
I Reject Trump's Random False Rationale Generator
I was the recipient of the Library of Congress's Prize for American Fiction in 2023. Dr. Carla Hayden struck me then as energetic, engaged and utterly dedicated to the work of the library. One of the things Dr. Hayden and I bonded over was the idea that knowledge is power, that in a democracy, the more we know, the better we are.
The White House, tossing out nonsense from its meager box of repetitive right-wing auto-defenses, claimed on Friday that Dr. Hayden had, 'in the pursuit of D.E.I.,' done 'quite concerning things.' Did it name those things? It did not. It couldn't have. Putting aside the basic idiocy of being against that position ('What, you value diversity? You think things should be equitable? And that all should be included?'), members of the administration now use 'D.E.I.' as a sort of omni-pejorative, deliberately (strategically) leaving its exact meaning vague.
What it seems to mean, to them, is: The accused is a person who is aware that certain groups have had a different experience of American life and who feels that it is part of our intellectual responsibility (and joy) to engage with that history, so as to improve our democracy (that whole 'more perfect union' thing). This the administration sees not as healthy intellectual curiosity but as dangerous indoctrination. Indoctrination into what? Truth, history, a realistic engagement with the past, I guess.
The White House also stated, with an inaccuracy that would be comic if it weren't so sickening, that Dr. Hayden put 'inappropriate books in the library for children.' The librarian of Congress doesn't put books into the library. And presumably, the American people benefit from having access to the widest possible collection of books. Even those American people who are children, who, after all, have parents to decide what is inappropriate.
In the real world, the world of cause and effect, when we tear down the best among us and provide bogus reasons for why we did it, reality will eventually come for us. To behave honorably requires that we be in contact with the truth, to be able to supply honest answers to simple questions. If the White House wanted to part ways with Dr. Hayden, why couldn't it, without insulting her groundlessly, do so, and then (truthfully) say why? One wonders.
The firing of Dr. Hayden and the inane dissembling that followed represent a kind of diabolical Opposite Day phenomenon: An exceptional person is stupidly tossed aside, and to come up with an explanation the administration turns to its patented Random False Rationale Generator.
When a ship is sinking, there's value in knowing how fast, and calling it out. When a country is self-sabotaging, ditto. So let me just say it: Shame on the White House. Shame on those who should be stopping this slide into autocracy and aren't. (I'm looking at you, John Thune, Mike Johnson and Marco Rubio.) Shame on all of us if we let these ignorant purveyors of cruelty reduce this beautiful thing we've built over these hundreds of years to a hollow, braying, anti-version of itself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
37 minutes ago
- CBS News
Baltimore City leaders call for end of BGE's 'Operation Pipeline' program, multi-year rate hikes
Baltimore City Council President Zeke Cohen and other city leaders are calling for a halt to Baltimore Gas and Electric's 'Operation Pipeline' program. The program aims to upgrade hundreds of miles of natural gas pipes and equipment across Maryland by replacing cast iron and bare steel pipes with new, more durable lines. In 2023, the Maryland Public Service Commission approved BGE's multi-year rate hike plan, which authorized a series of rate increases between 2024 and 2026. The plan, in part, will pay for the upgrades. But city leaders argue the program is driving up customer bills and increasing the company's profits. This isn't the first time city leaders have called for an end to the rate hikes. An analysis released by the Office of the People's Counsel in February found that spending on gas infrastructure is fueling the hikes, and projected even higher winter bills in the future if the company continues its current level of capital investment. The report says gas utilities will spend about $744 million on gas infrastructure in 2025. Shortly after the OPC's report was released, the Baltimore City Council passed a resolution calling on the PSC to stop the multi-year rate hikes, arguing that the infrastructure upgrades should not be paid for by taxpayers. Maryland sees rising utility costs BGE raised their rates on January 1, increasing the average residential gas bill by 9% and the electric bill by 7%. During the winter, Maryland households reported some of their highest gas bills ever. But BGE said that while the pipeline upgrades are a part of the cost increases, a 30% rise in natural gas prices over the past year, and increased spending on energy efficiency programs mandated by the state also play a factor.


CNN
40 minutes ago
- CNN
Supreme Court declines to hear case challenging parental consent for abortion
The Supreme Court declined Thursday to review a Montana law that requires people under 18 to seek parental consent before obtaining an abortion, leaving in place a state court ruling that struck the law down. Montana's law, enacted in 2013, prohibits a doctor from providing an abortion to a patient under 18 without notarized written consent from a parent. The state's highest court concluded that the law violated the Montana state constitution, which includes broader protections for abortion than the US Constitution. This is a breaking news story and will be updated.


Newsweek
40 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Petition Against Donald Trump's Executive Order Passes 100K Signatures
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A petition opposing President Donald Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship has garnered over 100,000 signatures. The MoveOn petition is calling on Congress to reject any federal court ruling or legislation that overturns birthright citizenship after the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that judges lack the authority to issue nationwide injunctions blocking Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship from taking effect. If Congress votes on the order, they "must resoundingly reject this brazen attack on our Constitution and its discriminatory agenda that threatens the very fabric of America," the petition states. Why It Matters Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen. The right was enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution soon after the Civil War. Trump signed an executive order to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily shortly on his first day back in office on January 20. Three federal judges issued nationwide injunctions blocking the order from taking effect, prompting the Trump administration to file an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court to narrow the scope of the orders. The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that individual federal judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions. The outcome was a win for the president, who has complained about judges hindering his agenda. However, the court's conservative majority stopped short of allowing Trump's executive order to take immediate effect nationwide, leaving its fate unclear. Demonstrators hold up an anti-Trump sign outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on June 27, 2025. Demonstrators hold up an anti-Trump sign outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on June 27, 2025. Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images What To Know The Supreme Court "gave the green light for Trump to end birthright citizenship," the MoveOn petition states. "By allowing Trump's EO to end birthright citizenship to be decided by the federal courts in select parts of the country, SCOTUS has greenlit creating a two-tiered system of citizenship." It adds that ultimately federal courts "will have to rule on birthright citizenship, and if they rule to overturn it, it will be up to Congress to block these unconstitutional grabs at our rights." It urges people to add their names to "protect birthright citizenship and demand that Congress, state and local elected leadership, and the courts fight back against this blatantly unconstitutional executive order!" As of Thursday morning, the petition has more than 110,800 signatures. What People Are Saying MoveOn spokesperson Britt Jacovich said in a statement provided to Newsweek: "This is yet another attempt by the Trump administration to undermine core American freedoms and target specific communities, who are the fabric and lifeblood of our country. While the Supreme Court bends to the will of Trump, Congress still has the power to protect the people who have called our country home for their entire lives." The MoveOn petition states: "Congress must take action and refuse to concede to Trump's assault on our Constitution. Re-litigating the question of who gets to be a citizen is just another attempt by Trump to divide us and further advance a discriminatory America." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social after the Supreme Court's ruling: "GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard. It had to do with the babies of slaves (same year!), not the SCAMMING of our Immigration process." What Happens Next The Supreme Court's ruling sends cases challenging Trump's birthright citizenship order back to the lower courts, where judges will have to decide how to tailor their orders to comply with the High Court's ruling. The executive order remains blocked for at least 30 days, giving lower courts and parties time to determine next steps, but it could result in a patchwork of rules that may differ between the 22 states that sued over the order and the rest of the country. The order still faces challenges, as within hours of the ruling, two class-action suits were filed in Maryland and New Hampshire seeking to block Trump's order. While the Supreme Court did not address the merits of Trump's bid to enforce his executive order on birthright citizenship, Attorney General Pam Bondi told reporters that the Trump administration is "very confident" that the Court will ultimately side with it on the merits of the case.