I've had enough of stupid ideas from clownish politicians
Why can't they just fund things properly instead of applying one-hundredth of what is actually needed to resolve important matters, and shouting from the rooftops that they are resolving these issues when they know damned well they are not and when in reality they are not even applying a sticking plaster to the problem?
Have no fear, though, as they can miraculously find an unlimited supply of money in the billions to buy more bombs.
Spending more money on lawyers to try to prevent victims of one government catastrophe after another being paid the money for their lives being absolutely ruined – like in the cases of the sub-postmasters and infected blood victims – tells us all we need to know.
The English establishment does not want the common people to ever prosper.
As I daily shake my head in disbelief as one clown after another takes the position and then proposes one massively stupid policy idea after another, which inevitably damages our lives even more, I think that the only way such clowns could be anywhere near positions of authority is thanks to the huge support from the English media, which puts them up as saviours then hangs them out to dry almost as soon as they start completely messing everything up.
This leads me to think the only way this scenario can play out again and again and again is because the media constantly treat the electorate as absolute fools to be manipulated whatever way they like, and we know why: keep them in the dark, clueless and ignorant.
If you need any further proof of this comment, never forget the Church of England was vehemently against even opening schools to start educating the poor common children until as late as the 1870s, as they felt an educated public could bring down the crooked establishment like a house of cards. Now the House of 'Lords' has 26 Bishops gaining automatic entry into this bloated, archaic institution which helps uphold decisions that ruin all of our lives.
Oh, for a strong indy leader with an ounce of fight in him/her who will refuse to take this utter bull*** and daylight robbery we have to suffer one moment longer, someone who would at least publish an instant and genuine response to the ludicrously crooked GERS bull**** we all have to endure each year. But no ... that would make too much sense.
OK, I best be off now to catch more octogenarians in Adidas tops and baseball caps hiding copies of your paper again, or if I miss them, try find where they have hidden copies of the paper and give it centre stage.
Iain K
Dunoon
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
11 minutes ago
- Spectator
Lefties on a Plane: my real-life horror movie
Trapped in the middle seat next to a Dublin businessman in the window seat, I was subjected to a monologue on the 'far right'. 'It's not Islamic extremism we need to be worried about,' he said. I wanted very badly to say it absolutely is Islamic extremism we need to be worried about, but I kept my mouth shut. If it had kicked off between us, the pilot might have decided to turn around and do an emergency landing. Snakes on a Plane was a silly movie, completely unrealistic. I have an idea for a much more convincing sequel about being trapped on an aircraft with a terrifying menace, and it's called Lefties on a Plane. This has happened to me twice, both times on budget airlines where the narrowness of the seat made it all the more horrifying. The Dublin businessman was a know-it-all who wanted to showcase his political knowledge. He leaned in and told me conspiratorially that the reason he knew so much was that he worked for the government. His firm did secret contracts to do with intelligence and security, he claimed. He ordered a drink and glugged it down. I let him blurt out everything he wanted to blurt, in case he turned out to be someone important, which I'm pretty sure he wasn't. I was so offended by what he was saying about ordinary working-class people that I wanted to ask the stewardess to change my seat, but the plane was packed. There was no threat from al Qaeda or Isis, he said. The threat was all from the far right, by which sweeping definition it turned out he simply meant people who were poor and ignored. 'We've had our eye on this for a long time. We saw it coming. After Brexit it all took off…' Here we go, I thought. It was a struggle for the next hour not to spark an incident and force the plane into an emergency landing. Ever since being trapped next to him, I've paid extra to book the window seat on Ryanair on the basis that I can slump against the window and pretend to go to sleep. The other day, flying from Gatwick to Cork, I was in this window seat when an Irish lady took the middle seat and began to read her book, indicating she would be no trouble. But then an English lady arrived in a flutter of fuss to take the aisle seat. She got settled in the way an upper-middle-class English person does on Ryanair, by making derisory comments about the unspeediness of the boarding and the lack of leg room, as though she had paid £500 for the ticket, not £50. The plane had not even begun taxiing when she started. She introduced herself to the Irish lady, the Irish lady politely asked if she was going on holiday, clutching the open book she was hoping to read, and the English lady said she had a second home in Ireland. Oh, this will be good, I thought. The Irish lady said that was nice, whereupon the English lady decided to talk at the poor Irish woman all the way to Cork. Donald Trump was awful, very volatile, always changing his mind. Who can the Democrats get in? The governor of Philadelphia, perhaps. People were destitute, living in tented communities. (Whether she meant in LA or Worthing was hard to tell.) She was appalled by the lack of action on debt and spending. Also, why didn't the M25 work? I heard myself muttering: 'Oh for goodness sake.' I'd have taken a python making its way down the aisle any day over this. As the trolley approached, I tried to order a drink by offering the refreshment credit I had been sent on my Ryanair app as we had been delayed. The stewardess apologised and said she didn't know how to do that and I said fine, don't worry. The stewardess went to move off, but the lady intervened. Speaking very loudly and slowly at me, she said: 'You need to present that to a shop or restaurant in the terminal!' Then she sat back and recommenced her monologue. 'I do a lot of birding,' she said. Please, I thought, can someone tell me what is wrong with the phrase 'bird-watching'? Did I miss that memo? Is 'watching' too invasive an upset of a word to the dignity of the bird? Does it impinge on the tweetie's civil rights? Birding. Oh please. If ever a word was invented by lefties in denial about reality, it's birding. She had plans all the way to Christmas and beyond. By the time she was detailing her social schedule for January I wanted to wrestle the emergency door off and jump out. I watched the Isle of Wight go past beneath me as she listed her opinions about every news item that day. Everything in the world was puzzling her. 'What I don't understand,' she said, 'is why does Trump look so good?' The Irish woman could not enlighten her. So she moved on. 'What I don't understand is, don't all these royals with cancer have the best private healthcare screening?' She was puzzled about everything, I decided, because no conspiracy theory was getting through to her. She was so far from having a risqué Google of a wacky blog that she had no ideas, not even wacky ones, to explain all the crazy stuff that's been happening. Once the obvious had been eliminated, she was stumped. The plane was wobbling down to land, but she didn't draw breath as it thumped on to the tarmac. As passengers filled the aisles to get off, she harrumphed: 'Nothing very speedy about this is there?' No, there's not meant to be. Speedy disembarkation isn't a thing, not unless you count being told to climb out on to the wing in an emergency which, on Ryanair, can be arranged, but that was the sort of recent news story that would have left her confused. 'What I don't understand,' she would have said, 'is why Ryanair is allowed to evacuate planes like that…' 'Well, we've sorted out the world,' she said, as she took up her bag and bid her new friend farewell. 'We could run things better than them. They should be asking us!' It could have been worse, I decided. It could have been me in the middle seat.
Fashion United
4 hours ago
- Fashion United
EU and Japan agree on closer cooperation
Japan and the European Union (EU) aim to further strengthen their cooperation in the areas of economic security, trade and defence. For this purpose, both sides launched a "Competitiveness Alliance" at a summit meeting in Tokyo. "We will expand our cooperation on increasing the resilience of supply chains and reducing strategic dependencies," a joint final declaration stated. At the same time, the EU and Japan emphasised the importance of promoting free trade and multilateralism. Closer cooperation has become even more important against the backdrop of a "complex global geopolitical environment, in particular Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, the serious challenges to a free and open Indo-Pacific, and other regional and international issues", the declaration continued. The EU and Japan are determined "to work with like-minded international partners to address these challenges". This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Steve Reed's water claims that of an incompetent charlatan
IN an article for The National, the Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Climate Change and Energy angrily responded to false statements made earlier this week by UK Environment minister Steve Reed. He attempted to defend his own Labour party's betrayal of its pre-election promise to nationalise England's failing, privately-owned water companies by claiming that nationalisation was not the solution to England's dirty and expensive water, stating that Scottish Water is publicly owned, yet "[water] pollution levels in Scotland are worse than they are in England". This is categorically untrue. Either Reed knew it was untrue and said it anyway, knowing he'd be unlikely to be challenged – in which case he's a charlatan and a liar –, or he didn't know it was untrue – in which case he's an incompetent charlatan, who uncritically leaps on false statements to get himself out of politically tricky situations. Reed also warned that nationalisation would cost £100bn and would slow down efforts to cut pollution. This claim has also been disputed. READ MORE: Anas Sarwar urged to break silence on Labour's 'nuclear tax' for Scots Estimates of the cost of renationalising the water industry in England range from £14.7bn, a figure estimated by the public services international research unit (PSIRU) at the University of Greenwich, to £99bn if company debts are included, a figure estimated by a thinktank commissioned by the water companies themselves. By citing the figure of £100 billion, it's clear that Reed and the Labour Government are siding with the profiteers of the English private water companies. This figure is based on a calculation of the maximum dividends, which starts from the purchase cost of the companies in 1990 when they were privatised, adding capital investment per year and inflation, but it takes no account of the actual market value of the companies. Crucially, these figures are predicated on the assumption that directors and shareholders who have extracted vast profits from the water companies over the years while piling debts on the companies should be financially compensated for nationalisation and not be left liable for the debt. Some claim that the cost of nationalisation could be close to zero. Thames Water is currently in debt to the tune of some £20 billion – even though its directors and shareholders have continued to profit, so it could be argued that the true value of the company is next to nothing. Thames Water is not alone. England's water companies are bust. They would not be financially viable if they had to meet the required standards without taking on huge amounts of debt. According to the latest independent water commission report, Scotland has a far higher percentage of its waterways in 'good' ecological condition than England and Wales. The Independent Water Commission found that 66% of Scotland's water bodies were of good ecological status, compared with 16.1% in England and 29.9% in Wales. READ MORE: Labour panned for foreign aid cuts as women and children to be hit hardest It is also worth noting that Scotland has some 32% of the UK land mass, is the part of the UK with the highest annual rainfall and has many more water bodies than England and Wales. Loch Ness alone is popularly claimed to contain more fresh water than the combined total of the rivers and lakes of England and Wales, holding 7.4 cubic km of clean Scottish water. Yet Loch Ness is neither Scotland's largest loch by surface area (that's Loch Lomond), nor is it the deepest – that's Loch Morar, whose maximum depth is 310m (1017 ft). Scotland contains truly vast amounts of water, most of which is in good condition. 87% of Scotland's entire water environment is assessed by SEPA as having a high or good classification for water quality, up from 82% in 2014. The claim about Loch Ness (below) containing more fresh water than all of England's lakes and rivers may just be a popular myth. It's not easy to find reliable statistics on the amount of water in all of England's rivers and lakes, but since the English water companies abstract 4.6 cubic km of water annually and don't extract every last drop of water – otherwise there would be no lakes or rivers left in England – the popular boast about Loch Ness seems unlikely to be true. However, what is unquestionably true, is that Scottish Water must manage much more water than all the water companies of England combined. It does so successfully, without siphoning off large amounts of cash for directors and shareholders and invests back into Scotland's water infrastructure. Steve Reed and this Labour government are terrified of nationalisation, so Reed would rather lie about Scottish Water. For him, that serves two purposes: allowing him to stick the boot into the Scottish Government, while defending the interests of the profiteers of England's private water companies. He does know knowing that he's not going to be challenged by a London centric media, which is all too happy to propagate the Anglo-British nationalist myth that 'parochial' wee Scotland could not possibly make a better fist of things than the all-mighty Westminster. Westminster goes into summer recess this week, and just prior to MPs going off for the summer, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband sneaked in an announcement that the energy bills of everyone in the UK, Scotland included, will increase by around £1 per month in order to cover the estimated £38 billion cost of the new Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk. The SNP's Westminster energy spokesman, Graham Leadbitter, said nuclear power was 'extortionate, takes decades to build and the toxic waste is a risk to local communities'. He added: "To make matters worse, Scots will be left to foot the bill with a levy on energy bills – you simply couldn't make it up, yet Anas Sarwar and Scottish Labour back this extortionate and wasteful plan that energy-rich Scotland will pay for through the nose. 'Meanwhile, Grangemouth has been shut down and Westminster's fiscal regime has ruined Scottish energy jobs – Scotland isn't just an afterthought, it's barely a thought at all.'
