Iwi Hosts Meeting With Multiple Crown Agencies For New Strategy
The inaugural hui was a formal discussion to begin to realise the opportunities of He Kawenata Hu, a commitment included in the iwis Treaty settlement legislation, Settlement Trust Chair Paora Ammunson says.
Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua Settlement Trust has met with senior officials from 12 Crown agencies to begin the development of a new strategy to transform social and economic outcomes for whānau.
Crown representatives travelled to Masterton to meet with the iwi on Wednesday 9 July, including from: Health NZ; the Ministries of Education, Social Development, Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE), Justice, Housing and Urban Development; Oranga Tamariki; NZ Police; Department of Corrections; Te Puni Kōkiri; Social Investment Agency; and Ministry for Primary Industries.
Settlement Trust Chair, Paora Ammunson, said the inaugural hui was a formal discussion to begin to realise the opportunities of 'He Kawenata Hōu', a commitment included in the iwi's Treaty settlement legislation.
'Our settlement was signed back in 2021 and included a new covenant – He Kawenata Hōu – as the platform for us to build a new Tiriti relationship between Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua and the Crown,' said Mr Ammunson.
'Having these senior government officials all come to us here in Masterton, signifies the unique and ongoing nature of He Kawenata Hōu.
'We are talking about a foundational strategy for the social and economic revitalisation of our iwi. Crucially, we must plan how to address the severe inequities that our whānau are facing.'
Mr Ammunson said that the development of the strategy was an important opportunity for the Crown and its responsible agencies to demonstrate their commitment to authentic Treaty Partnership.
'Our iwi is committed to making this mahi our priority focus, and as our Treaty partner, we expect the Crown to do the same.
'Discussions with these agencies so far have been positive and supportive of our hapū-led approach.'
Settlement Trust Group Chief Executive, Ray Hall, said yesterday's inaugural meeting in Masterton was a significant step for all parties.
'We are encouraged by the shared willingness to explore practical initiatives that will start to make a real difference for whānau who are facing serious deprivation in our communities,' Mr Hall said.
'Our goal is to enable our whānau to thrive in their daily lives, across all areas of hauora including health, education, employment, income, housing and cultural connection.'
Mr Hall said that the overarching strategy is expected to be developed over the coming months and finalised later this year.
Notes:
Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua are mana whenua iwi of the Wairarapa and Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua (Dannevirke) regions. Their rohe (tribal area) extends from Turakirae in the south, to the headwaters of the Manawatū Awa in the Ruahine Ranges in the North, to Poroporo at Cape Turnagain on the eastern coast.
Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki-nui-a-Rua Settlement Trust is the Post-Settlement Governance Entity (PSGE) responsible for receiving and administering settlement assets on behalf of the iwi. www.kkwtnr.org.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
Ratepayers To Be Respected: Puppy Dogs And Ice Cream Law To Be Repealed
ACT is welcoming the Government's moves to get local councils focused on core services and show respect for the people who pay the bills. 'David Seymour called Labour's introduction of 'four well-beings' legislation in 2018 the Puppy Dogs and Ice Cream Bill', says ACT Local Government spokesperson Cameron Luxton. 'Because rather than requiring councils to deliver core services in a cost-effective way for households and businesses, Labour believed councils should be able to do whatever they felt like. That was always going to be a recipe for higher rates 'Act has long argued that councils need to stick to their knitting, focused on value for money instead of vanity projects. 'For too long, councils have treated ratepayers' money with disdain. Labour's 'four well-beings' approach invited councils to meddle in everything under the sun, from climate policy to public health and tourism campaigns, all funded by hardworking ratepayers struggling with their own bills. 'These reforms are a good start. ACT is especially pleased to see genuine accountability with the benchmarking so ratepayers can more easily compare the performance of their own council with others. Ratepayers will finally be able to see exactly how their council stacks up in terms of rates, debt, and spending. Some healthy competition between councils is long overdue. 'But accountability can't stop there. ACT wants to see stronger protections for local democracy itself. Moves by councils to grant unelected appointees voting rights, or to introduce Māori wards erode the Treaty's promise of the same rights and duties for all New Zealanders. 'That's why ACT has restored the right for voters to throw out Māori wards and ACT Local will be campaigning to ensure only elected councillors are at the decision-making table. 'Today's changes show the Government has heard the message ACT has been delivering for years, and the message we're hearing every day from ratepayers: focus on the basics, deliver core services well, and stop wasting our money.'
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Ray Chung's 'vile' email condemned across the political spectrum
By Lillian Hanly of RNZ Both the prime minister and the opposition leader have given scathing rebukes of Wellington councillor Ray Chung's email about Mayor Tory Whanau, saying it is "absolutely disgusting" and calling it "vile and unacceptable." Whanau has rejected the contents of the email, saying it is false and contains "malicious and sexist" rumour. The email - seen by RNZ - was sent to three fellow councillors, recounting a story Chung had been told by his neighbour about the neighbour's son allegedly having a sexual encounter with the mayor. The mayor received an apology from Chung earlier today over the email claims, which he sent to other councillors in 2023, but surfaced last week. Asked about the email in today's post-cabinet media conference, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said first and foremost it was "unacceptable" and "really pretty vile" stuff. Luxon said he did not know Chung, and did not remember meeting him. "I wouldn't be able to tell you who he is or point out who he is." With the upcoming local body elections, Luxon said "you get what you deserve" if you don't show up and vote, and "get good candidates in races". Asked whether Chung should stand down, Luxon replied: "I think the email was entirely inappropriate and utterly unacceptable. "But ultimately, it's up to the fine people of Wellington, who I'm sure will work through who they would like to represent them in that role." Chris Hipkins also criticised the councillor, saying the email was "absolutely disgusting" and there was no place for that content in "good, civilised, democratic debate". "Critiquing an opponent is one thing - those kind of personal, abusive, denigratory messages are just totally unacceptable." Asked whether Chung should stand down, Hipkins said it was a matter for Chung. "But I just think that kind of language should be called out in the strongest possible terms. "It denigrates an opponent. It's undoubtedly sexist, if not misogynist, and I just think there's no place for that in a fair election competition." Strained council relationships could undermine the 'good work' - observer Meanwhile, Lindsay McKenzie, the Crown Observer assigned to Wellington City Council, said he had made his concerns about the events known to Local Government Minister Simeon Brown as well as Mayor Whanau, councillors and council chief executive Matt Prosser. He said it was likely that the community perceptions of elected members "will be further harmed by what has gone on and will adversely affect the organisation". McKenzie said the strained relationships could undermine the "good work" the council had achieved over the eight months since he was brought in. He said the council still had significant decisions to be made ahead of implementing the amendment to the Long Term Plan and submitting the quality water services delivery plan. "Despite their focus on the election ahead, candidates who are councillors have been reminded that they are still elected members, are still being remunerated and should be focused on the duties and obligations that go with that status. "I have sought reassurances that elected members will stay focused on the interests of the community they are there to serve," McKenzie said. McKenzie said his role with the council would finish at the end of this month and he had no part in the "the formal pre-election period or in relation to electioneering". "I do have a stake in seeing that the gains of the past seven months or so are not lost and Council successfully navigates its way to the end of this term of office," McKenzie said. Prosser confirmed "a number of complaints" had been made against Chung following the revelations. "A number of complaints against the elected member have been received, including some complaints under Wellington City Council's Code of Conduct. Those complaints are currently being reviewed," Prosser said.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Panel recommends end to weather damage buyouts in 20 years
Phasing out government assistance for climate adaptation and property buy-outs would be "morally bankrupt", a climate policy expert says. An independent reference group set up by the Ministry for the Environment on Wednesday released a suite of recommendations to help the government shape climate adaptation legislation. Following a 20-year transition period, homeowners whose houses are flooded or damaged by weather events should not expect buy-outs, the group recommended. The group also recommended that funding for adaptation measures such as flood schemes, sea walls and blue-green infrastructure, should follow a 'beneficiary pays' approach in most cases. "This would mean those who benefit most from these investments contribute more." ADVERTISEMENT Central government should only invest in adaptation if it would protect Crown assets, "or where broader national benefits can be realised". "Central government investment or other financing strategies may be appropriate to help overcome challenges in particularly vulnerable areas, where there is less ability to pay." Victoria University emeritus professor Jonathan Boston, who was part of a previous expert working group on climate adaptation, said the message from the latest report to New Zealanders was clear: "You are on your own." The report rightly recognised the need for urgent action on climate adaptation, and to make consistent, reliable information about climate hazards available, Boston said. However, the recommendations to withdraw financial assistance for both property buy-outs and adaptation measures, and to leave decision-making up to individuals, were "fundamentally flawed". "One of the core responsibilities of any government is to protect its citizens and to deal with natural disasters and so on. That is above almost anything else." To put an end-date on that was "morally bankrupt and highly undesirable", he said. ADVERTISEMENT The report wrongly assumed that people would act rationally if they were properly informed of the risks, he said. "We know from vast amounts of literature that people suffer from all kinds of cognitive biases... and that these have a profound influence on whether people make sensible decisions or not. "And quite apart from cognitive bias, lots of people lack choices. They lack the [financial] resources to make good decisions." Boston also criticised the recommendation of a transitional period, saying the risks from climate change would continue to evolve well past 2045 or another hard end-date. He and others had previously warned against the 'moral hazard' of creating expectations of generous property buy-outs every time there was a severe weather event. "We certainly need to be ensuring that we don't create incentives for people to stay in risky areas or indeed to build in areas that are going to become risky because of climate change," he said. "But the idea that you can just sort of leave it to individuals to decide what's going to happen and have no oversight or involvement in helping people to make good decisions and helping people to move where they have to move, I just think it's bizarre." ADVERTISEMENT Managed or unmanaged retreat? Environmental Defence Society policy director Raewyn Peart said the report seemed to be moving away from the concept of "managed retreat", where communities moved out of harm's way in a coordinated fashion. "The approach seems to be unmanaged retreat, where we'll give people information and a transition period - they're on notice - and at that point, people can make their own decisions about whether to move or not." That would be unworkable, Peart said. "Some people will move, some won't, councils [will have] to provide services to a community that's gradually emptying out, people there who can't afford to move will be trapped into a risky situation - they may be facing regular floods of their properties. "I just don't think it's in the best interests of the country to essentially leave it to the market and people's individual decisions." The report recommended handing over responsibility for adaptation planning to local councils, but it was unclear whether central government would provide any financial or administrative support, she said. ADVERTISEMENT "Some councils are really on to it and are already doing it — they have the resources. It's the small councils who may only have one planner, who have no expertise in adaptation planning." The latest report echoes previous warnings that insurers could increase premiums to unaffordable levels, and even withdraw from some areas, as the risk from climate change hazards continued to increase. Insurance Council chief executive Kris Faafoi — whose organisation has long called for greater national direction from central government on climate adaptation — said it was good to see the report authors recommending urgent action. "There's still some very difficult issues to work through — but these extreme weather events are going to happen, and being able to protect communities and to keep insurance affordable and available is really important in the long-term." There was little appetite anywhere on the political spectrum for expensive buy-outs of properties to continue, he said. The question of who would actually pay for adaptation measures still needed to be answered, Faafoi said. "In the report itself, there was an expectation that councils will do a lot of the heavy lifting and where some communities might find it a challenge to be able to pay for some of the protections … then investment from the Crown might be necessary." ADVERTISEMENT But following a "beneficiary pays" approach could see the costs of adaptation fall heavily on some communities. "I think reading between the lines, there could be the likes of targeted rates in some areas. "Again, that has to be floated with communities and as to whether or not people who benefit from that might be able to pay for that." The report noted the financial difficulties many councils faced. "Funding will be a challenging proposition if councils' ability to increase rates is constrained," the authors wrote. Climate Change Minister Simon Watts told RNZ the Government welcomes the independent recommendations for how New Zealand can adapt to the impacts of climate change. "We will now take the time to review recommendations and announce decisions in due course," Watts said. "The report is not government policy, however the Government is considering the group's recommendations, alongside the findings of last year's cross-party climate adaptation inquiry and other advice, as it works to put in place the building blocks for a national adaptation framework."
