After a Tornado of False Starts, Educators Remain in the Dark on School Funding
Less than a day later, Trump appeared to rescind the Office of Management and Budget memo that set the funding 'pause' in motion.
But just 30 minutes after that, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took to X to …rescind the rescission. 'This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze,' she posted. 'It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo.'
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
She described her post as an attempt to 'end the confusion.'
It didn't.
'For an administration that wants to make the argument that public education is dysfunctional and not serving our students well, they are amplifying and contributing to that narrative,' said Amy Loyd, CEO of All4Ed, a policy and advocacy organization. Until last October, she served in the Department of Education as assistant secretary for the Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education.
For now, it's unclear which programs will be affected as the new administration takes stock of spending it deems wasteful or contrary to the president's agenda. Those goals include freeing up funds for school choice, ending 'wokeness' and passing a tax cut package. Start-up funds for charter schools, school lunches, funding for homeless students and hundreds of other federal grants 'will be reviewed by department leadership for alignment with Trump administration priorities,' said education department spokeswoman Madison Biederman.
OMB said it spared major 'formula' grants, like Title I for low-income students, special education funding and Impact Aid to districts serving military families. While the administration said Head Start wouldn't be impacted, the preschool program is still listed among thousands to be reviewed.
The administration originally gave agencies until Feb. 7 to identify grants that advance, among other things, 'Marxist equity, transgenderism and green new deal social engineering policies.' Over several chaotic hours, district leaders and advocates tried to interpret whether their programs would be cut while coming to terms with the enormity of the president's actions.
'This is more than a typical partisan divide,' said Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women's Law Center. 'This is an unusual and unprecedented power grab and every member of Congress should be concerned.'
Related
Challenging the administration's pause on funding Congress had already appropriated, three associations sued Tuesday, asking for a temporary restraining order 'to maintain the status quo.' Just before 5 p.m., as the freeze was about to start, U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan granted the request, noting the 'specter of irreparable harm.'
Afterschool programs, food banks and organizations that arrange for children to be driven to cancer treatment centers are among those that would be impacted, said Rick Cohen, a spokesman for the National Council of Nonprofits, one of the groups that filed the complaint. Another plaintiff, Main Street Alliance, a network of small businesses, said its members include child care centers that serve low-income families using federal assistance so they can work.
For many leaders, Tuesday was a rollercoaster.
Just after lunch, Marvin Connelly, superintendent of the Cumberland County Schools in North Carolina, was trying to figure out how he'd handle a potential freeze on over $2 million in Impact Aid — funds that help make up for lost property tax revenue when there's a nearby military installation. A high-poverty district, Cumberland schools serve over 8,000 children of active service members stationed at Fort Liberty.
'We could really be in a grave situation,' he said. Less than two hours later, he learned the funds would not be affected.
Meanwhile Barbara Duffield, executive director of SchoolHouse Connection, which supports homeless students, was participating on a panel at a conference in Washington when some nonprofit leaders told her they were unable to access federal funds for homeless youth and families.
The effort to pause funding followed the president's first-day executive order that prohibits federal spending on diversity, equity and inclusion. On Thursday, the administration removed or archived hundreds of guidance documents, reports and training materials related to DEI and put staff members focusing on equity within the department on leave.
'Who knew dismantling could happen this quickly?' Ian Rowe, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute and the founder of a network of charter schools, told The 74. 'If these moves put America on a path to becoming a colorblind society, that is a very good thing.'
Many conservatives argue such programs amount to a form of illegal discrimination and waste money. Neera Deshpande, a policy analyst at the Independent Women's Forum, pointed to reporting that shows the Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia spent $6.4 million to staff its equity office.
'What is that money accomplishing besides adding layers of bureaucracy to the school system, burdening teachers, and taking away time and money from schools that could be used for instructional purposes or even extracurricular activities for students?' she asked. 'Every dollar that is allocated toward DEI is a dollar that's not allocated toward … teacher salaries or arts programs or literacy support or sports.'
The reversal in priorities at the federal level has left some nonprofit leaders in a bind. When former President Joe Biden was in office, the director of a teacher apprenticeship initiative applied for a Department of Labor grant to help recruit a diverse pool of potential teachers. Now, he doesn't know whether that emphasis will hurt his application.
'I hope they can strike a balance with sanity here,' said the man, who asked not to be named to keep from jeopardizing the grant. 'I'm not going to talk about the diversity part, but we still have a significant crisis in the teacher pipeline. We have to attract individuals into this profession.'
With more than 2,600 programs targeted for potential review, it's unclear which might ultimately be left on the chopping block.
But at least one Republican said the National School Lunch Program shouldn't be off limits. On CNN, Georgia GOP Rep. Rich McCormick suggested low-income students shouldn't depend on schools for meals. The program, which costs roughly $17 billion, provides free and reduced-price meals for over 28 million children during the school year and extends services through the summer with the help of parks, recreation centers and other community organizations.
'You're telling me that kids who stay at home instead of going to work at Burger King, McDonald's, during the summer, should stay at home and get their free lunch instead of going to work?' he asked. 'I think we need to have a top-down review.'
Other advocates noted that while federal funds make up only about 10% of a district's operating budget, some school systems rely on those dollars more than others. In 2023, AASA, the School Superintendents Association, created a map showing that overall, federal funds account for a larger share of district budgets in GOP-led states, mainly those in the South and West.
'Any conversation about federal funding levels — whether a cut in overall level or a proposal to freeze access — requires us to be very honest about the role of federal dollars in local school districts, and to be candid about the facts of who … is more reliant on federal dollars,' said Noelle Ellerson Ng, associate executive director for advocacy governance at AASA.
Responding to news reports that the president had rescinded the freeze memo, Leavitt, the press secretary, posted that the president's executive orders nonetheless 'remain in full force and effect.'
Ng doesn't know where that leaves the nation's schools, but she's run out of patience. Regarding Leavitt's post, she asked, 'Did it attempt to end confusion, or add a layer for today?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Fed Pick Could Face Resistance From Colleagues on Rates
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump's relentless calls for dramatic reductions in interest rates, along with his ability to make changes to the Federal Reserve's leadership, is drawing more attention to the way monetary policy decisions are made — and the people who make them. PATH Train Service Resumes After Fire at Jersey City Station Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind A close look at that group — barring additional surprise departures from the Fed — suggests the president probably won't get the outsize rate cuts he wants in 2026. Fed Governor Adriana Kugler announced last week she'll resign on Aug. 8, five months before her term was set to run out. Trump said he expects to name a replacement in the coming days. Whomever he chooses will likely be in the running to lead the US central bank when Jerome Powell's term as chair expires in May, and could set the tone for what the Trump administration wants from monetary policy. But even if the new chair agrees with Trump that borrowing costs should be much lower, changing them will require a majority on the central bank's Federal Open Market Committee. Former Fed officials and staffers say that means arguments must be based on the economy, not politics. 'Whoever is in that role as chair, their job is to build consensus among the other voters,' said Loretta Mester, former president of the Cleveland Fed. 'And it'll have to be a sound, economical rationale.' The importance of building support for a decision was on display last month, when Fed officials voted 9-2 to leave their benchmark rate unchanged. Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman — both Trump appointees — dissented in favor of a quarter-point cut. Waller and Bowman said the Fed should provide more support to a slowing labor market, but most officials, including Powell, remained wary of tariff-driven inflation. Fed chiefs are traditionally given significant deference by other policymakers in pursuing consensus, so long as they have the committee's respect. 'If the new chair is perceived as political or aligned with the administration, they may not be granted that trust immediately,' said Marc Giannoni, chief US economist at Barclays (BCS) Capital and former research director at the Dallas Fed. Fed Board All 19 policymakers participate in discussions about the economy and monetary policy, but only 12 officials vote. The seven Fed governors in Washington always vote, along with the president of the New York Fed. The remaining four votes are rotated each year among the presidents of the 11 other regional Fed banks. If Powell resigns from the board when his chairmanship ends in May 2026, as is customary, that will give Trump another opening to fill, in addition to Kugler's seat. Powell's term on the board doesn't officially expire until 2028. Replacing both Kugler and Powell would make four of seven governors Trump appointees. It's not guaranteed that all would automatically take direction from the president, though it could give the new chair a head start, Fed watchers say. 'If you have four governors all lined up on one side, that gives the chair quite a bit of momentum to get his or her way,' William Dudley, a former president of the New York Fed, said Monday on Bloomberg TV. 'But I think the Federal Reserve presidents are going to vote their conscience in terms of what's right for the macroeconomy.' Dudley is a Bloomberg Opinion contributor. While Trump has been calling for lower rates for months, Bowman and Waller backed holding rates steady — and voted in favor of such moves — through June. Waller, whose name has been floated as a potential successor for Powell, has also been a staunch defender of central bank independence. The other members of the board — Governors Michael Barr, Lisa Cook and Vice Chair Philip Jefferson, are generally viewed as neutral voices on rates. All three were appointed by former president Joe Biden. 'They will be very focused on the fundamentals, and they could be a bit of resistance if the new members of the FOMC seem to be more influenced by political desire,' said Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist for Nationwide. Regional Banks Aside from New York Fed President John Williams, the regional presidents voting next year will be Cleveland's Beth Hammack, Dallas Fed chief Lorie Logan, the Minneapolis Fed's Neel Kashkari and Philadelphia's Anna Paulson. Williams, who is also vice chair of the FOMC, has often backed Powell and is viewed as a centrist. He said last week he would go into the September policy meeting with 'very much an open mind' about lowering rates, and described the labor market as 'still solid' after gradually cooling over the past year. Hammack, who voted against a rate cut in December, only her third meeting as a policymaker, has shown cautiousness over inflation and a willingness to publicly disagree with her colleagues. She said Friday that while the jobs report was 'disappointing,' she still had confidence in the Fed's decision to keep rates steady last week and believes officials are further from their inflation goal than their employment target. Logan took the helm at the Dallas Fed in 2022 after more than two decades on the markets desk at the New York Fed, where she oversaw management of the Fed's balance sheet. She said in July that officials should hold rates steady for a while longer to bring inflation closer to the 2% target. Kashkari, who previously worked for the Treasury Department under George W. Bush and Barack Obama, oversaw the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) during the financial crisis. He said last week that the Fed is committed to making decisions based on the best data. Paulson, who started in the role in July and will be voting as a policymaker for the first time next year, was previously the director of research at the Chicago Fed, where she worked since 2001. Her career as an economist will make her more prone to taking an analytical approach to policy decisions, said Mester. 'All four of the voters coming in are particularly attuned to financial markets and would be particularly sensitive to any indication that the Fed's credibility is at risk,' said Julia Coronado, founder of the research firm MacroPolicy Perspectives and a former Fed economist. Potential Divisions Projections released in June showed 10 officials predicted at least two cuts in 2025. Those in favor of lowering rates this fall could grow after the July jobs report revealed a weaker labor market than previously thought. Additional deterioration could swing the committee in favor of more cuts. But if the new chair is unable to achieve consensus, it could lead to votes even more deeply split – a dynamic that hasn't been seen in decades. That could raise doubts in financial markets about the central bank's direction and its ability to manage inflation, potentially leading to higher long-term interest rates, said Mester. Waller has also nodded to those financial risks. If the next chair lacks credibility with markets, 'you're going to see inflation expectations spike,' Waller said in a July interview with Bloomberg TV. 'You will not get lower interest rates. You will get higher interest rates.' AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO Government Steps Up Campaign Against Business School Diversity What Happens to AI Startups When Their Founders Jump Ship for Big Tech How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign up for the Yahoo Finance Morning Brief By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marriott cuts 2025 revenue forecast on soft travel demand
(Reuters) -Hotel operator Marriott International cut its full-year revenue growth forecast on Tuesday, signaling slow travel demand in the United States amid looming economic uncertainties. American consumers have been cutting back on discretionary expenses, including travel, after U.S. President Donald Trump's shifting trade policies and the resulting trade war sparked fears of a recession. The Bethesda, Maryland-based company expects 2025 room revenue growth of 1.5% to 2.5%, with the midpoint below its previous forecast of 1.5% to 3.5% increase. Marriott has also taken a hit from lower government spending, which accounted for around 4% of its U.S. and Canada room nights in 2024. Excluding items, per-share profit for the quarter came in at $2.65, higher than the $2.50 a year ago. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palantir books its first $1 billion in quarterly sales after dodging US spending cuts
NEW YORK (AP) — Shares of Palantir Technologies appear to be heading toward another record high Tuesday after booking its first $1 billion in quarterly sales and raising its outlook for the year. The stock rose above $170 before the opening bell Tuesday, which would be tops for the company that has already notched record highs four times this year, the most recent on July 25 when its stock closed at $158.80. Since going public in 2020 when it posted a $1.17 billion annual loss, the artificial intelligence software company has swung to a profit. Profit rose 33% to $327 million in the second quarter. Its $1 billion quarterly revenue haul was fueled by a 53% spike in government sales, despite massive spending cuts under President Donald Trump and his Department of Government Efficiency, once led by the world's richest man Elon Musk. 'DOGE has had zero negative impact on Palantir's U.S. government business, which achieved its fastest growth rate since the second quarter of 2021,' wrote William Blair analysts Louie DiPalma and Bryce Sandberg. 'Palantir is clearly benefiting from AI industry momentum across its government and commercial customer bases.' The company also recorded a 93% jump in business sales. Overall U.S. revenue surged 68% to $733 million. Late Monday, Palantir raised its revenue expectations for 2025 to between $4.14 billion and $4.15 billion. It also raised its U.S. commercial revenue guidance to more than $1.3 billion, which would mean that Palantir achieved a growth rate of at least 85%. 'This was a phenomenal quarter,' CEO Alex Karp said in a statement accompanying the earnings release. 'We continue to see the astonishing impact of AI leverage.' Palantir, headquartered in Denver, Colorado, specializes in software platforms that pull together and analyze large amounts of data. The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data