Big step to kick off $25 medicines pledge
Once passed, eligible medicines will be lowered from $31.60 to $25.
The government estimates the change will save Australians $200m a year, while costing the budget $690m over four years.
This is in addition to previous reforms which allowed patients to acquire 60-day prescriptions, and freezing the cost of medicine for pension and concession card holders at $7.70 until the end of 2029. Labor will begin its first steps to bring down the cost of PBS-listed medicines to just $25. NewsWire/ Dan Peled Credit: News Corp Australia
The election pledge was also matched by the Coalition, suggesting the Bill will likely have a swift passage through parliament.
Anthony Albanese said it was a promise delivered.
'This is another example of cost of living relief that helps every Australian,' Mr Albanese said.
'The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare. My government will continue to deliver cost of living relief for all Australians.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said 'the size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare'. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Albanese said the government would continue to deliver cost of living relief for Aussies. NewsWire/Philip Gostelow Credit: News Corp Australia
Health Minister Mark Bulter also welcomed the incoming Bill.
'Cheaper medicines are good for the hip pocket and good for your health,' Mr Butler said.
'For general patients medicines haven't been this cheap since 2004.
'For pension and concession card holders we've frozen your medicine prices at a maximum price of $7.70 until the end of the decade.'
The Bill comes as the United States lashed Australia's PBS as 'discriminatory' amid tariff negotiations to remove the general 10 per cent levy, as well as fees on Australian steel and aluminium US imports. The government estimates the change will save Aussies $200m a year. NewsWire/Joel Carrett Credit: News Corp Australia
Concerningly, US President Donald Trump has also flagged a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceutical imports, which could have a major impact on $2bn of Australian exports.
However the Albanese government said it is unwilling to use the PBS as a bargaining chip.
On Sunday, Mr Albanese also faced a grilling over when Labor would introduce its proposed plan to double the tax on superannuation accounts over $3m up to 30 per cent.
He said the Bill 'will come in time' and that the priority in the first fortnight was policies 'that make a difference to people's money in their pocket'.
Perth MP and assistant minister to the Prime Minister Patrick Gorman said the government had been 'clear about our priorities' for the Bill and said he was 'confident it will pass'.
'I think we have seen in this building, time and time again, that when it comes to getting things through parliament, you have got to also let the parliamentary processes do their piece,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
3 minutes ago
- Perth Now
PM stares down internal push for Palestine recognition
The prime minister is staring down internal pressure to recognise a Palestinian state as Labor figures decry the "unspeakable cruelty" being thrust on civilians in Gaza. Anthony Albanese has been urged to follow in the footsteps of his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron, but on Sunday said he would not "imminently" recognise Palestinian statehood. Both major parties in Australia support a two-state solution for Palestinians and Israelis, however Mr Albanese said any resolution would need to guarantee Hamas, the de-facto ruling authority in Gaza, played no part in the future nation. There would also need to be agreements on the rebuilding of Gaza and the West Bank, and a resolution of issues over the expansion of Israeli settlements. But former Labor frontbencher Ed Husic pointed out that recognition of a Palestinian state had been part of Labor's national platform since at least 2018. "We've already green-lighted it through our party, we've taken it to elections - the circumstances demand it," the MP told reporters in Canberra on Monday. "The announcement by the (Israeli) government to partition or reshape the way in which borders exist in Gaza means that we need to send a strong signal that we are opposed to that." Former Labor Foreign Minister Bob Carr echoed the call. There were ways to address the various obstacles to the new nation being established, he said, adding those considerations were outweighed by a "bigger fact and bigger truth". "Deaths are coming fast, unspeakable cruelty is being visited against babies and children in the enforcement of something not seen in the modern world - that is, an advanced state using mass starvation as a weapon of war and giving effect to a genocide," he said. "We will insist that the Palestinian state that comes into being will be one that opts to be a non-militarised state ... that is a serious security guarantee that can be delivered in negotiations, and which the Palestinians have already offered." More than 140 out of the 193 members of the United Nations already recognise the state of Palestine, including EU members Spain and Ireland. The international push to recognise Palestine has been fuelled by the escalating crisis in Gaza, where more than two million people are facing starvation. Israel cut off aid to Gaza in March before re-opening channels under tight restrictions in May, measures it says are necessary to stop the supplies being diverted to fund Hamas operations. Its officials say enough food has been let into Gaza during the war and Hamas is responsible for the suffering of civilians. Israel's military offensive has already killed more than 58,000 Palestinians, according to health authorities in Gaza. The campaign began after Hamas, a designated terrorist organisation in Australia, attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and took 251 hostages. Opposition frontbencher Dan Tehan said Hamas was responsible for continuing to "politicise and weaponise the use of aid in Gaza". Multiple aid organisations, including Amnesty and Medecins Sans Frontieres, have condemned the Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation for the trickle of aid being supplied in recent months.
Perth Now
3 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Teal urges bold changes for Australia's future
The Albanese government should use its term in office to implement long-term reform like those led by visionary prime ministers of the past, a new independent MP says. Nicolette Boele, who won the once-safe Liberal seat of Bradfield on Sydney's north shore, called for MPs to be bold and brave in their decision-making in the next three years. Ms Boele won the former blue-ribbon seat by just 26 votes in one of the closest results in Australian election history, with the final outcome going down to a recount. In her maiden speech to parliament, she said big reforms similar to John Howard's gun restrictions and Gough Whitlam's Medicare are necessary to ensure long-term systemic issues are dealt with. "Politics as usual isn't working," Ms Boele told the House of Representatives on Monday. "Difficult decisions are delayed until the failure to act ushers in disastrous consequences, at which point a royal commission is called for, a referendum sought, or a plebiscite scheduled, or important decisions are made in the dark. "Independents like me have been elected to put people back into the process of creating our future. This is how we fix things." However, the independent's future in the parliament remains under a cloud, with her Liberal opponent Gisele Kapterian launching a petition with the High Court to overturn the tight result. While Ms Kapterian won the first count in Bradfield by eight votes, the recount put Ms Boele ahead by 26. The independent did not mention the court challenge in her speech, instead talking about her family who spurred her on to become who she is. Ms Boele spoke of her parents' arrival from the Netherlands and their initial confusion at Australian customs. "Like so many in this nation, when they arrived, there were challenges fitting in, finding their tribe and that sense of belonging," she said. "For my mum, it was finally being invited by school mums to join a morning tea and being told to bring a plate, which she did, literally." Before entering parliament, Ms Boele worked in finance and the clean energy sector for three decades.
News.com.au
3 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Dumb way' Australians measure their superannuation balances as expert shares how to hit $1 million by the time you retire
For many Australians, a million in super has been a dream scenario. But it was more than was really necessary. Most Aussies who are retired never even got close and are absolutely fine. But for you? The person who isn't going to retire for ages? It is possible. It's actually even likely, if you are young enough. About half of all people aged 30 will end up with a million in super. But which half? A million dollars in super might be pretty nice to have in the future. Because the cost of living keeps going up. If inflation is high enough, a million dollars might be enough to buy Weet-Bix and keep the lights on! In this story we're going to look at who has what, and who is likely to end up with a million dollars in super. And we are going to look at some amazing graphs. No more averages please When I talk about super, I give the full story. Not just the averages. Averages are, in this context, dumb. Because almost nobody is the average. Super is not like height, where we are all fairly similar and an average is meaningful. When it comes to super, some people are like lego people and some are bigger than giraffes. The following charts break super up by age group. They also break your age group into 20 groups, from the zeroes on the left (no super) to the superheroes on the right (loads of super), and everyone else in the middle, in chunks of 5 per cent. This is useful because it shows you not just the average for your age, but where you stand compared to your peers. You can find yourself in the following charts (there's one for men and one for women) 1. First find your age group, 2. Then find the tallest column that is less than your super balance. That's your column. 3. See where your column stands. If it is the tallest you're in the top 5 per cent, second tallest top 10 per cent, etc. If your bar is near the right side, you're near the top. If your bar is near the left, you're closer to the bottom. Each bar is 5 per cent of that age group. The height of the bar is the minimum dollar amount to be in that group. My super balance is just below the second bar for my age group. Which means I'm in the third group – the top 15 per cent for my age. Not too bad, not amazing. My holidays in retirement might be a week at the coast not a month of cruising the Mediterranean, but at least I should get some holidays! Where will I end up? So … who is likely to end up with a million in super? If we make some simplifying assumptions – say everyone puts in $9000 a year and gets 7 per cent returns, we see the following. The charts are the same as the ones above, but I've coloured red the people who are able to hit a million by age 60. For women, we see about 20 per cent of those aged 35 to 39 will hit a million by age 60. Those whose balances are over $120,000 now are on their way to seven figures. For women under 30, all of them can hit a million. If they put $9000 a year away for 30 more years and get 7 per cent returns the magic of compounding will get them over the line. The following charts are for men. More men aged 35 to 39 will hit a million in super by age 60 – about 30 per cent of them. Again, all men under 30 can hit a million in super by age 60. In reality not everyone under 30 now will get there by 60. People who have no super at age 30 are not likely to start saving $9000 a year. Putting $9000 a year away is a lot for a person making below average income in 2025, so that assumption is a bit dubious, on the other hand some of these people will still be working in 30 years and at that point $9000 a year won't be much. The above charts are best thought of as a simplified model of what's possible. Should you worry about your super? Obviously this is just a projection – a guess, estimate, forecast. If you get promoted to manager or act super frugal you can end up with more than the projection. If someone drops a steel beam on your head or your business goes broke, you end up with less. And if you fall in a fiery volcano the day before your 60th birthday it won't matter at all. Super works only if civilisation still exists at retirement. And the longer the time frame you're looking at the harder it is to predict the future. Eighteen year olds aren't thinking about retirement and honestly good on them. Go have fun. Also, every so often history dishes up a big financial event that crashes markets and destroys wealth. If that arrives in your last five years before retirement, a lot of your good work in saving hard can be undone. The assumption I've made – of 7 per cent returns steadily each year – could come to look ridiculously optimistic. For anyone about to retire and stressing about the cost of living in retirement there is comfort in the knowledge that the pension is going to be there. Politicians have raised the pension age to 67 but no further rises are planned. If you can stretch your working life and savings to age 67 then the pension ($1051 per fortnight for a single) will carry you afterwards, and you needn't worry about super at all!
