, and bears a resemblance to the original gerrymander, a long, salamander-like state Senate district in Massachusetts in 1812. The only point of the new 13th district lines, fashioned in the redistricting after the 2020 census, was to gather together far-flung Democrats to create another Democratic congressional district. Advertisement Mission accomplished: The 13th went from being a competitive district long held by a Republican to flipping to the Democrats in 2022. Overall, Illinois lost one district after the 2020 census and managed to write lines that changed the congressional ratio from a 13-5 Democratic advantage to a 14-3 Democratic advantage. The political analysis website 538 called the new map 'the worst gerrymander in the country drawn by Democrats.' Advertisement This makes it especially inapt that a contingent of Texas Democrats fleeing the Lone Star state to try to stop what they consider unfair new congressional boundaries found a safe harbor in Illinois. Next time their travel agent should do a hypocrisy check before booking a destination. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker welcomed the self-exiling Democrats and hailed their courage. He told them that he and other top Democrats in the state were pleased 'to stand in solidarity with you and send a clear message to all Americans.' Advertisement His conscience showed no sign of being pricked by the fact that he signed into law the redistricting that saw Republicans in 2022 win nearly 44% of the popular vote in Illinois congressional races — and only 18% of the congressional seats. A special session of the Texas Legislature is considering new lines that could net Republicans another five House seats. Gov. Greg Abbott has cited a Department of Justice letter saying that some of the current districts need to be redrawn because they represent unconstitutional racial gerrymandering (the Biden Justice Department had been fighting Texas because, in its view, the current lines didn't reflect enough racial gerrymandering). The Supreme Court is taking up a Louisiana case that should clarify the extent to which states can consider race in drawing so-called majority-minority districts. In the meantime, the partisan effect of the new Texas lines before the 2026 mid-terms is unmistakable: If Republicans were likely to lose five seats from this redistricting, there's no doubt that the state's Republican governor and Republican legislature wouldn't be undertaking it. Drawing district lines is an inherently political enterprise, and parties tend to give themselves the best of it. When Democrats controlled the Texas Legislature, they maintained congressional lines in their favor. Advertisement It wasn't until 2002, when Republicans won the state house for the first time since Reconstruction, that the GOP could redraw the congressional map — and Republicans subsequently won a majority of Texas congressional seats in 2004, also for the first time since Reconstruction. Since Democrats gerrymander too, they have limited options for retaliating against Texas. Pritzker says he may re-draw his state's lines, but this would require gerrymandering on top of his current gerrymander. Advertisement Gavin Newsom is making similar noises, but the California map is already tilted toward Democrats: Republicans won nearly 40% of the congressional vote in the Golden State in 2024, but only about 17% of the seats. If the Texas plan goes through and all else remains equal, the Lone Star state will have about the same partisan skew as California. Less gerrymandering would be better than more, but Democrats like Pritzker, who blessed his state's meandering 13th district, have no standing to make the case. Twitter: @RichLowry
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance to visit Indiana amid push for redistricting. Will Braun call special session?
Vice President JD Vance is visiting Indianapolis on Aug. 7 to speak with Gov. Mike Braun about the possibility of redistricting the state's congressional districts amid the Trump administration's push to increase the GOP majority in the House. Braun didn't rule out calling a special session to redraw the Hoosier State's congressional districts in an attempt to squeeze in another Republican seat ahead of the 2026 midterms. Republicans already hold seven of Indiana's nine U.S. House seats, but Braun's comments come as the Trump administration has encouraged other states to take up mid-decade redistricting to help maintain a GOP majority in the House after next year's elections. The redistricting process is already underway in Republican-led Texas where new congressional maps would give the GOP in that state five additional U.S. House seats. The effort resulted in Texas Democrats fleeing to Illinois on Aug. 3 to disrupt legislative procedures. What would it take to redistrict in Indiana? Braun would have to call a special session for the Indiana General Assembly if Republicans decide they want to redraw Hoosier congressional maps. House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, both Republicans, have not responded to IndyStar questions through spokespeople about whether Trump has contacted them or if they have an appetite to draft new maps. It's likely U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan's 1st District seat in Northwest Indiana would be a signature focus of any redistricting efforts at the Statehouse, although some national outlets have reported longtime Indianapolis U.S. Rep. Andre Carson's 7th District seat could be targeted as well. National Republicans have targeted Mrvan's seat as a flip opportunity for the last two election cycles and are poised to again in 2026, especially as Northwest Indiana's rust belt communities have voted more Republican over the years. 'I think this seat is one that belongs in the Republican column,' House Speaker Mike Johnson told IndyStar in 2024. But Mrvan has still defeated his Republican challengers, winning reelection in 2022 by nearly six percentage points and in 2024 by eight percentage points. When did Indiana last go through redistricting? State lawmakers last went through redistricting in 2021 following the 2020 U.S. Census. At that time, Republicans left Mrvan's seat alone. Instead, they further cemented GOP grip on the 5th Congressional District after now-U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz defeated Democrat Christina Hale by four points in a nationally-watched race in 2020. Since then, Spartz has won general election contests in 2022 and 2024 by double-digit percentage points over her Democratic opponents. The 2021 congressional maps also adjusted the boundaries of the 6th Congressional District, now represented by Republican U.S. Rep. Jefferson Shreve, to include the southern portion of Indianapolis. Some Republicans at the time criticized the move as potentially minimizing the voices of more rural communities in that district. This story will be updated. Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at Sign up for our free weekly politics newsletter, Checks & Balances, curated by IndyStar politics and government reporters. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: JD Vance to visit Indiana amid push for redistricting
