Iraqi asylum seeker can stay in Britain after being mocked in his home country over his speech impediment - as tribunal rules he'd be persecuted there because of his political beliefs
The unnamed Kurd told an immigration tribunal he had been 'mistreated, humiliated and abused' as a result of his disability.
He claimed the experience 'forged' his political beliefs which now put him at risk of persecution if he is returned to the Middle Eastern country.
The Home Office argued that as long as the Kurdish man deleted his Facebook, containing statements critical of the authorities, he could safely go back to his home country.
However, the Upper Tier of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber found that the Iraqi could not be expected to conceal his 'genuinely held' political beliefs 'forged by his disability' in order to avoid persecution.
The hearing was told the asylum seeker, who was granted anonymity and referred to only as HR, had attended multiple demonstrations in Iraqi Kurdistan to voice his opinion against the government.
'HR is a citizen of Iraq of Kurdish ethnicity who claimed to have been mistreated, humiliated and abused in Iraq due to his speech impediment,' it was told.
In December 2017, he claimed he was beaten up at a protest to deter him from taking part in future ones, suffering an injury to his right ear.
Five years later at another demonstration he claims he was detained for 24 hours.
The tribunal heard he experienced 'humiliating and degrading treatment' and was 'mocked' for his disability.
The Iraqi also posted critical comments about the authorities on social media and claims friends had been 'made to disappear' over similar posts.
He told the court this left him with 'no choice' but to leave Iraq on a tourist visa to Turkey in August 2022.
On arrival in the UK, he made a protection claim in October 2022 which was rejected by the Home Office who argued he could delete his Facebook account and safely return to the Middle Eastern country.
The asylum seeker has also continued his political activities whilst in the UK.
After he appealed the government's decision, the First-tier Tribunal of the court granted the Iraqi the right to stay on the grounds his political views were genuine.
It ruled they were 'forged by his experience as a disabled person' and he could not be expected to conceal them when interviewed by the authorities on his return.
The lower chamber also found, in agreement with the Home Office, that whilst the asylum seeker's speech impediment had influenced his political views, the treatment he experienced as a result of it only amounted to discrimination and not persecution.
The Home Office appealed the decision arguing adequate reasons for allowing the Iraqi to stay had not been given, he was not of interest to the authorities, and had not been persecuted.
They added it was 'improbable' he would argue for the rights of disabled people because there is assistance for them in Iraqi Kurdistan and there was no expert country report showing the demonstrations he mentioned took place.
These grounds were dismissed by the Upper Tier Tribunal because they had not been argued before the lower chamber.
Upper Tribunal Judge Christopher Hanson concluded the First-tier Tribunal made no error in law in deciding the Iraqi's political views would put him at risk if he returned and he could not be expected to conceal them.
He said: '[The First-tier Tribunal] does not dispute that [the Iraqi] will be able to express his genuinely held political views forged by his experience as a disabled person or that his existing political profile is low.
'The key point is that... [the Iraqi] has a characteristic, namely his political opinion, which could cause him to fear persecution and that if he expresses that on return it would put him at risk of persecution from the authorities.
'The key point made by the [First-tier Tribunal] is that the Appellant cannot be expected to conceal his political opinion to avoid persecution.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
White House blames Democrats for attacks on ICE agents
The White House has blamed Democrats for a series of attacks on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. The White House released a statement on Tuesday accusing Democratic lawmakers of spreading 'dangerous, inflammatory rhetoric' that it claimed has inspired vigilantes to assault immigration officers. 'As ICE agents risk their lives to secure our borders and protect our communities, they're facing a 700 per cent surge in assaults — a direct consequence of dangerous, inflammatory rhetoric from Democrat politicians,' the White House said. Eleven people were arrested this week after setting up a 'planned ambush' on an ICE facility in Alvarado, Texas, in which a police officer was shot in the neck, according to law enforcement. Ten suspects face charges of attempted murder, with one facing charges of obstruction of justice, after a group of people in black military-style clothing allegedly shot fireworks at the facility and defaced vehicles with graffiti saying 'ICE pig' and 'traitor'. When ICE agents and an Alvarado Police officer responded, two assailants opened fire, hitting the officer in the neck, officials said. In a separate instance of violence allegedly inspired by Democrats, three people were charged with assault this week after ICE agents were kicked, punched, and targeted with an 'incendiary device' during a protest in Oregon, according to state prosecutors. And on Monday, a man wielding an assault rifle was shot dead after he fired off dozens of rounds at federal agents outside another border patrol facility in Texas, leaving three people in hospital. It comes as House Democrats introduced a bill to ban federal agents from wearing face coverings and requiring them to wear visible ID during public enforcement operations. Footage of masked ICE agents snatching people off the streets and whisking them away in unmarked cars has sparked a furious backlash from Democrats and immigration activists. New Jersey representative LaMonica McIver, who was arrested while protesting outside a migrant detention centre, has called on her supporters to 'shut down the city' and said 'we are at war'. Meanwhile, Tim Walz, the former vice-presidential candidate, condemned ICE agents as the 'modern-day Gestapo'. Responding to the bill, Donald Trump warned that exposing the identity of ICE agents would place them in 'tremendous danger', and pointed out that Democrats have supported pro-Palestinian university protesters who wear face masks to hide their identities. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, also criticised Democrats for 'shamelessly attacking' federal agents. 'ICE agents put their lives on the line every day to get the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens off our streets and out of our communities,' she wrote on X. 'They are making America safer, and Democrats are shamelessly attacking them for it.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Turkey detains hundreds of Erdogan opponents in pursuit of 'octopus' of corruption
ANKARA, July 10 (Reuters) - Tayyip Erdogan's main political opponents have faced an unprecedented crackdown that has seen more than 500 detained in just nine months, according to a Reuters review of a sprawling investigation that has accelerated dramatically in recent days. Turkey's president says the probe tackles what he calls a corrupt network that is like "an octopus whose arms stretch to other parts of Turkey and abroad." The investigation, which began in Istanbul but has spread across the country, has targetted only municipalities run by the main opposition Republican People's Party, or CHP, the party of modern Turkey's secularist founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. The CHP denies the corruption allegations and calls them a naked attempt to eliminate a democratic alternative for Turks, a charge the government refutes. The crackdown tightens Erdogan's two-decade grip on power at a time that Turkey's influence in the Middle East and Europe has grown. For this reason, diplomats and analysts say, it has garnered only muted criticism from Western allies as a threat to democracy even as street protests erupted in the spring. According to the review of legal filings and state disclosures, 14 elected CHP mayors, including Istanbul's Ekrem Imamoglu - Erdogan's main rival - and more than 200 party members or local officials have been jailed pending trial. Not since a series of coups in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s have such high-profile political leaders been removed from office on the basis of as yet unpublished evidence, which suspects' lawyers dismiss as fabricated. "These investigations are being used as a tool for political attrition rather than objective investigation of concrete events," said Ertugrul Gunay, a former culture and tourism minister in Erdogan's cabinets between 2007 and 2013. He resigned from the ruling AK Party (AKP) after thousands of Turks were arrested over the anti-government Gezi Park protests of 2013. The latest legal drive, though smaller in scale, has gone further in targetting a would-be future government, riding high in the polls. It reflects "anxiety and panic that (Erdogan's) ruling party has for the next elections," Gunay told Reuters. Erdogan and his ministers have repeatedly rejected as unfounded critics' accusations of judicial interference, saying the independent courts need time to sort through evidence. They say such criticism reflects an opposition party reckoning with its illegal practices and internal strife, and undermines public trust. "This is a legal process, not a political one. We are not involved in any aspect of this process," Erdogan told his AKP MPs in parliament on Wednesday. At the centre of the investigation is Imamoglu, mayor of Istanbul's 17 million people, who was jailed in March pending a court hearing on corruption charges he denies. He is the CHP presidential candidate in any future election, and his arrest sparked the biggest protests since Gezi and a sharp lira selloff, both of which have since abated. But beyond Imamoglu - who from behind bars still leads Erdogan in some polls - the Reuters review found that more than 500 people were detained and questioned since the probe began in October last year, including at least 202 since last week alone. Of those, more than 220 were imprisoned or put under house arrest, according to the review, which was based in part on a compilation of reports by state-run Anadolu Agency. Erdogan's office and the Justice Ministry did not respond this week to a detailed request for a tally of detentions and arrests, and for a comment on the Reuters review's findings. Reuters further found that at least 36 people, mostly those in the private sector doing business with municipalities, provided a second statement to prosecutors from prison under the "effective repentance" provision of Turkish law - after which 32 of them were released from prison under judicial control measures. These statements have identified more suspects, disclosures from prosecutors and others show. Since Tuesday last week the investigation has spread to Izmir, Turkey's third-largest city, as well as Antalya, Adana and Adiyaman - all won by the centrist CHP over Erdogan's ruling conservative AKP in last year's March municipal elections, the party's biggest ever electoral defeat. Erdogan has in recent months predicted, correctly, that more charges and detentions were to come, further stoking concerns over political interference. Days after his octopus comment in May, five district mayors from Istanbul and Adana were arrested on corruption charges. Erdogan's office and the Justice Ministry did not respond to a request for comment on critics' claims that authorities' public comments about the probe harm judicial independence, and that it unfairly targets only the CHP for political gain. Turkey's Directorate of Communications released a list of past AKP mayors who were convicted on similar charges in separate probes, saying claims that the CHP is exclusively targetted are "entirely unfounded". Most of those listed were investigated after leaving office and were not jailed pending trial. The Reuters review of the latest probe shows no legal actions were taken in the 14 of Istanbul's 39 districts run by the AKP. Mehmet Pehlivan, Imamoglu's lawyer who was also jailed last month on criminal-membership charges he denies, told Reuters from prison that the investigation seeks for the first time to criminalise the right to practice law and to a legal defence. He said the mayor faces "not a single concrete piece of evidence". Prosecutors have not yet issued indictments. In one window into the probe, a 121-page transcript of police questioning seen by Reuters shows that Imamoglu faced one claim that he colluded with a group of men who allegedly met at a cafe to discuss bribe payments. Police asked how his phone connected to the same cellular tower as those of the men at least 150 times, the documents show. He responded that his home at the time was close to the cafe so his phone would naturally use the same tower. A spokesman for the prosecutor did not immediately comment on the police questioning. The CHP has rejected all corruption allegations against its municipal officials but has said it will investigate after Turkey's TRT state broadcaster released footage of the deputy mayor of Manavgat, in the southern Antalya province, allegedly accepting bribes. Turkey has in the past seen waves of mass arrests of pro-Kurdish leaders, civil society members, military officers and outlawed groups, especially during Erdogan's increasingly authoritarian tenure. The CHP had been relatively spared in the Erdogan era, in which it lost a string of elections to his AKP since 2002. Though the next presidential vote is not scheduled until 2028, it will need to come sooner if Erdogan wants to run again. He could also seek to amend the constitutional two-term limit. The CHP mayors, including 14 in jail and one under house arrest, all deny the corruption, bribery and terrorism-related charges for which they await a court decision. Some have been suspended from duty. CHP Chairman Ozgur Ozel said the mayors "have fallen prisoner to this coup against Ataturk's party" in a speech on Sunday, that itself prompted a separate probe on charges including insulting the president.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Former Democratic presidential nominee says ‘Trump was right' on borders
John Kerry, a former US Secretary of State, criticised the Democratic party for neglecting immigration, stating that " Trump was right" on the issue. Kerry, a Democrat who unsuccessfully ran as for presidency in 2004, accused the party of allowing the US-Mexico border to be "under siege" during Joe Biden 's presidency, which he believes gave Republicans a political advantage. He emphasised that a protected border is fundamental to a nation and expressed a wish for President Biden to have been more assertive in enforcing immigration laws. The border has been a central issue for Trump, who recently directed federal immigration officials to prioritise deportations from Democratic-run cities. In a social media post Trump called for the "single largest Mass Deportation Program in History," aiming to deport millions of undocumented migrants from major US cities.
