ASTI members reject Leaving Cert reforms
They voted by more than two thirds to reject the document, Senior Cycle Redevelopment – Implementation Support Measures.
With a turnout of 73%, 68% voted against the proposals and 32% voted in favour.
In a separate ballot, ASTI members voted by 67% to 33% in favour of industrial action, up to and including strike action, if necessary, in opposition to the accelerated implementation of the reforms.
Turnout in that vote was slightly lower at 70%.
The ASTI said that the results point to "a lack of confidence in the accelerated Senior Cycle Redevelopment Programme as it is currently constituted".
Members had, the ASTI said in a statement, delivered "a resounding rejection of the package of implementation support measures on offer from the Department of Education".
General Secretary Kieran Christie said that "second-level teachers have real and significant concerns" about the implementation of the proposals.
Research the union conducted "shows that a key concern is the lack of resources and capacity in schools", he added.
"Furthermore, the supports on offer do little to provide a Senior Cycle experience for all students that addresses the core inequalities that are in place in the second-level system.
"The ASTI research also finds that the majority of second-level teachers are concerned about developments in AI, authentication of Additional Assessment Components, and insufficient teacher training in some subject areas. The support package available from the Department fails to sufficiently address these concerns."
The ASTI said that it "will continue to be available to engage with the Minister for Education and Youth and her Department in relation to how these and other significant concerns can be addressed".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the shortage of teachers: education is being compromised
At first glance, it appears to be a paradox: despite record numbers of qualified teachers working across the country, schools report increasingly severe challenges in filling vacancies. Almost all primary schools, for example, had to employ unqualified individuals without teaching qualifications as substitutes in the past year. At second level, one in five schools say they were forced to drop subjects due to teacher shortages. On Monday came confirmation of the scale of the issue : more than 1,800 teaching posts were left vacant across schools last March, according to Department of Education data, up from around 1,600 last November. Yet, 79,000 qualified teachers were employed during the past academic year – the highest number on record. The pipeline of teaching graduates continues to be strong, with 3,700 newly qualified teachers registered last year. Teaching remains an attractive career choice, with high demand among CAO applicants for both primary and post-primary education courses. So what is going on? At its heart, the teacher shortage is not just a workforce problem – it is a housing problem. It is no coincidence that most of the schools reporting serious recruitment difficulties are located in the capital and commuter belt areas, where accommodation is both scarce and prohibitively expensive. Young teachers, particularly those newly qualified and on the lower end of pay scales, are increasingly priced out of living near where they are needed most. In response, Minister for Education Helen McEntee has extended temporary measures aimed at boosting teacher supply. These include allowing teachers to provide additional substitution cover and lifting restrictions for job-sharing teachers. Further measures are planned, such as faster access to permanent contracts for young teachers. While helpful, these are sticking plasters. They do not address the deeper issue: a chronic lack of affordable housing. READ MORE The programme for government has pledged to build more affordable homes and to earmark cost-rental units for key public sector workers, including teachers. In theory, this would allow young professionals to live closer to their work. Progress, however, has been sluggish. The State missed its target for delivery of social housing delivery last year by nearly 20 per cent. While the number of cost-rental units doubled to over 1,200 last year, it remains a drop in the ocean. Ultimately, teacher shortages will persist unless the Government takes decisive action to increase the supply of affordable housing. When children's education is compromised – through cancelled classes, lost subjects and a lack of qualified staff – the cost is borne by the next generation. We must do better by our pupils. They deserve experienced teachers, consistent support and the full breadth of educational opportunity.
Irish Examiner
3 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Mick Clifford: Third-level fee rise sparks backlash — but who is really hardest hit?
For most of the week, a cohort of middle Ireland was on RTÉ's Liveline. Joe is no longer there to talk to, so they made do with Philip. And boy, did they have a lot to get off their chests. The topic that has got many people angry enough to pick up the phone is what looks like an increase in third-level fees. This payment is called a 'registration fee'. It stood at €3,000 but was reduced in 2022 to €2,000 as a cost of living measure. This was one of a number of supports provided by the Government to offset steep inflation. Then, this week, the minister for higher education James Lawless, let it be known that the fee will revert to €3,000 in the next budget. Cue outrage. It should be noted that the Government is being hoist on its own petard. Once the reduction was introduced there was no way it was going to be clawed back until the election was done and dusted. Those who send their children to third-level are the heart of the electorate. They needed some loving if they were to do the right thing at the ballot box. Now the returned Government is learning that unless you want to be reckless, there arrives a reckoning. What they giveth before the election, they taketh away once returned to the pig's back. Opposition The first strand of opposition to the measure came from, well, within the Government. Fine Gael are all against it. A primary reason for this is that one area where the party is wildly popular is the fee-paying second-level sector, from which practically 100% of Leaving Cert students go onto third-level. (Nationally the figure is around 75%). Those parents are willing to fork out up €8,000 annually to give their children the best start and advantage possible, and that is laudable. But apparently, for some at least, it is outrageous that they should be asked to revert to the original registration fee for a third-level which is already subsidised by all taxpayers, not just those who have offsprings attending the sector. What we have, we hold, would appear to be the prevailing sentiment. When the news broke, Liveline went into overdrive. At times like these, I always revert to my favourite example of Liveline outrage. This was back in 2009, in the wake of an economic crash that would ultimately result in widespread devastation, most particularly on those least able to bear it. One of the measures introduced by a government on the precipice of bankruptcy was a €200 tax on second or more homes. So onto the radio comes this woman who was absolutely devastated. Where, she demanded of Joe, was she supposed to come up with the €1,400 that would be required for her seven properties? Did the government think money grew on trees, or maybe in the flower boxes at the windows of her various properties? So it went in the last days of the suspended reality that informed the Celtic Tiger years. Financial impact Any increase in taxes or fees or charges is going to have an impact on a cohort of the population. That goes without saying. For some people this impact might reverberate in the weekly food shopping, which is pretty devastating, particularly when there are children involved. For others, quite possibly, it might demand a rethink of various holiday plans. And, for more again, the impact might be on a lifestyle that has come to be considered a right rather than, in any element, a luxury. Just a few facts might be noteworthy in terms of the debate this week. A household must be earning at least €115,000 to be liable for the full registration fee. That's not a huge sum these days, but it is over twice the average industrial wage. Nearly all parents who have to pay the fee are homeowners, putting them on one side of a growing divide in society today. As homeowners, they pay a property tax that would be considered a joke in the vast majority of developed countries. Their wealth, as measured by their biggest asset, has increased exponentially in the last fifteen years. This cohort of society is also likely to be among those who account for the €158bn which the Central Bank reports represents household savings in the State. On paper, in general, by the standards that apply to society as a whole, the cohort liable for the full registration fee are doing relatively well in today's world There will be some who have particular circumstances which would render an increase in the fee as delivering a blow rather than an adjustment. Included among these are parents who must locate accommodation for their offspring. Certainly, some allowance should be made there, but beyond that, are we talking real hardship for a considerable number of people? Is it all about who shouts the loudest on air, delivering narratives that are heavy with emotion but simply cannot be verified? There was no outrage recently when the CSO published its latest Survey of Income and Living Standards which revealed that over a quarter of a million children are experiencing 'enforced deprivation'. These children are defined as living in a household that was unable to afford the goods and services which are considered the minimum essentials for a decent standard of living such as being able to buy a winter coat, afford a new pair of shoes or being able to replace broken furniture. These children, in all likelihood, will never have to worry about third-level education, not to mind registration fees. According to the ESRI, childhood poverty increases the chances of 'greater interaction with the criminal justice system', and is also associated with 'lower third-level education and higher rates of unemployment in adulthood'. Should children in these circumstances be given any kind of priority when it comes to deciding how best to spend public money? Apart from priorities, a whole range of financial watchdogs and monitors have asserted that the State is underfunded. This is definitely the case in third-level education. Infrastructure to support home building is particularly bad, but extra funds will also be required to tackle an aging population and the ravages of climate change. Where is that money going to come from? At the rate we're going it won't be from those at the heart of the electorate who shout the loudest. We live in difficult and uncertain times. There are various problems and challenges across society, some life-defining, others worrying and yet more capable of heightening public anger. But are priorities to be decided exclusively on who is best at utilising the media, at threatening politicians to withdraw support, at knowing how to play the system? If that continues to be the defining compass in determining policy there will be a bigger cost to pay in the future. And it won't be just those at the lower rungs of the socio-economic ladder who will be paying it.
Irish Independent
4 days ago
- Irish Independent
Carol Tancock named interim chair of The Housing Agency
Ms Tancock, who was an independent, non-executive director of the agency prior to the appointment, joined its board in 2023. Her appointment as interim chair of the state agency has been confirmed by James Browne, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage. Mr Carey was also the chairman of Enterprise Ireland, but resigned from that role too at the same time last month. The agency named board member Jim Woulfe as its interim chair. Mr Carey resigned from the boards of the two state agencies after his East Coast Bakehouse company remained in breach of company law by failing to file its annual return, including its accounts on time. The company has been in breach of the law for more than 18 months, putting Mr Carey at risk of prosecution. He pledged last month to file the accounts early in July. Drogheda-based East Coast Bakehouse sells cookies under its own brand as well as manufacturing private label product for clients including supermarkets. It has a number of high-profile financial backers. Mr Carey said it recently completed a €5m 'growth equity' fundraising. The business, founded in 2015, has racked up substantial losses. Thousands of companies are typically in breach of the law at any one time in Ireland. While the potential statutory fines and penalties for failing to file returns on time are sizeable, the reality is that few directors are ever prosecuted in Ireland for non-compliance with their relevant legal obligations under the Companies Act. The Companies Registration Office (CRO) isn't even able to currently undertake the automated strike off of non-compliant companies because of an IT issue that has persisted for more than a year. The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment revealed in May this year that the total cost of the troubled IT platform at the CRO, called Regsys, was €2.9m between 2017 and 2020 when it was implemented. The system was developed by a firm called ERS Limited, according to the Department. The CRO also spent almost €1.2m last year and more than €313,000 on the system so far this year on support and maintenance. The Department said it could not isolate the specific costs associated with fixing the IT issue that has affected it.
