It's up to each of us to help save life on Earth – I love this challenge
A perverse market rule on species had been established: the rarer a species gets, the more valuable it becomes. It came too late for those who killed the last dodo, moa or Steller's sea cow – but look at the money now going into resurrecting mammoths and thylacines.
Extinction is forever but it is mostly ho-hum for the rulers of our age of materialism. In this world of commercial expedience, it can even be a worthy thing. In 1888 the Tasmanian parliament legislated a one-pound bounty on thylacine heads – more than 2,000 bounties were paid – in its successful bid to 'extirpate' the species.
The rate of loss of nature has accelerated ever since and in my short lifetime three-quarters of the world's volume of wildlife has been eradicated, including most of the big specimens of human-edible fish.
The Maugean skate is a contemporary headache. This ancient fish survived when the dinosaurs didn't but is now having its habitat polluted by problematic industrial fish farm activity in Macquarie Harbour on Tasmania's west coast. To save the profits of the foreign-owned salmon corporations both the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, and opposition leader, Peter Dutton, have promised laws to guarantee the fish pens – but not the Maugean skate.
Get Guardian Australia environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as an email
Environmentalists are a problem because they publicise the reality of impending extinctions. Corporations have had to have parliaments pass laws banning peaceful protests in forests and near fish pens and to criminalise the nature-defending ringleaders. Eco-sabotage is subsidised while eco-rescue risks a jail sentence.
Nevertheless, the polls show a huge majority of Australians want to end native forest logging to save what's left of koalas, greater gliders, swift parrots, masked owls and black cockatoos. So far the corporate lobbyists have managed to keep the big-party politicians subsidising the forest destruction even though primary schoolchildren, and the national minister for the environment, know that it is a prime cause of habitat loss and extinction.
Then there's coal and gas extraction driving an age of global heating and consequent worldwide extinctions. That includes coral bleaching. The corporate-dependent parties back more coalmines and gas extraction and promise cuts in the 'green tape' which protects species – but their stand is not free of political risk.
Millions of voters, especially young voters alarmed about their future in a nature-depauperate world, have turned to the Greens and green-minded independents to stop the rot.
The new generation is very aware that things are worse than the conventional and co-opted commercial coverage makes out and is not comforted by the false government estimate that since 1788 'only 100' species of plants and animals have gone extinct.
According to the Biodiversity Council's Prof John Woinarski and the researcher Jess Marsh, 9,000 species of Australian insects may be extinct, including many 'ghost extinctions' of species before they were discovered or described.
Sign up to Clear Air Australia
Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis
after newsletter promotion
February's bushfires in Tasmania's world heritage-value takayna burned 100,000 hectares including some Huon pines, one of the longest-living species on the planet. The fires will have caused another bout of ghost extinctions as well as edging this high-profile species closer to oblivion. Huon pines are depleted from two centuries of logging and global warming, and the February fires were child's play compared with what's to come.
In the hands of arrogant, empathy-lacking autocrats and billionaires like Trump and Putin, both quite capable of using ecocidal weapons, we risk the end of our own species through a nuclear, microbial, chemical or genetic weaponry war. Or via artificial intelligence getting the drop on us very soon. On current evidence, our empowering big brains are an evolutionary own goal set for self-extinction.
Perversely, the chances of most other life forms on Earth getting through the next century depend on our own urge for survival. That is, human common sense has to prevail for them as well as for ourselves.
It's up to each of us to help save life on Earth by voting the exploiters of nature out, by peacefully obstructing their destruction, or through civil disobedience for our children and fellow creatures.
I love this challenge. Such green-flag action may be risky but it is deeply rewarding compared with wallowing in white-flag hopelessness. The prospect of getting what's left of nature through to the Sustainocene or next age of assured life on Earth is incalculably attractive and remains within our reach – but only if enough of us take action.
Bob Brown is a former senator and leader of the Australian Greens and is patron of the Bob Brown Foundation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
10 hours ago
- The National
SNP under fire over public energy firm as Wales launches wind projects
The Labour-run administration in Cardiff set up Trydan Gwyrdd Cymru (which translates to Green Electricity Wales) in 2024, and in July announced plans for three wind farms on publicly owned Welsh woodlands – as well as more renewable energy projects yet to be finalised. Trydan said the initial three wind farms would be able to generate up to 400 MW of clean electricity – enough to power around one in four Welsh homes – with 'all profits generated reinvested in Welsh communities and public services'. In 2017, then-Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon pledged to establish a 'publicly owned, not-for-profit energy company', but the policy was dropped after the 2021 Holyrood elections. Robin McAlpine, from the Common Weal think tank, said that they had partnered with Plaid Cymru during their time in the Welsh government to lay the groundwork for Trydan Gwyrdd Cymru. 'The whole point of that conversation was to explain how to create a public energy company under a devolved settlement – and the fact that this is happening in Wales shows that it certainly could have happened in Scotland too,' he said. READ MORE: UK energy bills to rise as Ofgem approves £24bn investment 'Common Weal has made this point over and over again – the letter of the devolution settlement says the Scottish Government can't own a wind farm, but we've set out about six different workarounds. 'The fastest is to create an energy company which is co-ordinated and funded by the Scottish Government, but in which the actual wind farms are owned by local authorities. 'We have told the Scottish Government this again and again. It is a very active choice to maintain an almost wholly privatised energy system in Scotland.' Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie MSP also called for more to be done to ensure communities in Scotland see the benefits of energy generation projects. Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie (Image: PA) 'Scotland has seen extraordinary growth in renewables, but this hasn't come with the growth of local, community and public ownership that some countries have achieved,' he told the Sunday National. 'We have an abundance of natural resources at our disposal that can generate clean, green, renewable energy, and we also have highly skilled people with years of experience working in the energy sector. The Greens want these resources to benefit everyone, not just giant private investors. 'It is great to see Wales taking steps in this direction. As Greens, we've long made the case for every local community to have its own energy company, as well as a role for the national level. 'The Scottish Government can do far more to ensure that the ownership models for renewable energy put money back into communities across Scotland, at the same time as cutting emissions. Local ownership, community ownership and public ownership should all be playing a much bigger role.' READ MORE: Scottish Government approves one of world's biggest wind farms amid controversy However, a Scottish Government spokesperson insisted that they did not have the powers required. 'A national public energy company that is involved in large-scale energy generation would only be possible in an independent Scotland where we had full powers over the energy market and full access to borrowing,' they said. 'We are committed to maximising the public benefits of our renewables revolution, and while many powers remain reserved, we will use the powers we do have and continue to grow community investment in energy-related projects and technology.' In January, Scottish Energy Secretary Gillian Martin told MSPs that setting up a publicly owned energy firm was "not something we are able to do at the moment with the current devolution settlement". Rebecca Evans is the Economy Secretary in the Welsh Labour Government (Image: Welsh Government) Announcing the Trydan Gwyrdd Cymru plans for 400MW of wind farm capacity, Welsh Labour's Economy Secretary Rebecca Evans said: 'These proposals demonstrate our commitment to harnessing Wales's abundant natural resources to generate clean energy while ensuring the benefits are felt locally. 'By developing these projects on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate, we're making best use of our public land to tackle the climate emergency and create sustainable economic opportunities." A press release said that the developments will 'create hundreds of jobs during construction and operation, with Trydan committed to involving Welsh companies throughout the process'.
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
Green party leadership contest heats up as ballot opens
Today, Green party members can begin voting for their next party leader – or leaders – as ballots in the leadership contest have now opened. Voting will take place across the month before ballots close on 30 August with the result to be announced on 2 September, just a month before the party heads to Bournemouth for a three-day conference. The choice is between current co-leader Adrian Ramsay who is running on a joint ticket with North Herefordshire MP Ellie Chowns (after Bristol Central MP Carla Denyer announced she wouldn't be running again) and the party's current deputy leader Zack Polanski. Yet despite the competitors having worked closely together for years, the race has got off to a pretty disagreeable start. Ramsay and Polanski were pitted against each other on Iain Dale's LBC show last week. Over the course of 90 minutes, each made their case for the leadership and quizzed the other on their diverging proposals. Things got frosty when Dale asked Ramsay if he liked his deputy – at which point the co-leader became strangely tongue-tied. In a later hustings, Ramsay went on to compare Polanski to, er, Liz Truss. The Green co-leader worries that Polanski's proposals will break from a strategy that has in recent years seen the Greens quadruple their seats in Westminster (albeit from one to four), ousting a shadow cabinet member in the process. Polanski is less bothered about persuading soft Conservative voters to back the environmentalists, and instead has pushed a more radical 'eco-populism' campaign using social media platforms and prominent voices on them to help draw people to his cause. While not quite at Nigel Farage levels of TikTok followers, he has 45 times more followers than Ramsay. Left-wing media outlet Novara Media has suggested that the Green party membership has grown by 'at least 8 per cent' since Polanski launched his campaign – while the deputy leader himself recently boasted he had secured the backing of election campaign organisers and managers. Yet recent YouGov polling suggests that the Green leadership team remains relatively unknown not just among the wider population, but their own voters – with more than 84 per cent unaware of Ramsay, Chowns or Polanski. The creation of the as-yet-nameless Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana party also poses identity problems for the environmentalists. Polling has shown that those stuck on whether they should back Corbyn's group or the Greens have expressed a desire to see the latter outfit become more left-wing than environment-focused. This is where Polanski may win out over Ramsay and Chowns: he is widely seen as being more progressive on culture war issues and has shared social media clips of Corbyn and left-wing commentator Owen Jones heaping praise on him. Where Polanski is open to an electoral pact with the new left-wing party, Ramsay has warned against the Greens becoming a 'Jeremy Corbyn support act'. For his part, Jezza has this week ruled out an alliance with the Greens – saying that the group is 'not a socialist organisation' – but admitted his new party wouldn't rule out working with them 'on social justice issues'. The matter is already dividing those on the left, with some taking aim at James Schneider, the former director of communications for Corbyn's Labour party, over his support for a left-wing pact with the Greens on the background he is married to Keir Starmer's press secretary. If there's one thing on which the left is unrivalled, it's fighting amongst itself. It certainly seems unlikely that the Green party will emerge from this leadership contest unscathed.
New Statesman
2 days ago
- New Statesman
Are the Greens heading left?
Photo byIn exactly a month's time, the Green Party will be in the first moments of a new, or renewed leadership. The battle to lead the party will be passed into the hands of members this afternoon as a month-long period of voting opens (the winner will be announced on 1 September). Since May, candidates to take on the role – the MPs Ellie Chowns and Adrian Ramsay (who is a current co-leader) and the London Assembly Member Zack Polanski – have been locked in a head-to-head. This race comes at a defining moment for the Green Party, and more widely for the left. After winning four MPs in last year's general election (a record performance), the party could have the chance to capitalise on its victories in this new era of five party politics. And, with the imminent founding of a new left-wing party led by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, the future of the left hangs in the balance. Whichever candidate (or candidates) is successful, their leadership will define the party's place in British politics going forwards. Polanski fired the starting gun on this race when he announced his surprise (although not so to most party insiders) decision to run shortly after this year's local elections. His platform of 'eco-populism' has, in some ways, defined the campaign and its place in the wider political moment. Polanski, who is the party's current deputy leader, said in his leadership pitch that the Greens should occupy a more progressive, populist space on the left in order to confront the infectious populism of Nigel Farage's Reform. He has called for a wealth tax, a better approach to net zero and a more robust left-wing position on immigration. In doing so, he has captured the imagination of the former Corbynite left, some of whom have ditched their former Labour allegiances and become paid-up members of the Greens. The commentator and former NS columnist Grace Blakeley announced her defection to the party in order to vote for Polanski in June. This, insiders in his campaign believe, is reflective of wider increases in membership of the party: people have signed up to Green Party membership in order to vote for Polanski. (This mirrors those who took advantage of Labour's £3 membership deal to vote for Corbyn's leadership in 2015). 'I'm delighted,' Polanski told me, 'there's been a lot of focus on all the new members that have joined to vote for me.' He added: 'I'm feeling confident, but not complacent. I will be campaigning until the very last day of voting for every single vote.' (When asked, the Green Party said they would not share membership data during the election campaign.) Though it was clearly obvious Polanski was on manoeuvres, he did not inform Ramsay of his decision to run. Nor was Chowns aware of her now-opponent's intentions. The pair stepped forward as candidates shortly after Polanski's announcement, with Chowns stepping in to run as a co-leader, replacing Carla Denyer, the MP for Bristol Central who has been leading the party alongside Ramsay since 2021. Their campaign has focused on their ability to win first-past-the-post elections, and the pair have made clear the damage they think having a leader sitting outside of parliament would do to the progress the Green party has made. 'People really want a professional party that can win elections,' Chowns told me when we spoke over the phone shortly before voting opened. 'That's what Adrian and I are standing for. Members can vote for a leadership who knows how to win elections.' This has been a perennial criticism thrown at Polanski throughout the campaign: that as a London Assembly Member and not an MP, his leadership would provide a stumbling block for the Green Party's enduring progress. Jenny Jones, a party grandee and former deputy mayor of London, who is backing Ramsay and Chowns told me: 'I get on well with Zack, he's an excellent campaigner.' But she added: 'The reason I am voting for [Ramsay and Chowns] is because they are good at getting not only themselves elected, but getting other people elected'. But this is a moment of flux in British politics. As Labour has moved rightward in order to face-up to the ongoing threat of Reform, it has become more exposed on its left flank. Analysis by Stack Data Strategy and shared with the New Statesman found that Labour is losing more votes to its left than to the right. The founding of Corbyn and Sultana's party, and the increasing anger and frustration from left-wing voters over Gaza, has provided an opportunity for the Green Party. James Schneider, Corbyn's former director of strategic communications, said in a recent interview with the New Left Review that Corbyn and Sultana's party should be open to some form of red-green cooperation. Chowns and Ramsay have all but turned their backs on this idea: 'We have a really distinct identity as Greens,' Chowns told me. On the eve of voting opening, they criticised Polanski's eco-populist platform as 'chasing the next headline, the next set of likes, rather than real substance'. This has been an unprecedented campaign for the Green Party, not least because of the volume of media attention it has courted. But the outcome also bears wider political significance. A party led by Ramsay and Chowns would likely mean business as usual for the Green Party (beefed up local campaigning, and a focus on winning more seats). A victory for Polanski, however, would mark a new era for the party and more widely, for the left. In partnership with a new left party led by Corbyn, the Greens could do some serious damage to Labour's left flank. In just over four weeks' time, the future of the Green Party may finally begin to take shape. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Related
