Standard Bank Named Africa's Most Admired Financial Services Brand
The Africa Best Brands study is described as the most comprehensive, research-based ranking of Africa's most admired brands. Released annually during Africa Month (May), the survey is independently conducted by GeoPoll and Kantar, with strategic insights and rankings led by Kantar and Brand Leadership, Africa's leading brand advisory firm, and supported by regional experts across the continent.
'We are delighted to receive an accolade that is distinguished by being authentically African, data-driven and consumer-led. This acknowledgement reflects the trust that we have built and our commitment to providing consistently excellent service to our clients across the continent,' says Sim Tshabalala, Chief Executive, Standard Bank Group.
'Africa is our home, and we strive to drive her growth every day. This award reaffirms our Africa focus by being rooted in research that relays the continent's voice and vision. As the most comprehensive barometer of consumer brand preferences, this award reflects our uncompromising commitment to our diverse client base and driving value for all stakeholders. We are grateful to our employees who have made this achievement possible,' concludes Margaret Nienaber, Chief Operating Officer, Standard Bank Group.
Earlier in the year, Standard Bank was named Africa and South Africa's Most Valuable Banking Brand by Brand Finance. As Africa's biggest bank by assets, Standard Bank has a brand presence across 20 African countries. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
13 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Don't bot against the human touch — why AI won't replace Africa's call centre jobs
Contact centres are booming on the continent despite the rise of artificial intelligence. As it turns out, people want the human touch. When I was in my second year of varsity I spent six months working the night shift in a call centre in the Cape Town CBD. It sounded like a great idea on paper: I would be answering incoming phone calls for a large German airline (in German). How exciting, I thought somewhat naively, I'm going to help people to book their holidays all over the world. It was only after I started the job that I realised the truth about call centres and the people who phone them. No happy Germans were going to call me to book flights for them. The people who were phoning were the ones who had run into a problem they couldn't solve. They couldn't reschedule a return flight, or their luggage had been lost, or their connecting flight had been cancelled. In most instances, these were problems that I, a 19-year-old student sitting in an office in Cape Town, could not solve. Instead, my job was to de-escalate the situation as much as possible. People phoned in an absolute rage and I explained to them, as nicely as possible, why the airline couldn't help them, until they resigned themselves to their fate and hung up. If I did my job well enough they would end the call slightly less angry. I thought about this story when the City of Cape Town announced the opening of a brand-new call centre by TP Group (formerly Teleperformance), one of the largest business process outsourcing (BPO) firms in the world. The centre will seat 3,500 staff and there are plans to grow this to 10,000 by the end of 2025. This is not a one-off success story either. In Cape Town alone, nearly 100,000 people work in call centres. The industry poured R23-billion into the city's economy in 2024. That's a lot of people earning a living by telling people they can't solve their problems. Africa's moment is here South Africa has become Africa's crown jewel of customer service, consistently ranking as a top destination globally for BPO. But Kenya, Egypt, Ghana, Ethiopia and Rwanda are quickly coming up behind. Africa's BPO workforce stands at about 1.2 million full-time equivalent roles, according to research from CCI Global and the Everest Group. By 2030 this number is expected to more than double, with up to 1.5 million new jobs created. So what's driving the boom? Start with cost: African markets offer labour cost savings of up to 80% compared with Western markets. Then there's the continent's demographic edge. Africa is home to the world's youngest population, brimming with digitally savvy, multilingual talent. Governments are helping too by offering tax incentives, training programmes and infrastructure that make cities like Cape Town, Nairobi and Kigali more attractive by the year. Add to that a favourable time zone, and all the stars are aligning. Global companies want quality service at lower cost. African countries want jobs. And in between, a huge, untapped workforce is saying 'let's go'. But what about the robots? Of course, no conversation about customer service jobs in 2025 is complete without bringing artificial intelligence (AI) into the room (preferably with a name like Claire or Ava and a polite British accent). The fear about AI disruption in the BPO space is real. What if all these shiny new call centre jobs are just a temporary stopgap before conversational AI replaces the need for human agents altogether? On its LinkedIn page, Phonely AI (a company offering 'natural, human-like conversations with 100+ AI voices, voice cloning and seamless turn-taking') proudly announced that one of its clients had replaced 350 call centre workers with a single subscription. Some experts estimate that AI could handle 70% to 80% of customer interactions in the next two to three years. Many of the companies that tout the virtues of AI talk about its efficiency. But most people don't call a support line because they want efficiency. They call because something has gone wrong and they need help. They want empathy. Nuance. Someone who knows the difference between 'I'm locked out of my account' and 'I'm about to lose my mind'. And no matter how much data you feed a virtual agent, emotional intelligence doesn't come standard. A total of 70% of contact centre managers, in a study by Calabrio, said they believe AI will lead to more human agents, not fewer. That's because the human touch is moving up the value chain. Agents are increasingly seen as brand guardians, trusted to manage the emotionally complex, reputationally risky or high-stakes interactions that AI simply can't handle. Think of it as a collaboration: AI handles the grunt work and human agents step into the conversations that actually matter. The future isn't AI instead of people. It's probably more like AI plus people. What this means for Africa Africa is perfectly positioned to thrive in this hybrid model. The BPO jobs being created now aren't the dead-end, headset-in-a-booth clichés. Increasingly, they're pathways into tech, training and long-term careers. As the role of the agent becomes more complex and valuable, so does the need for upskilling, and that's where African talent can shine. Many of the call centre workers of today will be the AI supervisors, customer experience designers and data interpreters of tomorrow. And the infrastructure being built (both physical and digital) will serve as a launchpad for broader tech industry growth across the continent. Cape Town's newest call centre isn't just a building. It's a bet on people. On empathy. On the idea that, in a world obsessed with automation, being able to connect with another human is still one of the most valuable skills around. DM
Daily Maverick
18 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Africa must help steer the world away from deep-sea mining
Unilateral deep-sea mining, such as that planned by the Trump administration, could have grave impacts on Africa. The continent has a vital role in global ocean stewardship and safeguarding humanity's shared future. Under President Donald Trump, the US' rush for critical minerals spans Ukraine, Greenland, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and now the last untouched frontier – the deep sea. A recent White House executive order aims to position the US as a 'global leader in seabed mineral exploration and development both within and beyond national jurisdiction'. It involves extracting critical minerals such as cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel and rare earth elements from the ocean floor through dredging, hydraulic systems and subsea drilling. Seabed or deep-sea mining (DSM) risks irreversible harm to ocean ecosystems. It involves extracting critical minerals such as cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel and rare earth elements from the ocean floor through dredging, hydraulic systems and subsea drilling. These ventures do not align with Africa's long-term economic and environmental priorities. As the global debate intensifies – led by the United Nations' International Seabed Authority (ISA) – ocean governance is being reshaped. African countries must engage collectively or risk being sidelined. The short-term economic benefits for miners are apparent, but several countries and stakeholders are concerned with the industry's long-term financial viability and environmental impact. This has stalled the finalisation of the ISA Mining Code to govern DSM activities, which has been in development since 2014. During the March 2025 ISA Council meeting, Sierra Leone, on behalf of the African Group, highlighted key concerns about DSM commencing before the code is finalised. These include potential impacts on land-based mining economies and the need to bolster the economic assistance fund. There is also a need for environmental thresholds, effective compliance and enforcement mechanisms, robust anti-corruption and transparency measures, and a fair financial model for benefit sharing. The US's planned exploration outside its waters goes against the 'common heritage of humankind' principle in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The principle requires collective global governance of seabed resources. Although the US is neither an ISA member nor a party to UNCLOS, the country has generally observed the treaty as customary international law. However, Trump's executive order enables unilateral exploitation of the global seabed. Trump's global seabed 'exploitation' It was issued barely a month after Canadian firm The Metals Company (TMC) announced it would circumvent the ISA by applying for mining licences under a US mining code. In April, TMC USA filed for licences under the 1980 US Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act to mine in the Pacific Ocean's Clarion-Clipperton Zone. Trump's executive order risks undermining decades of multilateral efforts to protect the ocean. According to ISA Secretary-General Leticia Carvalho, 'Any unilateral action threatens not only this carefully negotiated treaty (UNCLOS) and decades of successful implementation and international cooperation, but also sets a dangerous precedent that could destabilise the entire system of global ocean governance.'' The executive order has also drawn criticism from China (which shares DSM interests), France and the European Commission for its apparent violation of international law. Even before the order was issued, 33 developed and developing countries called for a precautionary pause on DSM until scientific certainty ensured its safety. June's UN Ocean Conference (UNOC3) in France saw global opposition to DSM grow, with 37 countries supporting a moratorium or precautionary pause. UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned that the deep sea couldn't become the 'Wild West'. Although Trump's executive order faces strong global pushback, African countries have been less vocal than other regions. 'African states should advocate for science-based decision-making and address environmental knowledge gaps to protect shared marine resources,' says Dr Kirsty McQuaid, a researcher at the Nelson Mandela University Institute for Coastal and Marine Research and African Network of Deep-water Researchers coordinator. Altered seafloor topography Addressing knowledge gaps is vital. A recent study in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone revealed that more than 44 years since DSM experiments in 1979, mining equipment tracks, sediment plumes and altered seafloor topography remain. Biodiversity was also impacted, particularly among slow-growing and endemic species. Scientists continue to sound the alarm on the irreversible harm posed to marine ecosystems. Forecasts suggest that DSM could damage African economies, particularly in land-based mineral-exporting countries. Seabed minerals could undercut the value of land-based exports like cobalt, nickel and manganese, which are major sources of revenue for several African countries. The industry could also depress terrestrial mineral prices by flooding markets with seabed-derived alternatives. The DRC, Eritrea, Gabon, Madagascar, Mauritania, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe are especially vulnerable. Zambia and the DRC derive over half their export earnings and a substantial share of gross domestic product from these metals. African manganese producers such as South Africa, Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire may also be affected. Ocean governance and maritime security expert Dr Ifesinachi Okafor-Yarwood told ISS Today that the US executive order 'will likely increase competition for seabed exploitation and risk further ocean degradation'. This would undermine social equity and ecological conservation, 'which is concerning given the vital role of marine fisheries in the livelihoods of millions of Africans. Africa must establish a clear stance on DSM'. Professor Edwin Egede, an expert on international law of the sea and member of the ISA Legal and Technical Commission, agrees. 'Any unilateral appropriation of the deep seabed area and the resources therein contravenes both UNCLOS and customary international law.' He says 'Africa should raise its voice and uphold its legacy in global ocean governance, protect the common heritage of humankind developed by a rules-based international order, and ensure international cooperation and equity guide decisions shaping humanity's shared future.' African protective options African states have two possible options. First, they could ask the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to clarify states' obligations under the 'common heritage of mankind' principle. In 2011, the tribunal affirmed that sponsoring states must comply with UNCLOS environmental standards and due diligence obligations – a decision that discourages unilateral or domestic licensing. Second, ahead of the mid-July ISA General Assembly meeting, African countries could advocate for a DSM pause to ensure environmental safeguards and address regulatory gaps. The momentum achieved at UNOC3 for the High Seas Treaty – with 50 of 60 required ratifications reached – faces serious threats from the rise of unilateral DSM activities, which weaken ocean governance. Africa has a vital role in global ocean stewardship and safeguarding humanity's shared future. By advocating for stringent environmental safeguards and equitable benefit-sharing in ISA policy discussions, African countries can prevent DSM from compromising the health of our oceans and the rights of future generations. DM
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Africa Energy Forum presents a unique opportunity for African collaboration
In the rural village of Gwanda, Zimbabwe, a mother walks several kilometres each day to find firewood so she can cook for her children. She's never had access to reliable electricity, and her story is not unique. Across Africa, 600 million people still live without energy access – a fact that affects every aspect of their lives. The former United Nations Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, summarised Africa's biggest challenge when he said: 'Energy is the golden thread that connects economic growth, increased social equity, and an environment that allows the world to thrive'. Without electricity, communities cannot run clinics, power schools, or create jobs – all of which are fundamental to dignity and development. That is why I attended the Africa Energy Forum in Cape Town recently, a milestone that marked the first time in the event's 27-year history that it was hosted in South Africa. This year's theme, 'Africa United', could not be more fitting. As the global investment meeting for Africa's power, energy, infrastructure and industrial sectors, it was attended by stakeholders who hold the key to accelerating energy access - African presidents, ministers, policymakers, continental executives, the World Bank, African Development Bank and DFIs. With South Africa chairing the G20 this year, the continent must use the momentum of the Africa Energy Forum (AEF) and the G20 Summit to amplify a cohesive African voice in global energy governance. As geopolitical instability rises, with trade wars and fractured alliances, it's more urgent than ever to ask: Can Africa present a united energy agenda? And can it do so on its terms? To seize this opportunity, Africa must first agree on a set of shared energy priorities. These must include scaling up renewable resources like solar, wind and hydro, where the continent has a competitive advantage, while also affirming the sovereign right to include coal, gas and nuclear in the energy mix where needed. This is not a contradiction, but a necessity. Industrialised countries built their economies using all available energy sources. Africa must be afforded the same space to grow. Some of the critical arguments at this year's event will be around balancing the need for energy access and economic development with plotting a sustainable energy future that includes an abundance of Africa's renewable energy resources. Favourable terms for the financing of African energy projects will also be another important topic of debate. Although there are hundreds of initiatives to ensure the achievement of universal energy access on the continent, more than half the continent still lacks access to modern energy, which is why African energy stakeholders believe that amid the drive for reducing carbon emissions, Africa should have a sovereign right to include coal, gas and nuclear as part of its energy mix in line with how developed nations built their economies. What will the US role be in Africa's energy future? The first Power Africa Summit was launched by former US President Barack Obama in June 2013 as a private sector-led initiative with the ambitious goal of doubling electricity access on the continent. Through USAID, 12 US government agencies implemented Power Africa activities by providing financing and technical assistance to support the power sector in 40 African countries. Though different US administrations advised countries on electricity access for years, Power Africa's approach was different in that it took a demand-driven, transactional approach by reviewing actual transactions between private-sector players like investors, entrepreneurs, and manufacturers, and with governments and then identified obstacles that were preventing transactions from moving forward. A large reason for the success of Power Africa in the past was the power of diplomacy to level the playing field for U.S. investments in the energy sector. US President Trump and his administration announced that Power Africa would be dismantled, after more than a decade of successful work on the continent. With almost all of Power Africa's programmes listed for termination, the diminishing role of the US in Africa's energy sector opens opportunities for new alliances and greater intra-African collaboration. Energy financing must be favourable The challenge for Africa is that it needs to industrialise and electrify its economy, but at the same time, it needs the finances to do so in a sustainable way. Africa has also been most severely affected by climate change, and so its infrastructure development needs to be climate-resilient. Most African nations don't need an energy transition, but energy accessibility. Many African countries are grappling with rising inflation, which has also impacted the amount of developmental finance available to African nations. But America may want to maintain its presence and footprint in Africa's energy sector, especially as China seeks to play a leading role in the continent's infrastructure development. Despite the challenging global environment, Africa needs its member states and voices to unite with a collective vision to fund Africa's energy revolution with international financing mechanisms that are just. After all, Africa is responsible for less than 3% of the world's carbon emissions and home to massive, unlocked energy potential, while also being home to 1.2 billion youth aged between 15 to 24 years that account for 16% of the global population (according to the UN). Greg Nott is Director Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc
