&w=3840&q=100)
France's Macron makes state visit to UK with migration, Ukraine on agenda
Macron and Prime Minister Keir Starmer will also try to advance plans for a post-ceasefire security force for Ukraine, despite apparent US indifference to the idea and Russia's refusal to halt the onslaught on its neighbor.
Macron's three-day visit, at the invitation of King Charles III, is the first state visit to the UK by a European Union head of state since Brexit, and a symbol of the British government's desire to reset relations with the bloc that the UK acrimoniously left in 2020.
The president and his wife, Brigitte Macron, will be driven to Windsor Castle by horse-drawn carriage, greeted by a military honor guard and treated to a state banquet hosted by the king and Queen Camilla. The British royals made a state visit to France in September 2023.
Macron also will address both houses of Britain's Parliament in the building's fabulously ornate Royal Gallery before sitting down for talks with Starmer on migration, defense and investment.
At a UK-France summit on Thursday, senior government officials from the two countries will discuss small-boat crossings, a thorny issue for successive governments on both sides of the channel.
Britain receives fewer asylum-seekers than Mediterranean European countries, but thousands of migrants each year use northern France as a launching point to reach the UK, either by stowing away in trucks or after a clampdown on that route in small boats across one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.
The UK has struck a series of deals with France over the years to increase patrols of beaches and share intelligence in an attempt to disrupt the smuggling gangs.
It has all had only a limited impact. About 37,000 people were detected crossing the English Channel in small boats in 2024, the second-highest annual figure after 46,000 in 2022. More than 20,000 people made the crossing in the first six months of 2025, up by about 50% from the same period last year. Dozens of people have died attempting the crossing.
Starmer, whose center-left government was elected a year ago, has pledged to smash the gangs behind organized people-smuggling. His plan rests on closer cooperation with France and with countries further up the migrants' route from Africa and the Middle East. The UK also aims to strike deals with individual nations to take back failed asylum seekers.
British officials have been pushing for French police to intervene more forcefully to stop the boats, and welcomed the sight of officers slashing rubber dinghies with knives in recent days.
UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the French are bringing in important new tactics to stop boats that are in the water.
Britain also is pushing France to let officers intervene against boats in deeper waters, a change the government in Paris is considering. Campaigners for migrants' rights and a police union warn that doing so could endanger both migrants and officers.
Starmer spokesperson Tom Wells said some of the tactics being discussed are operationally and legally complex, but we're working closely with the French.
The two leaders have worked closely together to rally support for Ukraine, though they have taken contrasting approaches to US President Donald Trump, with Macron more willing to challenge the American president than the emollient Starmer.
Britain and France have led efforts to form an international peacekeeping force for Ukraine to reinforce a future ceasefire with European troops and equipment and US security guarantees.
Trump has shown little enthusiasm for the idea, however, and a ceasefire remains elusive. British officials say the coalition of the willing idea is alive and well, with Macron and Starmer due to join an international videoconference on Thursday to discuss planning for the force.
Starmer spoke with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Monday about the significant progress being made by military planners, the British leader's office said.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
39 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Jewel Of State": Chief Justice BR Gavai Felicitated By Maharashtra Assembly
Mumbai: Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai was felicitated by the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly on Monday in recognition of his appointment as the country's 51st Chief Justice. Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde hailed CJI Gavai as a "jewel of Maharashtra" and a symbol of justice for the marginalised. In his remarks at the event, Mr Shinde said, "He holds the highest position in the country--it's a joy, and he is a jewel of Maharashtra. He is the pinnacle of our nation's judicial system. He granted rights to Dalits, the oppressed and afflicted. When a true diamond falls, it shines wherever it lands." Praising the judiciary's role in recent constitutional matters, Mr Shinde referred to the Supreme Court's upholding of the revocation of Article 370, stating, "Article 370 was removed by Amit Shah--many went to the Supreme Court, and in every judgment, a decision was delivered in accordance with social justice and the law. This will make the justice system even stronger." CJI Gavai, on Saturday strongly supported the abrogation of Article 370, saying the abrogation was aligned with the ideology of Dr BR Ambedkar. Speaking at an event in Nagpur, CJI Gavai said, "... If the country wants to remain united, the country needs only one Constitution. A separate Constitution for a state was not in line with Babasaheb Ambedkar's ideology, so we unanimously accepted the decision (of abrogation of Article 370) taken by the Parliament, so that the country will be governed by only one constitution." On August 5, 2019, the Centre decided to strip Jammu and Kashmir of its special status and divide it into two Union Territories. "Babasaheb Ambedkar was criticised for our Constitution being too centralised... Babasaheb had replied to that criticism by saying... 'We are giving the country a Constitution suitable for all challenges, and I can assure you that it will keep the country united in times of war and peace.' Today, we are seeing in our 75-year journey what the situation around us is. Whenever this country has faced any crisis, it has remained united..." he told ANI. On Friday, Chief Justice of India Gavai also emphasised the importance of the Indian Constitution, stating that it has "defined the boundaries" of the three branches of government: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. CJI Gavai highlighted that lawmaking is the responsibility of the legislature and state assemblies, while the executive functions within the framework of the Constitution and the law. Addressing the issue of "judicial activism," the CJI asserted that it is necessary for "upholding" the Constitution and rights of the citizens. "Judicial Activism is bound to stay, and it is necessary for the upholding of the Constitution and the upholding of the rights of citizens. At the same time, I am of the view that the Indian Constitution has defined the boundaries of its three wings, whether it is the Legislature, the Executive, or the Judiciary. The work of making laws belongs to the Legislature, whether it is the Parliament or the various State Assemblies. It is expected that the Executive functions according to the Constitution and the law", CJI BR Gavai said while addressing an event in Nagpur on Friday. However, CJI Gavai opined that despite "judicial activism" being bound to stay in the judicial system, it should not be allowed to be converted into judicial adventurism or judicial terrorism. "If the Judiciary tries to interfere in the Executive and Legislative fields in every matter, then I always say, though Judicial Activism is bound to stay, it should not be permitted to be converted into Judicial Adventurism and Judicial Terrorism", CJI BR Gavai said. The Chief Justice further stated that when a law is enacted beyond the authority of Parliament or a State Assembly, and it violates constitutional principles, it is imperative for the judiciary to step in. "When any law is made beyond the authority of Parliament or the Assembly, and it breaches the constitutional principles at that time, the Judiciary can step in", he said.
Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Former UK PM Rishi Sunak returns to Goldman Sachs in senior advisory role
Former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is rejoining Goldman Sachs in a senior advisory position, the Wall Street giant announced on Tuesday, marking a return to his financial roots just a year after leading the Conservative Party to its most crushing electoral defeat in over a century. Sunak, who remains a Conservative MP for a constituency in northern England, first worked at Goldman Sachs as an analyst in the early 2000s before moving into hedge funds. He left finance for politics in the 2010s, eventually serving as Chancellor of the Exchequer and then Prime Minister. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon said Sunak would 'work with leaders across the firm to advise our clients globally on a range of important topics, sharing his unique perspectives and insights on the macroeconomic and geopolitical landscape,' Reuters reported. Sunak's return to Goldman comes after months of relative quiet following his resignation as Conservative Party leader in July 2024. Since then, he has taken up academic roles at Oxford and Stanford universities. His re-entry into the financial sector continues a well-trodden path for former British politicians leveraging their policy experience and global networks in the world of finance. Sunak's wealth and privileged background, including his marriage to Akshata Murty—the daughter of Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy—drew scrutiny during his political career, with critics arguing he was out of touch with ordinary Britons. He now joins a growing list of former UK finance ministers entering the private sector: George Osborne joined BlackRock and advisory firm Robey Warshaw, while Sajid Javid became a partner at investment firm Centricus.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
UK woman slammed over ‘deport non-English-speaking Indian staff at Heathrow' post
A British woman's complaint post about Indian and Asian staff at London's Heathrow Airport not speaking English sparked debate online. Lucy White, who described herself as a Public Policy Specialist, claimed on X that most Heathrow staff were Indian or Asian and 'not speaking a word of English'. 'Just landed in London Heathrow. Majority of staff are Indian/ Asian and are not speaking a word of English,' she said in her post. advertisement White said when she told them to speak English, they accused her of racism. White doubled down in her post, saying, 'They know I'm right, so they have to use the race card.' She went a step further, calling for their deportation. 'Deport them all. Why are they working at the first point of entry to the UK?! What must tourists think,' White said as she concluded her post. Take a look at White's post here: But the internet wasted no time in dissecting her claims. While sveral users agreed with her concerns about language barriers, a section of the internet called out her remarks as "racist" and "ignorant".One of the users pointed out the obvious contradiction, saying, 'They don't speak a word of English but understood you perfectly and called you racist? They should've also called you a fabulist.' Another user said, 'Western countries aren't allowed to be ethnocentric. Be racist, or accept the death of the West.''British locals aren't stepping up for these jobs, which is why Indians and Asians are there. Admit it—it's a fact,' a user said. Countering White's argument, a user explained how Heathrow's location naturally attracts a diverse, multilingual workforce in a lenghty comment. The user reminded White that Britain's economy runs on immigrant labour, particularly in sectors like hospitality, logistics, and healthcare, where ethnic minorities fill roles many locals avoid. They added, 'For visitors and investors, seeing diversity at Britain's ports of entry proves the country's global connection—not the opposite.' 'If I were a tourist, I'd be impressed by how diverse one of Europe's biggest cities is,' one of the users said. See the comments here: While Lucy White accused the staff of failing to represent Britain, the internet felt her outburst said more about outdated attitudes than the people working to keep Heathrow running.- Ends
