Schwarzenegger Tells Environmentalists Dismayed by Trump to ‘Stop Whining' and Get to Work
The new US administration has taken an ax to Biden-era environmental ambitions, rolled back landmark regulations, withdrawn climate project funding and instead bolstered support for oil and gas production in the name of an 'American energy dominance' agenda.
Schwarzenegger, the former Republican governor of California, has devoted time to environmental causes since leaving political office in 2011.
He said Tuesday he keeps hearing from environmentalists and policy experts lately who ask, 'What is the point of fighting for a clean environment when the government of the United States says climate change is a hoax and coal and oil is the future?'
Schwarzenegger told the Austrian World Summit in Vienna, an event he helps organize, that he responds: 'Stop whining and get to work.'
He pointed to examples of local and regional governments and companies taking action, including his own administration in California, and argued 70% of pollution is reduced at the local or state level.
'Be the mayor that makes buses electric; be the CEO who ends fossil fuel dependence; be the school that puts (up) solar roofs," he said.
'You can't just sit around and make excuses because one guy in a very nice White House on Pennsylvania Avenue doesn't agree with you,' he said, adding that attacking the president is 'not my style' and he doesn't criticize any president when outside the US.
'I know that the people are sick and tired of the whining and the complaining and the doom and gloom,' Schwarzenegger said. 'The only way we win the people's hearts and minds is by showing them action that makes their lives better.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
25 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
European Union assumes its faces 15% tariffs in the US from Friday. But a key text still isn't ready
The European Union is working on the assumption that the US will impose a 15 percent tariff on most EU exports from Friday even though the two sides have yet to complete a key document clarifying how the agreement will operate. Last weekend US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a political agreement that would see 15 percent duties imposed on around two-thirds of EU produce worth around 380 billion euros (434 billion). The tariffs are set to enter force on Friday, but as of Thursday, the two sides were still working on a joint statement that would lay out the terms of their understanding, European Commission spokesman Olof Gill said. The document wouldn't be legally binding. 'It is the clear understanding of the European Union that the US will implement the agreed across the board tariff ceiling of 15 percent,' Gill said. The commission negotiates trade terms on behalf of the EU's 27 member countries. Carve-outs were agreed for a range of strategic goods like aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, some drug generics, or natural resources. Gill said that 'it is also our clear understanding that the US will implement the exemptions to the 15 percent ceiling.' 'The US has made these commitments. Now it's up to the US to implement them. The ball is in their court,' Gill said. European wine and spirits won't escape the 15 percent levy on Friday, but may do later as negotiations on additional exemptions to the new tariff regime continue, he said. Before Sunday's meeting, Trump had threatened the bloc with 30 percent tariffs, which the EU's top trade official said would effectively mean the end of trade between them. Over the last three months, the commission drew up retaliatory measures worth tens of billions of euros to enact should the talks fail. Those countermeasures are due to take effect on Aug. 7, but Gill said that if everything goes as expected, they would be frozen. 'If we have reached a deal, we don't need the retaliatory tariffs,' he said.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Medvedev reminds Trump of Russia's nuclear strike capabilities as war of words escalates
Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Thursday told US President Donald Trump to remember that Moscow possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort after Trump told Medvedev to 'watch his words.' Trump, in a post on his Truth social network in the early hours of Thursday, singled out Medvedev, who is deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, for sharp criticism after Medvedev said that Trump's threat of hitting Russia and buyers of its oil with punitive tariffs was 'a game of ultimatums' and a step closer towards a war between Russia and the United States. 'Tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!' Trump wrote, in his second warning to the close ally of President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. Trump on July 29 said Russia had '10 days from today' to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil buyers, with tariffs. Moscow, which has set out its own terms for peace, which Kyiv says amount to demanding its capitulation, has not so far indicated it will comply with Trump's deadline. Trump in his post on Thursday said he didn't care what India - one of Russia's biggest oil buyers along with China - did with Russia. 'They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World. Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way,' he said. 'The fabled dead hand' Medvedev said that Trump's statement showed that Russia should continue on its current policy course. 'If some words from the former president of Russia trigger such a nervous reaction from the high-and-mighty president of the United States, then Russia is doing everything right and will continue to proceed along its own path,' Medvedev said in a post on Telegram. Trump should remember, he said, 'how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be,' a reference to a secretive semi-automated Russian command system designed to launch Moscow's nuclear missiles if its leadership had been taken out in a decapitating strike by a foe. Medvedev has emerged as one of the Kremlin's most outspoken anti-Western hawks since Russia sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine in 2022. Kremlin critics deride him as an irresponsible loose canon, though some Western diplomats say his statements give a flavor of thinking in senior Kremlin policy-making circles. Trump also rebuked Medvedev in July, accusing him of throwing around the 'N (nuclear) word' after the Russian official criticized US strikes on Iran and said 'a number of countries' were ready to supply Iran with nuclear warheads. 'I guess that's why Putin's 'THE BOSS',' Trump said at the time.
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
How Americans' views of racial discrimination have shifted since 2021, according to AP-NORC polling
Slightly less than half of US adults believe that Black people face a great deal or quite a bit of discrimination in the United States according to a new poll. That's a decline from the solid majority 60 percent who thought Black Americans faced high levels of discrimination in the spring of 2021 months after racial reckoning protests in response to the police killing of George Floyd. Significant numbers of Americans also think diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, also known as DEI, are backfiring against the groups they're intended to help according to the survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, including many people who belong to those groups. The findings suggest Americans' views on racial discrimination have shifted substantially since four years ago when many companies launched efforts to promote diversity within their workforces and the products they sold. Since then, many of those companies have reversed themselves and retreated from their diversity practices, a trend that's accelerated this year under pressure from President Donald Trump, a Republican who has sought to withhold federal money from schools and companies that promote DEI. Now, it's clear that views are changing as well as company policies. Claudine Brider, a 48-year-old Black Democrat in Compton, California, says the concept of DEI has made the workplace difficult for Black people and women in new ways. 'Anytime they're in a space that they're not expected to be, like seeing a Black girl in an engineering course…they are seen as only getting there because of those factors,' Brider said. 'It's all negated by someone saying, 'You're only here to meet a quota.'' Reversal in views of racial discrimination. The new poll finds 45 percent of US adults think Black people face high levels of discrimination, down from 60 percent in the spring of 2021. There was a similar drop in views about the prevalence of serious discrimination against Asian people, which fell from 45 percent in the 2021 poll – conducted a month after the Atlanta spa shootings which killed eight people including six women of Asian descent – to 32 percent in the current survey. There's no question the country has backtracked from its so-called racial reckoning and the experiences of particular groups such as Black people are being downplayed, said Phillipe Copeland, a professor at Boston University School of Social Work. Americans' views about discrimination haven't shifted when it comes to all groups, though. Just under half of US adults, 44 percent, now say Hispanic people face at least quite a bit of discrimination and only 15 percent say this about white people. Both numbers are similar to when the question was last asked in April 2021. Divisions on the impact of DEI on Black and Hispanic people. The poll indicates that less than half of Americans think DEI has a benefit for the people it's intended to help. About 4 in 10 US adults say DEI reduces discrimination against Black people, while about one-third say this about Hispanic people, women, and Asian people. Many – between 33 percent and 41 percent – don't think DEI makes a difference either way. About one-quarter of US adults believe that DEI actually increases discrimination against these groups. Black and Hispanic people are more likely than white people to think DEI efforts end up increasing discrimination against people like them. About 4 in 10 Black adults and about one-third of Hispanic adults say DEI increases discrimination against Black people compared with about one-quarter of white adults. There is a similar split between white adults and Black and Hispanic adults on assessments of discrimination against Hispanic people. Among white people, it's mostly Democrats who think DEI efforts reduce discrimination against Black and Hispanic people. Only about one-quarter of white independents and Republicans say the same. Pete Parra, a 59-year-old resident of Gilbert, Arizona, thinks that DEI is making things harder for racial minorities now. He worries about how his two adult Hispanic sons will be treated when they apply for work. 'I'm not saying automatically just give it to my sons,' said Parra, who leans toward the Democratic Party. But he's concerned that now factors other than merit may take priority. 'If they get passed over for something,' he said, 'they're not going to know (why).' About 3 in 10 say DEI increases discrimination against white people. The new poll shows that Americans aren't any more likely to think white people face discrimination than they were in 2021. And more than half think DEI doesn't make a difference when it comes to white people or men. But a substantial minority – about 3 in 10 US adults – think DEI increases discrimination against white people. Even more white adults, 39 percent, hold that view compared with 21 percent of Hispanic adults and 13 percent of Black adults. The recent political focus on DEI has included the idea that white people are more often overlooked for career and educational opportunities because of their race. John Bartus, a 66-year-old registered Republican in Twin Falls, Idaho, says that DEI might have been a good thing for all races of people, but it seems like it's gone far left. It's his impression that DEI compels companies to hire people based on their race or if they identify as LGBTQ+. 'The most qualified person ought to get a job based on their merit or based on their educational status,' Bartus said. Brider, the Black California resident, objects to the notion that white people face the same level of discrimination as Black people. But while she thinks the aims of DEI are admirable, she also sees the reality as flawed. 'I do think there needs to be something that ensures that there is a good cross-section of people in the workplace,' Brider said. 'I just don't know what that would look like to be honest.' ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1437 adults was conducted July 10-14 using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the US population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.6 percentage points.
