
Bihar doesn't need bigotry: It needs a blueprint
Their hatred for Prime Minister Narendra Modi has reached such extremes that their entire campaign seems driven by emotional sloganeering and anti-Hindu posturing. The frequent attacks on Sanatan Dharma and efforts to paint Hindus as anti-Muslim while projecting themselves as minority saviours only fuel polarisation. One glaring example is the repeated criticism of Hindu seers like Dhirendra Krishna Shastri of Bageshwar Dham, who is building a state-of-the-art cancer hospital offering free treatment to poor patients. Such positive acts are ignored while no such criticism is ever levelled against minority leaders or their institutions—revealing the deep-rooted hypocrisy of the opposition.
Instead of addressing real national security concerns, like Pakistan's espionage activities through a Nepali spy module—which sought to extract crucial military deployment details—the Congress and its allies are fixated on RSS-bashing. They remain silent on how Pakistan's ISI allegedly directed its mission through handler Yasir and Indian mole Akhlaq Azam. Such threats to national security don't make it to their speeches or tweets.
Equally ignored are the stories of persecuted Hindu professionals, who fled Pakistan and are now languishing in India. According to an article in Times of India, Dr Chandra Das, a gynaecologist with over a decade of experience in Pakistan's public hospitals, fled Sindh due to religious persecution. In Jaipur, her skills are not recognised by Indian authorities; she now draws blood samples and schedules appointments.
Similar is the story of Dr Roop Singh Sodha, a neuro-specialist who now checks sugar levels and files vitals. Dr Nirmala Maheshwari, another doctor, works in hospital administration while her anaesthetist husband lives in obscurity. These stories reflect a humanitarian tragedy, but the Congress ecosystem is too busy politicising caste to care.
On law and order, the silence of opposition is deafening. The brutal rape and murder of a 31-year-old postgraduate medical student inside RG Kar Medical College in Kolkata in August 2023 drew no outrage from the Congress or the INDIA bloc. Nor did the recent rape of a 24-year-old law student by a TMC-linked faculty member in Kolkata's Kasba area. Despite being led by a woman Chief minister, West Bengal has seen zero accountability and yet, the opposition does not bat an eyelid in demanding Modi's resignation over crimes in Delhi.
This selective outrage betrays their intent: politicisation, appeasement, and polarisation—not justice or governance. If the AAP, Congress, and SP are genuinely concerned about women's safety, why not analyse and compare crime data across all states—BJP-ruled or otherwise—over the last decade and demand a uniform national response?
Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi continues his global sojourns when Parliament isn't in session but returns just in time to peddle fear-'Samvidhan khatre mein hai' and 'Ban the RSS.' This lazy rhetoric ignores history. Sardar Patel, India's first Home Minister, had initially banned the RSS post-Gandhi's assassination but later lifted it, clarifying in a letter to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on February 28, 1948 that RSS had no role in the assassination. Yet, Congress continues to link Nathuram Godse to the RSS, conveniently forgetting that Godse had left the Sangh long before 1948.
By that flawed logic, should we then label Mohd Ali Jinnah—a former Congress leader who worked closely with Nehru—as proof that the Congress divided India? Jinnah and Nehru both sought independence from the British, but while Jinnah later pivoted to a communal ideology, Congress cannot escape the fact that he was once their own. History isn't a buffet—you can't pick what suits your narrative and discard the rest.
Today, Congress is as rudderless as the INDIA bloc. The AICC president admits he's not the final authority—decisions lie with the 'High Command.' But who is the High Command—Rahul or Sonia Gandhi? There's no transparency, only a dynastic fog.
So, what do Congress or RJD stand for in Bihar today? Ask their leaders, and you'll either get romanticised nostalgia about their glory days or apocalyptic warnings about BJP 'destroying the Constitution.' Both are irrelevant to the present voter.
The Bihari electorate of today isn't swayed by emotion alone. They want better roads, reliable electricity, industrial development, healthcare, education, jobs—and above all, dignity. But instead of feeding aspirations, the opposition feeds anxieties.
Congress leaders offer nothing on skilling Bihar's youth, industrialising the state, or addressing its chronic outmigration. Instead, they speculate that the BJP wants to tear apart the Constitution—a bogeyman narrative without basis. Ironically, the Constitution has been amended over 106 times so far since Independence, the most draconian of which came during Indira Gandhi's Emergency. If any party undermined the Constitution, it's the Congress. Yet, they now claim to be its last line of defence.
And when fear doesn't work, the opposition unleashes its old weapon: caste. By pitting communities against each other, they aim to consolidate vote banks. But even here, their hypocrisy is laid bare. It was the Modi government that implemented 10 per cent EWS reservations across castes. It was this government that conducted the long-demanded caste census in Bihar. What has Congress or RJD done for backward castes apart from symbolic gestures and dynasty preservation?
The voters are asking hard questions: What did Lalu Prasad Yadav achieve for OBC upliftment apart from installing his own family across government posts? What did decades of Congress rule deliver except tokenism and communal appeasement?
Caste rhetoric without a development agenda is dead-end. Voters today want a roadmap—not rants. They want schools, not slogans; industries, not incitement.
If the opposition truly seeks to regain relevance, it must abandon its hate-fuelled narratives and present a positive, forward-looking vision. This means articulating clear policies on infrastructure, employment, law and order, education, women's safety, and healthcare. But these are glaringly absent. Instead, we get conspiracy theories, RSS paranoia, caste arithmetic, and communal dog-whistles. This isn't leadership. It's political bankruptcy.
Bihar—and India—deserve better.
(The author is former Chief Editor of The Hans India)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India says no to trade deal under deadline pressure; Trinidad & Tobago backs Delhi for UNSC; Gaza ceasefire soon
India abstains from signing trade deal with the US under 'deadline pressure', says open for a mutually beneficial deal; during PM Modi's visits to Trinidad and Tobago, the two sides reaffirm the need for reforms in the UN; US President Trump voices frustration over Russian President Vladimir Putin's failure to end the fighting; Hamas says it is ready to start talks 'immediately' on a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire – here is weekly roundup of key global news. Notwithstanding the July 9 deadline for the reciprocal tariff pause, India abstains from signing a trade deal with the US under 'deadline pressure' reiterating that 'all possibilities are open' for a mutually beneficial deal. India has been negotiating with the US to eliminate the 26 per cent reciprocal tariff imposed on April 2. As Indian trade negotiators returned from the US on Friday, a government official described sustained access for labour-intensive goods (such as textiles and footwear), auto component exports, and steel as key interests in the India-US negotiations. In addition, agriculture and dairy sectors, where India has drawn 'very big red lines', emerged as sticking points, with the US demanding access to the Indian market for genetically modified (GM) products. What are the other points of difference that averted a trade deal, and what are the future prospects? Let's explore. India has drawn 'red lines' around politically sensitive agriculture and dairy sectors and has imposed both tariff and non-tariff restrictions on certain goods, including corn, ethanol, and soybeans. It has managed to shield its dairy sector because of at least two major reasons: one, the sector employs more than 80 million people, many of whom are smallholders; and two, there are concerns that foreign dairy products intended for food may be derived from animals fed with internal blood meal, a high-protein feed made from animal blood. As far as soyabean and corn are concerned, it is argued that imports are unlikely to suit India's soybean industry, which has a strong foundation in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. Similarly, millers are not too pleased about importing genetically modified corn as a feedstock for fuel ethanol. In addition, labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and footwear are among India's top demands in trade negotiations. It has sought lower tariffs in the textile trade in the US, similar to those offered to other FTA partners. India has also sought zero tariffs on electronic items exports, even as US President Donald Trump warned Apple of a 25 per cent tariff if it sold in the US iPhones built in India or anywhere else. Apple currently produces nearly 15 per cent of all iPhones in India, and plans to increase that to a quarter. India also aims to remove the US's additional duties on goods such as steel, aluminium, and auto components. In addition to the elimination of reciprocal tariffs, it has sought guarantees of no future tariffs. Moreover, New Delhi is seeking that the Trump Administration maintain a 'steady tariff differential' of 10-20 per cent between US tariffs on China and India, which is also a key reason to clinch the deal. This gives Indian traders an advantage over Chinese competitors and mitigates some of India's structural downsides, including infrastructural bottlenecks, logistics woes, and high interest costs. However, it may be noted here that this would hinge on how China leverages its dominance in rare earths to influence US tariff decisions. The growing concerns over Beijing's dominance in resources vital to new technologies were underscored at the recent Quad Foreign Ministers' meeting, where the grouping announced a Critical Minerals Initiative to 'collaborate on securing and diversifying' supply chains. The US has pushed hard for a broad-based opening of Indian sectors, from automobiles and whisky to agricultural items such as apples, corn and soya among others, as well as dairy. It has demanded the removal of a crucial regulation regarding dairy to sell its genetically modified (GM) products, resulting in tense discussions and even triggering protests from voices back home. The US eyes the Indian market amid a recent report by the US Department of Agriculture, which suggests that India's consumption of animal products (milk, eggs, fish, and meat) is likely to increase with population growth and rising per capita GDP. This could, in turn, boost demand for feed and create opportunities for US exports of these commodities (corn and soybeans) by the early 2030s, the report says. Moreover, the US sees India as a large market for its corn, soyabean and cotton amid the decline in exports of these products to China, which was its largest corn importer at $5.2 billion in 2022. Although India has said that the trade deal with the US will be signed when it is mutually beneficial, the two countries remain committed to more than double their bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. India is said to focus on areas where it has a competitive edge. Indian officials have indicated that diversifying oil and defence procurement is in the country's strategic interest, and that sourcing more from the US could significantly help bridge the goods trade gap. India's oil imports from the US have already jumped over 270 per cent year-on-year in the first four months of 2025. Moreover, in recent years, New Delhi and Washington have forged closer defence, technology, and diplomatic ties in a shared front against China. There is greater receptiveness now within India's policy circles to cut tariffs on some industrial goods, including automobiles, and some agricultural products of interest to Americans such as apples, almonds, walnuts, avocados and spirits. There is also more openness on the GM foods issue too. The NITI Aayog, in its Working Paper, has proposed that India import GM maize and soybeans, with the former as a feedstock for ethanol production, and the latter to extract oil for domestic consumption. In both cases, it calls for the export of their byproducts in their entirety – distiller's dried grains with solubles (maize) and de-oiled cakes and meals (soybean). It also called for concessions on agricultural products from the US such as edible oils and nuts where domestic supply gaps exist, and duty concessions to boost high-performing exports such as shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber. Additionally, the chances of India becoming the biggest market for the US are, perhaps, higher in cotton than in soyabean or corn. And it may be argued that duty-free imports of raw cotton can boost India's textile and apparel exports to the US itself, which stood at $10.8 billion in 2024. Notably, India-US trade negotiations have wrapped up for now, even as New Delhi strengthens its global diplomatic footprint. Support for India's permanent membership in the expanded United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and a shared commitment to fight terrorism are among the announcements made during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Trinidad and Tobago, the first by an Indian Prime Minister since 1999. The two countries inked six agreements to boost cooperation in several sectors, including infrastructure and pharmaceuticals, following talks between Prime Minister Modi and his counterpart from Trinidad and Tobago, Kamla Persad-Bissessar. The two leaders also delved into pressing global issues and reaffirmed the need for comprehensive reforms in the United Nations, including expansion of the UN Security Council, to better reflect current realities. The Caribbean nation also extended support to India's membership in the expanded UNSC. Modi and Bissessar called for dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward amid rising geopolitical tensions and global conflicts, and underlined the need for greater cooperation to deal with contemporary challenges such as climate change, disaster management, and cybersecurity. Prime Minister Modi also lauded the contribution of Indian-origin people to Trinidad and Tobago's development journey, and announced a decision to issue Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) cards up to the sixth generation of the Indian diaspora in the country, where over 40 per cent of the population is of Indian origin. Earlier on Friday, the Prime Minister addressed the parliament of the Caribbean nation and spoke about the cricket connection between the two countries. He also reiterated his offer to train aspiring young women cricketers from Trinidad and Tobago in India. PM Modi expressed appreciation for Trinidad and Tobago's strong support and solidarity to the people of India in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, as the two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. Modi is currently on a five-nation tour, which began with his visit to Ghana where he was honoured with Ghana's national award, 'The Officer of the Order of the Star of Ghana,' in recognition of his 'distinguished statesmanship and influential global leadership'. Four Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) were signed, including in the areas of cultural exchange and traditional music. In his joint press statement following talks with John Mahama, the President of Ghana, Prime Minister Modi announced that they have decided to give India-Ghana ties the form of a Comprehensive Partnership. After Trinidad and Tobago, PM Modi has reached Argentina for the next leg of his tour. Later, he will attend the BRICS Summit in Brazil, and visit Namibia on his return. Russia launched the largest aerial assault on Ukraine in the over three-year long war amid reports that Moscow has been using banned chemical weapons in Kyiv, while US President Donald Trump voiced frustration over Russian President Vladimir Putin's failure to end the fighting. Russian forces have used increasing numbers of drones to target Ukrainian cities, with a record total of 539 drones and 11 missiles deployed against Kyiv on July 4, Reuters reported, citing the Ukrainian air force. Russia also downed dozens of Ukrainian drones in widely dispersed parts of the country, including two near the second-largest city of St Petersburg. Meanwhile, Dutch and German intelligence agencies said Russia's use of chemical weapons in this war is 'becoming more normalised, standardised, and widespread', with Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans calling for tougher sanctions against Moscow, reported Reuters. The US first accused Russia of using chloropicrin, a chemical compound more toxic than riot control agents and first used by Germany during World War I, in May last year. Ukraine also alleges thousands of instances of Russian chemical weapons use. Hours after Thursday's attack by Russia, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had a phone call with Trump, following which the US President said Ukraine would need Patriot missiles for its defence, Reuters reported. Commenting on the prospect of a ceasefire, Trump said, 'It's a very tough situation… I was very unhappy with my call with President Putin. He wants to go all the way, just keep killing people – it's no good.' Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, claiming it was needed to protect Russian-speaking civilians in eastern Ukraine and prevent the country from joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Notably, Trump has ruled out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO and even halted shipments of weapons and military aid to it. Since 2022, every NATO summit has committed to aiding Ukraine in its war against Russia. Most NATO countries view Russia as a direct and immediate threat. All the while, Israel continues to kill starving Palestinians as Hamas said it is ready to start talks 'immediately' on a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire, prompting US President Trump to say there could be a deal by next week. At least 50 Palestinians were killed in Gaza as Israeli forces again target people waiting for food, Al Jazeera reported, while the UN said on July 5 that it had recorded at least 613 killings both at aid points run by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and near humanitarian convoys run by other relief groups, including the UN. The United Nations has criticised the GHF, which began distributing aid at the end of May following a three-month Israeli blockade on Gaza, for bypassing the UN-led system and violating humanitarian impartiality rules. Meanwhile, Hamas responded in 'a positive spirit' to the Gaza ceasefire proposal, brokered by the US and mediated by Egypt and Qatar. Trump had earlier said that Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalise' the ceasefire, which envisages a release of hostages and negotiations on ending the conflict. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, at least 57,268 people have been killed and 135,625 wounded in Israel's devastating war on Gaza since October 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, killing over 1,100 people and taking 251 hostage. In the meantime, the West Bank, occupied by Israel since the Six-Day War in 1967, has become a 'big prison' as Israel fences it in, Reuters reported. Walls and checkpoints erected by Israeli forces have long been a part of day-to-day life for the nearly 3 million Palestinian residents of the West Bank. But many now say that a dramatic increase in such barriers since the start of the war in Gaza has put towns and villages in a state of permanent siege. Experts like Talmiz Ahmad, a former ambassador to Oman, the UAE and Saudi Arabia, had underlined a number of provocations in the run up to the October 7 attack by Hamas, which included the surge in attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank. Send your feedback and ideas to


Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Raj Thackeray's blunt advice to MNS workers after Marathi 'slapgate' case: 'Slap, but don't make video'
Raj Thackeray, who patched up with cousin Uddhav Thackeray nearly two decades, issued a blunt directive to his party workers just days after his party, the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), landed in controversy for assaulting a restaurant owner for not speaking in Marathi. In a starkly blunt message to his party workers, Raj Thackeray said, 'Beat, but don't film it.' Speaking in Marathi, Raj Thackeray said, 'Be it a Gujarati or anyone else here, must know Marathi, but there is no need to beat people for that if they don't speak Marathi. Yet, if someone does some drama, you must hit them below their eardrums.' 'If you beat someone, don't make a video of the incident. Let the person beaten up tell that he has been beaten up; you don't need to tell everyone," Raj Thackeray added. The MNS chief was apparently addressing criticism after his men slapped and intimidated people, including street vendors, over their not speaking in Marathi. The much discussed Thackeray reunion unfolded against the backdrop of 'Marathi pride' sparked by the BJP-led Maharashtra government's move to introduce Hindi as a third language in schools – a decision that was later rolled back following intense backlash. Initially announced as a protest against the original move, Raj and Uddhav Thackeray's rally in Mumbai was converted to a celebration of the rollback. Raj Thackeray's assertion of 'Marathi pride' was followed by Uddhav Thackeray's speech, echoing the same sentiments. The Shiv Sena (UBT) chief also spoke in Marathi, stating: 'Yes, we are goons; if we have to be goons to get justice, we will do goondagiri.' At the much-hyped Mumbai rally, MNS Chief Raj Thackeray delivered a sharp, ironic jab — praising Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis. Raj claimed Fadnavis managed to do what even Shiv Sena patriarch Bal Thackeray could not. "Uddhav and I are coming together after 20 years… What Balasaheb Thackeray could not do that Devendra Fadnavis managed to do," Raj Thackeray claimed at the massive event in Worli. Uddhav Thackeray's split with Raj Thackeray happened when Bal Thackeray was alive, as he preferred son Uddhav over nephew Raj to hand over the Shiv Sena reins. Uddhav also criticised the BJP - in power in Maharashtra and the Centre - for allegedly imposing the agenda of 'Hindi, Hindu, Hindustan' on India. 'We will protect the ideology of Hindutva, in Marathi language,' he further said. Following the Thackeray brothers' cousins at the reunion rally, senior Congress leader Prithviraj Chavan stated that the introduction of Hindi as a third language from class 1 evoked statewide opposition. "It's fine if Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray claim credit for the withdrawal of the GRs. If they come together politically, our best wishes," Chavan told PTI.


Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
PM will bow before Trump deadline on trade deal: Rahul; Goyal hits back
Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Saturday targeted PM Narendra Modi over the proposed trade deal with the US and claimed that the PM will 'meekly bow' before the tariff deadline set by the Trump administration as Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal asserted that India negotiates from a position of strength and not under deadlines. Goyal also accused the Congress of 'negotiating and signing agreements that were not in the national interest' during that party-led UPA government's tenure. On Saturday, Goyal said, 'India does not negotiate under deadlines. We negotiate keeping national interest in mind, and national interest is paramount in all our engagements across the world.' He added that India negotiates from a position of strength. 'We are self-confident and can compete with anybody in the world,' he said. In a post on X on Saturday, Gandhi said, 'Piyush Goyal can beat his chest all he wants, mark my words, Modi will meekly bow to the Trump tariff deadline.' Trump has set a deadline of July 9 to finalise the trade agreement with India. The Congress had earlier hit out at the PM over his 'silence' on US President Donald Trump's repeated claims that he negotiated a ceasefire understanding between India and Pakistan following the military hostilities. India had launched Operation Sindoor in retaliation to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that left 26 people dead. However, during the recent G7 Summit in Canada's Kananaskis, PM Modi set the record straight and told US President Donald Trump during a 35-minute phone call that at no point was there any discussion, at any level, on an India-US trade deal, or any proposal for mediation by the US between India and Pakistan. Modi had said that 'India does not and will never accept mediation'. With the deadline only days away, Goyal had said that India would accept the proposed trade deal with the US only when it is fully finalised and in national interest. 'Negotiations are underway, FTA (free trade agreement) is possible only if it's beneficial for both sides… it should be a win-win agreement,' Goyal said.