logo
Lawsuit challenges billions of dollars in Trump administration funding cuts

Lawsuit challenges billions of dollars in Trump administration funding cuts

Time of India25-06-2025
Attorneys general from more than 20 states and Washington, DC, filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday challenging billions of dollars in funding cuts made by the Trump administration that would fund everything from crime prevention to food security to scientific research.
The lawsuit filed in Boston is asking a judge to limit the Trump administration from relying on an obscure clause in the federal regulation to cut grants that don't align with its priorities.
Since January, the lawsuit argues that the administration has used that clause to cancel entire programmes and thousands of grants that had been previously awarded to states and grantees.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
"Defendants' decision to invoke the Clause to terminate grants based on changed agency priorities is unlawful several times over," the plaintiffs argued.
"The rulemaking history of the Clause makes plain that the (Office of Management and Budget) intended for the Clause to permit terminations in only limited circumstances and provides no support for a broad power to terminate grants on a whim based on newly identified agency priorities."
Live Events
The lawsuit argues the Trump administration has used the clause for the basis of a "slash-and-burn campaign" to cut federal grants.
"Defendants have terminated thousands of grant awards made to Plaintiffs, pulling the rug out from under the States, and taking away critical federal funding on which States and their residents rely for essential programmes," the lawsuit added.
The White House's Office of Management and Budget did not immediately respond to a request made Tuesday afternoon for comment.
Rhode Island Attorney General Neronha said this lawsuit was just one of several the coalition of mostly Democratic states have filed over funding cuts. For the most part, they have largely succeeded in a string of legal victories to temporarily halt cuts.
This one, though, may be the broadest challenge to those funding cuts.
"It's no secret that this President has gone to great lengths to intercept federal funding to the states, but what may be lesser known is how the Trump Administration is attempting to justify their unlawful actions," Neronha said in a statement.
"Nearly every lawsuit this coalition of Democratic attorneys general has filed against the Administration is related to its unlawful and flagrant attempts to rob Americans of basic programmes and services upon which they rely. Most often, this comes in the form of illegal federal funding cuts, which the Administration attempts to justify via a so-called agency priorities clause."
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said the lawsuit aimed to stop funding cuts he described as indiscriminate and illegal.
"There is no because I don't like you' or because I don't feel like it anymore' defunding clause in federal law that allows the President to bypass Congress on a whim," Tong said in a statement.
"Since his first minutes in office, Trump has unilaterally defunded our police, our schools, our healthcare, and more. He can't do that, and that's why over and over again we have blocked him in court and won back our funding."
In Massachusetts, Attorney General Andrea Campbell said the US Department of Agriculture terminated a USD 11 million agreement with the state Department of Agricultural Resources connecting hundreds of farmers to hundreds of food distribution sites while the US Environmental Protection Agency terminated a USD 1 million grant to the state Department of Public Health to reduce asthma triggers in low-income communities.
"We cannot stand idly by while this President continues to launch unprecedented, unlawful attacks on Massachusetts' residents, institutions, and economy," Campbell said in a statement.
The lawsuit argues that the OMB promulgated the use of the clause in question to justify the cuts. The clause in question, according to the lawsuit, refers to five words that say federal agents can terminate grants if the award "no longer effectuates the programme goals or agency priorities".
"The Trump Administration has claimed that five words in this Clause-'no longer effectuates . . . agency priorities'-provide federal agencies with virtually unfettered authority to withhold federal funding any time they no longer wish to support the programmes for which Congress has appropriated funding," the lawsuit said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New York, Michigan, Iowa...: Is Trump getting desperate to shape US midterms that are due in 2026?
New York, Michigan, Iowa...: Is Trump getting desperate to shape US midterms that are due in 2026?

First Post

time8 minutes ago

  • First Post

New York, Michigan, Iowa...: Is Trump getting desperate to shape US midterms that are due in 2026?

Donald Trump is steering key Republicans away from statewide races to protect the GOP's narrow House majority in 2026 read more As the political calendar turns its attention toward the 2026 US midterm elections, President Donald Trump appears to be exerting increasingly overt control over Republican congressional strategy. In recent weeks, Trump has played a decisive role in shaping GOP candidacies across battleground states like New York, Michigan and Iowa. While his supporters hail this as party discipline in action, many view it as a calculated and possibly desperate attempt to prevent another electoral debacle like the 2018 House flip. The question now looms: is Trump consolidating power or compensating for vulnerability? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Keeping the House at all costs At the core of Trump's strategy is a single, obsessive goal: protecting the GOP's razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives. Republicans control the chamber by only a handful of seats, a fact not lost on the president. According to reporting by NBC News, Trump has been personally intervening to dissuade vulnerable House Republicans from seeking higher office, thereby keeping reliable incumbents in place. The Associated Press quoted Trump campaign sources as saying that the move marks a departure from earlier cycles where Trump often endorsed insurgent Senate candidates without much concern for broader party dynamics. Now, the emphasis is on unity and incumbency especially in marginal districts. New York: Lawler stays put, Stefanik in waiting One of the clearest examples of this effort unfolded in New York. Congressman Mike Lawler, who represents a swing district in the Hudson Valley that former vice president Kamala Harris won in 2024, recently confirmed he would not challenge Governor Kathy Hochul for the state's top job. While Lawler stressed the decision was his alone, he acknowledged that Trump had 'offered his perspective' during a private meeting. Lawler's re-election campaign was endorsed by Trump in May—an early signal that the president wanted him to stay in the House. Republican strategists see Lawler's decision as critical to retaining the seat in a high-stakes midterm. Meanwhile, this move potentially clears the gubernatorial path for Representative Elise Stefanik, a staunch Trump ally whose name was floated after her nomination to the United Nations ambassadorship was withdrawn. Stefanik has indicated she will reveal her intentions after this fall's elections. As reported by NBC News, her possible candidacy highlights Trump's willingness to elevate allies from safer districts while reinforcing GOP infrastructure where it's most needed. Michigan: Avoiding a GOP civil war Trump's influence is equally visible in Michigan, where Congressman Bill Huizenga opted out of a Senate run after meeting with the president at the White House. The Associated Press revealed that Trump's priority was keeping Huizenga in the House to secure his west Michigan seat, rated 'likely Republican' by the Cook Political Report. Huizenga's exit from the Senate race effectively clears the way for former Congressman Mike Rogers, a Trump-friendly figure who has staffed his campaign with former Trump aides. Though Trump has not yet formally endorsed Rogers, insiders expect that move soon. While Huizenga has not officially announced a re-election bid, GOP operatives suggest his decision—shaped directly by Trump—is part of a broader strategy to avoid intra-party conflict in swing states and to maximise resources toward winnable districts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iowa: Nunn bows to Trump's midterm playbook In Iowa, Representative Zach Nunn had been considering a run for governor following Governor Kim Reynolds' decision not to seek re-election. However, after a conversation with Trump, Nunn chose to remain in the House. The district he represents is a Democratic target in 2026, having been won by only four points in the last cycle. Trump's endorsement of Nunn's re-election was quick and emphatic, with sources describing the congressman as a 'team player.' According to NBC News, this move is emblematic of Trump's new playbook which is of convincing lawmakers in contested districts that the national interest of the party outweighs individual ambitions. Representative Randy Feenstra, who holds a safer seat, is now among those considering a gubernatorial run. This supports the notion that Trump is willing to let GOP members seek higher office only when their departure doesn't threaten House control. A calculated silence in the Senate Interestingly, while Trump is taking a hands-on approach with House races, he has remained relatively circumspect when it comes to open Senate contests. In states like Georgia and North Carolina, Trump has not yet waded into contentious primaries. Political observers interpret this as a deliberate contrast to his previous, often chaotic, endorsement patterns. That said, former North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper is widely expected to run for the Senate seat being vacated by Republican Thom Tillis. This could create a high-stakes showdown that may yet draw Trump's attention. For now, his priority appears to be ensuring a stable, loyal and electorally viable House majority. Trump's direct involvement has not gone unnoticed. Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama told The Hill that Trump now commands more influence over the Republican Party than any president he's ever seen. Tuberville also issued a warning to dissenters, stating that GOP lawmakers who refuse to align with Trump should prepare to face primary challenges. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, not all Republicans are falling in line. Michigan's Representative John James has chosen to run for governor, a decision that reportedly displeased Trump. During a recent event, Trump jokingly suggested that James shouldn't be allowed to run unless his House seat could be adequately filled. Such moments illustrate the limits of Trump's control—even as most GOP lawmakers seem to heed his directives. As Lawler candidly put it in a media appearance, while Trump's opinion was valuable, 'I didn't get here by doing as told.' Desperation or discipline? Democrats, unsurprisingly, interpret these moves through a lens of weakness. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries framed Trump's interventions as coercion, saying that Republicans are being 'ordered' to stay in place because of their grim electoral prospects. Still, it's hard to ignore the effectiveness of Trump's manoeuvres. He's minimising damaging primaries, bolstering vulnerable districts and testing a more disciplined version of his political machine. This could either be the product of maturity in strategy or of nervous anticipation about what's at stake if the GOP fails to hold the House again. If Trump's campaign is marked by calculation rather than chaos in 2026, it may not be desperation at all but rather a serious, if ruthless, effort to ensure that history does not repeat itself. Whether that's enough to counteract traditional midterm losses remains to be seen. What's clear is that Trump intends to leave nothing to chance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Trump calls Tulsi Gabbard ‘hottest in the room'. It has a Obama connection
Trump calls Tulsi Gabbard ‘hottest in the room'. It has a Obama connection

Indian Express

time8 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump calls Tulsi Gabbard ‘hottest in the room'. It has a Obama connection

US President Donald Trump called Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard 'the hottest' during a reception with Republican lawmakers at the White House on Tuesday. The remark came a day after Gabbard filed a criminal referral to the Department of Justice (DOJ), accusing former President Barack Obama and his top intelligence officials of a 'treasonous conspiracy' to undermine Trump's 2016 election victory. 'She's like, hotter than everybody. She's the hottest one in the room right now,' Trump said. Turning to House Speaker Mike Johnson, he added, 'Speaker, she's hotter than you right now, speaker. She's the hottest person in the room right now, speaker.' Trump also praised Gabbard's move to hold the Obama-era officials accountable, saying, '[Gabbard] found out that Barack Hussein Obama led a group of people and they cheated in the elections and they cheated without question. She has all the documents, she has everything that you need. You've found things that nobody thought we'd ever find. Very happy and very honoured to have you with us. We're very proud of you, Tulsi.' 🚨President Trump: 'Where's Tulsi? She's the hottest one on the room right now, because she found out with certainty…Barack Hussein Obama led a group of people, they cheated without question!' — Derrick Evans (@DerrickEvans4WV) July 23, 2025 The report, which was recently made public, claims to uncover Obama-era communications that show attempts to manipulate the outcome of the 2016 elections. It points that there was no tampering with vote totals, but implies that the lack of direct interference undermines broader findings of Russian involvement with conclusions that several bipartisan investigations have upheld. Trump praised Gabbard's revelations, stating, 'Tulsi, great job, and I know you have a lot more coming.' He also renewed his accusations against former President Obama, calling the effort to tie him to Russia a 'treasonous conspiracy' aimed at sabotaging his 2016 campaign. The report claims the Obama administration's intelligence figures manufactured the narrative that Trump had colluded with Russia, describing it as the 'groundwork' for a years-long coup attempt against the Trump presidency. However, between 2019 and 2023, four independent watchdog investigations confirmed that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election. Trump, throughout his presidency, dismissed those findings as a 'hoax.' Responding to the renewed claims, Obama's spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush issued a rare statement: 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.'

Trump to Tech Giants: Stop Hiring in India, Put America First
Trump to Tech Giants: Stop Hiring in India, Put America First

Hans India

time8 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Trump to Tech Giants: Stop Hiring in India, Put America First

In a bold move aimed at reshaping the global tech employment landscape, U.S. President Donald Trump has called on leading technology companies—including Google and Microsoft—to stop hiring overseas workers, particularly in countries like India. The statement came during an AI Summit in Washington, where Trump laid out a sweeping vision for American dominance in artificial intelligence and domestic job creation. Addressing tech leaders and policymakers, Trump accused major firms of prioritizing global profits over American workers. He argued that the industry's 'globalist mindset' had led to offshoring of jobs and neglect of domestic employment opportunities. "Many of our largest tech companies have reaped the blessings of American freedom while building their factories in China, hiring workers in India and stashing profits in Ireland, you know that. All the while dismissing and even censoring their fellow citizens right here at home. Under President Trump, those days are over," he declared. Trump's message came alongside the signing of three executive orders focused on accelerating AI development in the U.S., under an initiative called "Winning the Race." The first order aims to fast-track AI infrastructure development, especially data centers, to boost innovation and maintain a competitive edge globally. "Winning the AI race will demand a new spirit of patriotism and national loyalty in Silicon Valley and long beyond Silicon Valley," he emphasized. The second executive order targets companies receiving federal funding for AI development. These firms must now ensure their AI systems are politically neutral. In a sharp rebuke to previous policies encouraging diversity and inclusion, Trump said these approaches have hindered technological progress. 'We are getting rid of woke,' Trump stated, insisting that AI systems must be 'accurate and not influenced by ideology.' These neutrality requirements will extend to all AI systems used by U.S. government agencies, reinforcing Trump's commitment to depoliticized technology. Adding a touch of branding rhetoric, Trump also questioned the very term 'artificial intelligence,' arguing it fails to capture the power of the technology. 'It's not artificial, it's genius,' he said. The third order lays out strategies for boosting the global reach of American-made AI tools. This includes promoting AI exports and encouraging end-to-end AI development entirely within U.S. borders. These executive orders are expected to reshape hiring trends in the tech industry. While the long-term impact is still unfolding, Indian IT professionals and outsourcing firms may soon face increasing hurdles if Trump's policies gain further traction. Trump's latest directive underscores his 'America First' stance, pushing U.S.-based companies to invest in American talent and innovation while limiting reliance on international labour markets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store