Welsh Government urged to act on massive loss of abattoirs
Several organisations, including the Farmers' Union of Wales have written to the Government raising the critical issue.
The letter, addressed to Huw Irranca-Davies MS, Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Climate Change and Rural Affairs, has been co-signed by eight organisations, including Nature Friendly Farming Network, North Wales Wildlife Trust, Pasture for Life, Plantlife Cymru, Rare Breeds Survival Trust, RSPB Cymru, the Sustainable Food Trust and the Farmers' Union of Wales.
In 1990 there were 58 red meat abattoirs in Wales, whereas today there are just 15, with nine being small-medium, and five of these being classed as small.
Even fewer are able to provide all of the services farmers need to sell directly to local consumers, such as butchering, packaging, processing small numbers of animals, multi-species animals, having organic certification, and the ability to deal with horned animals, or those 'over thirty months' (OTM).
This issue puts Welsh farmers' ability to sell and distinguish their products from imports produced to lower environmental and animal welfare standards at risk.
All co-signatures of the letter highlighted the role of grazing livestock for the management and enhancement of priority habitats across Wales, from peatlands to salt marshes, species-rich grasslands to heathlands, ffriddoedd and 'Celtic Woodlands'.
Farmers' Union of Wales president Ian Rickman said: 'The FUW has been clear that if the Welsh Government wants to promote a 'circular economy' and ensure Welsh produce produced to high environmental standards can be marketed as such, then the abattoir infrastructure is an essential enabler.
"The fact that Australian and New Zealand lamb imports have increased by 78 per cent, at the same time that farmers in Wales are struggling to sell their produce locally, makes no sense.
"Such a situation undermines the efforts farmers are making to enhance biodiversity, nutritional value, and low carbon produce sold to Welsh consumers, as well as the integrity of Welsh Lamb and Beef's 'Protected Geographical Indication' status.
Other issues facing abattoirs include 'animal by-products' which used to represent an income stream for abattoirs and contributed towards a circular economy, which are now an added cost due to disposal charges.
Teleri Fielden, Farmers' Union of Wales policy officer added: 'Farmers in Wales are rightfully proud of our high animal welfare standards and the quality of life afforded to many grazing livestock.
"While out of the farmers' control, short journeys to slaughter is part of this, as is access to casualty and emergency slaughter services.
"However, there is only one slaughterhouse in Wales which has the 'contract' to receive BovineTB reactors, creating lengthy journeys and additional stress to both the animal and the farmer experiencing a bTB breakdown.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
41 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
We sorely need another McCrone Report on education
It came as something of a shock to find that I, as a headteacher, was regularly working a 50-60-hour week. The Report's findings and recommendations, which included a 35-hour working week, a maximum class contact time and a generous pay settlement of 10%, were warmly welcomed even by the EIS who commended on the 'unique process of discussion and dialogue among employers, teacher representatives and the Scottish Executive…. to create a package of conditions and pay on which to build a confident and highly regarded teaching profession.' Another national inquiry is long overdue. Then there is the need for a guaranteed (and centrally funded) level of staffing for our schools. My generation was brought up in the era of the famous Red Book. This was a very detailed set of calculations prepared by the then HMI that enabled schools and local authorities to work out a customised staffing for each establishment. On top of a basic staffing entitlement based on pupil numbers, additional staff allocations were funded by the Government to support, for example, probationary teachers and what were then referred to as 'remedial pupils'. A Government determination to re-establish agreed national staffing levels for our schools with additional allocations for indicators of deprivation and the integration of special needs youngsters would do much to restore confidence in a service that currently is under siege. A commitment by the Scottish Government to establish these major inquiries as a matter or urgency is not going to bring about any significant results before next year's elections for the Scottish Parliament, but it would set out a clear direction of travel which might remove some of the current pressure and hold out promise for an education system better suited to the challenges of the 21st century. Eric Melvin, Edinburgh. Read more letters Stop the gangs to stop the boats What would be your response if, sitting at home one day content that your home was secure, a young man broke in? Would you put him up in your spare room, give him food and pocket money, and in the coming days arrange for him driving lessons and visits to leisure centres? Or would you possibly try to restrain him and definitely call the police? Astonishingly, our Government favours the former response to the migrants breaking in to the UK illegally by crossing the Channel in small boats, whilst pontificating that the numbers are 'clearly unacceptable" ('Record number of migrants crossing English Channel for first half of year", The Herald, July 2). No wonder these migrants keep coming in ever-increasing numbers. When will the Government accept that paying the French police and trying to 'smash the gangs" simply doesn't work? One sure way to stop this migrant invasion would be to deter them from attempting to cross the Channel by making that crossing pointless. Why does the Government not legislate that anyone arriving here illegally will be disqualified automatically from staying, killing both the migrants demand and the gangs' business? Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop. The lesson of Dounreay Charles Scott (Letters, July 2) says he is not part of the pro-nuclear lobby. Unfortunately he displays the same head-in-the-sand attitudes with regard to financial and environmental costs of this dirty industry. The decommissioning of Dounreay, which has been under way for years, is not expected to be completed until at least 2070. Also, the highly dangerous waste produced will need to be stored for thousands of years. Such legacies would be even more of a "major mistake by our Government". David Hay, Minard. • In his plea for atomic power, Charles Scott writes of the need to "reduce harmful emissions in the (energy) sector". Well, if radioactivity isn't harmful I don't know what is. Two miles from my abode the irradiated hulls of submarines still have to be kept well away from the public, and power stations produce lethal waste which has to be guarded for many decades if not centuries, either on-site at Torness or at Sellafield, both of which are potential war targets. But of course for most folk these places are far away, someone else's problem. George Morton, Rosyth. The decommissioning of Dounreay will last decades (Image: PA) Are turbines elegant symbols? In a consultation document for the proposed Torfichen wind farm – 18 turbines, 180m high near our World Heritage Site of Edinburgh – there is a very revealing comment: "...particularly given user experience is a subjective concept with some users viewing wind turbines as incongruous and intrusive structures in rural locations, whilst others consider them to be elegant symbols of sustainable energy provision". Should we not have a serious discussion as a nation to see how many members of the public see turbines as symbols as we continue with a planning system based on the Scottish Greens' manifesto? During the SNP/Scottish Greens pact the Government voted for the two National Parks and National Scenic Areas to be protected from wind farms but 'where impacts are localised and/or appropriate design mitigation has been applied, they will generally be considered to be acceptable". The developer in the above case considers the effect "localised for national planning purposes"; "the significant landscape and visual effects would only extend out to a maximum of some 5.6km". For comparison, the Glasgow Tower is 127m tall. Celia Hobbs, Penicuik.
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
Reeves makes surprise appearance with PM after tears in Parliament
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has made a surprise appearance alongside Sir Keir Starmer, one day after she was seen crying at Prime Minister's to unveil the government's 10-year plan for the NHS, she was smiling and embraced the prime minister as they jointly set out the government's 10-year plan for the NHS. The pound plummeted and government borrowing costs rose after the incident in Parliament on Wednesday, when Sir Keir initially failed to guarantee that Reeves would keep her fall was partially reversed after Sir Keir insisted he was "in lockstep" with his chancellor, who he said would be in her job "for a very long time to come". In a bid to put on a united front, the chancellor joined Sir Keir and Health Secretary Wes Streeting at a hospital in East London to launch plans for new neighbourhood health Keir praised his chancellor, telling the audience that decisions made by Reeves had allowed the government to "invest record amounts in the NHS".Asked if he had been aware that his chancellor had been crying next to him in the House of Commons, Sir Keir said he "hadn't appreciated what was happening" as he was "literally up and down" answering questions.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
UK politics live: Rachel Reeves breaks cover after crying in Commons during PMQs
Rachel Reeves has appeared in public with Sir Keir Starmer a day after breaking down in tears alongside the prime minister in the Commons. The public show of unity came after Sir Keir gave her his full backing and said he did not appreciate how upset she was in the Commons because he was focused on answering PMQs. The pair were both at the launch of the government's 10-year plan for the NHS in London. The prime minister said all people could be caught 'off guard' by their emotions, but the chancellor had to deal with it while on camera in Parliament. He said she was doing an 'excellent' job, would remain in place beyond the next general election, and that they were both absolutely committed to the chancellor's 'fiscal rules' to maintain discipline over the public finances. UK government bonds rallied and the pound steadied on Thursday, after reassurances from the prime minister about the chancellor's future. Now Reeves turns to laughter After three questions in a row to Sir Keir Starmer about Rachel Reeves having appeared alongside him at the speech, the chancellor has turned to laughter. When ITV asked how she is doing today, after yesterday's tears in the Commons, she could be seen looking towards the correspondent and laughing at the premise. Jabed Ahmed3 July 2025 11:18 Rachel Reeves sighs at Beth Rigby question Rachel Reeves audibly said 'ugh' when Sky's Beth Rigby asked Sir Keir Starmer about her tears in the Commons on Wednesday. She was the second journalist in a row to ask about the chancellor, who has appeared alongside Sir Keir in a show of unity as he unveils his NHS plan. But she is clearly in no mood to go into the personal matter that left her in tears, if her audible sigh is anything to go by. Archie Mitchell3 July 2025 11:13 Starmer says NHS reform is 'about fairness' Reforming the NHS is 'about fairness' for everyone, Sir Keir Starmer said as he spoke at the launch of the NHS 10-year plan. The Prime Minister said: 'Millions of people across Britain no longer feel that they get a fair deal, and it's starting to affect the pride, the hope, the optimism that they have in this great country, and our job is to change that.' He continued: 'For 77 years this weekend, the NHS has been the embodiment, if you like, of British pride, of hope, that basic sense of fairness and decency. 77 years of everyone paying in, working hard, doing the right thing, secure in the knowledge that if they or their family needs it, the NHS will be there for them. 'In 10 years' time, when this plan has run its course, I want people to say that this was the moment, this was the Government, that secured those values for the future. 'Look, when people are uncertain about the deal they're getting from this country, what fairer way is there to respond than that, by giving them more control, by partnering with them to build an NHS that is fit to face the future? And that is what this plan that we are launching today will do.' Jabed Ahmed3 July 2025 11:11 Starmer credits Reeves' decisions for record NHS investment Sir Keir Starmer has hailed the decisions made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves as playing a part in the government investing 'record amounts in the NHS'. He said: 'It's all down to the foundation we laid this year, all down to the path of renewal that we chose, the decisions made by the Chancellor, by Rachel Reeves, which mean we can invest record amounts in the NHS. 'Already over 6,000 mental health workers recruited, 1,700 new GPs, 170 community diagnostic centres – really important – already open. 'New surgical hubs, new mental health units, new ambulance sites. Record investment right across the system.' Jabed Ahmed3 July 2025 11:10 Pictured | Starmer, Reeves and Streeting at launch of NHS 10-year plan Jabed Ahmed3 July 2025 11:09 Watch live | Starmer joined by Reeves as Labour unveil 10-year NHS plan Jabed Ahmed3 July 2025 11:06 Starmer says NHS still needs work but future 'already looks better' under Labour Sir Keir Starmer acknowledged improvements were needed in the NHS but said the situation was better than when Labour first took over from the Conservatives a year ago. The prime minister said: 'I'm not going to stand here and say everything is perfect now, we have a lot more work to do and we will do it. 'But let's be under no illusions: because of the fair choices we made, the tough Labour decisions we made, the future already looks better for our NHS. 'And that is the story of this Government in a nutshell.' Jabed Ahmed3 July 2025 11:02 Reeves says NHS plan is 'good for nation's health and finances' Labour's plan for the NHS will be 'good for the health of our nation and good for the health of our nation's finances', Rachel Reeves has said in her first public appearance since crying in the Commons chamber on Wednesday. Smiling as she spoke at a health centre in London, the chancellor said: 'I want to be clear, we are spending money on taxpayers' priorities, but that wouldn't have been possible without the measures that we took in the budget last year. 'We fixed the foundations and we've put our economy back on a strong footing.' She went on to say the government was 'making this country fairer for those who have paid in all their lives by guaranteeing that the NHS will be there when they need it'. Ms Reeves added: 'This is the right way forward, good for the health of our nation and good for the health of our nation's finances. 'This government will always deliver on the priorities of ordinary working people, and I am proud that with this plan the NHS will always be there for those who need it for the next 77 years, and many more beyond that too.' Jabed Ahmed3 July 2025 11:01 Analysis: Rachel Reeves needed to be visible today A beaming chancellor Rachel Reeves is definitely making an effort to look much happier today. She has not mentioned the tears of yesterday at PMQs and the prime minister has now rallied to her saying she is safe in her job as chancellor. Ms Reeves was not previously slated for this NHS 10-year plan launch but it was important she was here today to try to move on from a very difficult week for the government. This is a show of unity and strength with three of the biggest figures in the government - Keir Starmer, Reeves and health secretary Wes Streeting. David Maddox
