Investing abroad: Here are the pros and cons of using old and new routes
There are multiple ways to invest abroad, and with deepening of markets, more avenues are becoming available.
Here is a look at the advantages and disadvantages of both old and new avenues, and different investor profiles.
Direct purchase of stocks
There are broking firms, either multinational firms or Indian entities with tie-ups with broking firms abroad, who facilitate the execution. Your investment in stocks or bonds abroad is subject to liberalized remittance scheme (LRS) limit of $250,000 per financial year. At a conversion rate of 86 per dollar, it is ₹2.15 crore per financial year.
Provided you do not have any other requirement for money abroad, children's education, or travel, you can utilise this limit. However, one issue here is stock selection. If you are in a different profession, then analysing stocks, that too foreign stocks, is not your forte.
There are entities in India that offer a curated basket of stocks which you can purchase, and they will facilitate the transaction through a broking entity with which they have a tie-up. However, they do not have accountability for the performance of those stocks. You require guidance on picking stocks abroad. Otherwise, it is not advisable to venture into it.
Managed vehicles - mutual funds
Through the mutual fund route, you not only get the advantage of a professional fund management team managing the portfolio, but also the fact that it is not part of the LRS limit. The issue of the MF route is entirely different.
There are RBI limits for the MF industry, of $7 billion for investment abroad and another $1 billion for investments in ETFs abroad. The limits became almost full, and MFs had to stop accepting fresh subscriptions. However, certain MFs investing abroad do accept money from time to time.
There are redemptions, which open up scope for accepting fresh money. Hence, you can go through the MF route. You get the advantage of a fund manager managing your money, or a passive fund following an index abroad, where you can avoid the fund manager risk (risk of the fund manager underperforming a benchmark index).
GIFT City options
There is another avenue in MFs: recently, a fund has been launched under the IFSCA (International Financial Services Centres Authority) jurisdiction at GIFT City. This is a different jurisdiction, not subject to the usual RBI or SEBI regulations. That is, it is not subject to the cap on investments abroad or $7 billion or $1 billion. This is a retail fund, with minimum subscription of $5,000 ( ₹430,000) at a conversion rate of 86.
The term retail fund has a particular connotation: it is a particular fund structure under the IFSCA. This fund is subject to the LRS limit of $250,000 per year. The appeal of this structure is that at $5,000, the ticket size is relatively affordable. There are other outbound products available at GIFT City (other than mutual funds) where the ticket size is higher.
Portfolio management services
There are PMSs available at GIFT City, where you convert your money from your normal rupee bank account to dollar and remit to a bank housed at GIFT. The ticket size is usually $75,000, which is ₹64.5 lakh. Quantum could be lower if the service provider offers 'accredited investors". There is a professional fund manager to manage your portfolio. Money remitted to GIFT jurisdiction is part of the LRS limit of $250,000.
Alternative Investment Funds
There are fund management houses that have Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) under IFSCA guidelines. The fund would be structured as something like 'A Restricted Scheme (Non-Retail) classified as a close-ended category III AIF under the IFSCA FM Regulations".
A restricted scheme is one under a private placement offer to only accredited investors or investors investing above $150,000, and it shall have not more than 1,000 investors.
Things to know about GIFT City route
Similarly, when there is a redemption from investments abroad but the money stays within GIFT, there is no LRS implication. It can be remitted abroad later when required.Joydeep Sen is a corporate trainer (financial markets) and author. Views are personal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
India ramps up fertiliser production output, diversifies away from China
Mumbai: After China halted critical fertiliser supplies, the Indian manufacturers are increasing domestic output through advanced technologies and new formulations, according to a report on Monday. India's fertiliser industry is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4.2 per cent, reaching $16.58 billion by 2032. In FY25, total fertiliser production increased to 51 MT, supported by flagship schemes such as PM-KISAN and PM-Garib Kalyan Yojana, CareEdge Ratings said in its report. After restrictions on rare earth elements, China halted its speciality fertilisers and key phosphate exports to India. In response to this, India has secured a five-year agreement with Saudi Arabia to import 3.1 million tonnes of Di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) annually, which is equivalent to approximately 30 per cent of its domestic requirement. 'This crisis presents a unique opportunity. With China pausing fertiliser supplies, Indian manufacturers are stepping up to bridge the gap by increasing domestic output, which will not only benefit them but also drive innovation, particularly through the adoption of advanced technologies and the development of new formulations," said Priti Agarwal, Senior Director at CareEdge Ratings. "Policymakers, manufacturers, and farmers are collaborating to combat the issue with a combination of alternative sourcing, local production, and on-the-ground innovation,' she added. China accounted for nearly 70 per cent of India's speciality fertiliser imports during the June to December period in recent years. Now, India is signalling a decisive shift towards supply diversification and enhanced resilience by exploring alternatives like Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Russia, Oman, Morocco. Chinese di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) supply to India began to decline in 2023, then dropped from 2.29 MT in FY24 to 0.84 MT in FY25, and there have been no shipments since early 2025. Inspection clearances for DAP and speciality fertiliser shipments to India have been withheld since April 2025, blocking supplies while exports to other nations continue. "Ensuring adequate inventory and timely distribution — through coordinated efforts between the government and private stakeholders should be the near-term focus. The recent agreement with Saudi Arabia for long-term DAP supply is a timely step in this direction,' said Sachin Mathur, Associate Director at CareEdge Ratings.
India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Skoda Kodiaq Becomes First Petrol SUV from India to Conquer Everest Base Camp
Skoda Auto India has set the historic benchmark with the Skoda Kodiaq, as the first Indian-made SUV powered by petrol to get to the North Face Base Camp of Mount Everest. The journey comprised of more than 6,000 kilometers of diverse land in India, Nepal, and China, on which the Kodiaq successfully conquered various terrains, cold temperatures below freezing point and high altitudes to set this record. The India Book of Records and Asia Book of Records have acknowledged this historic feat as an engineering, strength and performance testament of the Kodiaq. The journey highlights how Skoda has created vehicles, which can go further than their design and ability. Ashish Gupta, Brand Director of Skoda Auto India reiterated that this journey is a symbol of the aspiration of customer in India to the adventure and the confidence in engineering excellence of Skoda. It is not a destination accomplishment, but he said it is about pushing and then figuring out what can be done. Along with this feat, Skoda Auto India registered the best ever H1 sales in 2025, selling 36,194 units of which is r so as a huffing 134 percent increase compared to H1 2024. The brand has also Fronted 300 customer touchpoints in 172 cities hence strengthening fast growth and strong presence in the market. Skoda is headed towards its 25 th year of operations in India and 130 th year of operations worldwide; the Everest challenge made by the Kodiaq can be summed up as a statement of progress, innovation, and trust. The adventure of the SUV writes an important chapter in the history of Skoda-it means fueling adventures that are above the normal.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Decoding India-China climate and energy interests
In the third high-level Indian visit to China in recent weeks, external affairs minister S Jaishankar called for the 'continued normalisation of ties' between the two countries. Jaishankar once again reiterated that the bilateral approach should be based on 'mutual respect, mutual sensitivity, and mutual interests.' A strategic vision between India and China that takes into consideration these mutuals is the need of the hour on energy and climate issues. Today, China has emerged as the dominant supplier of green technologies and critical minerals while also vying for leadership in global climate governance. China's role in the global green economy, combined with the backsliding of Western economies towards their climate commitments, has geopolitical implications for India's green energy ambitions. At the Leaders' Summit on Climate and Just Transitions held by the United Nations and the Brazil COP Presidency in April 2025, President Xi Jinping made a strong pitch for China to remain committed to global climate goals. First, Xi criticised some 'major countries' for their unilateralism and protectionism, iterating China's support for international climate cooperation through multilateral governance platforms like the United Nations Framework for Climate Change. Second, in what was essentially a reference to the trade and tariff restrictions on Chinese-manufactured EVs and solar modules, Xi called for free circulation of high-quality green products and promotion of technological innovation and industrial transformation through cooperation. Third, Xi has labelled China as a 'doer', taking strong action for tangible results. However, China's narrative doesn't wholly reflect today's reality, climate action for the country is not only about protecting the global commons but also impacts economic growth, trade, investments, and national security. In fact, UN Secretary-General António Guterres also calls the transition to renewable energy the 'economic opportunity of the century.' China presently dominates key green technologies: Over 75% of global lithium-ion battery manufacturing, almost 80% of solar module production, and a majority share of the world's electric vehicle output. Further, China's rising global leadership in providing climate adaptation and mitigation strategies in the Global South is aimed at expanding its influence. If China truly seeks to become a climate leader, championing energy transitions in the Global South, it will need to constructively engage with India. India is the world's most populous country, with a strong economic growth and ambitious renewable energy policies. India aims to double its renewable energy capacity and quadruple electric vehicle penetration by 2030. Even as India attempts to become more self-sufficient in manufacturing green technologies and building resilient supply chains for raw materials, in the short-term, the country will still be reliant on China. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi said at the BRICS summit earlier this month, it is beneficial for countries to jointly work together on minerals supply chains, rather than weaponising them. The restriction of rare earth minerals has caused the Indian government and auto manufacturers to rethink the country's EV strategy, potentially impacting the phase-out of conventional fossil fuel cars. If China's policies are resulting in the deceleration of energy transition in India, this punctures China's narratives of promoting the 'free flow of green technologies' and 'industrial transformation through cooperation'. Rather, it encourages countries to accelerate their protectionist policies, diversify supply chains, and look towards alternative cooperative partners. In fact, a decade ago, our mapping of India-China bilateral climate engagement shows that between 2005 and 2015, there was a flurry of plans, agreements, and joint statements. These plans were diverse, covering a broad range of climate mitigation and adaptation issues. Environmental conservation, sustainable urbanisation, and water governance were the most discussed topics. Traditional energy issues, such as coal and energy security, and newer issues, such as energy efficiency and renewable energy, were also key points of discussion. The interactions involved active participation from government officials, the scientific community, as well as the private sector. Site visits, trainings, capacity building, standards, and regulation setting complemented knowledge exchanges on governance and data sharing. Yet, despite such a wide agenda and density of engagements, there was limited project implementation. Today, engagement between the two countries may benefit from pragmatism, strategically identifying key areas of engagement such as technology and knowledge exchange, and climate resilience of shared resources. Initially, low-risk, small-scale engagements that encourage trust-building and understanding of modalities of operation can then lead to larger-scale engagement. If direct bilateral engagement proves difficult, the two countries can explore coordination through multilateral development organisations, smaller groupings, or in triangular agreements with a third country. At the same time, India needs to carve out its own credibility as an economic and developmental partner. This doesn't mean merely playing 'catch-up' with China or positioning itself as an alternative, but relying on its own strengths. For instance, in the critical minerals sector, India can build partnerships at the processing stage of the supply chain. On technology and knowledge exchange in the Global South, India must continue to focus on developing low-cost, effective solutions for climate adaptation and mitigation, such as climate resilient agriculture, artificial intelligence for disaster risk management, and renewable energy applications for health, education, and rural livelihoods. It is important for both countries to have clear strategies on the role that they can play, cooperatively and competitively, in the global green economy. Pooja Ramamurthi is an expert on climate change and energy transitions. Shruti Jargad works on Chinese domestic governance and China-South Asia relations. The views expressed are personal.
