Wales' Future Infrastructure Needs 'Must Be Given Greater Priority'
The Welsh Government must give greater priority to planning for Wales' future infrastructure needs and decide on the future of the body set up to advise it on infrastructure requirements, according to a Senedd Committee.
A new report from The Climate Change, Environment and Infrastructure Committee concludes that planning for big projects such as flood defences and energy projects are being held back by the Welsh Government.
The report looks at how the Welsh Government works with the National Infrastructure Commission for Wales (NICW), a body created to look ahead at major infrastructure challenges.
The Senedd Committee finds that the Welsh Government has a 'non-committal' attitude towards NICW. This is because of long delays in responding to their reports and uncertainty regarding their budget, said the Committee, adding that it was led to question if the Welsh Government values NICW's work.
Last year, the Senedd Committee recommended that the Welsh Government should commit themselves to formally responding to any report published by NICW within three months.
However, despite the Welsh Government reviewing how they should work with NICW, they didn't come to any conclusion about when they should respond to their recommendations, the Committee said. NICW is still awaiting a response to their report into flooding, published in October 2024.
The Committee report says that it is overdue for the Welsh Government to decide on the role and objectives of NICW. According to the Committee, this should also go hand in hand with giving the organisation more certainty in their work by extending their funding past the next Senedd elections in 2026.
The report looked at how a similar organisation in New Zealand, which has a similar population size to Wales, plans its country's infrastructure work.
The New Zealand Infrastructure Commission confirmed that the cost of carrying out a comprehensive infrastructure assessment was around £2.5 million. With the UK Government also having recently carried out a similar piece of work, the Senedd Committee said it was concerned that the Welsh Government's decision-making could be weaker and more costly in the long run if a similar effort isn't undertaken here – despite the initial extra cost.
Llyr Gruffydd MS, Chair of the Climate Change, Environment and Infrastructure Committee, said:
'The report is clear that it's time for the Welsh Government to decide whether or not they're going to treat the National Infrastructure Commission for Wales seriously.
'NICW is meant to advise and challenge the Welsh Government on how they're planning for major things like adapting to climate change, beefing up flood defences and renewable energy developments.
'This makes sure that Wales is ready for the challenges of the future, so it's been incredibly disappointing to see the Welsh Government showing very little interest in NICW's work.
'It's time for the Welsh Government to back NICW and give them the support they need to do an infrastructure assessment in Wales – and at a bare minimum to respond to their reports in a timely manner.
'The big infrastructure challenges of the next 20 years might not seem like a priority right now, but if the Welsh Government continues to disregard this, it will be the taxpayers of the future who will be paying the price.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
Celebrities call for UK Government not to ban Palestine Action
On Sunday, from Glastonbury's Other Stage, singer-songwriter Nadine Shah read out a statement against the UK Government's decision to ban campaign group Palestine Action. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has published a draft order which would the group as terrorist organisations in the UK, meaning supporting or joining them could lead to up to 14 years in jail. READ MORE: Labour accused of 'breath-taking hypocrisy' over English oil refinery rescue In an open letter, leading artists including musicians Paul Weller, Massive Attack's Robert del Naja, Brian Eno and US artist Reggie Watts have joined Shah Actors Steve Coogan and Billy Howle are among those signing the statement which states: 'Palestine Action is intervening to stop a genocide. It is acting to save life.' Writers including Kamila Shamsie, Laline Paull and Pankaj Mishra have also signed, and said: 'Labelling non-violent direct action as 'terrorism' is an abuse of language and an attack on democracy.' They are joined by visual artists Jeremy Deller and Florence Peake, comedians Boyle, Francesca Martinez and Tez Ilyas. The open letter concludes: 'The real threat to the life of the nation comes not from Palestine Action but from Home Secretary Yvonne Cooper's efforts to ban it'. READ MORE: Protesters target Wimbledon over Barclays sponsorship links to Israeli arms firms In addition to the joint statement, Brian Eno said: 'On the one hand, 60,000 dead. On the other, a splash of paint on a plane. Which one are you most troubled by?' Poet Alice Oswald commented: 'Thank goodness for those who break minor laws in an attempt to uphold law itself". A spokesperson for Artists for Palestine UK said: 'Never before has a decision like this been challenged so immediately by artists and so widely across the country. If the Government persists with this ban, it will face anger and opposition on a massive scale.' The artists' statement in full "Palestine Action is intervening to stop a genocide. It is acting to save life. We deplore the government's decision to proscribe it. Labelling non-violent direct action as 'terrorism' is an abuse of language and an attack on democracy. "The real threat to the life of the nation comes not from Palestine Action but from the home secretary's efforts to ban it. We call on the government to withdraw its proscription of Palestine Action and to stop arming Israel."
Powys County Times
40 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Cabinet minister urges MPs to back welfare Bill as rebellion looms
A Cabinet minister has urged Labour MPs to back the Government's welfare Bill in a crunch vote as Sir Keir Starmer continues to face a major rebellion despite making concessions to disgruntled backbenchers. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds warned that retreating entirely from the reforms would mean losing the chance to 'make any changes for the better whatsoever' and undermining 'public support'. Ministers hope a partial U-turn on the benefit cuts, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of universal credit, are enough to win over Labour rebels. But ahead of the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill's second reading in the Commons on Tuesday evening, some 39 backbenchers signed an amendment rejecting the legislation. That number is far lower than the 83 needed to overturn the Prime Minister's majority, but leading rebel Rachel Maskell has warned 'many more' have told her they still plan to vote against the Government's plans. 'I'd ask (colleagues) to support the Government on that basis, because clearly what we've got here is something which is better than the existing system,' Mr Reynolds told Sky News on Tuesday morning. Asked whether MPs would lose the whip for voting against the Government, he said he was 'not aware of anything like that' but 'those issues are for the chief whip'. To see off the threat of far greater rebellion, the Government last week softened the impact of its changes to protect some 370,000 existing Pip claimants who had been set to lose out following reassessment. It also committed to a review of the system, involving disabled people and led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, and unfreezing the higher UC rate for those already claiming the health-related element. But critics have argued the concessions risk creating a 'three-tier' system of disparity between existing and new claimants, as well as any future changes that emerge as a result of the Timms review. Facing questions from broadcasters on Tuesday morning, Mr Reynolds insisted it was 'entirely normal' for existing entitlements to be 'grandfathered' during major changes to the welfare system. 'There are people in the UK getting severe disablement allowance. That closed to new entrants in 2001. So this is quite common,' he said. He added: 'If people think Governments will dodge difficult issues, spend a lot of money even on outcomes they don't think are very good, and the public don't support, and if that chance to reform the system is seen to have been lost entirely, that undermines public support.' Speaking to BBC Breakfast, the minister warned: 'If we were to completely retreat from this, I think we would lose the chance to make any changes for the better whatsoever.' Some 126 Labour MPs had previously signed a 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier that would have stopped the legislation if approved. The Government looks set to have averted a revolt on that scale after watering down its reforms following a series of crisis talks with leading rebels last week, but backbench anger continues to simmer. York Central MP Rachel Maskell said that many more backbenchers than the 39 who put their names to her amendment had told her they plan to reject the Government's package of reforms. She said she had no fear in voting down the Bill and felt a 'moral duty' to 'speak up for' disabled people. 'Yes, I support getting disabled people into work where they've been discriminated and dismissed, of course that's important, but when those people can't work or need longer to prepare for work, it is vital we don't remove their lifeline,' she said. 'Or else they'll disappear further and further into the margins.'
South Wales Argus
41 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Severn Bridge weight limit compared to steelworks closure
The giant steelworks were saved from closure when the UK government used emergency legislation to take them over in April amid fears they would be imminently shut down with the loss of up to 2,700 jobs. Monmouthshire County Council has said it has been using the comparison in lobbying for the lifting of the closure of the M48 crossing, between Chepstow and Aust, to vehicles over 7.5 tonnes. Councillor Catrin Maby said the council fears the weight restriction is placing jobs in the Chepstow area at risk including at the Newhouse Farm industrial estate, at the foot of the bridge, that employs nearly the same number of people at the steel plant in Linconshire. The Labour councillor said: 'We have emphasised the impact and job losses that may occur with over 2,500 jobs at risk at Newhouse alone that is equivalent to the potential job losses at Scunthorpe steelworks. 'We have made that point and it is really shocking. 'Every delay allows leases to end and relocations to take place to elsewhere in Europe so we are extremely concerned.' Cllr Maby, whose council cabinet role includes responsibility for highways, said she and Monmouthshire MP Catherine Fookes had met with the UK government's minister for future roads, Lilian Greenwood and 'emphasised the impact on the local economy and in particular the potential job losses at Newhouse.' She said claimed the council's lobbying efforts have had an impact as the minister, in a letter to Ms Fookes, had said the concerns have been 'taken on board'. Cllr Maby said: 'They aim to find a solution to enable normal traffic movements to return in late 2026 which does show our lobbying has had an impact as that has brought forward what they originally intended.' She reminded councillors a longer term solution to strengthen the bridge would be 'expensive'. National Highways, the UK government agency responsible for the Severn bridges, had said when it announced the weight restriction in April it would likely be in place for 12 to 18 months as it works on developing a plan to help manage in real-time the number of vehicles over 7.5 tonne using the bridge to 'ensure vehicle loads remain within safe limits'. Cllr Maby, who was responding to a question from Conservative councillor for Chepstow Mount Pleasant, Paul Pavia, said the council has also raised the impact of the bridge closure on local roads and increased traffic, diverted over the second crossing, on the M4 junction at Magor. She said those concerns have also been outlined to Welsh transport minister Ken Skates and the council has 'emphasised the importance of the M48 link road'. The authority has been arguing for the new junction, at Rogiet, which it says would relieve traffic on the motorway. Cllr Pavia also raised concern at HGVs are continuing to cross the bridge, which he said had also been highlighted by Labour's Cllr Armand Watts, and he said 'anecdotally' it appears more lorries have been using the A48 through Chepstow. Cllr Maby promised to share data from the air quality management zone, installed due to high levels of pollution at Hardwick Hill. She also said enforcement of the weight restriction, that applies to all vehicles over 7.5 tonnes other than emergency service vehicles and scheduled buses, is now being done through ANPR number plate recognition cameras. 'How successful it is depends a lot on police back office capacity to enforce as with so many other things we deal with,' said Cllr Maby.
