logo
Japan trade deal info on Trump's desk was altered by hand with a marker

Japan trade deal info on Trump's desk was altered by hand with a marker

CNBC4 days ago
President Donald Trump's art of the deal seemed to play out in real time on Tuesday.
Trump announced what he called a "massive" trade agreement with Japan over his Truth Social platform Tuesday night, which the president said includes a 15% tariff rate and $550 billion in investments. But the details of that deal on a card on Trump's desk shows discrepancies and last-minute edits, according to a photo posted by by Dan Scavino, the White House deputy chief of staff.
The card on Trump's desk displays a 10% tariff, in addition to a 15% levy rate on the automotive, pharma and semiconductor industries. However, Trump said on Truth Social only that Japan would face a rate of 15%, without elaborating.
"Japan will pay Reciprocal Tariffs to the United States of 15%," Trump wrote.
Below the tariff rate, the phrase "$400B" appears on the board in large lettering. The number four is crossed out, with "500" written above it.
That seemingly references Japan's plan to investment in the U.S., as was explained by Trump in his social media post. But Trump used a different figure than even the altered amount, saying in the post that the Asian country would invest $550 billion into the U.S.
It is not clear where the additional $50 billion came from.
"Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 Billion Dollars into the United States, which will receive 90% of the Profits," Trump wrote in the post. "This Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it."
The White House did not comment on CNBC's request for clarification on the tariff rate or total investment amount. It's not clear whether the card difference is the result of last-minute negotiations by Trump, typos, or something else. Nor was it clear who altered the $400 billion figure.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick appeared to take credit for the board in a Wednesday morning interview with Bloomberg, but did not directly address the edits or discrepancies.
"I created the big board and put it there," Lutnick said. "But the answer is: the negotiator in chief of the United States of America is sitting behind the desk. Donald Trump is sitting there negotiating the deal."
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a Wednesday morning interview with Bloomberg that Japan got the 15% rate on autos — despite some other countries' automakers facing higher rates — because they offered both guarantees of equity credit and funding for large U.S. projects. This statement came in response to a question about if trading partners could now expect to see a floor of 15% tariffs during negotiations.
"That is a different kind of deal," Bessent said. "They got the 15% rate because they were willing to provide this innovative financing mechanism."
Wall Street was left a bit confused by the terms of the deal.
Andy Laperriere, head of U.S. policy research at Piper Sandler, said Japanese officials are "describing it differently" when it comes to the investment plan. Japan's leaders, he said, see the $550 billion figure as a cap and inclusive of government loan guarantees.
"Especially given that the Japanese believe they are being bullied into this commitment, they will almost certainly slow walk whatever investments they don't think are in their own economic self-interest," Laperriere wrote to clients in a Wednesday note.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thai-Cambodia border clashes persist despite ceasefire hopes
Thai-Cambodia border clashes persist despite ceasefire hopes

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Thai-Cambodia border clashes persist despite ceasefire hopes

Fresh artillery clashes erupted on Sunday near a long-contested region between Cambodia and Thailand that has been the scene of recent fighting in which at least 33 people have been killed. Both countries said they were ready to discuss a ceasefire after a late-night intervention by US President Donald Trump. Thailand and Cambodia clashed for a fourth day Sunday, despite both sides saying they were ready to discuss a ceasefire after a late-night intervention by US President Donald Trump. The neighbours, popular destinations for millions of foreign tourists, have been locked in their bloodiest conflict in years over the disputed border, with at least 33 people confirmed killed and more than 200,000 displaced. Both said they were willing to start talks to end the fighting, after Trump spoke to the two prime ministers late on Saturday and said they had agreed to meet and 'quickly work out' a ceasefire. Read moreTrump says Thailand and Cambodia agree to immediate ceasefire talks But fresh artillery clashes erupted on Sunday morning near two long-contested ancient temples in the frontier region between northern Cambodia and northeast Thailand that has seen the bulk of the fighting. Cambodian defence ministry spokeswoman Maly Socheata said Thai forces began attacking areas around the temples at 4:50 am. The regular thump of artillery rattled windows in the Cambodian town of Samraong, around 20 kilometres (12 miles) from the frontline, AFP journalists said. Thai Army Deputy Spokesman Ritcha Suksuwanon said Cambodian forces began firing artillery around 4:00 am as the two sides battled for control of strategic positions. Ceasefire calls Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet on Sunday said his country 'agreed with the proposal for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between the two armed forces'. He said his Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn will talk to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to coordinate with the Thais, but warned Bangkok against reneging on any agreement. After Trump's call, Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said he had agreed in principle to enter a ceasefire and start talks 'as soon as possible'. While both sides have expressed a desire for talks to end the crisis, neither has so far been willing to back down. On Sunday, they again each blamed the other for undermining peace efforts. The Thai foreign ministry also accused Cambodian forces of firing shells into civilian homes in Surin province. 'Any cessation of hostilities cannot be reached while Cambodia is severely lacking in good faith and repeatedly violating the basic principles of human rights and humanitarian law,' the foreign ministry said in a statement. From the Cambodian side, defence ministry spokeswoman Maly Socheata issued a statement denying that they fired first. The statement accused Thailand of 'deliberate and coordinated acts of aggression'. Read moreThailand and Cambodia clash: A border dispute fuelled by nationalism A long-running border dispute erupted into combat this week with jets, tanks and ground troops battling in the rural border region, marked by a ridge of hills surrounded by wild jungle and agricultural land where locals farm rubber and rice. Thailand says seven of its soldiers and 13 civilians have been killed, while Cambodia has confirmed eight civilian and five military deaths. The conflict has forced more than 138,000 people to be evacuated from Thailand's border regions, and 80,000 have been driven from their homes in Cambodia. After an urgent United Nations Security Council meeting Friday in New York, Cambodia's UN Ambassador Chhea Keo said his country wanted 'an immediate ceasefire' and a peaceful resolution of the dispute. UN chief Antonio Guterres urged both sides Saturday to 'immediately agree to a ceasefire' and hold talks to find a lasting solution. As well as blaming each other for starting the fight, Cambodia has also accused Thai forces of using cluster munitions, while Thailand accused Cambodia of targeting civilian infrastructure, including hospitals. The fighting marks a dramatic escalation in a long-running dispute between the neighbours over their shared 800-kilometre border where dozens of kilometres are contested. (FRANCE 24 with AFP)

Scots Do Not Hold Back While Showing Trump How They Really Feel About The President's Visit
Scots Do Not Hold Back While Showing Trump How They Really Feel About The President's Visit

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Scots Do Not Hold Back While Showing Trump How They Really Feel About The President's Visit

Donald Trump has, in his usual fashion, caused an enormous stir after touching down in Scotland on Friday. The US president managed to play golf at his course on the Scottish coast on Saturday without being disturbed, but protests at his presence were erupting across the country. Trump and his son Eric played on Turnberry, the family course they've had for a decade, with US ambassador to the UK Warren Stephens. Meanwhile, more than 100 miles away, hundreds of demonstrators gathered outside the US Consulate in Edinburgh, making it plain that Trump was not at all welcome. Many also lashed out at UK prime minister Keir Starmer for striking up a new trade deal with Trump in a bid to avoid US tariffs on foreign imports. Trump is set to meet with Starmer, Scotland's first minister John Swinney and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen during his five-day trip, while also making time to visit his second golf club in the region. Demonstrators rallied together ahead of his visit, with Pro-Palestine campaigners, environmental activists and pro-Ukraine groups uniting to create a loose group called the 'Stop Trump Coalition'. During Saturday's protests, some people brought bagpipes, while others wore outfits from the dystopian world of The Handmaid's Tale. One protester told broadcasters: 'We should not be opening Scotland or the UK to somebody with Trump's background. 'Trump is an abhorrent human being with no saving graces.' Anti-Trump protestors on Sky News, "We should not be opening Scotland or the UK to somebody with Trump's background""Trump is an abhorrent human being with no saving graces" — Farrukh (@implausibleblog) July 26, 2025 The left-wing, pro-independent newspaper The National also joined in with their Friday front page which featured Trump's mug shot and the headline: 'Convicted US felon to arrive in Scotland.' Amid backlash online, the newspaper then asked which part of their front page is factually inaccurate. Today's front page 📰 Convicted US felon to arrive in ScotlandOur front page has caused a stir online, prompting anger from Donald Trump's supporters. So, we want to ask: which part is factually inaccurate? 🤔 — The National (@ScotNational) July 25, 2025 Others got... a little more personal... Some really lent into their Scottish dialect to make sure the insults hit home.... Large crowds gathered with handwritten placards... Related... Trump Claims He 'Never Went' To Epstein's Island And Tells People To Focus On Bill Clinton Instead Joe Rogan On Trump Administration's Handling Of Epstein Files: 'Do You Think We're Babies?' Trump Doesn't Rule Out Pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell

Is International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A.'s (LON:IAG) ROE Of 47% Impressive?
Is International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A.'s (LON:IAG) ROE Of 47% Impressive?

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A.'s (LON:IAG) ROE Of 47% Impressive?

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (LON:IAG), by way of a worked example. Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. How To Calculate Return On Equity? The formula for ROE is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for International Consolidated Airlines Group is: 47% = €2.9b ÷ €6.2b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. That means that for every £1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated £0.47 in profit. Check out our latest analysis for International Consolidated Airlines Group Does International Consolidated Airlines Group Have A Good Return On Equity? By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. Pleasingly, International Consolidated Airlines Group has a superior ROE than the average (28%) in the Airlines industry. That's clearly a positive. Bear in mind, a high ROE doesn't always mean superior financial performance. A higher proportion of debt in a company's capital structure may also result in a high ROE, where the high debt levels could be a huge risk . To know the 2 risks we have identified for International Consolidated Airlines Group visit our risks dashboard for free. How Does Debt Impact ROE? Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used. International Consolidated Airlines Group's Debt And Its 47% ROE International Consolidated Airlines Group clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 2.81. Its ROE is pretty impressive but, it would have probably been lower without the use of debt. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time. Summary Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt. But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store