Pupils punished for incorrect uniform due to cost pressures, charity warns
A poll of 3,000 parents of school-aged children in the UK found some pupils have received detention, been placed in isolation or been excluded for not having the correct uniform.
Nearly two in five (38%) parents said they struggle to pay for the school uniform their child needs, according to the poll for The Children's Society.
The survey, carried out by Censuswide in June, found 42% of parents said school uniform was not more affordable this year (2024/25) compared to the previous academic year (2023/24).
It comes as the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which is currently being considered in the House of Lords, includes a proposal to cap the number of branded uniform items schools in England can require.
The survey found 44% of parents said their children have faced negative outcomes for wearing the incorrect uniform, or for not having a required item, as the uniform is unaffordable.
Around one in eight (12%) said their child had received a detention for uniform breaches, while 9% had been placed in isolation, and 8% had been excluded.
The poll found 15% of parents said their child had not been able to participate in lessons and 12% were not able to participate in extracurricular activities due to incorrect uniform.
Mark Russell, chief executive at The Children's Society, said: 'Punishing children for circumstances outside their control is deeply unjust.
'Every child should be able to attend school without fear of detention, isolation, or exclusion because of uniform costs their families cannot afford.'
Nearly four in five (78%) parents believe there should be a specific limit on the number of branded uniform items that schools can require, the survey found.
The charity is calling on the Government to implement proposals set out in the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill to introduce a limit of three branded items of school uniform to help families.
Mr Russell added: 'At a time when many families are already struggling to afford the basics, we can't let the cost of school uniforms make life even harder for children.'
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: 'The experiences reflected in this survey are worrying, and demonstrate just how tough the financial position is for some families who face having to make impossible decisions.
'Most schools – in our experience – are acutely conscious of cost pressures on families and work hard to support the many children in our country who live in difficult financial circumstances.
'We support the Government's intention of limiting the cost of uniforms – though we think this would be better achieved with a monetary cap rather than specifying the number of branded items that are allowed.'
Ahead of the committee stage debate on the Bill in the House of Lords on Thursday, schoolwear retailers have repeated warnings that the proposed cap of three branded school uniform items could increase costs for families.
Matthew Easter, chairman of the Schoolwear Association, said: 'We have repeatedly tried to engage with ministers in a constructive way to warn of the risks of this policy backfiring – harming the very families it's meant to help, and putting small community businesses and local jobs at risk.
'A blunt, one-size-fits-all cap will only drive-up costs and reduce access to essential support.'
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'School uniforms can create a sense of community and belonging for children but they shouldn't cost the earth.
'Through our Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill we are capping the number of costly branded uniform items – putting money back into the pockets of working families as part of our Plan for Change.
'Whilst it might upset those who profit from branded items, it's clear from the Children's Society research that we have the backing of parents. It means schools can continue to benefit from a cohesive uniform, while parents can shop where suits their budget.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Why it's not time for Scotland to go to war with its seagulls
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... After a long truce, Scotland could be on the brink of war – with its seagulls. Amid calls for a cull, the Scottish Government is to hold a summit on the matter later this year. There's no denying the birds can cause serious problems. Seven children suffered 'gashes to the scalp' in attacks in a single month in Eyemouth and a woman in Elgin who was attacked by a gull fell and broke her leg, only to be attacked again when she came out of hospital. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Many gulls have discovered that cities are good places to find food (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images It's all too easy to dismiss complaints when you are not the one at the sharp end of a gull's beak. Michael Kusznir, a Conservative councillor in gull 'hotspot' Aberdeen, described the city's birds as "big vicious creatures", adding 'we should be looking at making it easier to curb their numbers'
The Herald Scotland
3 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
'Scotland needs better availability of land ownership data'
This comes as the Scottish Government is actively developing an Ecosystem Restoration Code (ERC) as a new mechanism to encourage private investment in nature restoration and biodiversity projects. Under the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004, all public bodies in Scotland are required to further the conservation of biodiversity when carrying out their responsibilities. READ MORE: However, the new report from UHI concludes that there is no universal standard to measure biodiversity. As a result, measuring success or failure of biodiversity initiatives is 'extremely challenging'. The report, which focused on biodiversity assessments on community-owned land, suggests that 'community landowners cannot know if or how they are achieving their biodiversity objectives despite the biggest community buyouts have a higher-than-average proportion of sites of ecological importance such as peatlands and Sites of Special Scientific Interest'. The report also found that community ownership is inherently geared towards biodiversity, with 12 of the 18 largest community landowners directly constituted to 'conserving, protecting or enhancing the environment or natural heritage, and with environmental sustainability central to community aspirations'. As well as standardising the way in which biodiversity is measured, the report recommends local people – with their often-detailed understanding of the area – should become more involved in designing and carrying out biological monitoring. The report highlights the need for better methods to measure levels of biodiversity (Image: Community Land Scotland) It also calls for specific measurable targets for landowners around biodiversity objectives. The UHI report also found that making assessments of land use and management across Scotland is unnecessarily challenging due to the lack of land data and lack of transparency. To have robust climate and biodiversity projects there needs to be readily available data on land boundaries, ownership and land use so that successes, failures and differences can be assessed in our fight against climate change and biodiversity loss. Dr Josh Doble, Director of Policy and Advocacy at Community Land Scotland, welcomed the research from UHI. He said: 'It clearly demonstrates the issues inherent in Scottish landownership data and how to accurately measure biodiversity. It provides important pause for thought as the Scottish Government consults on how to leverage in private finance to biodiversity recovery. 'For our members there are important findings regarding the number of key ecological sites they are custodians of, as well as where ecological recovery needs to take place. We wholeheartedly agree with UHI that community-led biological monitoring should have a far more prominent place in biodiversity assessments as well as the need for much stronger data to assist all landowners in understanding what biodiversity actions need to happen on their land.' Dr Mike Daniels, a researcher at UHI's Centre for Mountain Studies, added: 'It is surprising, given the high priority of biodiversity in public policy, how difficult it is to get data on biodiversity outcomes for specific areas of land. Scotland needs better availability of land ownership data and greater transparency on how it is managed.'
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Schools in one UK region ban skirts as all kids must wear 'practical' trousers
Secondary schools in the area have been ordered to follow a new uniform policy which includes the removal of skirts. The trust said the move is more 'practical' An education trust has faced backlash after it announced that schools in one UK region will be forced to introduce a ban on skirts - making the environment more "inclusive". Students across six schools in Teesside have been told that their "uniform will no longer include skirts as an option". The rule change comes from Northern Education Trust - which manages numerous secondary schools in the region. The trust said that swapping skirts out for tailored trousers is more "practical". However, some parents have hit out at the policy, with one mum branding the move as "outragous misogyny". In a letter published online across four of its Teesside secondary schools, the trust says: "From September 2026, the school uniform will no longer include skirts as an option, and all students will be expected to wear tailored school trousers. This decision has been made following careful consideration and feedback from all stakeholders across the trust, where it highlighted the benefits of a more practical, inclusive, and consistent uniform policy. "The move to trousers for all students promotes equality and inclusivity, ensuring all students feel comfortable and supported. Trousers are also more practical for active learning and movement throughout the school day, while simplifying uniform requirements helps reduce costs for families. We understand that this is a significant change, which is why we are providing over a year's notice to allow time for any necessary adjustments." But the change has been met with backlash from some parents. One mum, whose daughter attends a school within the trust, told Teesside Live: "My daughter and many of her friends are upset about it. Many girls choose to wear skirts to express their gender identities. It is outrageous misogyny. There's nothing open, modern and inclusive about this." She claims there was students and parents were not consulted on this, however the trusts says it spoke with a "significant number of students" to ask their opinion. Limit on compulsory branded items In the letter, the trust says these changes are in response to the Department of Education changing its guidance on school uniforms to make them more affordable for families. The key change, the trust outlines, is a limit on the number of branded uniform items schools can require. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill will cap the number of branded items to three - with the addition of a branded tie allowed for secondary schools. From September 2026, at the trust's secondary schools, the only compulsory branded items will include a school blazer, school tie, and the PE top - with the trust adding it will no longer allow plain black T-shirts for this propose. All other uniform items, such as trousers, shirts, shoes, and PE bottoms, can be purchased from any retailer, provided they adhere to the school's colour and style guidelines. A spokesperson for the trust said: "Northern Education Trust is extremely mindful of the cost of school uniforms for parents, and has been considering the impact of this for a number of months, and of the forthcoming changes to government legislation. Alongside this, consideration was given to no longer including skirts as an option, and we have spoken to a significant number of students to ask their opinion about this. "As a result of positive feedback to this suggestion, it was decided that all secondary students should wear tailored school trousers from September 2026, as highlighted in the letter to parents earlier this month. The decision to delay implementation of the change until 2026 was to give families plenty of time to prepare so that they could make an informed choice when purchasing items this year, as well as saving costs on having to repeatedly replace tights. "A very small number of parents have raised concerns which have been discussed with individuals, but the vast majority of responses to the notification have been very positive. We cannot comment on individual cases, and we always ask parents to contact us directly to discuss any concerns they have about such changes." The Teesside schools under the Northern Education Trust Dyke House Academy, Hartlepool Freebrough Academy, Brotton The Grangefield Academy, Stockton (letter not published online at time of publication) Manor Community Academy, Hartlepool North Shore Academy, Stockton Thornaby Academy, Thornaby (letter not published online at time of publication)
