Man who raised £100k for charity since cancer diagnosis to take on 588-mile walk
Paul Dennington's 'March Through Life' will see him stroll 588 miles over 36 days from North Shields to Hempstead Valley, near his home town, Gillingham, marking milestone moments from his 59 years.
Mr Dennington, who has raised more than £100,000 and awareness for Prostate Cancer UK since his diagnosis in February 2021, wants to fund research and a screening programme to help others.
He said: 'When I was diagnosed it felt surreal as I didn't have symptoms and thought I was pretty fit and healthy. I did feel guilt, though, as it was my body that was the reason my family were going to have to go through this journey.
'When I started fundraising, I thought I might raise up to £5,000 but it kind of took off. It has become a great source of positive focus, and I've met so many wonderful and generous people along the way. For this challenge I wanted to do something different and big that would grab attention, would encourage donations, be physically challenging and would be personally poignant for my fifth year.
'With the amazing support of my wife in particular, family and friends, I want to raise awareness of the cancer, its risks, drive testing and raise valuable funds to support those going through this terrible experience, to create a screening programme and for vital research.
'I want to help prevent other men and their families from going through the same journey as mine and to give hope to those who already are.'
He will set off from his place of birth in North Shields on Sunday, and the opening day will see him visit his first house, his former infant and junior school and will end at St James' Park, home to his boyhood football club, Newcastle United.
As he navigates his way south, Mr Dennington will visit key life landmarks, and pay tribute at the resting places of his late parents.
Mr Dennington's challenge finishes on September 7 when he reaches his current home in Hempstead where he has lived for the past 27 years. By which time he would have also scaled 27,375 feet, just shy of the summit of Mount Everest.
The serious message of his walk will also be shared via several awareness talks along the way.
Mr Dennington added: 'Caught early, prostate cancer is very treatable. However, I'm one of the circa 10,000 men a year caught too late to be cured and did not have obvious symptoms.
'For me, without a screening programme in the UK we rely heavily on well-informed and willing men to proactively get themselves tested. That is why raising awareness of risk is so important.'
Prostate Cancer UK chief executive Laura Kerby said: 'We're so grateful for the fantastic support from Paul as he tirelessly walks 588 miles to raise funds and celebrate his life.
'To say Paul is a force of nature would be an understatement. Despite his diagnosis, he has worked relentlessly to raise funds and awareness for Prostate Cancer UK, and his efforts are always whole-hearted. It's fair to say this is his most extreme to date, and I know this is a deeply personal journey for Paul, and is one he will tackle with the same grit and determination he has approached the last four and a half years.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Prince Harry criticised over row that risks damaging his charity's reputation
PRINCE Harry was blasted last night for letting a boardroom battle damage his charity Sentebale. A watchdog said the public row risked undermining trust in good causes generally. 2 The Charity Commission said chances were missed to settle differences at Sentebale, set up by Harry and Lesotho's Prince Seeiso in 2006 for young people and kids living with HIV and Aids. It launched a probe when they stood down as patrons in support of trustees who quit in a dispute with Dr Sophie Chandauka over a fundraising strategy. Board of trustees chair Dr Chandauka said the 'toxicity' of Harry's brand since his move to live in the US had seen a drop in donors. She accused the Duke of Sussex, 40, of involvement in a 'cover-up' of a probe into bullying and harassment. Last night, she said the 'adverse media campaign' launched by those who resigned 'caused incalculable damage' to the charity. The Times reported a source close to Harry blasted the report and said the prince was 'devastated the chair had been allowed to succeed with a hostile takeover'. His spokesman said those who rely on Sentebale would bear the 'consequences of her actions'. The Charity Commission said the public airing of the row harmed Sentebale's reputation and risked overshadowing its achievements. The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment' felt by some involved. David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'Passion for a cause is the bedrock of volunteering and charity, delivering positive impact for millions of people here at home and abroad every day. Harry QUITTING his own charity is utterly humiliating - misogyny row will hurt him deeply 'However, in the rare cases when things go wrong, it is often because that very passion has become a weakness rather than a strength. 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve.' 2
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Prince Harry and others criticised by charity watchdog for letting ‘damaging' Sentebale dispute play out in public
A watchdog has cleared Prince Harry of 'over-reach' at the charity he co-founded – but says a string of failures amounted to mismanagement in its administration. Regulator the Charity Commission, which investigated Sentebale for four months, has condemned 'all parties to the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly'. The commission also says the then trustees' failure to resolve disputes internally severely affected the charity's reputation and risked undermining public trust in charities more generally. Pointing to 'a lack of clarity around role descriptions and internal policies' as the key cause for weaknesses in the management, the watchdog says the confusion inflamed tensions, which culminated in a row and mass resignations of trustees and both founding patrons, the commission found. In March, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, the co-founder, quit as patrons, saying the move was in support of the trustees – who also resigned – in a dispute with chairwoman Sophie Chandauka. 'It is devastating that the relationship between the charity's trustees and the chair of the board broke down beyond repair, creating an untenable situation,' the princes said at the time. Dr Chandauka said she had reported Sentebale's trustees to the Charity Commission and had taken legal steps to prevent her removal. She also made claims of misconduct. Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry founded the organisation in 2006 in honour of Harry's mother, Diana, to help young people and children in southern Africa, particularly those with HIV and Aids. The watchdog said the row began after 2023, when Sentebale's then trustees tried to implement a new fundraising strategy in the United States. A serious dispute then emerged between Dr Chandauka, some trustees and the Duke of Sussex. Members of the regulator said that after conducting interviews and reviewing evidence, they found the delegation of certain powers to the chair, including consideration of an executive chair role, was a 'confusing, convoluted and poorly governed' process, with a lack of clearly defined delegations. The watchdog said the then trustees failed to have proper processes and policies to investigate internal complaints. 'More generally, a lack of clear policies contributed to the failure to resolve disputes,' they concluded. And the commission said public statements made to the media and criticism made in television interviews, did not serve the charity's best interests. It found no evidence of widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or racism, but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally'. Nor was there evidence of 'over-reach' by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex, it said. But the regulator concluded: 'The failure to clarify delegations within the charity to the chair, and the failure to have proper processes for internal complaints, both amount to mismanagement in the administration of the charity.' The commission has issued Sentebale with a regulatory action plan, saying the charity should have a clearly defined patron role set out in writing. The plan also includes improving complaints and whistleblowing procedures. The watchdog said all the charity's then trustees contributed to a missed opportunity to resolve issues that led to the dispute. Financial difficulties following the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to tensions, it added. David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Prince Harry reprimanded for crisis at charity
The Duke of Sussex has lost his battle for control of the charity he set up in his mother's memory as a watchdog criticised him for his part in a 'damaging' bullying row. Sentebale, which Prince Harry co-founded in 2006, was thrown into crisis in March when Dr Sophie Chandauka, its chairman, made claims of harassment and misogyny, triggering the resignations of the Prince as patron and several trustees. A Charity Commission investigation into the affair has found problems with Sentebale's governance and rebuked 'all parties' involved for allowing the spat to play out in public, but ruled that Dr Chandauka and the current board could remain in place, meaning she has emerged victorious. The Prince is said to be 'utterly devastated' by what he regards as a 'hostile takeover' of the charity, and has signalled that his split from Sentebale is now permanent. Had the commission launched a statutory inquiry into Sentebale, there would have been pressure on the chairman to leave, paving the way for Prince Harry to return, but the fact that the watchdog decided that was unnecessary and allowed her to stay means there is now no way back for him. He hit back at the commission's findings, saying its investigation had fallen 'troublingly short' and that the 'consequences of [Dr Chandauka's] actions will not be borne by her but by the children who rely on Sentebale's support'. It is a bitter blow for the Duke, who set up the charity with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho to continue the work of Harry's late mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, by supporting children with HIV/Aids. The row began when Dr Chandauka was asked to step down following disagreements about fundraising, including accusations that she had spent £500,000 on consultants to find wealthy donors in the US, which she denied. She responded by suing the charity and reporting it to the Charity Commission, alleging bullying, harassment, misogyny and 'misogynoir' – discrimination against black women. That triggered the resignations of Prince Harry, Prince Seeiso and several trustees. The commission said in a statement: 'The regulator has criticised all parties to the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly, and further concluded that the then trustees' failure to resolve disputes internally severely impacted the charity's reputation and risked undermining public trust in charities more generally.' The commission said it had found no evidence of widespread or systematic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir, but it 'acknowledged the strong perception of ill-treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally'. Harry carries on the spat In a statement, a spokesman for the Duke said: 'Sentebale has been a deeply personal and transformative mission for Prince Harry, established to serve some of the most vulnerable children in Lesotho and Botswana.' In his response to the report, the Duke continued the public spat by describing Sentebale as a 'once brilliant charity' that had helped more than 100,000 children during his time as patron. He said he would 'now focus on finding new ways to continue supporting the children of Lesotho and Botswana'. A friend of the Prince said he could not now see any way the Prince could ever return to Sentebale. After carrying out a compliance investigation into Sentebale, the watchdog issued it with a regulatory action plan 'to address governance weaknesses' after finding that there had been 'mismanagement in the administration of the charity'. It did not escalate the investigation to a statutory inquiry, meaning Dr Chandauka will be allowed to address the issues with a largely new board of trustees whom the commission said had been 'validly appointed'. In a television interview, Dr Chandauka complained about her treatment by Prince Harry, citing an incident at the end of a charity polo match in Miami last year. Television footage showed the Duchess of Sussex apparently asking her to switch places from her position next to the Duke during the prizegiving. Dr Chandauka had to duck under a trophy in an awkward moment that prompted questions from the media about the Duchess's behaviour. She said earlier this year: 'Prince Harry asked me to issue some sort of a statement in support of the Duchess and I said I wouldn't. Not because I didn't care about the Duchess, but because I knew what would happen if I did so, and because we cannot be an extension of the Sussexes.' She said that as tensions between the Sussexes and the Royal family grew, it became harder to raise funds for the charity and she had been a victim of 'this unleashing of the Sussex machine'. The commission found no evidence of over-reach by the Duke of Sussex as patron of the charity, but was 'critical of the charity's lack of clarity in delegations to the chair which allowed for misunderstandings to occur'. This lack of clarity around roles, and around internal policies, had exacerbated tensions, which culminated in the dispute. In a series of criticisms, the commission found that the delegation of certain powers to Dr Chandauka was 'a confusing, convoluted and poorly governed process'; that the then trustees did not have a proper complaints process in place; and that it was 'not satisfied that public statements made to the media and public criticism made in television interviews were conducted in a way that served the charity's best interests'. In future, it said, the charity should have a clearly defined patron role set out in writing. The commission found that: 'All the charity's then trustees contributed to a missed opportunity to resolve issues which led to the dispute. The regulator observed that strategic and financial difficulties that had emerged for the charity following the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to the tensions that arose.' As well as improving internal processes, Sentebale was told of 'the importance of the trustees securing sufficient funding to enable the charity to deliver for its beneficiaries'. David Holdsworth, the chief executive of the commission, said in his report: 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve. 'Passion for a cause is the bedrock of volunteering and charity, delivering positive impact for millions of people here at home and abroad every day. However, in the rare cases when things go wrong, it is often because that very passion has become a weakness rather than a strength. 'This case highlights what can happen when there are gaps in governance and policies critical to charities' ability to deliver for their cause. As a result, we have issued the charity a regulatory action plan to make needed improvements and rectify findings of mismanagement. 'Moving forward I urge all parties not to lose sight of those who rely on the charity's services. The current trustees must now make improvements and ensure the charity focuses on delivering for those it exists to serve.' Sentebale's latest accounts, for the year ended Aug 31 2023, show that its total income was £3.4 million and it spent £3.78m. The Prince donated £1.2m from the proceeds of his autobiography, Spare, which was published in 2023.
