logo
Hundreds gather again at Essex asylum hotel in weekend of anti-immigrant protests

Hundreds gather again at Essex asylum hotel in weekend of anti-immigrant protests

The Guardian4 days ago
Hundreds of protesters gathered outside a hotel in Epping on Sunday for the fifth time to protest at the premises being used to house asylum seekers, as protests spread to other hotels over the weekend.
A large police presence containing officers from multiple forces restricted contact between anti- and pro-immigrant protesters, with Essex police saying restrictions were necessary after what it described as repeated serious disruption, violence and harm to the community since the first demonstration took place on 13 July.
Two men have been charged with public order offences after a protest of about 400 anti-immigration and 250 counter-protesters outside a hotel in Diss on Saturday, Norfolk constabulary said. There was a further protest outside a hotel in Canary Wharf, London, on Sunday, with the number of protesters appearing to be in the low hundreds.
The demonstration in Epping, Essex on Sunday – which saw about 300-500 anti-immigrant protesters gather behind metal barriers outside the Bell hotel – was the latest in a series of protests sparked after an asylum seeker was charged with sexual assault for allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Kebatu, 41, from Ethiopia, has denied the offences and is in custody.
Protesters wore T-shirts and held up signs with the slogan 'Protect our kids', while others waved England flags. Other flags seen included one for Reform UK, and a white flag with a red cross on a purple square, as seen in America at anti-abortion demonstrations.
Counter-protesters held banners including 'Don't let the far right divide us with their hatred and violence', and 'Care for refugees'. They chanted 'Refugees are welcome here' and 'Nazi scum off our streets'.
Police said three people were arrested during the peaceful protest, two from the anti-hotel protest group and the other from the counter-protest group. 'I want to thank those who attended for the peaceful nature of both protests,' said Ch Supt Simon Anslow of Essex police. 'I am pleased that today has passed off without incident and I am grateful to our colleagues from other forces for their support.'
In a letter sent to the Guardian, asylum-seekers said 'harmful stereotypes' about refugees did not reflect the truth.
'There are some refugees who do not behave respectfully or who do not follow the rules of the host society. But those individuals do not represent all of us,' they said. 'As with any group of people, there are both good and bad – and it is unfair to judge the majority by the actions of a few.'
The letter mentioned fleeing persecution and violence. 'We refugees are not here to take advantage of the system. We are here to rebuild our lives, to work, and to contribute,' they wrote, adding: 'This letter is not a plea for sympathy, but a call for understanding and fairness.'
Outside the Bell hotel, one local woman, who did not want to be named, said local people had complained about an increase in antisocial incidents since it began housing asylum seekers but felt ignored and unfairly labelled as 'far-right'.
'I'm not saying everyone in any of these hotels is up to no good. I'm not going to judge everyone, but there is no vetting,' she said. 'We won't stop until they start listening and shut this hotel down.'
Activists from far-right groups including Homeland, Patriotic Alternative and the neo-Nazi White Vanguard movement have been present at previous protests. On Sunday Kai Stephens, the Norfolk branch organiser for Homeland, held a sign which said: 'Put local people first.'
Stephens said: 'Unfortunately, there has to be a certain point where we turn around and say, the British people should be put first, the indigenous British people.'
Supporters of the far-right activist Tommy Robinson were also present. Robinson, 42, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, had said he would attend before changing his mind and saying it would not be helpful to protesters.
Wendell Daniel, a former Labour councillor who is now a film-maker for Robinson's Urban Scoop video platform, asked one man if he understood why Robinson had not attended. He responded: 'We're with Tommy all the way.'
Other local protesters said that far-right agitators were not welcome. 'It's 100% unhelpful, because it just gives them a message which is not what we're trying to achieve here,' said one man, who did not want to be named.
Stand Up to Racism, the group that organised the counter-protest, estimated about 700 people had gone to Epping. Lewis Nielsen, an officer at Stand Up to Racism, said Nigel Farage's Reform UK had emboldened the far right.
'It's a really dangerous situation at the moment because you haven't just got the protest here, you've got other protests coming up around the country,' Nielsen said. 'We stopped the riots last August with these kinds of mobilisations, and that's why we're pleased the one today has been successful.'
Joshua Bailey, who said he grew up in Epping, said increasing anti-immigration sentiment had made his non-white friends feel vulnerable and threatened. 'It's very important that we have a positive stance towards refugees, who are people fleeing genuine tragedy and disaster,' he said.
He added that he did not agree with chants that labelled protesters as fascists or Nazis. 'There is room for nuance,' he said. 'I'd like to be able to sit down in a pub with someone who had opposing views and be able to speak about it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Just 900 people on top-level benefits joined work coach scheme last month
Just 900 people on top-level benefits joined work coach scheme last month

Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Times

Just 900 people on top-level benefits joined work coach scheme last month

Only 900 people on the top level of incapacity benefit joined a coaching scheme to help get them back into work last month, new figures show. Since 2022, 14,000 people in the 'limited capability for work or work-related activity' (LCWRA) group of universal credit, the highest level of incapacity benefit, have taken up the voluntary offer of employment support. The numbers represent a tiny fraction of the 1.93 million people in the LCWRA group who have no 'requirement to look for work'. Ministers are facing questions about whether their reforms will succeed in getting the long-term sick back to work after a chaotic retreat last month saw key elements watered down. Previous figures have shown that almost half of people on universal credit, Britain's main working-age benefit, have no requirement to look for work, as rising numbers are signed off sick. Ministers have pledged to deal with the rising numbers being deemed unfit to work, with measures including a £1 billion-a-year boost to employment support scheme designed to help them get jobs. 'These numbers show the urgent need to reform welfare and get people off long-term sickness benefits,' said Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, who uncovered the figures through parliamentary questions. 'Labour's decision to scrap the Conservative reforms they inherited will mean hundreds of thousands more people trapped on these benefits with no work requirements at all, as The Times have previously reported. After their costly welfare U-turn, it's clear the Labour government is failing to turn tough words into action.' • More than a million universal credit recipients are non-UK citizens Ministers scrapped Tory reforms that would have made it harder for people with mobility and mental problems to claim LCWRA even before they had to retreat on their own reform package after a backbench revolt. Those currently on LCWRA will no longer see a cut in income designed to encourage them to seek work and reduce incentives to stay signed off sick, after ministers agreed to apply the cut only to new claimants. Sir Stephen Timms, the disability minister, said that the help from work coaches 'provides disabled people and people with health impairments increased one-to-one personalised support from their work coach to help them move towards, and into, work'. He pointed to changes that will require all those on LCWRA to 'engage' in some way with employment support, ranging from annual chats to intensive work preparation, with pilot schemes beginning this summer. A thousand extra advisers will be hired as part of the scale-up of employment support, and Timms said that those affected by welfare reforms 'will be able to access a conversation about their needs, goals and aspirations; offered one-to-one follow-on support'. Stephen Evans, chief the executive of the Learning and Work Institute, a think tank, said: 'A significant minority of people out of work due to ill health want to work and say they would be able to work. But they are rarely offered help to do so and may not be confident they'll get the help they need from the Jobcentre.' • Labour rebels now know that if they push, Keir Starmer will back down He warned ministers that 'building trust and engagement takes time. Rolling out regular conversations with Jobcentres can help, but health services, local authorities and others all have a role to play. We also need employers to think about recruitment and job design so work can fit with people's health conditions.' Previous official evaluation has found that sickness claimants are reluctant to take up support, fearing that 'the Jobcentre would force them into any work'. However, those who did take part generally found the schemes helpful, particularly people with mental health problems who reported improvements in their conditions 'because of the consistent, empathetic support they received from their work coach — this was often simply due to attending appointments, or through work coaches signposting customers to other mental health support', the evaluation found. Those given work coaching were more likely to find jobs, but still just 11 per cent were in work a year later. This suggests that even if all LCWRA claimants took part in the scheme, just 57,000 extra would find work.

Labour's love lost in less than a year but will electoral reform rescue it?
Labour's love lost in less than a year but will electoral reform rescue it?

Metro

time30 minutes ago

  • Metro

Labour's love lost in less than a year but will electoral reform rescue it?

In MetroTalk: Readers discuss Labour leaders, the left-wing, mass migration and the wealth tax debate (Picture:) Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Is your spiritual home sturdy? Reader comments on Farage, Corbyn and Starmer Brian Dooley (MetroTalk, Wed) thinks Jeremy Corbyn's new political party should be the spiritual home of Labour supporters because Sir Keir Starmer has abandoned core Labour values. If only! Starmer ran to be Labour leader on left-of-centre policies and then understandably abandoned them to win last year's general election. Then, inexplicably, he forgot why he had won and reverted to comfort-zone, left-of-centre policies that plunged the government into a serious poll dive that shows no sign of being reversed. Immigration control, law and order, economic growth, NHS reform… policies very popular with the electorate have all collapsed in less than a year. Instead, out-of-touch, left-of-centre backbenchers bully the prime minister to maintain a bloated welfare state that is a magnet for migrants. No wonder Nigel Farage is so popular. Brian, the present Labour Party is indeed your spiritual home… until it is swept away in a few years' time – something that has happened in practically every country in Europe. Chris Shepherd, London Left-wing and centre-left vote to be split four ways? This reader says Corbyn would have less momentum if Labour offered concession to the left-wing(Picture:) I couldn't agree more with James Freeman (MetroTalk, Tue) that if Labour were to offer any sort of concession to the left wing of the party then Corbyn's party wouldn't have as much momentum. To reduce the threat posed by Reform UK, we also need proportional representation (PR). Under first past the post (FPTP), there is a danger the left-wing and centre-left vote will be split between Labour, the Lib Dems, the Greens and Corbyn's party, while the right-wing vote is largely united behind Reform UK. Reform could win an overall majority with just 30 per cent of the popular vote under FPTP – but this could not happen under PR. Alan Yearsley, Sheffield Anti-immigrant, anti-immigration or pro-borders? Reader debates Some politicians and pro-immigration activists call their opponents 'anti-immigrant' protesters. Got a question about UK politics? Send in yours and Metro's Senior Politics Reporter Craig Munro will answer it in an upcoming edition of our weekly politics newsletter. Email alrightgov@ or submit your question here. Maybe the protesters are not so much opposing immigrants – maybe they are opposing the government policies that have encouraged mass immigration? So, why not call them anti-immigration protesters? Or again, perhaps it would be more accurate to call them pro-borders protesters? Some of the pro-immigration activists carry banners calling for 'No borders, no nations'. Will Podmore, London 'Trying to nail down jelly', reader talks wealth tax This reader says wealth tax would be 'impossible to administer' (Picture:) Rob Slater (MetroTalk, Tue) asks why chancellor Rachel Reeves has ruled out introducing a wealth tax. The answer is simple – it's impossible to administer, as other countries have found. How do you put a value on works of art, fine wines, vintage cars, property or companies owned by individuals, to give just a few examples? What's to stop people who live here moving their assets to another country? How many civil servants would you need to assess values – if indeed you could? How many court cases would be brought by those who feel their assets have been overvalued? It's like trying to nail down jelly. The big mistake this government made was in promising not to increase those taxes that make up two-thirds of the total tax income – income tax, national insurance and VAT. If we don't want to pay more tax then we have to expect cuts to public services. It's as simple as that. John Daniels, Redhill Reader says Reform can't solve emigration when the party includes many ex-Tories responsible for mass migration? In her analysis of the causes of mass immigration, Helen (MetroTalk, Tue) ignores the fact large numbers of migrants don't come from countries with war or disaster but the EU and India etc. She glossed over the fact many who do come from problem countries go through safe countries to get here. Helen ignored the impact on the country of over-population (in the 1970s people were urged to stop having children as the then much smaller population was considered unsustainable). She also ignored the fact not only are we becoming 'an island of strangers' – in the words of Starmer, albeit words he now regrets – but of enemies as per the under-reported conflict between Muslims and Hindus. Helen is right about the terrible conditions driving some to emigrate but as to Reform claiming to being the solution, the party contains many ex-Tories responsible for much of the mass migration. Reform is in favour of increasing the wealth disparity between rich and poor, probably increasing the drive for immigration. Mark, via email At what age can you be rugby tackled to the floor for breaking the law? This reader saysthat if they're allowed to vote, they're old enough to face consequences for stealing(Picture: Getty Images) The other night I watched two teenagers walk out of my local superstore with a rucksack full of shopping they had not paid for. The security guard tried to stop them but they just casually walked past him. He told me they did it all the time because they know he can't touch them. If the government considers them old enough to vote then surely they are of the age where they can be rugby-tackled to the floor for breaking the law. Gareth, London Reader suggests substance testing for those on benefits with mental health issues Why doesn't the Department for Work and Pensions introduce drug and alcohol testing for those who receive benefits and claim to have mental health issues? Very often I see people on the street smoking marijuana or with a can of beer. It's easy to see what kind of state they are in and it's very dangerous. These individuals should be receiving medical care and food, travel and rent vouchers, not money or benefits. If they refuse, they should be disqualified and prosecuted. Val, Broxbourne Arrow MORE: KöD's signature three-course menu for only £39.50: 10 unmissable Time Out deals Arrow MORE: I'll sleep soundly through the next heatwave thanks to this game-changing item from Oodie Arrow MORE: Former UFC fighter Conor McGregor loses appeal for civil rape case

Who might lead the Green Party – and why it matters
Who might lead the Green Party – and why it matters

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Who might lead the Green Party – and why it matters

The Greens may be small but they cannot be dismissed as 'fringe'. The Green Party of England and Wales (our focus here, since Scotland and Northern Ireland have autonomous sister parties) now boasts four MPs, three London Assembly members and more than 800 councillors – arguably bigger than Nigel Farage and Reform UK. In Scotland, they were (until relatively recently) in government, and have notably been in office in Germany. Britain's ongoing political de-alignment has opened up opportunities for the Greens, but also some challenges. That's the context for the potentially rather important party leadership election that is now underway. Why is the Green Party having an election? Greens like to be hyper-democratic and have a visceral resistance to 'strong' leadership. They have leadership elections every two years as a rule, and were due for one last year when the general election got in the way. The leader, or co-leaders, elected now will only serve an initial term of one year before having the option of doing it all over again next year. And then again in 2028… Isn't that a bit disruptive? Yes, but it keeps the leadership on its toes, and greatly empowers the membership – and they prefer things that way. 'Party discipline' is a bit of an alien concept to the Greens. Who's running? One of the two present co-leaders, Carla Denyer, no longer wants the job and wishes to concentrate on her role as MP for Bristol Central, having won that seat from Labour last year. The other present co-leader, Adrian Ramsay, MP for Waveney Valley (gained from the Tories a year ago), would like to carry on, and his proposed new co-leader is Ellie Chowns, MP for North Herefordshire (a former Conservative seat). Their outspoken and charismatic challenger Zack Polanski – often described as an 'eco-populist' – could certainly be a more high-profile personality on the national stage than the MPs, even though he is 'only' a member of the Greater London Assembly. He is the current deputy leader, a post to which he was elected in 2022. What's the election about? Where they go next. Former leader and ex-MP Caroline Lucas, who supports the Ramsay-Chowns combo, says the leadership must come from parliament, reform the party's structures and must have climate change and 'environmental and social justice' as the core issue and focus on winning elections. The fear among some is that the party could split unnecessarily on 'culture war' issues and get tangled up with the new Jeremy Corbyn/Zarah Sultana 'Your Party', losing its identity in a Red-Green beetroot-coloured mess. What do they agree on? Greens agree on a surprising amount, at least in principle: anti-austerity, pro-wealth tax, pro-public ownership, anti-racism, pro-Palestine, anti-war, anti-Brexit, pro-refugee, anti-Trump and a devout belief there is a climate emergency. But there are also profound differences of view on issues such as trans rights/gender critical views, antisemitism, the status of Israel, tolerance for the kind of social conservatism that exists in some Muslim communities, and the extent of their respective independence of policy and action in the event of any electoral pacts with each other. What happens if Polanski wins? It sounds as if he will be the more likely to entertain a closer liaison with the Sultana/Corbyn grouping and, being outside the Commons, will necessarily find himself at odds with the parliamentary party, which will require a de facto leader in any case. Public disagreements about radical policy options and endorsing the Corbynites in electoral pacts may be healthy and democratic, but tend to put voters off, especially in the kind of previously Tory-held market towns and villages where the Greens have more recently found fertile ground. Polanski's stance on migration and taxation and his closer association with Corbyn may thus prove an obstacle for the party in the counties at a general election. Polanski, a hypnotherapist in a previous life, also has to cope with having once told female clients that they could have a bigger bust by simply visualising it. He's gay, vegan and lives in Hackney. What about the deputy leadership? Many more candidates here – nine in all. None are MPs or 'household names' (some are not even big names in their own kitchens). That could change. The most high profile is perhaps Mothin Ali, a councillor in Leeds. He came to prominence after his victory speech in the May 2024 election, when he said: 'We will not be silenced. We will raise the voice of Gaza. We will raise the voice of Palestine.' He went on to declare: 'Allahu Akbar!' ('God is the greatest!'). In due course, this drew an apology from him. Should Polanski win as a single candidate for leader, then there will be two deputy leaders, and not necessarily of one mind. What will happen? If all goes well, and they don't split, and they come to some mutually advantageous electoral arrangement with the Corbyn/Sultana party, there could be impressive electoral rewards as the Greens capitalise on Labour's present unpopularity. The first opportunities would come in the English local, Welsh Senedd, and Scottish parliament elections next year; then, in 2028, the London mayoralty (where anything could happen); and the 2028-29 general election. Why, they might even hold the balance of power after the latter. On the other hand, they might split the Red-Green vote and let Labour, the Tories or Reform UK win in their most winnable wards and constituencies, and fight themselves into oblivion. That wouldn't be good for them, the country, Gaza or the planet. When is the result? Ballots are open now; declaration on 2 September.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store