
A new Texas law could have wider effect on how food products are made, experts suggest
Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott signed into law hundreds of bills last week, including one concerning a requirement for food manufacturers to disclose the use of any of 44 food additives through a 'prominent and reasonably visible' label on the packaging. These additives include artificial dyes, certain enzymes, molecularly altered oils, and additives banned in other countries, among other ingredients.
'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom,' the label would read, according to the language of SB 25.
The bill had previously passed through the Texas legislature as part of a 'Make Texas Healthy Again' initiative. But it may very well have implications far outside of Texas, if food manufacturers end up deciding to label or revamp their products for the market as a whole, according to Jennifer L. Falbe, an associate professor of Nutrition and Human Development at UC Davis.
'It is encouraging to see bipartisan support for food industry reform,' Falbe, who recently co-authored a study on the effectiveness of front-of-package labels, told Nexstar. 'Policies in a large state like Texas can have ramifications for the rest of the country.'
Speaking with the Washington Post, Scott Faber of the Environmental Working Group said there was 'no question' that such a law would influence how food companies do business in the rest of the U.S.
'When a state as big as Texas requires a warning, that will have an impact on the entire marketplace,' he told the outlet.
Even still, it may take years to learn how the new law ends up influencing how food companies label or manufacture their products in Texas and beyond. According to the language of the bill, the warning labels would only apply to 'a food product label developed or copyrighted on or after January 1, 2027.'
As noted by Stat, the entire requirement could also be moot if the federal government introduces its own legislation regarding food labeling before 2027.
There's also another potential problem with the law: The language surrounding the additives may be inaccurate.
A review cited by the Associated Press found that almost a dozen of the 44 additives listed are in fact allowed in some of the foreign regions where the label required by the Texas law claims they're not, while several are allowed in all of them. And others, like Red Dye No. 4, are already banned in the U.S.
'I don't know how the list of chemicals was constructed,' Thomas Galligan, a scientist with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, told the Associated Press. 'Warnings have to be accurate in order to be legal.'
Falbe says the warning also does little to deter food manufacturers from limiting sodium or sugar, even if they end up removing any offending additives from the ingredients list.
'To the extent that sugary and salty products also contain the additives in the Texas law, the warning could drive healthier choices in the near term. But they may also incentivize food companies to replace a limited set of additives to avoid labeling, without fundamentally improving the quality of foods and beverages,' says Falbe.
'For example, a sugary soda that has a coloring agent replaced with another is still a soda — it is still going to increase disease risk. Same with a sugary cereal or a salty soup.'
Falbe's study, published this month, indicates that consumers would more accurately assess the nutrition profile of a given food if it had clearer front-of-package labeling highlighting the saturated fat, sodium and added sugar content. And that's also what she believes the federal government should be pushing food manufacturers to include.
'Front-of-package warning labels indicating high amounts of added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat increase consumer knowledge, help people make healthier choices, and nudge the food industry to make healthier products,' Falbe said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
New developments as Israel-Iran ceasefire hits a week
The Big Story As the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran hits one week, there's little clarity on what comes next in U.S.-Iran relations and whether Iran remains a near-term nuclear threat. © Mostafa Roudaki, Mizan News Agency via Associated Press President Trump and Iran's leaders have sent mixed signals on resuming nuclear talks, while new evidence called into further question Trump's claims that U.S. strikes obliterated Iran's nuclear threat. Trump denied reports Monday that he is weighing a $30 billion deal with Iran that would allow for the development of civilian nuclear facilities. The ceasefire came after a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, which started when Israel launched an attack on Tehran in June that it said was meant to prevent the country from developing a nuclear bomb. Iran has maintained its nuclear program is not intended to produce a weapon. Among the most headline-grabbing developments this week was the intercepted communication between senior Iranian government officials commenting that June's U.S. strikes on Tehran's nuclear sites were less devastating than expected. The Iranian officials in a phone call said the U.S. bombing of three nuclear facilities was not as damaging or extensive as had been expected, challenging Trump's repeated assertions that the sites and Tehran's nuclear program were 'completely and totally obliterated.' The call, first reported by The Washington Post, follows debate among the intelligence community as to how damaged the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites were after the strikes. While Trump continues to insist the bombings destroyed all they targeted and sent Iran's nuclear program back by years, a leaked summary from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency found that structures underneath Fordow and Natanz were still intact and Tehran was only set back by months, as it had likely moved a significant portion of enriched uranium prior to the strikes. After classified briefings last week at the Capitol, Republican lawmakers have conceded that the strikes may not have wiped out all of Iran's nuclear materials. Trump administration officials have not denied the Iran call's existence but have attacked the Post's reporting. Further contradicting Trump's claims, the head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog said Sunday Iran could restart enriching uranium 'in a matter of months.' Rafael Grossi, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said that 'one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there' when it comes to Iran's capabilities. 'The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that,' Grossi said on CBS's 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.' Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: FBI determines headquarters will remain in DC The FBI announced Tuesday it would not be moving its headquarters outside of D.C., abandoning plans hatched under the Biden administration to move the bureau to the Maryland suburbs. The bureau will leave the crumbling Hoover Building and instead occupy space at the Ronald Reagan Building — space that was recently occupied by the U.S. Agency for International Development. EU's top diplomat urges Iran to resume nuclear talks The European Union's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas urged Iran to resume talks on ending the country's nuclear program while speaking with Tehran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. 'Negotiations on ending Iran's nuclear programme should restart as soon as possible. Cooperation with @iaeaorg must resume. The EU is ready to facilitate this. Any threats to pull out of the non-proliferation treaty don't help to lower tensions,' Kallas said in a Tuesday post on social platform X. Iran-linked hackers threaten to release Trump aides' emails: Report A hacking group linked to Iran is threatening to release emails from the accounts of several top aides to President Trump, according to Reuters. The hackers told the news agency they had about 100 gigabytes of emails from Trump officials, including White House chief of staff Susie Wiles. Emails from Trump lawyer Lindsey Halligan, adviser Roger Stone and adult film actor Stormy Daniels, who was a key figure in the Manhattan hush money trial against Trump, were also reportedly accessed. On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: DOJ memo pushes for broader effort to revoke naturalized US citizenship The Department of Justice (DOJ) has laid out new guidelines encouraging its attorneys to seek to strip U.S. citizenship from those who have naturalized if they have committed various crimes. The June 11 memo tells attorneys in the Civil Division to move to strip citizenship from immigrants if they … On Tap Tomorrow Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Senate passes big changes to student loans in reconciliation bill The Senate's version of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' passed Tuesday would make significant changes to student loan programs, worrying … Read more House conservatives threaten floor revolt over Trump megabill A handful of hard-line House conservatives are threatening to tank a Wednesday procedural vote for the party's reconciliation bill, a revolt that would … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-eds related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man arrested for ‘spying' for Iran before possible attacks in Germany
A Danish man has been arrested on suspicion of spying in Germany on behalf of Iran, an allegation swiftly denied by the Iranian embassy in Berlin. German prosecutors on Tuesday said the man, identified only as Ali S under German privacy law, was suspected of conducting the surveillance 'in preparation of further intelligence activities in Germany, possibly including terrorist attacks on Jewish targets'. It added that the individual was suspected of receiving the espionage orders from 'an Iranian intelligence service'. German and Danish authorities said the man had been arrested in Denmark but would be extradited to Germany. The Iranian embassy in Berlin decried what it called 'unfounded and dangerous accusations'. 'Previous discussions with relevant German authorities have already highlighted that certain third parties are attempting to divert public perceptions from the actual events through artificial staging,' the embassy said in a Germany's foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, said Iran's ambassador had been summoned after the arrest. 'If this suspicion were confirmed, it would be an outrageous incident that would once again demonstrate that Iran is a threat to Jews all over the world,' Wadephul said during a visit to Odesa, Ukraine, shortly after visiting a synagogue there. According to Germany's Der Spiegel magazine, the suspect took photos of at least three buildings in Berlin in June. They included the headquarters of the German-Israeli Society, which has lobbied the European Union to list Iran's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) as a 'terrorist' organisation, and a building where the president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, Josef Schuster, was said to occasionally stay. Der Spiegel reported that investigators believe the suspect was working on behalf of the Quds Force, the foreign operations arm of the was arrested in the Danish city of Aarhus by local police last week and was awaiting extradition to Germany. During the 12-day war between Israel and Iran in June, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his country was preparing 'in case Iran targets Israeli or Jewish institutions'. He did not provide further details at the time. Berlin has been a key ally of Israel and vocally supported the attacks on Iran, which began with surprise strikes on June 13.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Russia claims gains in Ukraine as US attention focuses on Iran war
Russia on Monday evening claimed to have captured the entirety of Ukraine's Luhansk region, marking the first time since its illegal invasion began three years ago that it may fully occupy an entire region. Fox News Digital could not independently verify the claim made by Leonid Pasechnik, the Moscow-appointed leader of Luhansk, which Russian President Vladimir Putin illegally annexed in 2022 along with the regions of Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. Kyiv has not yet commented on Pasechnik's claims issued Monday evening when speaking with Russian state TV outlet Channel One, in which he said "literally two days ago" he had received a report that "100%" of the region was now fully occupied, first reported the Associated Press. Ukraine Moves Toward Withdrawing From Treaty Banning Anti-personnel Mines Russia is still assessed to occupy less than 20% of Ukraine, which includes Luhansk as well as some 70% of the other three regions it has claimed to have annexed, according to Reuters – though it is unclear if this figure also includes Russia's occupation of Crimea. Reports on Monday showed that Russia had amassed some 50,000 troops on Ukraine's northern border near the Sumy region, sparking concerns that Putin could be planning another major offensive. Read On The Fox News App Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Ukrainian forces had been moved to the region a week ago in preparation of any Russian offensive. "The Russian plan for an offensive in Sumy is not being realized, and that is thanks to every Ukrainian unit operating in the area," he said in a social media post on Telegram. When asked about Russia's plans on Tuesday, President Donald Trump told reporters, "We will see what happens, I'm watching it very closely." Moscow over the last two months has drastically intensified its war efforts in Ukraine despite attempts by Trump to push a ceasefire and an end to the war. While Ukraine has agreed to Washington's ceasefire proposals, Putin has flatly rejected all attempts and broken deadlines set forth by Trump. In June, Russia launched more than 5,300 Shahed-type drones in a series of mass attacks that have become more frequent and more deadly, reported the Kyiv Independent, citing the Ukrainian Air Force. The 5,337 kamikaze drones fired at Ukraine last month alone reportedly shattered Moscow's previous record of 4,198 drones fired in March – a record that coincided with the renewed outbreak of war against Iran as first Israel, and then the U.S., targeted Tehran's nuclear infrastructure in June. While European nations have remained steadfast in their support of Ukraine, Washington's support since Trump re-took office in January has wavered from the Biden administration as the U.S. has turned its attention to Israel's war in Gaza, returning the hostages and addressing Iran's nuclear threat. Russia Launched Its Largest Aerial Attack Of The War, Ukraine Says U.S.-led attempts to broker a Ukraine-Russia ceasefire appear to have stalled, and little communication has been reported between Washington and Moscow following Trump's previous call with Putin in mid-June. Trump maintains that Putin is looking for a way to end the war, and told reporters during a NATO news conference last week, "I know one thing – he'd like to settle." "He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him," he added. But NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who has managed to establish a positive relationship with the U.S. president despite Trump's previous criticism of the alliance, has warned that he estimates Putin has ambitions beyond Ukraine and could attack other parts of Europe within three to five years. Trump gave Putin a two-week deadline in May to show he was serious about ending the war, or whether he is "tapping [the U.S.] along." But the deadline has long passed, and the president has not made clear what his next steps will be. The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's questions on what the president plans to do next when it comes to U.S. attempts to end Russia's war in Ukraine, or when Trump plans to next speak with article source: Russia claims gains in Ukraine as US attention focuses on Iran war